No popular authors found.

Categories

No categories found.


Join Celiac.com's forum / message board and get your questions answered! Our forum has nearly 1 MILLION POSTS, and over 62,000 MEMBERS just waiting to help you with any questions about celiac disease and the gluten-free diet. We'll see you there!






Follow / Share


  FOLLOW US:
Twitter Facebook Google Plus RSS Podcast Email  Get Email Alerts

SHARE:

Popular Articles

No popular articles found.
Celiac.com Sponsors:

Confusing Study Results Keep Non-celiac Gluten Sensitivity Sufferers Confused

Celiac.com 11/11/2015 - If you ask me, it doesn't seem that far-fetched that some people who do not have celiac disease could still have adverse reactions to gluten. However, actually proving that scientifically continues to be challenging.

Photo: CC--Bilal KamoonTake the case of the research team that recently conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, gluten-challenge trial of patients with suspected non-celiac gluten sensitivity. The team wanted to try to get an idea of the number of self-diagnosed patients with non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

The team enrolled 53 women and 8 men referred to two Italian centers between October 2012 and November 2013 for suspected non-celiac gluten sensitivity. The subjects were randomly assigned to receive 4.375-g gluten or rice starch per day via gastro-soluble capsules for 1 week after a 1-week run-in period, and followed by a 1-week washout period and cross-over to the other group.

The team chose rice starch as the placebo because it is "the most readily absorbable of the complex carbohydrates, and thus less fermentable, in the intestinal tract." They used a daily questionnaire to chart any changes in overall symptom scores, and conducted analysis with a per-protocol approach. A total of 59 patients completed the trial, while two withdrew due to "intolerable symptoms."

Overall, one week of gluten consumption increased overall symptom severity compared with one week of placebo (P = .034), including abdominal bloating (P = .04), abdominal pain (P = .047), foggy mind (P = .019), depression (P = .02) and aphthous stomatitis (P = .025).

Perplexingly, the team found that "most patients showed approximately equal degrees of overall symptoms with either gluten or placebo, although overall symptoms were worsened significantly by gluten in comparison with placebo."

Got that? Significant numbers of the subjects reacted to the placebo.

The short conclusion is that these results "do not represent crucial evidence in favor of the existence of this new syndrome." However, and it's a big however, the results aren't quite as clear as they might appear.

In an accompanying editorial, Benjamin Lebwohl, MD, from the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University, and Daniel A. Leffler, MD, MS, from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center write:

The "overall positive result was driven by a minority of patients, whereas the rest had no (or at most a modest) worsening compared with placebo."

They add that:

"These findings can be a Rorschach test of sorts, in which the viewer draws interpretations that are based on his or her prior beliefs about NCGS. … It is therefore not surprising that this trial, like its predecessors, seems only to contribute to the uncertainty about NCGS."

So, basically, there's no clear word on the existence or non-existence of non-celiac gluten sensitivity, or on the number of people who might suffer from it.

Stay tuned for more studies, and more information as researchers attempt to sort it all out.

Source:

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).



Related Articles




Spread The Word





10 Responses:

 
pete
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
16 Nov 2015 1:51:03 PM PST
The obvious scientific conclusion is they were testing two antigens, in a study with NO placebo...(yes?)

 
xantosle
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
16 Nov 2015 9:04:22 PM PST
Totally agree. Rice is far from being considered a placebo!

 
Sheryl Aronson
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
16 Nov 2015 6:00:39 PM PST
My own experience of out-of-control GERD clearing up, when I stopped eating gluten, and now getting a bad stomach ache whenever I eat gluten, and the experiences of others like me, is evidence to me. Rather than doing a study of one week gluten, one week non-gluten, design the study so the samples are randomly given, and the you should get clearer results.

 
cri
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
16 Nov 2015 11:51:57 PM PST
Does it sound impossible to the team that these subjects have a reaction to RICE? Why didn't they use some neutral powder? In my opinion, this study should be repeated. Many cereals give adverse reactions, not only gluten.

 
adrienne
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
17 Nov 2015 4:04:12 AM PST
Why would they use rice starch in the study when rice is gluten-free?

 
Christy
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
17 Nov 2015 4:12:53 AM PST
A one week wash out period? Who of us who are severely sickened by eating gluten are symptom free in one week? I know if I get even slight cross contamination once, I'm sick for at least two weeks. I can't imagine if I'd ingested it every day for a week.

 
CRI
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
17 Nov 2015 12:58:49 PM PST
Even rice can trigger reactions: why didn't they use a neutral placebo?

 
Laura
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
17 Nov 2015 3:46:24 PM PST
I have reactions to rice as well as wheat and corn too. It seems more reasonable to use a non-grain as a placebo, duh!

 
ptjk
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
18 Nov 2015 4:18:53 AM PST
My question is: What else did the group consume all week during this trial? In my opinion, 1 week is not enough AND the entire group needs to be monitored for ALL food consumption during the trial as well.

 
donna
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingempty Unrated
said this on
19 Nov 2015 9:35:42 AM PST
They also needed to adjust for the fact that anyone who was willing to sign up for a study which could introduce gluten into their diets must not experience debilitating reactions to gluten in the first place. "Hey, your body reacts to gluten like it's poison, come let us watch how sick you really get." "Thanks, I'll pass. Science can watch and learn from someone else."




Rate this article and leave a comment:
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Your Name *: Email (private) *: