No popular authors found.

Categories

No categories found.


Join Celiac.com's forum / message board and get your questions answered! Our forum has nearly 1 MILLION POSTS, and over 62,000 MEMBERS just waiting to help you with any questions about celiac disease and the gluten-free diet. We'll see you there!






Follow / Share


  FOLLOW US:
Twitter Facebook Google Plus RSS Podcast Email  Get Email Alerts

SHARE:

Popular Articles

No popular articles found.
Celiac.com Sponsors:

Can we Reliably Test Beer for Gluten?

Celiac.com 03/18/2013 - People are wary (for good reason) of products that are derived from gluten-containing ingredients, and few products have received quite as much heat as beer. Gluten-removed beers are almost always tested to under 20ppm gluten to allay the concerns of celiacs, but the reliability of such tests is often challenged. Can we really trust the results of gluten tests performed on beer?

Photo: CC--k.ivoutinAs Tricia Thompson, MS, RD writes on her blog, Gluten-Free Dietitian, the current standard for testing gluten content in foods is a sandwich ELISA test. The R5 and omega-gliadin versions of the test are the most widely used, and both have been validated in collaborative trials.

While sandwich ELISA tests are reliable for detecting gluten in heated and non-heated food items, they are notoriously unreliable for detecting hydrolyzed gluten. Many see this as reason not to trust gluten-removed beers: the fermentation process hydrolyzes gluten in beer, so sandwich ELISA tests cannot accurately quantify their gluten content. If the test is unreliable, it's hard to believe that a once gluten-containing substance is safe for consumption by celiacs.

However, the sandwich R5 ELISA's weaknesses are well documented and widely known. Most of these brewers are using an entirely different test that was specifically designed to detect partial gluten fragments (peptides) that may still be harmful to the gluten-sensitive. The competitive R5 ELISA is the standard test used to detect these peptides, and although it has not been validated yet, many published studies have found the competitive R5 ELISA to be a reliable indicator of hydrolyzed gluten.

A recent article published on Medical Daily titled “Gluten-Free Beer? Common Gluten Detection Method is Inaccurate” addresses the issue of ELISA testing on beer, and claims that current testing procedures are inaccurate. This is only half true, and unfortunately, articles like these only serve to confuse the public about an already confusing issue.

The article seems well-meaning enough; after all, there's nothing wrong with taking a precautionary stance when one's health is on the line. However, the cited study clearly states that they are using the sandwich R5 ELISA. It has already been established that the sandwich R5 ELISA is unreliable for testing beer, and for this reason, most companies do not use it when testing for hydrolyzed gluten. This makes the article's title highly misleading, as the inaccuracy of the sandwich R5 ELISA for detecting gluten in beer is, in most cases, irrelevant.

Another point that the article fails to address is that it is not entirely clear just how toxic these gluten peptides are for gluten-sensitive individuals. The toxicity of the 33 mer peptide and numerous others have been demonstrated, but aside from that, it's possible that at least some of the peptides detected by the Competitive R5 ELISA are not toxic to celiacs.

One should always err on the side of safety, but it is important to be as precise as possible with the scientific terminology to avoid needless (perhaps inadvertent) fear mongering, as that is one thing the celiac community does not need more of.

Parts of this article appeared in “Common Misunderstandings of Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages,” from the Winter 2012 issue of The Journal of Gluten Sensitivity.

Sources:

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).



Related Articles




Spread The Word





4 Responses:

 
jules
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
18 Mar 2013 8:25:09 AM PST
Thanks for tackling this confusing issue.
Last summer I wrote in Living Without Magazine about the mass spectronomy testing that first raised the question of the efficacy of testing "de-glutenized" barley beers. That article can be viewed on-line here: http://www.livingwithout.com/issues/4_20/gluten_free_brewing_bonanza-2895-1.html.
On The Gluten-Free Voice Radio show, I also interviewed Estrella Damm brewery’s Xavier Sitgas from Spain on these testing questions and their protocols - that podcast can be heard here: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/gluten-free/2012/01/13/the-gluten-free-voice-with-jules-shepard.
I appreciate your caution regarding the fear mongering that often occurs within (and is done to) our gluten-free community. This is one issue that we need to watch closely as more research is done. For now though, these beers seem to pass the crowd test, in that we aren't hearing reports that they are sickening those of us with celiac, including the CEO and the wife of the brewmaster at Oregon's Omission Beer (de-glutenized barley beer), both of whom also have celiac disease.
~jules shepard
Blog.JulesGlutenFree.com

 
Sarah
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingemptyratingempty Unrated
said this on
14 May 2013 8:26:29 PM PST
Jules- I have reported to Estrella that their beer made me sick. No response. There are a number of celiacs who report similar findings. Let's not sweep our reactions under the rug.

 
Sarah
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
18 Mar 2013 6:48:21 PM PST
It's really great to see this issue discussed in a reasoned and informative manner. Thanks!

 
Phyllis
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
25 Mar 2013 9:44:16 AM PST
Thank you for an articulate and reasoned summary of this issue.




Rate this article and leave a comment:
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Your Name *: Email (private) *: