Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Two Doctors, Two Diagnoses
0

11 posts in this topic

I'm a little frustrated today.  About 6 months ago my endocrinologist requested the celiac blood tests.  I don't know what she requested or what my results were, but at the time I was told they were negative.  Then 6 months later, I am still not absorbing my Synthroid the way I am suppose to, so my endo sends me to the GI doctor.

 

I had my endoscopy Feb 11.  My endocrinologist called me the results today and told me that my results were positive for "early celiac disease".  The GI doctor called later and told me my results showed a gluten intolerance but not celiacs at all. When I questioned what my endo had said he back tracked and stated if my blood work would have been positive he would have given me the diagnosis of Celiac's Disease.  I asked him to get copies of the said blood work from the endo and call me back.

 

I'm frustrated by the two differing diagnoses. Although I know in the end, the result is the same for me.  Off gluten I go. 

 

Has anyone else ever had a biopsy showing early celiac's disease and not gotten a diagnosis?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

That must be making you crazy! Can you get a copy of the biopsy report? If it shows signs of villi damage, I'd go with the celiac diagnosis myself.

 

As far as I know, there is no biopsy finding that can indicate "gluten intolerance but not celiac."

 

There are a few other rare causes of villi damage (certain parasites, for example) but non-celiac gluten intolerance isn't one of them. Maybe it's time for a new GI doc... where oh where are the enlightened ones?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a good chance only one celiac blood test was run. There are several.

Get the lab results and see. In the interim, stay on gluten and if the results are missing tests, request they are run ASAP. Then get off gluten.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Traditionally, as i understand it, a celiac diagnosis based on a biopsy had to include total villi destruction; If the villi weren't totally  flattened and "merely damaged" doctors would not consider it to be celiac... perhaps that is what is happening with your doctor... You have one of those stone-age doctors who doesn't stay on top of current thinking. :huh:

 

Perhaps look into whether all blood tests were done before going gluten-free, as the others suggested.

 

Good luck!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Request (demand) your lab work..but I would, personally like to welcome you to the Club! :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Thanks everyone.  My endocrinologist states she views my diagnosis as celiac disease as there was damage to the villi and the biospy report states that it is consistent with early celiacs disease.  It's the GI doctor that isn't wanting to give the diagnosis.  After talking with him I have decided he doesn't understand much about Celiac's/gluten intolerance.  He was suppose to call me back today, but of course, he never called.

 

I have already had a total thyroidectomy due to thyroid cancer secondary to Hashimoto's Thyroiditis. I also have vitiligo.  So I already have a few autoimmune disorders.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That must be making you crazy! Can you get a copy of the biopsy report? If it shows signs of villi damage, I'd go with the celiac diagnosis myself.

 

As far as I know, there is no biopsy finding that can indicate "gluten intolerance but not celiac."

 

There are a few other rare causes of villi damage (certain parasites, for example) but non-celiac gluten intolerance isn't one of them. Maybe it's time for a new GI doc... where oh where are the enlightened ones?

 

 

My biopsy showed blunting of the villi, but not totally damaged.  It also showed that I had numerous leukocytes in the biopsied tissue.  That is why he wants to give me the gluten intolerance instead of celiacs disease diagnosis.  I'm leery to not get a true celiacs diagnosis now, because I have gone off gluten already.  My cancer diagnosis was missed for 18 months because my test were inconclusive and my doctor thought, "it's probably just messed up hormones from having a baby 6 months ago."    I am the queen of inconclusive testing. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My biopsy showed blunting of the villi, but not totally damaged.  It also showed that I had numerous leukocytes in the biopsied tissue.  That is why he wants to give me the gluten intolerance instead of celiacs disease diagnosis.  I'm leery to not get a true celiacs diagnosis now, because I have gone off gluten already.  My cancer diagnosis was missed for 18 months because my test were inconclusive and my doctor thought, "it's probably just messed up hormones from having a baby 6 months ago."    I am the queen of inconclusive testing. 

 

Welcome Dnwestover!

 

Did you receive a written pathology report in addition to the endoscopy report from the doctor?  It may provide important info.

 

I'm jumping in here without reading if you posted other stats -- blood tests etc.

 

Did you have all celiac antibody blood tests:

 

Total Serum IgA

tTG - IgA and IgG

DGP - IgA and IgG

EMA

AGA - IgA and IgG (optional if you had DGP)

 

Any nutrient testing:

 

B1, B2, B6, B12, D, K, Iron, Ferritin, Copper and Zinc?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here in Australia most specialists and GP's don't put much faith in the blood tests as i have been told by all of them (the ones i see or have seen) that they are all too inaccurate for a diagnosis. I have also read with regards to the biopsy, in Australia they now view no villi damage BUT hight lymphocyte levels as early celiac disease. The basis being while there are some other things that cause villi blunting, none of them cause BOTH villi blunting and high lymphocyte levels other than celiac. 

 

Just in my family there are 4 biopsy diagnosed celiacs with positive gene tests. Only one of us had a + blood test. My current GP said she wont even bother with the blood tests anymore she just refers straight to the GI specialist for biopsy. Her method is "if you are going to rule something out, you have to rule it out, not guess it out. The blood tests are guessing" in her opinion

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Troy!

 

On the Marsh Scale -- the first two stages are not specific to celiac disease, but if they are present with symptoms -- well, you do the math.

 

The reason I brought up both written path report and blood tests run is....often the diagnosis of Celiac Disease is NOT simple.  Many of us have to use all tests available before our docs even suggest biopsy.  I had positive blood, deficient nutrients, more symptoms than one should have to endure along with positive gene testing and Total Villi Atrophy at age 43....would not want anybody to wait as long as I for a diagnosis.  My kids all have mostly negative blood -- only positive genes and symptoms.  Should they have waited until they became as sick as I to remove gluten -- I think not.

 

Here is a basic explanation of the Marsh Scale used to type Celiac Disease.

Stage 1, the cells on the surface of the intestinal lining (the epithelial cells) have more lymphocytes (white blood cells) among them than normal - Stage one is not specific to Celiac Disease.

Stage 2, the changes of Stage 1 are present (increased lymphocytes), and the crypts are larger than normal. 

Stage 3, the changes of Stage 2 are present (increased lymphocytes and larger-than-normal crypts), and the villi are shrinking and flattening (atrophy). There are three levels of Stage 3:
3A--Partial villous atrophy
3B--Subtotal villous atrophy
3C--Total villous atrophy

Stage 4, the villi are totally atrophied (completely flattened) and the crypts are now shrunken, too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My endoscopy and biopsies after 5 months gluten-free showed increased interstitial leukocytes (I did eat gluten the week before the testing, but not a whole gluten challenge). With this and my positive dietary response (see my sig for why I went gluten-free to start), my GI dx'd celiac. I wish my PCP (not my current one) had let me go to GI Dec 2011 when my symptoms were at their peak. I think I would have had positive blood work and a positive biopsy then. But, it didn't work out that way so here I am. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,334
    • Total Posts
      920,438
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you cyclinglady! We'll just keep pushing forward and we'll get things figured out one way or another. You have been most helpful and informative and given me some great resources and things to consider. I really appreciate it! I definitely feel better as I've felt like a crazy mom lately thinking through the test results and everything. Even if it turns out to not be celiac or gluten related, at least I can say we did our due diligence and looked under every rock to find the source of his troubles. Thanks again!  Take care! 
    • Anxiety is quite a common symptom with undiagnosed celiacs. It should improve if not disappear when you go gluten free. Be sure to CONTINUE eating gluten until the endoscopy!   Welcome to the club!
    • Although serological tests are useful for identifying celiac disease, it is well known that a small minority of celiacs are seronegative, and show no blood markers for celiac disease. A team of researchers wanted to define the prevalence and features of seronegative compared to seropositive celiac disease, and to establish whether celiac disease is a common cause of seronegative villous atrophy. View the full article
    • This was absolutely me before diagnosis.  The worst of all of my Celiac symptoms occurred in the morning.  The anxiety was terrible in the mornings, I had horrible nausea, no appetite, felt light headed, dizzy and shaky, diarrhea, stomach cramps... the works.  Honestly, I don't know if it was the symptoms causing the anxiety, the anxiety making my symptoms worse, or a combination.  I almost dropped out of school because I felt so terrible every morning I didn't want to leave the house to go to class.  The first few doctors I saw insisted all of my symptoms were psychological and tried to give me anti-depressants/anti-anxiety meds, but I knew there was something else wrong with me.  I had always been a bit "high-strung," but for the year I was really sick before diagnosis, the anxiety got out of control. I was diagnosed with celiac disease 6 months ago and have been gluten free ever since.  It took time, but everything is gradually improving.  The morning anxiety is much improved and some mornings, is completely gone.  I realized a month or two ago that I no longer spend the first hour after waking up gagging and dry-heaving, something I had done for so many years that I just thought it was normal for me.  I can brush my teeth and my tongue without feeling like I'm going to puke.  I eat breakfast now, which I have never done, because I was always too anxious and nauseous in the mornings to be hungry.  I am not "all better."  I still have bad days and even bad weeks.  If I get glutened the anxiety comes back full force.  If I'm super-stressed out or letting my health slide (not eating well, not sleeping enough) the AM anxiety seems to return.  But, it has been slowly improving over the last 6 months and has become so much more manageable.   Your anxiety could be a separate disorder from the celiac disease, but for me, it seems it was absolutely related and continues to get better.  Don't get discouraged if you don't see an immediate improvement or experience relapses after improving.  Often, I feel like it's a two-step-forward, one-step-back kind of thing, but it is getting better.
    • I have suffered with GERD for 20 years and accidently found out it was a gluten intolerance. I had gone on Atkins years ago and noticed that I had no GERD symptoms while on the diet. I didn't make the connection at that time. Then I went on the Mayo Diet back in the winter and once again, the constant was having no bread primarily. I had also noticed that I would have major attacks anytime I ate Italian food. I blamed it on the onions, the tomatoes, herbs...but I could tolerate all those foods separately. Then, like a lightning bolt...it hit me...the culprit was the "innocent" pasta. BINGO!!  I went gluten-free in March 2016 and I have had no GERD now in 5 months. I feel as if it is a gift to me.   
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,390
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    tomj777
    Joined