Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Two Doctors, Two Diagnoses
0

11 posts in this topic

I'm a little frustrated today.  About 6 months ago my endocrinologist requested the celiac blood tests.  I don't know what she requested or what my results were, but at the time I was told they were negative.  Then 6 months later, I am still not absorbing my Synthroid the way I am suppose to, so my endo sends me to the GI doctor.

 

I had my endoscopy Feb 11.  My endocrinologist called me the results today and told me that my results were positive for "early celiac disease".  The GI doctor called later and told me my results showed a gluten intolerance but not celiacs at all. When I questioned what my endo had said he back tracked and stated if my blood work would have been positive he would have given me the diagnosis of Celiac's Disease.  I asked him to get copies of the said blood work from the endo and call me back.

 

I'm frustrated by the two differing diagnoses. Although I know in the end, the result is the same for me.  Off gluten I go. 

 

Has anyone else ever had a biopsy showing early celiac's disease and not gotten a diagnosis?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

That must be making you crazy! Can you get a copy of the biopsy report? If it shows signs of villi damage, I'd go with the celiac diagnosis myself.

 

As far as I know, there is no biopsy finding that can indicate "gluten intolerance but not celiac."

 

There are a few other rare causes of villi damage (certain parasites, for example) but non-celiac gluten intolerance isn't one of them. Maybe it's time for a new GI doc... where oh where are the enlightened ones?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a good chance only one celiac blood test was run. There are several.

Get the lab results and see. In the interim, stay on gluten and if the results are missing tests, request they are run ASAP. Then get off gluten.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Traditionally, as i understand it, a celiac diagnosis based on a biopsy had to include total villi destruction; If the villi weren't totally  flattened and "merely damaged" doctors would not consider it to be celiac... perhaps that is what is happening with your doctor... You have one of those stone-age doctors who doesn't stay on top of current thinking. :huh:

 

Perhaps look into whether all blood tests were done before going gluten-free, as the others suggested.

 

Good luck!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Request (demand) your lab work..but I would, personally like to welcome you to the Club! :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Thanks everyone.  My endocrinologist states she views my diagnosis as celiac disease as there was damage to the villi and the biospy report states that it is consistent with early celiacs disease.  It's the GI doctor that isn't wanting to give the diagnosis.  After talking with him I have decided he doesn't understand much about Celiac's/gluten intolerance.  He was suppose to call me back today, but of course, he never called.

 

I have already had a total thyroidectomy due to thyroid cancer secondary to Hashimoto's Thyroiditis. I also have vitiligo.  So I already have a few autoimmune disorders.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That must be making you crazy! Can you get a copy of the biopsy report? If it shows signs of villi damage, I'd go with the celiac diagnosis myself.

 

As far as I know, there is no biopsy finding that can indicate "gluten intolerance but not celiac."

 

There are a few other rare causes of villi damage (certain parasites, for example) but non-celiac gluten intolerance isn't one of them. Maybe it's time for a new GI doc... where oh where are the enlightened ones?

 

 

My biopsy showed blunting of the villi, but not totally damaged.  It also showed that I had numerous leukocytes in the biopsied tissue.  That is why he wants to give me the gluten intolerance instead of celiacs disease diagnosis.  I'm leery to not get a true celiacs diagnosis now, because I have gone off gluten already.  My cancer diagnosis was missed for 18 months because my test were inconclusive and my doctor thought, "it's probably just messed up hormones from having a baby 6 months ago."    I am the queen of inconclusive testing. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My biopsy showed blunting of the villi, but not totally damaged.  It also showed that I had numerous leukocytes in the biopsied tissue.  That is why he wants to give me the gluten intolerance instead of celiacs disease diagnosis.  I'm leery to not get a true celiacs diagnosis now, because I have gone off gluten already.  My cancer diagnosis was missed for 18 months because my test were inconclusive and my doctor thought, "it's probably just messed up hormones from having a baby 6 months ago."    I am the queen of inconclusive testing. 

 

Welcome Dnwestover!

 

Did you receive a written pathology report in addition to the endoscopy report from the doctor?  It may provide important info.

 

I'm jumping in here without reading if you posted other stats -- blood tests etc.

 

Did you have all celiac antibody blood tests:

 

Total Serum IgA

tTG - IgA and IgG

DGP - IgA and IgG

EMA

AGA - IgA and IgG (optional if you had DGP)

 

Any nutrient testing:

 

B1, B2, B6, B12, D, K, Iron, Ferritin, Copper and Zinc?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here in Australia most specialists and GP's don't put much faith in the blood tests as i have been told by all of them (the ones i see or have seen) that they are all too inaccurate for a diagnosis. I have also read with regards to the biopsy, in Australia they now view no villi damage BUT hight lymphocyte levels as early celiac disease. The basis being while there are some other things that cause villi blunting, none of them cause BOTH villi blunting and high lymphocyte levels other than celiac. 

 

Just in my family there are 4 biopsy diagnosed celiacs with positive gene tests. Only one of us had a + blood test. My current GP said she wont even bother with the blood tests anymore she just refers straight to the GI specialist for biopsy. Her method is "if you are going to rule something out, you have to rule it out, not guess it out. The blood tests are guessing" in her opinion

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Troy!

 

On the Marsh Scale -- the first two stages are not specific to celiac disease, but if they are present with symptoms -- well, you do the math.

 

The reason I brought up both written path report and blood tests run is....often the diagnosis of Celiac Disease is NOT simple.  Many of us have to use all tests available before our docs even suggest biopsy.  I had positive blood, deficient nutrients, more symptoms than one should have to endure along with positive gene testing and Total Villi Atrophy at age 43....would not want anybody to wait as long as I for a diagnosis.  My kids all have mostly negative blood -- only positive genes and symptoms.  Should they have waited until they became as sick as I to remove gluten -- I think not.

 

Here is a basic explanation of the Marsh Scale used to type Celiac Disease.

Stage 1, the cells on the surface of the intestinal lining (the epithelial cells) have more lymphocytes (white blood cells) among them than normal - Stage one is not specific to Celiac Disease.

Stage 2, the changes of Stage 1 are present (increased lymphocytes), and the crypts are larger than normal. 

Stage 3, the changes of Stage 2 are present (increased lymphocytes and larger-than-normal crypts), and the villi are shrinking and flattening (atrophy). There are three levels of Stage 3:
3A--Partial villous atrophy
3B--Subtotal villous atrophy
3C--Total villous atrophy

Stage 4, the villi are totally atrophied (completely flattened) and the crypts are now shrunken, too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My endoscopy and biopsies after 5 months gluten-free showed increased interstitial leukocytes (I did eat gluten the week before the testing, but not a whole gluten challenge). With this and my positive dietary response (see my sig for why I went gluten-free to start), my GI dx'd celiac. I wish my PCP (not my current one) had let me go to GI Dec 2011 when my symptoms were at their peak. I think I would have had positive blood work and a positive biopsy then. But, it didn't work out that way so here I am. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      103,894
    • Total Posts
      919,527
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gluten does WHAT to the brain?
      I saw this the other day too & like Karen, wondered at the last line of the article. The article had me once again thinking about my deceased brother who was dx'd paranoid schizophrenic in his late 20's. He also had alternating constipation/diarrhea  but "they" always blamed it on his meds for the schizophrenia. We, his family, knew he had those issues prior to him being prescribed the meds but there is no telling the medical community something when you're talking about a mental patient.  Okay, I know the guy is selling something but the research noted in the article is valid: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/06/22/gluten-grains-cause-schizophrenia.aspx We knew about this back in the 50's & going forward. They even coined the term for it "bread madness". Why have we not recognized this in the psychology/mental health/institutions community for all these many years? Why does it seem to have been just shoved under the rug like some dirty little secret?  Wondering what kind of life my brother could have had - if  he had celiac - constantly haunts me.
    • Gluten does WHAT to the brain?
      My first thought was how many people that have been labeled as mentally ill or psychotic actually have Celiac Disease and never get diagnosed?  Their whole lives spent battling these conditions, being flooded with various meds and no one looks at their diet or does other testing!  It really is tragic.  I always wondered whether Patty Duke was an un-diagnosed Celiac.  She was finally diagnosed with bi-polar and ended up dying of a perforated intestine, at the young age of 69.  Ya gotta wonder........
    • Desperately Seeking DISARONNO!
      I think the company knows what the ingredients are better than us.  If you mean Amaretto, I have had it.  
    • Gluten free before biopsy???
      My doctor required me to continue eating gluten before the endoscopy for biopsy. She did say I could let up "a little" to ease some of the terrible pain I was having, but wanted me to eat gluten-containing foods every day until the biopsy. As it turned out, they were able to get me in quickly, so it was really only a few days for me. Both bloodwork and biopsy confirmed the diagnosis and now I am happily gluten-free! It has been a challenge, but having a gluten-free kitchen, checking labels on foods and being super-careful when going out has worked wonders. I am not 100% recovered yet, but getting energy back a bit at a time as my nutrition status improves. We don't eat out much - mostly at vegan places that declare they are gluten-free (although I still eat chicken, eggs, milk, and beef sometimes at home). One day, I'll go somewhere else - but not without checking first! Best of luck to you. I think it important to always double-check with the doctor when there are any questions at all. My doctor welcomes questions and I hope yours will too.
    • Gluten does WHAT to the brain?
      Thanks for posting I was just looking at this a short time ago. Something I found interesting was the last line of the article- " The psychosis that the woman experienced was an extreme condition and very unique, Fasano said. " While not common I am not sure that it is that unique.  There is a fair amount of research that has been done on the effects of gluten on the brains and nervous systems of celiacs.  Doing a search with the words neurological and celiac at places like Lancet, PubMed and the NIH can bring up some really interesting studies. Thankfully this impact is slowly becoming more common knowledge in the medical circles. Many of us have experienced in our families or first hand the way that the antibodies can impact our mood and thinking. It does seem miraculous when the clouds finally lift. I wish more doctors would test for celiac before pulling out the prescription pad, especially with kids.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Jmg  »  admin

      Hello Admin!
      I don't know whether this is of interest to post on your articles feed:
      http://pratt.duke.edu/about/news/window-guts-brain
      Kind Regards,
      Matt
      · 2 replies
    • celiac sharon  »  cyclinglady

      Hello cycling lady, have you noticed my picture is showing up as you?  Have no idea why but it's rather disconcerting to see my picture and your words 😉  Do you know how to fix it?  You seem to have far more experience with this board than I do
      · 1 reply
    • Larry Gessner  »  cyclinglady

      Hi There, I don't know if there is a place for videos in the forum. I just watched "The Truth About Gluten" I think it is a good video. I would like to share it somewhere but don't know where it should go. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
      Here is the link if you have never watched it.
      https://youtu.be/IU6jVEwpjnE Thank You,
      Larry
      · 2 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      60,939
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    vamanos25
    Joined