No popular authors found.

Categories

No categories found.


Join Celiac.com's forum / message board and get your questions answered! Our forum has nearly 1 MILLION POSTS, and over 62,000 MEMBERS just waiting to help you with any questions about celiac disease and the gluten-free diet. We'll see you there!






Follow / Share


  FOLLOW US:
Twitter Facebook Google Plus RSS Podcast Email  Get Email Alerts

SHARE:

Popular Articles

No popular articles found.
Celiac.com Sponsors:

P.F. Chang's Dodges Lawsuit Over Gluten-Free Surcharge


A plate at P.F. Chang's. Photo: CC--Parker Knight

Celiac.com 5/23/2016 - Plenty of people have followed the news of the woman who sued Chinese food chain P.F. Chang's, claiming that they discriminated against her by charging more for gluten-free dishes than for other non-gluten-free options.

Celiac.com covered P.F. Chang's efforts to have the suit dismissed, and also P.F. Chang's failure to prevent the woman from modifying the lawsuit, thus keeping it viable, if only for a time.

U.S. District Judge Ronald Whyte, of the Northern District of California, had dismissed the original complaint in August, but reinstated the suit once plaintiff Anna Marie Phillips amended her complaint. On Nov. 23, 2015, Whyte ruled that Phillips had sufficiently pleaded her claims in that amended complaint.

Many in the restaurant industry were watching the suit carefully since it was first filed in December 2014, as the claim of discrimination, based on higher charges for gluten-free items at P.F. Chang's, could have serious repercussions for the industry as a whole.

Phillips has now asked the judge to dismiss her lawsuit.

At least for now, the question to whether surcharges or higher charges for gluten-free food options constitute some form of discrimination against those with celiac disease or gluten-intolerance, remains un-litigated.

The position of the Department of Justice is that celiac disease is not a disability in every case, and that there are plenty of cases in which it is not a disability.

Read more at Legal News Line.

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).



Related Articles




Spread The Word





7 Responses:

 
Brenda
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
30 May 2016 9:35:31 PM PST
I was so happy that PF Chang's had gluten free food, they have to take extra precautions. I'll pay extra!

 
Food!over
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingempty Unrated
said this on
31 May 2016 2:27:30 AM PST
GF eaters who want options should welcome reasonable charges for GF food in restaurants. True GF preparation requires significant resources in a restaurant kitchen. To say nothing of potential liability in case of cross contamination. If they aren't allowed to recoup their costs, GF options will quite reasonably decrease. P.F. Chang's has wonderful GF choices and we should support them, not sue them.

 
Sean
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
31 May 2016 7:38:59 AM PST
As someone who dramatically reacts to gluten, food costs whatever people want to charge for it. Gluten-free food is more expensive to make, so it makes sense that those costs would be passed down to the consumer. I'm just glad we have any gluten-free options at all in restaurants.

 
Sandy
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingempty Unrated
said this on
31 May 2016 6:09:45 PM PST
Did the menu price mislead the customer? Did the restaurant tack on an additional charge after ordering? If not, then the customer chose to pay the price for a gluten-free meal. There are extra costs incurred by restaurants like PF Chang's to assure food safety, and as those with celiac disease know, the ingredients are more expensive in general. I applaud restaurants for going the extra mile to provide certified gluten-free menus. I do disagree with the DOJ statement that celiac disease is not always a disability. It is a disability, but it can be managed through strict adherence to a gluten-free diet.

 
alba
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
05 Jun 2016 12:21:39 PM PST
This person knows what they are talking about celiac disease, it's a disability. What are the GF foods they're using in place of the non GF foods to charge extra money? What like rice/corn flour, GF soy sauce which can be used in non GF foods as well. Most same restaurants use cornstarch in their foods. All the non GF items can be used in all their foods, the taste is not very different. It's Just another way to cheat a customer. Their food needs quite a bit of improvement whether it be GF or non GF.

 
Kelvin S.
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
06 Jun 2016 3:42:26 PM PST
Sandy, the term "disability" has a specific definition when used in most legal contexts, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act: "a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more 'major life activities'" or a history or perception of such impairment. Celiac disease does not substantially limit eating, even though it does limit what one can eat. I'm not aware of any successful litigation to require a restaurant to serve particular kinds of food to meet someone's dietary limitations, even though some of them could well reach the legal definition of "disability"--the son of a friend of mine can only eat about 4 foods due to severe multiple food allergies. Restaurants do, of course, need to be accessible to those with mobility impairments and the like.

 
Joe P.
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated
said this on
12 Sep 2016 10:30:35 AM PST
The policy of charging more is quite reasonable given the additional ingredient cost and effort the restaurant incurs in preparing the gluten free meals, including maintaining a gluten free prep area. As a long time Celiac sufferer I remember when restaurants did not make this accommodation and this ill conceived lawsuit may cause restaurants to choose not to accommodate us. I enjoy the food at PF Changs and I appreciate that they are one of the few chains that have made a genuine effort to reach out to us enabling me to eat out with my family. This could cause more restaurant chains to put a disclaimer on their menu about all allergens and not bother to accommodate any allergies. If this person does not relent in their attack of PF Changs perhaps we can start a go fund me site to help them afford the extra $20-$40 per year for food...




Rate this article and leave a comment:
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Your Name *: Email (private) *: