Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positive Blood Tests But No Biopsy


Rebecca92

Recommended Posts

Rebecca92 Apprentice

So I was diagnosed via a celiac panel approximately three years ago and have been gluten free since (minus the rookie mistakes and CC) My symptoms have definitely gotten better but I don't feel 100% so I decided to see a gastroenterologist I've been having a lot of nausea with some vomitting along with having to run to the bathroom a few time a day but had trouble going off and on . While I'll admit that sometimes I mess up and CC myself (I live with gluten eaters lol) there's no way it's gluten related I am extra careful when preparing and choosing food and cosmetic products. I had an endoscopy at a drs.office a few months ago and they did find a small ulcer and said that my small intestine was inflamed but didn't seem too worried about it, but honestly I don't trust the guy anymore he spent a total of two minutes talking about my results :\ but that's another rant. They gave me horse pills to take twice a day before I eat and being that I'm young and in college of course I never ended up taking them all. The gastro doc gave me a two week supply of an acid blocker to try to heal up an ulcer if there is one.  The gastro was surprised that the positive celiac blood test wasn't followed with a biopsy of the duodenum because there are false positives with blood tests. He said they would call in two weeks and see how I feel, and if I'm not feeling great then we should go ahead and schedule and endoscopy and a colonoscopy. Obviously I'm not thrilled with this idea so I'm hoping the acid blocker works (which the nasea is getting better) but if I'm still having "bathroom" issues and an extremely tender abdomen on the left side I'm thinking about doing the tests. For the endo he said that if I am a celiac even if I've been gluten free for almost three years I will most likely show some damage and also mentioned checking to make sure there's not a small bowel malignant tumor or something and the colonoscopy to check for microscopic colitis. I'm thinking about maybe just doing the endo for now and only doing the other if I get no answers. It was extremely scary to hear him say the word cancer he said that about 3% of celiacs get the malignant tumors. I was just wondering if anybody had any advice or if anyone knew what exactly he meant by false positive, if it wasn't celiac then what else could it be? I mean whatever it is it obviously likes a gluten-free diet so there's no way I'm going back but it just has me wondering, the doctor didn't really explain much about false positives. I'm sorry if this seems long or rambling but this is the only place I can ask these kinds of questions talk about these things without people getting grossed out or confused lol unfortunately I am the only celiac I know in R. The chapter in my town always meets on saturdays...and I always work saturdays. Go figure lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I'm pretty tired to respond, but I have to say that if you've been diligent about being gluten free for three years, you should not have any damage in your intestines.  We have others here who have been scoped years later and their intestines show no damage.  That said, you may be glutening yourself while living with gluten eaters.  But, maybe not.

 

You might have something else going on like Crohn's or maybe just picked up h. pylori which could be causing your ulcer.  So, I'd go with the endoscopy and colonoscopy.  If they do test for Celiac, make sure they follow the procedures outline on the University of Chicago's celiac website.  At least six or seven tissue samples should be taken.  But, if you've been gluten-free for years, your blood test will be negative and it's a crap shoot regarding the biopsy.  

 

Good luck!  Research and get empowered! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WinterSong Community Regular

Definitely check out the University of Chicago's page. My understanding is that false positives are rare, but it is definitely something to look into because you're still experiencing symptoms, and the other possibilities are serious. 

 

Your biopsy and test results will most likely come back as negative. If you get a gene test done, you can see if you even carry the gene to have Celiac. It could bring you a little closer to figuring out what's going on. 

 

If you do have Celiac, you could be dealing with CC or a secondary food intolerance (which is common).

 

Good luck and feel better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
    • Tanner L
      Constantly! I don't want everything to cost as much as a KIND bar, as great as they are.  Happy most of the info is available to us to make smart decisions for our health, just need to do a little more research. 
×
×
  • Create New...