Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Should I Get The Endoscopy?
0

12 posts in this topic

I have tested positive for both genetic markers and based on my symptoms and history of illness, the GI dr. said it's safe to assume that I have Celiac (I definitely have a gluten intolerance).  He also wanted me to schedule an Endoscopy but I'm debating on it since I have been gluten-free (as well as dairy/egg/sugar/alcohol/pop/processed foods) to heal my Leaky Gut Syndrome. 

 

Is it worth it to get it done even if my intestine has already started healing?  Thanks!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

In my opinion - yes.

 

You have no way of knowing at this point what damage has been done.  For some of us healing takes a very long time - and in rare cases (mine) damage continued for several years after gluten was completely removed.

 

While I hope that you heal quickly, I think it prudent to take a good look along with biopsies even if you recently removed gluten.  This way if you don't heal as quickly as hoped there will be something to compare down the road.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are pros and cons to having a celiac diagnosis.

Pros can include being able to follow up to monitor the healing process, can carry some clout when dealing with friends, family, or even doctors who don't believe you, or could help you stay motivated to avoid gluten. In some countries with nationalized health care, there are monetary benefits to help offset the costs of foods and in the U.S. you can take tax deductions for the difference in the cost of gluten free foods.

Cons could include being turned down or having to pay more for medical insurance (in the U.S.) or having to go through the retox period. The equivalent of six pieces of bread a day for six weeks sounds like hell to me. You'd have to have an invasive procedure done, plus, there is always the potential of having a false negative test result.

Before you decide, I'd head over to the publicity section of the forum and find some of the fairly recent posts about future testing methods that are being developed. There is talk about more reliable testing methods that use different markers than are currently looked at, shorter retox periods, and more accuracy.

For those who are already gluten free, I'd also take into consideration what your doctor thinks is needed, how much of a hard time your friends and family may give you without the full-on diagnosis, and if you have the willpower to stay gluten free without it.

But I think it really is a personal decision. Some people seem to feel the need to have the formal diagnosis. For others, what their bodies are telling them is enough.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are pros and cons to having a celiac diagnosis.

Pros can include being able to follow up to monitor the healing process, can carry some clout when dealing with friends, family, or even doctors who don't believe you, or could help you stay motivated to avoid gluten. In some countries with nationalized health care, there are monetary benefits to help offset the costs of foods and in the U.S. you can take tax deductions for the difference in the cost of gluten free foods.

Cons could include being turned down or having to pay more for medical insurance (in the U.S.) or having to go through the retox period. The equivalent of six pieces of bread a day for six weeks sounds like hell to me. You'd have to have an invasive procedure done, plus, there is always the potential of having a false negative test result.

Before you decide, I'd head over to the publicity section of the forum and find some of the fairly recent posts about future testing methods that are being developed. There is talk about more reliable testing methods that use different markers than are currently looked at, shorter retox periods, and more accuracy.

For those who are already gluten free, I'd also take into consideration what your doctor thinks is needed, how much of a hard time your friends and family may give you without the full-on diagnosis, and if you have the willpower to stay gluten free without it.

But I think it really is a personal decision. Some people seem to feel the need to have the formal diagnosis. For others, what their bodies are telling them is enough.

 

I don't disagree with much of this -- except -- I have not heard any major Celiac Disease Center suggest more than the equivalent of 1-2 pieces of glutenous bread when conducting a gluten challenge.

 

To be clear...in this case I was suggesting that this person go ahead and have the endoscopy the doctor recommended -- it didn't sound like they were talking about doing a challenge -- just an endoscopy to take a look and biopsy the small intestine in it's current condition.  

 

Perhaps I misunderstood.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had the blood tests yet? DGP, tTG and EMA?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I don't disagree with much of this -- except -- I have not heard any major Celiac Disease Center suggest more than the equivalent of 1-2 pieces of glutenous bread when conducting a gluten challenge.

 

To be clear...in this case I was suggesting that this person go ahead and have the endoscopy the doctor recommended -- it didn't sound like they were talking about doing a challenge -- just an endoscopy to take a look and biopsy the small intestine in it's current condition.  

 

Perhaps I misunderstood.

TurdFerguson15 said he was already gluten free, which means a retox would be needed for any testing to be done at this point.

But good to learn that less gluten may be required than what others have said elsewhere.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TurdFerguson15 said he was already gluten free, which means a retox would be needed for any testing to be done at this point.

But good to learn that less gluten may be required than what others have said elsewhere.

 

Yes, gluten should not be removed prior to diagnosis -- but some do have an endoscopy after gluten is removed without a challenge as they are not able to tolerate the challenge to take a look at damage and/or biopsy.

 

I was answering only the question as posed.  This member said they already know they are intolerant -- which I took to mean they can not safely ingest gluten.

 

I already said perhaps I was mistaken, but I was answering this particular question -- not a proper diagnosis/gluten challenge procedural question.

 

I also second Nicole's question -- was a complete celiac antibody panel competed?  If not this should be completed as well.  Whether a gluten challenge is possible for this person and how long they have been gluten free would determine whether they should re-introduce gluten and for how long.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GottaSki, I have to ask. 

For purely MEDICAL reasons, what good is the endoscopy/biopsy in your opinion? I know that some people like to get retested later to confirm that healing is taking place, but what benefit is this other than peace of mind when the treatment doesn't actually vary at all?

I'm all for follow up appointments, monitoring hormone and vitamin levels, etc. But the invasive procedure - especially after reading so much about doctors who don't seem to know how to test properly and false negatives - I'll admit that I don't see the need unless you need the diagnosis in order for insurance to pay for something additional.
 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GottaSki, I have to ask. 

For purely MEDICAL reasons, what good is the endoscopy/biopsy in your opinion? I know that some people like to get retested later to confirm that healing is taking place, but what benefit is this other than peace of mind when the treatment doesn't actually vary at all?

I'm all for follow up appointments, monitoring hormone and vitamin levels, etc. But the invasive procedure - especially after reading so much about doctors who don't seem to know how to test properly and false negatives - I'll admit that I don't see the need unless you need the diagnosis in order for insurance to pay for something additional.

 

 

Some of us do not improve after completely removing gluten - in fact I got worse.  Without the initial endoscopy along with full celiac antibody panel and nutrient level data obtained at my diagnosis - I would have had a much harder time remaining completely gluten-free -- after all removing gluten wasn't helping.

 

I had annual biopsies...not to simply "check" or "follow-up" -- I had them because I was not improving -- if the diet alone would have brought symptom resolution - great - for me and others with a multitude of autoimmune symptoms this was not the case.

 

How could I have known four years ago that I would need the data gathered at diagnosis?  I didn't - therefore I strongly promote gathering all possible starting data for those just starting down this road.  I can't tell you how many folks I have helped sort through having to go through a gluten challenge because they or their doctors decide a diagnosis is necessary to sort out their health issues.

 

I have no problem with someone that removes all gluten - improves and never has a biopsy - some of my children and grands are in this catagory -- but they also had the example of what decades of undiagnosed celiac disease looks like -- all cases are different.

 

Aside from my personal story -- there have been many members that had all negative blood work that were only diagnosed via endoscopic biopsy.  

 

Another great reason for official diagnosis is children -- I was diagnosed when my children were teens and young adult -- they would not have had the health improvements they have had without my diagnosis as most of their blood work was negative - only one had a single positive antibody test -- because they carry the genes and had a variety of autoimmune symptoms without major digestive issues they would never have removed gluten without my diagnosis and symptom history.

 

There are so many variances in diagnosis with Celiac Disease -- until better tests become available -- I will continue to strongly promote using all the tools that are currently available to us -- as imperfect as they are.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GottaSki, sorry. More questions. If you don't mind, I'm curious if you ever figured out why weren't you healing in the first four years?

And out of concern, I have to ask, have you at least started to heal now?

And I'll admit, I'm only questioning going through with the invasive testing for those that who are already certain that gluten is causing them problems, have already gone gluten free, and are completely committed to staying gluten-free.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GottaSki, sorry. More questions. If you don't mind, I'm curious if you ever figured out why weren't you healing in the first four years?

And out of concern, I have to ask, have you at least started to heal now?

And I'll admit, I'm only questioning going through with the invasive testing for those that who are already certain that gluten is causing them problems, have already gone gluten free, and are completely committed to staying gluten-free.

 

I'll PM you...as we have added way too much speculation and additional question to this new member's thread.

 

TF15...let us know if you have anymore questions :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are pros and cons to having a celiac diagnosis.

Pros can include being able to follow up to monitor the healing process, can carry some clout when dealing with friends, family, or even doctors who don't believe you, or could help you stay motivated to avoid gluten. In some countries with nationalized health care, there are monetary benefits to help offset the costs of foods and in the U.S. you can take tax deductions for the difference in the cost of gluten free foods.

 

The tax deduction in the US really isn't there.  It falls under medical and now you have to reach 10% of your adjusted gross income to even be able to deduct it.  Most people do not ever reach this minimum.  It will also set you up for an audit and I certainly do not want to deal with the IRS. The amount of record keeping required to document true deductions is not worth the effort on something you most likely will never reach the minimum for.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      103,902
    • Total Posts
      919,563
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Gluten does WHAT to the brain?
      I'm ok, just a little tired right now.  Lots of stress getting elderly parents and in-laws taken care of. My thyroid took a dip low (no surprise there) so I had to increase dose by a quarter grain. Overall, I am not dragging all day but waking up and getting going in the morning is slowwwwwwwww.  I'm sure you understand that! Yeah........Barty.  I thought of her for DAYS on end and it just saddens me to no end that such good people are the ones being taken.  Sometimes life is just so unfair. We all know that but there are times when it really hits you in the gut. There are times I think they are the lucky ones with the way the world is going these days. This terrorism plague is unnerving and I am really getting mad about it. Dear God, please stop this shyte!  I also miss nvsmom and others who have not been heard from. I hope she is feeling better and is just busy with life.  I got glutened on vacation about 6 years ago on the first day in Liverpool.  Jeez, was I sick!  I know how you feel but take heart........that was the last time I was bagged on vacation.  The longer you are gluten free and heal, the faster you recover from hits. You also get very good at not being glutened. It has been almost 2 years since it happened to me last so after 11 years gluten-free, I think I am doing well with that. I still have a little work to do with the vitamin D levels but I work so seeing much sun isn't happening.  My levels have doubled but they are still under 50. This whole Celiac thing is a part time job!
    • Test Results
      Hang in there SLLRUNNER...it is hard and frustrating.  Good job getting that appointment moved up.  I've done too...I've called daily looking for cancellations.  I can also remember counting down the days until my appointment.  ((((Hugs)))) and please let us know how it goes.
    • So I've been glutened....
      Miso soup has gluten in it, doesn't it? =/ I know that I've been avoiding it, which is a big shame because I adore miso!
    • Kissing and gluten
      Hi guys. I know this is a topic that has come up before, but I'd appreciate a little bit of advice. I've been 'courting' a guy for the past few months; nothing has happened yet but we have a proper date in a few weeks which is likely to lead to kissing. He didn't even know what a ceoliac was until a few days ago; I don't think he'd caught the hints that I'd been dropping beforehand. English isn't his first language - he's east Asian. Anyway, I've heard about being potentially glutened via a kiss. How do I broach this? I don't want to scare him off or make him think that I'm a lot of hard work; I know, I know, he's going to have to accept me as I am, etc. but for someone new to the entire thing, it is likely overwhelming. It would be for me if I'd never heard of it! Do I laughingly bring it up beforehand? We aren't going for food so if he isn't eating, just having a cup of tea, will I still need to be careful? If this seems safe, do I just let him kiss me and then bring up afterwards that any future kisses after food will have different precautions?  It all feels so clinical! He's a lovely guy so I do think he'll be understanding, but if anyone has any advice of first hand experience on how to approach the topic without it being a weird moment, that would be great.  
    • gluten-free...how long til I feel better?
      Hi there.  I had been sick for over a year and decided to try and go off gluten within 4 weeks i started to feel better than i had for so long! But my problem is now i test negative for celiac because i have no gluten in my body. I have been told to go back on gluten so it can be determined if i have it or not but im not willing to go back to feeling that sick again!
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Jmg  »  admin

      Hello Admin!
      I don't know whether this is of interest to post on your articles feed:
      http://pratt.duke.edu/about/news/window-guts-brain
      Kind Regards,
      Matt
      · 2 replies
    • celiac sharon  »  cyclinglady

      Hello cycling lady, have you noticed my picture is showing up as you?  Have no idea why but it's rather disconcerting to see my picture and your words 😉  Do you know how to fix it?  You seem to have far more experience with this board than I do
      · 1 reply
    • Larry Gessner  »  cyclinglady

      Hi There, I don't know if there is a place for videos in the forum. I just watched "The Truth About Gluten" I think it is a good video. I would like to share it somewhere but don't know where it should go. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
      Here is the link if you have never watched it.
      https://youtu.be/IU6jVEwpjnE Thank You,
      Larry
      · 2 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      60,948
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    VER
    Joined