Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Can Celiac Disease Prevent Cancer?


Mike212

Recommended Posts

Mike212 Rookie

I was wondering if UNTREATED celiac disease can prevent cancer. I know this might sound stupid but bear with me. So here is my train of thought. If celiac disease is left untreated then the villi dont heal. If they dont heal then the body cannot grow and get nutrients. So if like a mole for ex. becomes cancerous it can not grow and spread because of the lack of nutrients. So maybe untreated celiac disease can maybe at least slow down cancer. I know this is really retarted but just tell me why this is not possible if its not or ur opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



notme Experienced

actually, the opposite - untreated celiac is misdirecting your anti-bodies, the disease fighters, to fight gluten.  so other things can sneak in and manifest (like cancer) - also, untreated celiac will make your whole body weak and sick.  and holes in your intestines, because when your body fights gluten,, it also wrecks your guts.  the holes allow bad cancer cells to get through to other parts of your body.  that's how i understand it.

 

now, that being said, and along the lines of your theory:  things aren't going to get absorbed through damaged villi - this is true - but all the vitamins and good nutrition aren't getting absorbed.  so, you're not going to get the anti-oxidants and whatnot that will help your body fight cancer cells.

 

for the sideways opposite theory:  i can't drink as many alcoholic beverages as i used to - i think my intestines weren't absorbing the alcohol before i started healing - my days as a power drinker (LOLZ not) are officially over - strictly beer only and if i drink wine, i better wear my helmet   :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike212 Rookie

actually, the opposite - untreated celiac is misdirecting your anti-bodies, the disease fighters, to fight gluten.  so other things can sneak in and manifest (like cancer) - also, untreated celiac will make your whole body weak and sick.  and holes in your intestines, because when your body fights gluten,, it also wrecks your guts.  the holes allow bad cancer cells to get through to other parts of your body.  that's how i understand it.

 

now, that being said, and along the lines of your theory:  things aren't going to get absorbed through damaged villi - this is true - but all the vitamins and good nutrition aren't getting absorbed.  so, you're not going to get the anti-oxidants and whatnot that will help your body fight cancer cells.

 

for the sideways opposite theory:  i can't drink as many alcoholic beverages as i used to - i think my intestines weren't absorbing the alcohol before i started healing - my days as a power drinker (LOLZ not) are officially over - strictly beer only and if i drink wine, i better wear my helmet   :ph34r:

thanks i get it now

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

If all your villi are damaged and you are getting no nutrition - you would not live long enough to get cancer. So.....I guess it works as a cancer fighter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bartfull Rising Star

If all your villi are damaged and you are getting no nutrition - you would not live long enough to get cancer. So.....I guess it works as a cancer fighter.

Reminds me of cigarettes. They say people who smoke have a lower chance of getting alzheimers. Something about the way blood vessels react to nicotine. But I think it's probably because smokers don't live long enough to get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gemini Experienced

Reminds me of cigarettes. They say people who smoke have a lower chance of getting alzheimers. Something about the way blood vessels react to nicotine. But I think it's probably because smokers don't live long enough to get it.

Ok...now it's my chance to respectfully disagree!  ;)   Not all smokers die young.  Many people who smoke live well into their 70's and 80's, in fact, cancer and alzheimer rates are higher today and there are fewer smokers.  Many people who have gluten problems also live a long time.  My family are loaded with them and both sides live well into their late 80's to late 90's. I had a few people on my father's side who actually died of malnutrition (undiagnosed Celiac) but others who most likely had it, lived until old age.  Life and death work in strange ways, sometimes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bartfull Rising Star

Gemini, that was my attempt at a bad joke. I am a smoker and when my friends start nagging me to quit I always pull out that alzheimers thing. Actually, for a while they thought it was true but new studies have refuted it. But it's fun to tell my nagging friends that although I may get lung cancer someday, it's better than getting alzheimers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Okay, I swear somewhere on here in a comment from someone who had cancer, that a doctor told the patient there was a negative side to treated Celiac re: cancer, and it had to do with nutrition boosting the cancer growth.

No, I'll never find it - it was 2 years ago...search away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike212 Rookie

Okay, I swear somewhere on here in a comment from someone who had cancer, that a doctor told the patient there was a negative side to treated Celiac re: cancer, and it had to do with nutrition boosting the cancer growth.

No, I'll never find it - it was 2 years ago...search away.

so it could potentially slow it down right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bartfull Rising Star

I don't know. When friends of mine had cancer one of the things their doctors stressed was getting good nutrition so they would have a stronger immune system to fight it. Also, wasting is one of the big problems with cancer so it would make sense that you need good nutrition to prevent or at least hold off that wasting.

 

Also, I firmly believe that many of my Mom's family members had celiac and EVERY ONE of them died of cancer. Except for Mom, none of them were gluten-free, but they all had the symptoms.

 

If everything we have learned about celiac says that untreated celiac can lead to cancer, why would anyone lean the other way? I mean, even if what Prickly said is true and some doctor claimed that treating celiac can lead to cancer, we ALL know that most doctors are worse than clueless.

 

Eat. Eat healthy. Eat whole foods. Not only will your celiac symptoms subside and your body heal, but you will feel better, have more energy, and therefore you will enjoy your life more.

 

OK, time to step down from my soapbox now. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pricklypear1971 Community Regular

I don't know. When friends of mine had cancer one of the things their doctors stressed was getting good nutrition so they would have a stronger immune system to fight it. Also, wasting is one of the big problems with cancer so it would make sense that you need good nutrition to prevent or at least hold off that wasting.

Also, I firmly believe that many of my Mom's family members had celiac and EVERY ONE of them died of cancer. Except for Mom, none of them were gluten-free, but they all had the symptoms.

If everything we have learned about celiac says that untreated celiac can lead to cancer, why would anyone lean the other way? I mean, even if what Prickly said is true and some doctor claimed that treating celiac can lead to cancer, we ALL know that most doctors are worse than clueless.

Eat. Eat healthy. Eat whole foods. Not only will your celiac symptoms subside and your body heal, but you will feel better, have more energy, and therefore you will enjoy your life more.

OK, time to step down from my soapbox now. :)

Okay, back up. I didn't say treating Celiac can lead to cancer. What I said is there's a post somewhere on this forum from a cancer patient whose oncologist told her that increased nutrition benefits the cancer cells as well as the rest of the patient.

I did reply to the reply, above, but the forum ate it...

You can't selectively activate Celiac. It isn't a "treatment" for cancer. I'm not an oncologist, but I can understand how malabsorption can starve cancer along with the rest if the body's cells. And, I can see how a nutrient boost from reduced malabsorption could help cancer grow.

Ask an oncologist. I am not one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bartfull Rising Star

Sorry Prickly, I wasn't questioning YOU, I was just questioning what that doctor said. I'm no doctor either, but from what I learned with Kelly, certain things (like sugar) will feed cancer, but healthy foods feed the body and the immune system. I guess what I am getting at is this: if *I* had cancer, there is no way I would start eating gluten again in hopes that the malabsorption would slow the cancer's growth. Instead I would eat lots of good foods like broccoli and cut out the sugar. (And still make out my will.)

 

And when they pronounced me terminal, THEN I would go back to eating ice cream, and MAYBE I would have a burger and fries or some blueberry pie - but probably not because I'd already be feeling lousy enough without adding celiac symptoms.

 

It sounds to me that the OP might have cancer and might be toying with the idea of using gluten to slow it down. I am NOT a doctor, but to me the idea seems VERY counterproductive.

 

And OP, if I'm wrong, first of all I apologize, and second of all, I'll be glad (if you DON'T have cancer.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GottaSki Mentor

As I understand it:

 

Metabolic Cancer Therapy -- removing all carbohydrates which turn to glucose in the body -- all cells, including cancer cells use glucose as fuel.  When carbohydrates are removed all cells EXCEPT cancer cells can switch to ketones for fuel - thus the cancer cells are starved.  Our healthy cells have flexibility in fuel - cancer cells do not.

 

In my opinion - this should not be the only treatment for cancer -- but certainly cannot hurt should a person be diagnosed with cancer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular

From what I understand, untreated celiac can make certain forms less likely to occur, and certain forms more likely to happen. I believe untreated celiacs are more likely to have cancer of the small bowels, lymphoma, and pancreatic cancer (I think). That makes sense to me because of the damage inflammation would cause (lymphoma) and the area's directly affected my celiac disease that have been repeatedly hurt (intestinal cancer).

 

On the other hand, I know that celiacs are less likely to get breast cancer along with a few others (can't remember which).  This comes partially from the malnourished state that many celiacs live in. It's almost like being forced to fast, and it is documented that animals who fast tend to avoid cancers. It is thought that it has something to do with the resultant lowered levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). When these levels are lowered, your body is not focusing on making new cells but rather on taking care of the cells it has. This is possibly the link that causes some celiac children to have delayed or stunted growth; it's partially the reason some have a failure to thrive.

 

Lower IGF-1 levels are thought to be linked to lower cancer levels, and are often caused by malnutrition and low caloric intake; it also gets lower on a low GI diet. Higher IGF-1 occurs in some  individuals who consume a diet high in dairy, and possibly a diet high in protein. Excessively high levels are caused by a pituitary problem, as are excessively low levels.

 

I now know this stuff because I recently discovered I have excessively high IGF-1 - weird for a celiac. There are a lot of links out ther on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Loey Rising Star

From what I understand, untreated celiac can make certain forms less likely to occur, and certain forms more likely to happen. I believe untreated celiacs are more likely to have cancer of the small bowels, lymphoma, and pancreatic cancer (I think). That makes sense to me because of the damage inflammation would cause (lymphoma) and the area's directly affected my celiac disease that have been repeatedly hurt (intestinal cancer).

On the other hand, I know that celiacs are less likely to get breast cancer along with a few others (can't remember which). This comes partially from the malnourished state that many celiacs live in. It's almost like being forced to fast, and it is documented that animals who fast tend to avoid cancers. It is thought that it has something to do with the resultant lowered levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). When these levels are lowered, your body is not focusing on making new cells but rather on taking care of the cells it has. This is possibly the link that causes some celiac children to have delayed or stunted growth; it's partially the reason some have a failure to thrive.

Lower IGF-1 levels are thought to be linked to lower cancer levels, and are often caused by malnutrition and low caloric intake; it also gets lower on a low GI diet. Higher IGF-1 occurs in some individuals who consume a diet high in dairy, and possibly a diet high in protein. Excessively high levels are caused by a pituitary problem, as are excessively low levels.

I now know this stuff because I recently discovered I have excessively high IGF-1 - weird for a celiac. There are a lot of links out ther on it.

I have Chronic Leukocytic Leukemia. The better my intestines, the better my immune system. The better my immune system the lower my white blood cell count. The lower my white blood count the less I see my oncologist. Not seeing my oncologist as frequently makes me a happy camper!! I do follow a strict gluten-free diet.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
    • Tanner L
      Constantly! I don't want everything to cost as much as a KIND bar, as great as they are.  Happy most of the info is available to us to make smart decisions for our health, just need to do a little more research. 
×
×
  • Create New...