Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Cadbury Australia Undeclared Cross Contamination
0

3 posts in this topic

Warning to Aussies

 

Cadbury have just started releasing new packaging, which has a 'may contain traces of wheat' statement, even on plain milk chocolate. 

 

When contacted via facebook, the response was that there hadn't been any changes to ingredients or production methods, but they had reviewed their allergen labelling to better reflect the allergens that may be present due to cross contamination.

 

They didn't seem to understand that it is unacceptable that there has always been the potential for cross-contamination, and they have only just decided to start declaring this. How can a company this big not understand the mandatory reporting of allergenic cross contamination?

 

As a highly sensitive celiac I am furious that a previously trusted brand hasn't been properly declaring this issue, especially as in the past their website even had a list of gluten content categories, dividing between 'gluten free', 'traces of gluten (<20ppm)' and 'contains gluten'. To blithely state now that they 'never claimed their products were gluten free' is an insult to consumers as well as a misunderstanding of the issue. 

 

 

 

There goes one of my only emergency convenience food options!

 

Soph

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

If you have been eating it with no problems and the manufacturing process hasn't changed, its still the same food you have been eating all along.

 

I don't know the rules in Australia, but in the US, they  don't have to label the shared facility or shared lines thing.  Maybe they had a certain period of time to comply with your labelling laws?  If they have blatantly been flaunting the labelling laws in your country, you could contact whatever agency is in charge of that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Warning to Aussies

 

Cadbury have just started releasing new packaging, which has a 'may contain traces of wheat' statement, even on plain milk chocolate. 

 

When contacted via facebook, the response was that there hadn't been any changes to ingredients or production methods, but they had reviewed their allergen labelling to better reflect the allergens that may be present due to cross contamination.

 

They didn't seem to understand that it is unacceptable that there has always been the potential for cross-contamination, and they have only just decided to start declaring this. How can a company this big not understand the mandatory reporting of allergenic cross contamination?

 

As a highly sensitive celiac I am furious that a previously trusted brand hasn't been properly declaring this issue, especially as in the past their website even had a list of gluten content categories, dividing between 'gluten free', 'traces of gluten (<20ppm)' and 'contains gluten'. To blithely state now that they 'never claimed their products were gluten free' is an insult to consumers as well as a misunderstanding of the issue. 

 

 

 

There goes one of my only emergency convenience food options!

 

Soph

Created an account just to reply to this. 

I too am furious at Cadbury's insult to its customers by saying they never made gluten free statements.  Here is a link I had in my favourites - http://www.cadbury.com.au/Products/Gluten-Information.aspx.  Unfortunately I didn't print it and now the link doesn't work of course.  If the was a potential for cross-contamination it should have previously been labelled.  Australian coeliacs falsely chose their products over others because of their labels.  Hopefully Food Standards Australia are onto this and they get fined, and we get a well deserved apology!

 

Rachel.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,351
    • Total Posts
      920,500
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thankyou both! I was wondering if my high levels left much doubt on the diagnosis. I don't see the GI until the 15th Sep and I don't think I can stand to eat gluten in that time. If he tells me to I will do so after then. After 25 years of symptoms I don't think there is much chance of healing my bowel In a couple of weeks. I'm actually terrified of the damage they might find. But I think I will need the endo since there may be other things going on with me. So great they didn't put your son through the biopsy! Once I have a formal diagnosis I have my kids to worry about also. I can't even stand the thought of my daughter having a blood test. I think she would need to be sedated as she is so fearful and pain sensitive. My son is not yet 2 so I don't think they will test him. I'm feeling so off at the moment. I think I have some anxiety and reflux going on complicating things quite a bit.
    • My son's antibodies were 300. Based on his extremely high levels, his pediatric GI suggested genetic testing instead of the biopsy. Genetic testing can't diagnose celiac on its own but combined with such high levels, the gi dr was confident a positive genetic test would confidently diagnose celiac. He warned that biopsies are small snapshots of the intestine and can miss damage. He said this is an approach used very often in Europe but not as much in the US. What sold me on that approach was the ability to put my son directly on a gluten free diet instead of waiting three weeks for the biopsy, during which time he would continue to eat gluten and feel terrible. I'm not sure if this is more common with younger patients though (our son is two), based on the idea that he's had less time to inflict damage that would show in a biopsy? We are very happy that we immediately started the gluten free diet and chose the genetic testing. Our son got the proper diagnosis and his recent number shows a drop to 71 after only 4.5 months gluten free! Not sure if this helps. Good luck and I hope you feel better soon!
    • We have been off gluten for a while now, and symptoms return when I've allowed gluten full meals… so something still isn't sitting right with me.  Checking with her doc about seeing a pediactric GI although I'm not sure how long that will take since we live in small town America. I know she didn't get at least one of the recommended full panel tests but maybe two, can someone help clarify, or is she missing two? DGP for sure and possibly EMA? And if I understand what I'm reading in other posts that the DGP can be more accurate? Thanks Her blood panel results: Ttg ab iga <.5u/ml ttg igg <.8u/ml aga ab iga <.2 u/ml aga an igg <.7u/ml iga 61mg/dL  
    • I was tested for the full panel, I believe. I had normal values for t-transglutaminase (ttg) igg,t-transglutaminase (ttg) iga, deamidated gliadin abs igg, deamidated gliadin abs iga, and immunoglobulin a qn serum.  
    • Would you review this on Find Me Gluten free?  You can  use the app or just go to it on line. If the restaurant isn't listed, there is a way to suggest it.  I have done that and it works.  Many of us look at that site/ app
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,416
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    djs2117
    Joined