Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Two Doctors, Two Diagnoses
0

11 posts in this topic

I'm a little frustrated today.  About 6 months ago my endocrinologist requested the celiac blood tests.  I don't know what she requested or what my results were, but at the time I was told they were negative.  Then 6 months later, I am still not absorbing my Synthroid the way I am suppose to, so my endo sends me to the GI doctor.

 

I had my endoscopy Feb 11.  My endocrinologist called me the results today and told me that my results were positive for "early celiac disease".  The GI doctor called later and told me my results showed a gluten intolerance but not celiacs at all. When I questioned what my endo had said he back tracked and stated if my blood work would have been positive he would have given me the diagnosis of Celiac's Disease.  I asked him to get copies of the said blood work from the endo and call me back.

 

I'm frustrated by the two differing diagnoses. Although I know in the end, the result is the same for me.  Off gluten I go. 

 

Has anyone else ever had a biopsy showing early celiac's disease and not gotten a diagnosis?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

That must be making you crazy! Can you get a copy of the biopsy report? If it shows signs of villi damage, I'd go with the celiac diagnosis myself.

 

As far as I know, there is no biopsy finding that can indicate "gluten intolerance but not celiac."

 

There are a few other rare causes of villi damage (certain parasites, for example) but non-celiac gluten intolerance isn't one of them. Maybe it's time for a new GI doc... where oh where are the enlightened ones?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a good chance only one celiac blood test was run. There are several.

Get the lab results and see. In the interim, stay on gluten and if the results are missing tests, request they are run ASAP. Then get off gluten.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Traditionally, as i understand it, a celiac diagnosis based on a biopsy had to include total villi destruction; If the villi weren't totally  flattened and "merely damaged" doctors would not consider it to be celiac... perhaps that is what is happening with your doctor... You have one of those stone-age doctors who doesn't stay on top of current thinking. :huh:

 

Perhaps look into whether all blood tests were done before going gluten-free, as the others suggested.

 

Good luck!

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Request (demand) your lab work..but I would, personally like to welcome you to the Club! :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Thanks everyone.  My endocrinologist states she views my diagnosis as celiac disease as there was damage to the villi and the biospy report states that it is consistent with early celiacs disease.  It's the GI doctor that isn't wanting to give the diagnosis.  After talking with him I have decided he doesn't understand much about Celiac's/gluten intolerance.  He was suppose to call me back today, but of course, he never called.

 

I have already had a total thyroidectomy due to thyroid cancer secondary to Hashimoto's Thyroiditis. I also have vitiligo.  So I already have a few autoimmune disorders.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That must be making you crazy! Can you get a copy of the biopsy report? If it shows signs of villi damage, I'd go with the celiac diagnosis myself.

 

As far as I know, there is no biopsy finding that can indicate "gluten intolerance but not celiac."

 

There are a few other rare causes of villi damage (certain parasites, for example) but non-celiac gluten intolerance isn't one of them. Maybe it's time for a new GI doc... where oh where are the enlightened ones?

 

 

My biopsy showed blunting of the villi, but not totally damaged.  It also showed that I had numerous leukocytes in the biopsied tissue.  That is why he wants to give me the gluten intolerance instead of celiacs disease diagnosis.  I'm leery to not get a true celiacs diagnosis now, because I have gone off gluten already.  My cancer diagnosis was missed for 18 months because my test were inconclusive and my doctor thought, "it's probably just messed up hormones from having a baby 6 months ago."    I am the queen of inconclusive testing. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My biopsy showed blunting of the villi, but not totally damaged.  It also showed that I had numerous leukocytes in the biopsied tissue.  That is why he wants to give me the gluten intolerance instead of celiacs disease diagnosis.  I'm leery to not get a true celiacs diagnosis now, because I have gone off gluten already.  My cancer diagnosis was missed for 18 months because my test were inconclusive and my doctor thought, "it's probably just messed up hormones from having a baby 6 months ago."    I am the queen of inconclusive testing. 

 

Welcome Dnwestover!

 

Did you receive a written pathology report in addition to the endoscopy report from the doctor?  It may provide important info.

 

I'm jumping in here without reading if you posted other stats -- blood tests etc.

 

Did you have all celiac antibody blood tests:

 

Total Serum IgA

tTG - IgA and IgG

DGP - IgA and IgG

EMA

AGA - IgA and IgG (optional if you had DGP)

 

Any nutrient testing:

 

B1, B2, B6, B12, D, K, Iron, Ferritin, Copper and Zinc?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here in Australia most specialists and GP's don't put much faith in the blood tests as i have been told by all of them (the ones i see or have seen) that they are all too inaccurate for a diagnosis. I have also read with regards to the biopsy, in Australia they now view no villi damage BUT hight lymphocyte levels as early celiac disease. The basis being while there are some other things that cause villi blunting, none of them cause BOTH villi blunting and high lymphocyte levels other than celiac. 

 

Just in my family there are 4 biopsy diagnosed celiacs with positive gene tests. Only one of us had a + blood test. My current GP said she wont even bother with the blood tests anymore she just refers straight to the GI specialist for biopsy. Her method is "if you are going to rule something out, you have to rule it out, not guess it out. The blood tests are guessing" in her opinion

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Troy!

 

On the Marsh Scale -- the first two stages are not specific to celiac disease, but if they are present with symptoms -- well, you do the math.

 

The reason I brought up both written path report and blood tests run is....often the diagnosis of Celiac Disease is NOT simple.  Many of us have to use all tests available before our docs even suggest biopsy.  I had positive blood, deficient nutrients, more symptoms than one should have to endure along with positive gene testing and Total Villi Atrophy at age 43....would not want anybody to wait as long as I for a diagnosis.  My kids all have mostly negative blood -- only positive genes and symptoms.  Should they have waited until they became as sick as I to remove gluten -- I think not.

 

Here is a basic explanation of the Marsh Scale used to type Celiac Disease.

Stage 1, the cells on the surface of the intestinal lining (the epithelial cells) have more lymphocytes (white blood cells) among them than normal - Stage one is not specific to Celiac Disease.

Stage 2, the changes of Stage 1 are present (increased lymphocytes), and the crypts are larger than normal. 

Stage 3, the changes of Stage 2 are present (increased lymphocytes and larger-than-normal crypts), and the villi are shrinking and flattening (atrophy). There are three levels of Stage 3:
3A--Partial villous atrophy
3B--Subtotal villous atrophy
3C--Total villous atrophy

Stage 4, the villi are totally atrophied (completely flattened) and the crypts are now shrunken, too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My endoscopy and biopsies after 5 months gluten-free showed increased interstitial leukocytes (I did eat gluten the week before the testing, but not a whole gluten challenge). With this and my positive dietary response (see my sig for why I went gluten-free to start), my GI dx'd celiac. I wish my PCP (not my current one) had let me go to GI Dec 2011 when my symptoms were at their peak. I think I would have had positive blood work and a positive biopsy then. But, it didn't work out that way so here I am. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,651
    • Total Posts
      921,611
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How about reaching out to your local celiac disease support group? http://www.houstonceliacs.org
    • Yes, I am in Houston, TX. Can anyone recommend a good GI in Houston, lots of experience with celiac?  
    • I am sorry to hear about your mother.   It is not so hard to get a medical doctor to order a celiac panel -- especially if your father was diagnosed with celiac disease.  Our family GP did not blink an eye when I first asked my daughter to be tested.    If you think your doctor will disregard your legitimate request, you can either fire him or put the request in writing and send it certified (attorneys love documentation!)  I agree that our doctors should support us.  I have a great GI, but my GP  is pretty clueless when it comes to celiac disease, but she admits it.    She does always order all the lab tests I request.  Perhaps it is because I come in with supporting medical documentation and evidence.  If she was not supportive to my satisfaction, I would find a new doctor.   Again, you can go gluten free in your own.   Chance are you have celiac disease.    But it is hard.  Really hard if you do not have the support of your family.  That is my concern.   Are you in the US?  
    • I've just read SO MUCH about the long, arduous process of getting a positive diagnosis through traditional medicine - I'm not sure I want to put myself through all that. Since my father WAS positively diagnosed - I carry the celiac gene and another gene that predisposes me to gluten sensitivity - and my fecal tests for gliadin were SO elevated - there are enough reasons for me to go to a gluten free diet. The true medical diagnosis would just make it easier for my family/friends to believe the necessity of it. My children are adults and not particularly health care nuts. I doubt they would take their own risk seriously without a medical diagnosis. I'm afraid my husband, while he is trying to be supportive at this point, will grow weary of all the things I no longer serve at meals and all the places we will no longer go to because there are not gluten free alternatives on the menu. A medical diagnosis would make it easier for him, long term, I think.  I don't have much faith in general in our western health care system. My mother died 6 months ago at age 82 after 4-5 years of many different health issues. She had given up the keys to her car in her late 70's after getting lost several times. I became her designated driver to all doctor appointments, procedures, hospital stays, etc. The incompetence and disregard I saw blew me away. I'm surprised any elderly people survive our health care system once they get on that revolving door. The reason I started seeing a naturopath is that I am looking for an alternative to medical doctors for most of my health issues as I age. I know there are some things I still have to see them for - and of course, they are essential in trauma and emergency situations. But I am on a quest to follow a more holistic approach to my health care. If this is the path I am choosing, then I have to follow my gut (no pun intended) in situations like this. I think the only reason I would go through the medical testing would be for other people - not me. It seems to me, that with so many people being gluten intolerant these days, a decent M.D. would listen to a patient that was adamant about their intent to live gluten free - positive celiac diagnosis or not (and especially with the gene and stool test results). I mean, they don't tell vegetarians they have to eat meat ... and vegetarianism is a personal choice. Sorry if I seem to be rambling ... this is all so new, and I'm trying to find my way.    
    • This subject is often raised on this site, especially by women.  I am prompted to raise it again today, having spoken to my doctor who has said that she has noticed that celiacs often have thin hair, especially in later years.   Rather than just accept what she thinks is just the inevitable I would really like to hear from anyone who really has seen great improvement in their own hair and what they did. There are lots of tips on line but I am particularly interested in hearing from someone who has actually been there, done that, and now has better hair!  
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,653
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    KerryO
    Joined