Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Help With Blood Work
0

6 posts in this topic

Hello,

Last week we had our 2 year old sons blood tested for a bunch of allergies.  His symptoms have been ongoing and never changing diarrhea since birth.  At every new stage of new milk or formula Dr would say oh its just the change it will get better. Well it never did and so I brought him to a Pediatric GI.  He also has an unexplained eczema that he has had also since he was a newborn.  The test results are negative for Celiac but I would like your opinion.......also he was negative for the long list of food allergies that they tested for.

 

Here are his results.

IgA 58. Range is 11-134

IgA1 53. Range is 7-132

IgA2 6. Range is 1-23

 

IgE is 28. Range <61.

 

tTG Negative

tTG antibody IgA was 3.10. Range is <20.

 

Thank you everyone for your help.  I know that he can test negative and then we have an endoscopy done and they find that he does indeed have Celiac.  

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

IgE looks normal so it doesn't look like an allergy (as far as I know).

 

I'm not sure what the three types of IgA testing were for. I've never seen that done. He does appear to make adequate levels of IgA though so his tTG IgA should be fairly accurate... as accurate as it can be in toddler.  His tTG IgA is negative but those tests do tend to miss celiacs who are toddlers more often than adults.  The tTG IgA is 75-95% sensitive so there is a 5-25% chance his test is a false negative - probaby closer to the lower end because his IgA levels are adequate. This report discusses it on page 10-12: http://www.worldgastroenterology.org/assets/export/userfiles/2012_Celiac%20Disease_long_FINAL.pdf

 

As you pointed out, he could still have celiac disease in spite of the negative test. Are the other tests available to him? This is the full panel:

tTG IgA and tTG IgG

DGP iGA and DGP IgG (best test for children)

EMA IgA (detects more advanced cases)

AGA IgA and AGA IgG (older and less reliable test thought by some to also show non-celiac gluten intolerance - NCGI)

 

The DGP test might show you something, or even the IgG based tests...

 

There is also the chance that he has NCGI in which case he will have all the same horrible symptoms of celiac disease but not the villi damage (the blood tests look for autoantibodies that cause the villi damage). All you can really do is go gluten-free to test that theory- once all other testing is done.

 

My boys all had negative tTG igA tests, which were the only tests available to us, but I am a celiac and 2/3 of my kids had symptoms so I made them all gluten-free, and they are all much healthier because of it. You may have to go gluten-free without a doctors order; if you do, give the gluten-free diet at least 3 months before you judge it's effectiveness as healing takes time.

 

Good luck in what ever you decide to do.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just copying and pasting what I wrote in your other post :)

 

this link helped me learn about the different types of blood immunoglobulins when I first started researching: http://kidshealth.or...oglobulins.html

 

the following tests are not diagnostic of celiac, but instead tell you that your son makes normal levels of IgA and IgE.

 

Here are his results.
IgA 58. Range is 11-134
IgA1 53. Range is 7-132
IgA2 6. Range is 1-23

IgE is 28. Range <61.

 

The only celiac test that was completed was:

 

tTG Negative
tTG antibody IgA was 3.10. Range is <20.

 

Even though your son produces a normal amount of IgA and his TTG is negative, he really should have the DGP IgA and IgG based tests performed because they can be more helpful in finding celiac diesease in young children. 

 

take a look at the last line in this link: http://www.curecelia...-celiac-disease

 

take a look at this abstract as well regarding DGP to young children:  http://www.ncbi.nlm....pubmed/23558824

 

I'd say before moving onto the endoscopy, see if you can get the doctor to run the deamidated gliadin peptide IgA and IgG versions. 

 

good luck!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, Nicole.  I did some searching, and here was the best explanation I could find:

 

IgA Subclasses IgA1

IgA1 comprises approximately 85% of total IgA concentration in serum. Although IgA1 shows a broad resistance against several proteases, there are some that can affect / splice on the hinge region. IgA1 shows a good immune response to protein antigens and, to a lesser degree, to polysaccharide and lipopolysaccharides.

IgA2

IgA2, representing only up to 15% of total IgA in serum, plays a crucial role in the mucosa of the airways, eyes, and the gastrointestinal tract to fight against polysaccharide and lipopolysaccaride antigens. It also shows good resistance to proteolysis and many bacterial proteases, supporting the importance of IgA2 in fighting bacterial infections.

 

 


I'm not sure what the three types of IgA testing were for. I've never seen that done.


 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome! Thank you all so much! I will bring it up to the dr that I don't believe the full blood panel was done.

I was confused for sure and thought the iGA1 was apart of celiac panel.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Awesome! Thank you all so much! I will bring it up to the dr that I don't believe the full blood panel was done.

I was confused for sure and thought the iGA1 was apart of celiac panel.

 

The total serum IgA is run because about 5% of celiacs are deficient in IgA (which is higher than the regular population) which means that any IgA based testing (tTG IgA, DGP IgA, EMA IgA) that is done will most likely yield a false negative result if the patient is in fact a celiac. Those low in IgA will need to rely on IgG based tests instead. I think it's a good idea to run those anyway as there are a few celiacs around here who were diagnosed with only positive IgG based tests.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,385
    • Total Posts
      920,613
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Squirmingitch, I forgot to mention best of luck to you during the storm! I hope you are safe and that your home isn't impacted too badly! I'm on the coast in SC so we will see some storms from it but nothing near as bad as what you will have. Take care and good luck.
    • SquirmingItch, I really appreciate you gathering info for me! To answer your questions, yes, I'm on Dapsone now and have been on it for about 4.5 weeks. I have been gluten free for the same amount of time. I started on 50 mg of Dapsone which didn't seem to help much. I spoke to my doctor about it and after about a week she raised it to 100 mg. Since then I did notice a huge improvement in both my rash and itch. I no longer have any active rashes and my itching isn't completely gone but it's very minimal. I have been getting weekly blood tests done and will soon be moving to monthly.  My DH skin biopsy was done before the gluten free diet and Dapsone. My results for the skin biopsy came back as inconclusive, but even with those results, my doctor was convinced I had DH. I specifically asked her about the fact that she took the biopsy directly from the lesion rather than next to it and if that affects the result. Her explanation was that if it's a fresh enough lesion that isn't scratched, there should be IgA antibodies present. But she said that an inconclusive result isn't surprising because the IgA antibodies come and go from the skin so quickly that it can be very difficult to get a positive result, even in someone who is positive.  That's when she decided to run the celiac blood panel on me. And even though those results came back positive for the deamidated gliadin and negative for tTg, she still is very convinced that I have DH. I am happy that my doctor seems to be certain, but I would just feel better if the results were more definitive. The one other thing I am waiting on is I have been asked to attend grand rounds at the local academic hospital in 2 weeks. I guess grand rounds is where all of the academic dermatologists and dermatopathologists get together to review certain complicated cases. They will meet with me, review all of my pictures, biopsies and blood tests. My situation has been so complicated so they asked me to come. I am hoping maybe then I will get some more answers. 
    • It sure is, it really is. 
    • shellyb, I have info. for you & you may yet be able to get an official dx from your dermatologist as she sounds like she would be willing to learn. If you are dx'd with dh it is definitive & no other testing is needed. You don't need to see a GI. Im in FL & have had a long day watching Tropical Storm Hermine & making preparations for it's track which is over where I live. I'm tired! I will have links for you to reputable medical info. on the rash but it make take me till tomorrow or even longer if we lose power.  I'll be back as soon as I can. Question: You're on Dapsone now? How long have you been on it? How is it working for you? Are you getting the proper testing at regular intervals to make sure it isn't doing bad things to you? Were you gluten free before the skin biopsy?
    • Thank you so much for your quick response, GFinDC. While I wouldn't be completely opposed to another skin biopsy, I already had 4 done (3 were done prior to my dermatologist suspecting DH) so I don't love the idea of  yet another hole and scar on my body. Plus, fortunately I don't have any fresh lesions now, which I believe is needed for the biopsy. I wish I would have known to see a GI before going gluten free but I was so desperate to get any relief that I started that and Dapsone as soon as my doctor mentioned it to me.  My rash is definitely symmetrical and I have it in all of the "classic" DH spots although it basically spread over my entire body. As much as I'd like a more formal diagnosis, I really don't think I can go through all of that again. It was so bad that not only was I getting no sleep but I had to change my sheets every morning because there was blood all over them. Sorry, TMI. The worst part is that this all developed during my ninth month of pregnancy and got much worse after I delivered my baby. So not only was I dealing with this insanely itchy rash but I had a newborn and a toddler to take care of.  My daughters' pediatrician did mention doing DNA testing on me first and then my daughters to see if there's any concern that they may be susceptible. I may just go that route for now. I was just curious if others have had similar test results to mine and how did their doctors treat it? Thanks again!
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,455
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    JLeigh
    Joined