Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

ocalamity

Members
  • Content count

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About ocalamity

  • Rank
    New Community Member
  • Birthday
  1. So the more I read posts here and on other sites, the more I realize everything was/is just as confused as me when they got their first blood test results. Well I've been seeing a rheumatologist for the past year and a half to figure out some joint issues and blood tests have been showing very high inflamation for my ESR and C-Reactive proteins with no improvement with anti-inflamatories and steroids. I've also had persistent issues with B12 even though I'm taking two 1000-mcg pills of it a day--my system just doesn't want to absorb it. So for the last set of blood work he included a celiac panel. Results: IGA, SERUM: 260 TISSUE TRANSGLUTAM AB IGA: <3 (Interpretaion: Negative) GLIADIN AB (IGA): 23 (Interpretation: Positive) The doctor told me that I have celiac and should start eating gluten free, but to see my primary doctor and go from there for offical diagnosis. I have that appointment next week where I assume she'll send me for an endoscopy as I've been reading that's what geenerally happens with any positive results. BUT, I'm so confused. I've been reading contradictory things on what having only Gliadin as positive and the others as negative could mean. I'm just curious if anyone else has tested similarly and what their story wound up being. I know it sounds silly, but I actually just want my doctor to say "Yup, totally confirmed, you have Celaic" because it would answer a ton of questions that my doctors have been trying to answer for years and I just want answers. I'm 22 and have a family history of Celaic (my great-aunt has it). Thanks!! And sorry about the novel I just wrote