Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genetic Test Results - 4 Yr Old

jeslk

Recommended Posts

jeslk Apprentice
jeslk
Posted

I was diagnosed with celiac two years ago.  My primary doc did genetic and general celiac panel for the initial diagnosis, which was then confirmed by biopsy.  I have silent celiac so I've have never had a physical symptom / reaction to gluten.   I have had two types of cancer, though, and am not convinced there isn't a link.  I've been entirely gluten free since diagnosis.

 

My 4 year old daughter's pediatrician ordered blood work last month and included a test for celiac, which was negative.  She did test positive, though, for both DQ2 AND DQ8.  I am trying to research to find out the likelihood of her getting celiac down the road, and can't find much info.  

 

For those of you with family histories - did you keep your little one off of gluten before they were diagnosed, as a preventative measure?  She doesn't have reactions and the test for celiac was negative, so I don't want to worry unnecessarily but also want to do what's best for her.

 

Thanks!

Jess

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


StephanieL Enthusiast
StephanieL
Posted

In our family it is my oldest who was dx at the age of 3.5 (he's now 6.5).

 

I have 2 younger kids who are 4 and 18 months. Our 4 year old was tested after being exposed to gluten over months at preschool and was negative. They are all gluten free at home for safety and my sanity. The 18 month old is gluten free except for what may be passed through my breastmilk.  He won't get gluten till out of the house. 

Kids are just too messy with crummy, gluteny things so this is what we have chosen.  We have other actual allergies (peanut, tree nut, dairy, egg, banana and blueberry) none of which we let the kids eat in the house.

 

Oh, and our GI didn't even do the genetics. She's confident they all have at least one of the genes so it won't tell us anything we don't already know which is to test every 3 years or if there are any signs of issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jeslk Apprentice
jeslk
  • Author
Posted

Thanks Stephanie!  My daughter's doctor called this morning and said he strongly urges us to switch her to gluten free.  Turns out she has all eight (when you count the sub-markers?) of the genetic markers and so he said there's a much higher likelihood of her developing celiac in her lifetime and that by the time there's a biopsy diagnosis damage will already be done.  My husband and I have just started to talk about it, but given my health issues that may or may not be related to celiac, I don't think we want to risk it.  It's not going to be easy - the kid likes her bread, pizza and mac and cheese!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StephanieL Enthusiast
StephanieL
Posted

If gluten is the "only" thing you are avoiding, you can find subs for pizza and mac n cheese pretty easy!  You can do it Mama!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular
pricklypear1971
Posted

My son has few markers compared to your daughter - but is IMO, symptomatic. He has tested negative on blood and biopsy.

Our house is gluten-free (except lately, when I let him have gluten at home - and now that's over) and he's become accustomed to the diet. If he went gluten-free now it would be so much easier than if I did it in the beginning, when I was learning. He's tasted gluten-free cooking, decided what he lines/dislikes...so that battle would be over. The hard part would be getting him to voluntarily be gluten-free away from home.

So, I don't have answers. But I do know the child must be on board. If she won't do it (because she feels no adverse effects) then it may be difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wmramsel Explorer
wmramsel
Posted

I might be wrong, but I thought if they have the genetic markers but are not symptomatic, you SHOULD feed them gluten.  Again, I could be misunderstanding....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StephanieL Enthusiast
StephanieL
Posted

I might be wrong, but I thought if they have the genetic markers but are not symptomatic, you SHOULD feed them gluten.  Again, I could be misunderstanding....

I think it depends on the Dr. you see or the research you read.  Just because you have the markers does not mean you will ever have an activation of the disease. Just as many people have cancer genes but it doesn't mean they WILL get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


wmramsel Explorer
wmramsel
Posted

I think it depends on the Dr. you see or the research you read.  Just because you have the markers does not mean you will ever have an activation of the disease. Just as many people have cancer genes but it doesn't mean they WILL get it.

 

Gotcha.  Seems like everything about this disease is "it depends." :(  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular
pricklypear1971
Posted

Gotcha. Seems like everything about this disease is "it depends." :(

More like "incomplete information" than depends, IMO.

There are numerous studies in various aspects of celiac disease...but the more you read the more you realize most of the studies have skewed participant bases (because they're based on Celiacs who were primarily dxed based presenting with outdated criteria like "must have D", etc.". Then, you look at sample size, and dropout rate, then the term "statistically significant" creeps in.

All of these criteria are typical for medical studies; however, if there's one thing AI diseases are NOT - it's typical.

So, what you're left with are mostly studies on Celiacs who presented with "typical" celiac disease, tested positive on blood and biopsy (which isn't always achievable), and who are probably not "super sensitive" and can tolerate a degree of tinkering by medical professionals: being able to successfully change diet, successfully tolerate a gluten challenge, etc.

And in children....wow, the skew just gets more extreme since its harder to get an early + on blood work and that trickles down to fewer biopsies...which trickles down to fewer dx.

Then introduce NCGI....which helps but muddies at the same time. There are probably quite a few Celiacs carrying the NCGI label because one or more tests were -. Sometimes testing was done well, other times it was done poorly or not at all.

Gluten sensitivity dx and understanding is abysmally incomplete. More is known each day....but it's slow.

IMO what is REALLY needed is a test that can be performed WITHOUT a gluten challenge. Since medical advances and understanding of gluten sensitivity are on fast-forward these days, and the only way to manage gluten sensitivity is a gluten-free diet...retesting or investigating where an individual falls (Celiac or NCGI) requires a cruel and destructive event - a gluten trial. Not many are willing to do this. So, the already dxed (with a wealth of knowledge and successes and failures of the diet, lifestyle and challenges) are reluctant to undergo repeat testing.

Most of the best study participants don't wanna do it. And I am one of them, and I don't think any of us are making the wrong decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,090
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Nicole K
    Newest Member
    Nicole K
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Denise I
      Celiac Dietician

      By Denise I · Posted

      I am looking to find a Celiac Dietician who is affiliated with the Celiac Disease Foundation who I can set up an appointment with.  Can you possibly give some guidance on this?  Thank you!
    • Posterboy
      14 year old with Celiac & EOE still suffering...

      By Posterboy · Posted

      Nacina, Knitty Kitty has given you good advice. But I would say/add find a Fat Soluble B-1 like Benfotiamine for best results.  The kind found in most Multivitamins have a very low absorption rate. This article shows how taking a Fat Soluble B-1 can effectively help absorption by 6x to7x times. https://www.naturalmedicinejournal.com/journal/thiamine-deficiency-and-diabetic-polyneuropathy quoting from the article.... "The group ingesting benfotiamine had maximum plasma thiamine levels that were 6.7 times higher than the group ingesting thiamine mononitrate.32" Also, frequency is much more important than amount when it comes to B-Vitamin. These are best taken with meals because they provide the fat for better absorption. You will know your B-Vitamin is working properly when your urine becomes bright yellow all the time. This may take two or three months to achieve this.......maybe even longer depending on how low he/you are. The Yellow color is from excess Riboflavin bypassing the Kidneys....... Don't stop them until when 2x a day with meals they start producing a bright yellow urine with in 2 or 3 hours after the ingesting the B-Complex...... You will be able to see the color of your urine change as the hours go by and bounce back up after you take them in the evening. When this happens quickly......you are now bypassing all the Riboflavin that is in the supplement. The body won't absorb more than it needs! This can be taken as a "proxy" for your other B-Vitamin levels (if taken a B-Complex) ...... at least at a quick and dirty level......this will only be so for the B-1 Thiamine levels if you are taking the Fat Soluble forms with the Magnesium as Knitty Kitty mentioned. Magnesium is a Co-Factor is a Co-factor for both Thiamine and Vitamin D and your sons levels won't improve unless he also takes Magnesium with his Thiamine and B-Complex. You will notice his energy levels really pick up.  His sleeping will improve and his muscle cramps will get better from the Magnesium! Here is nice blog post that can help you Thiamine and it's many benefits. I hope this is helpful but it is not medical advice God speed on your son's continued journey I used to be him. There is hope! 2 Tim 2:7 “Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things” this included. Posterboy by the grace of God,  
    • trents
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By trents · Posted

      I'll answer your second question first. The single best antibody test for monitoring celiac blood antibody levels is the tTG-IGA and it is very cost effective. For this reason, it is the most popular and often the only test ordered by physicians when checking for celiac disease. There are some people who actually do have celiac disease who will score negatives on this test anyway because of anomalies in their immune system but your wife is not one of them. So for her, the tTG-IGA should be sufficient. It is highly sensitive and highly specific for celiac disease. If your wife gets serious about eating gluten free and stays on a gluten free diet for the duration, she should experience healing in her villous lining, normalization in her antibody numbers and avoid reaching a celiac health crisis tipping point. I am attaching an article that will provide guidance for getting serious about gluten free living. It really is an advantage if all wheat products are taken out of the house and other household members adopt gluten free eating in order to avoid cross contamination and mistakes.  
    • Anmol
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By Anmol · Posted

      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
×
×
  • Create New...