Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Should I Get The Endoscopy?
0

12 posts in this topic

I have tested positive for both genetic markers and based on my symptoms and history of illness, the GI dr. said it's safe to assume that I have Celiac (I definitely have a gluten intolerance).  He also wanted me to schedule an Endoscopy but I'm debating on it since I have been gluten-free (as well as dairy/egg/sugar/alcohol/pop/processed foods) to heal my Leaky Gut Syndrome. 

 

Is it worth it to get it done even if my intestine has already started healing?  Thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

In my opinion - yes.

 

You have no way of knowing at this point what damage has been done.  For some of us healing takes a very long time - and in rare cases (mine) damage continued for several years after gluten was completely removed.

 

While I hope that you heal quickly, I think it prudent to take a good look along with biopsies even if you recently removed gluten.  This way if you don't heal as quickly as hoped there will be something to compare down the road.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are pros and cons to having a celiac diagnosis.

Pros can include being able to follow up to monitor the healing process, can carry some clout when dealing with friends, family, or even doctors who don't believe you, or could help you stay motivated to avoid gluten. In some countries with nationalized health care, there are monetary benefits to help offset the costs of foods and in the U.S. you can take tax deductions for the difference in the cost of gluten free foods.

Cons could include being turned down or having to pay more for medical insurance (in the U.S.) or having to go through the retox period. The equivalent of six pieces of bread a day for six weeks sounds like hell to me. You'd have to have an invasive procedure done, plus, there is always the potential of having a false negative test result.

Before you decide, I'd head over to the publicity section of the forum and find some of the fairly recent posts about future testing methods that are being developed. There is talk about more reliable testing methods that use different markers than are currently looked at, shorter retox periods, and more accuracy.

For those who are already gluten free, I'd also take into consideration what your doctor thinks is needed, how much of a hard time your friends and family may give you without the full-on diagnosis, and if you have the willpower to stay gluten free without it.

But I think it really is a personal decision. Some people seem to feel the need to have the formal diagnosis. For others, what their bodies are telling them is enough.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are pros and cons to having a celiac diagnosis.

Pros can include being able to follow up to monitor the healing process, can carry some clout when dealing with friends, family, or even doctors who don't believe you, or could help you stay motivated to avoid gluten. In some countries with nationalized health care, there are monetary benefits to help offset the costs of foods and in the U.S. you can take tax deductions for the difference in the cost of gluten free foods.

Cons could include being turned down or having to pay more for medical insurance (in the U.S.) or having to go through the retox period. The equivalent of six pieces of bread a day for six weeks sounds like hell to me. You'd have to have an invasive procedure done, plus, there is always the potential of having a false negative test result.

Before you decide, I'd head over to the publicity section of the forum and find some of the fairly recent posts about future testing methods that are being developed. There is talk about more reliable testing methods that use different markers than are currently looked at, shorter retox periods, and more accuracy.

For those who are already gluten free, I'd also take into consideration what your doctor thinks is needed, how much of a hard time your friends and family may give you without the full-on diagnosis, and if you have the willpower to stay gluten free without it.

But I think it really is a personal decision. Some people seem to feel the need to have the formal diagnosis. For others, what their bodies are telling them is enough.

 

I don't disagree with much of this -- except -- I have not heard any major Celiac Disease Center suggest more than the equivalent of 1-2 pieces of glutenous bread when conducting a gluten challenge.

 

To be clear...in this case I was suggesting that this person go ahead and have the endoscopy the doctor recommended -- it didn't sound like they were talking about doing a challenge -- just an endoscopy to take a look and biopsy the small intestine in it's current condition.  

 

Perhaps I misunderstood.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had the blood tests yet? DGP, tTG and EMA?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I don't disagree with much of this -- except -- I have not heard any major Celiac Disease Center suggest more than the equivalent of 1-2 pieces of glutenous bread when conducting a gluten challenge.

 

To be clear...in this case I was suggesting that this person go ahead and have the endoscopy the doctor recommended -- it didn't sound like they were talking about doing a challenge -- just an endoscopy to take a look and biopsy the small intestine in it's current condition.  

 

Perhaps I misunderstood.

TurdFerguson15 said he was already gluten free, which means a retox would be needed for any testing to be done at this point.

But good to learn that less gluten may be required than what others have said elsewhere.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TurdFerguson15 said he was already gluten free, which means a retox would be needed for any testing to be done at this point.

But good to learn that less gluten may be required than what others have said elsewhere.

 

Yes, gluten should not be removed prior to diagnosis -- but some do have an endoscopy after gluten is removed without a challenge as they are not able to tolerate the challenge to take a look at damage and/or biopsy.

 

I was answering only the question as posed.  This member said they already know they are intolerant -- which I took to mean they can not safely ingest gluten.

 

I already said perhaps I was mistaken, but I was answering this particular question -- not a proper diagnosis/gluten challenge procedural question.

 

I also second Nicole's question -- was a complete celiac antibody panel competed?  If not this should be completed as well.  Whether a gluten challenge is possible for this person and how long they have been gluten free would determine whether they should re-introduce gluten and for how long.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GottaSki, I have to ask. 

For purely MEDICAL reasons, what good is the endoscopy/biopsy in your opinion? I know that some people like to get retested later to confirm that healing is taking place, but what benefit is this other than peace of mind when the treatment doesn't actually vary at all?

I'm all for follow up appointments, monitoring hormone and vitamin levels, etc. But the invasive procedure - especially after reading so much about doctors who don't seem to know how to test properly and false negatives - I'll admit that I don't see the need unless you need the diagnosis in order for insurance to pay for something additional.
 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GottaSki, I have to ask. 

For purely MEDICAL reasons, what good is the endoscopy/biopsy in your opinion? I know that some people like to get retested later to confirm that healing is taking place, but what benefit is this other than peace of mind when the treatment doesn't actually vary at all?

I'm all for follow up appointments, monitoring hormone and vitamin levels, etc. But the invasive procedure - especially after reading so much about doctors who don't seem to know how to test properly and false negatives - I'll admit that I don't see the need unless you need the diagnosis in order for insurance to pay for something additional.

 

 

Some of us do not improve after completely removing gluten - in fact I got worse.  Without the initial endoscopy along with full celiac antibody panel and nutrient level data obtained at my diagnosis - I would have had a much harder time remaining completely gluten-free -- after all removing gluten wasn't helping.

 

I had annual biopsies...not to simply "check" or "follow-up" -- I had them because I was not improving -- if the diet alone would have brought symptom resolution - great - for me and others with a multitude of autoimmune symptoms this was not the case.

 

How could I have known four years ago that I would need the data gathered at diagnosis?  I didn't - therefore I strongly promote gathering all possible starting data for those just starting down this road.  I can't tell you how many folks I have helped sort through having to go through a gluten challenge because they or their doctors decide a diagnosis is necessary to sort out their health issues.

 

I have no problem with someone that removes all gluten - improves and never has a biopsy - some of my children and grands are in this catagory -- but they also had the example of what decades of undiagnosed celiac disease looks like -- all cases are different.

 

Aside from my personal story -- there have been many members that had all negative blood work that were only diagnosed via endoscopic biopsy.  

 

Another great reason for official diagnosis is children -- I was diagnosed when my children were teens and young adult -- they would not have had the health improvements they have had without my diagnosis as most of their blood work was negative - only one had a single positive antibody test -- because they carry the genes and had a variety of autoimmune symptoms without major digestive issues they would never have removed gluten without my diagnosis and symptom history.

 

There are so many variances in diagnosis with Celiac Disease -- until better tests become available -- I will continue to strongly promote using all the tools that are currently available to us -- as imperfect as they are.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GottaSki, sorry. More questions. If you don't mind, I'm curious if you ever figured out why weren't you healing in the first four years?

And out of concern, I have to ask, have you at least started to heal now?

And I'll admit, I'm only questioning going through with the invasive testing for those that who are already certain that gluten is causing them problems, have already gone gluten free, and are completely committed to staying gluten-free.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GottaSki, sorry. More questions. If you don't mind, I'm curious if you ever figured out why weren't you healing in the first four years?

And out of concern, I have to ask, have you at least started to heal now?

And I'll admit, I'm only questioning going through with the invasive testing for those that who are already certain that gluten is causing them problems, have already gone gluten free, and are completely committed to staying gluten-free.

 

I'll PM you...as we have added way too much speculation and additional question to this new member's thread.

 

TF15...let us know if you have anymore questions :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are pros and cons to having a celiac diagnosis.

Pros can include being able to follow up to monitor the healing process, can carry some clout when dealing with friends, family, or even doctors who don't believe you, or could help you stay motivated to avoid gluten. In some countries with nationalized health care, there are monetary benefits to help offset the costs of foods and in the U.S. you can take tax deductions for the difference in the cost of gluten free foods.

 

The tax deduction in the US really isn't there.  It falls under medical and now you have to reach 10% of your adjusted gross income to even be able to deduct it.  Most people do not ever reach this minimum.  It will also set you up for an audit and I certainly do not want to deal with the IRS. The amount of record keeping required to document true deductions is not worth the effort on something you most likely will never reach the minimum for.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,688
    • Total Posts
      921,757
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Do you mean something like a protein powder you could mix up?  A lot of them in the US seem to be gluten free.  Maybe just go to your local store and read all the labels?
    • Yeah I ended up allergic to corn, olives, sesame, whey, and peanuts and intolerant to dairy, soy, yeast, enzyme issues with breaking down meats, and egg yolks, along with extreme bloat with any kind of carbs/sugars in moderate amounts. And very adverse reactions to certain artificial sweeteners. So your not alone in all the other issues cropping up, it happens as our bodies adjust.  I eat a bunch of stir frys with veggies, egg whites, plenty of  avocados, and toasted and raw forms of almonds, coconut, cashews, walnuts, hemp seeds, pumpkin seeds, flax seeds, sancha inchi seeds, chia seeds, and sunflower seeds in all forms including making them into butters, spreads, and incorporating them into sauces.   Most meals are forms of soups, omelettes, and stir frys. I do the seeds and nuts on rotation same with my veggies and snack on fruits in small amounts along with some homemade baked goods I make for markets. I do suggest a rotation of foods, my dietician said I need to rotate my foods to prevent more issues, making sure I am off one one for at least 7-14 days at a time completely. I find changing up the spices and rotating my cuisine base works well. I also make puddings, and protein shakes along with nut/seed milks, and different bases and extract flavorings to get my random cravings Taken care of. Guess take what you can from this and and see how it can help you,    As to the tinging, I ended up with both B vitamin and magnesium deficiency issues, the magnesium one caused a fire like tingling in my arms, legs and back, along with muscle pain. Ended up on a doctors best powder form of it so I can dose it out right, and found epsom salt bathes helped.  
    • Hi, I've gained so much knowledge on this forum over the past few months, which I am so thankful for. I can see how much hell people are going through with this disease and it's so lovely to see how much support and advice people give to others on here. I'd like a little bit of reassurance and advice myself from anyone that can help. I've been gluten free for six months. Two weeks after going gluten free I realised I also had a problem with corn so cut out processed food. Over the following weeks and months I continually had problems with food; fruit, dairy, a lot of vegetables, nuts, soya....it's basically dwindled down to just eating potatoes (not white potatoes), cucumber, lettuce, small amounts of red onion, spring onion, sprouts and beetroot. There may be more things I could be okay with but to be honest I'm too scared to try.  Is this all normal? Am I an extreme case? I've been taking some digestive enzymes and probiotics for about six weeks, my acid reflux has dramatically decreased but I always have a lot of loud noises going on in my guts, I'm guessing this is the probiotics working.  I've lost nearly 3st in weight since this started - which I'm not complaining about as I was overweight due to thyroid problems. I've had loads of blood tests done recently, all organs are working 'great' according to my doctor, the only thing they've picked up on is ketones, I seem to be having a glucose problem, which might explain my exhaustion and weight loss. I also have permanent numbness and sometimes tingling in one of my legs and sometimes hands and one shoulder, I thought it could have vitamin B12 deficiency but that's okay according to blood tests. I would be greatful for any replies. Thanks for reading.
    • Hi everyone, I am doing job in restaurant at evening 5 to 12 during working hours no time to do a dinner. I'm thinking to make a shake but don't know the gluten free vitamin or supplement brand which one is good for me and easily available in Berlin Germany to make me fit cause last one week i feel weak. I'm 28 year old. Sincerely
    • Hey there just wanted to warn anyone that has other allergies- these crackers may not be a good choice! I'm mildly sensitive to MSG- I only react if there's a giant amount like in Chinese food or Ramen noodles, etc.  I literally have a to eat TONS of a the offending food before reacting.  Anyway, I was excited to try these Trader Joes pumpkin crackers, kept hearing about them on the radio .... and they're gluten free!  (I have Hashi's).  I ate about 3/4 of the box last night. Woke up this morning with a red itchy face and nasal congestion, headache, anxiety. Hallmark symptoms for me of high MSG intake. (It does say yeast extract on the side but it's pretty far down the list). So if you're sensitive.... stay away! Apparently these particular crackers are loaded with it. 
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,691
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    EllianaEthan
    Joined