Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Confusing Biopsy Results
0

12 posts in this topic

My daughter was recently very sick and then diagnosed with celiac disease by blood tests and endoscopy. The doctor did blood work on my husband and I. My bloodwork was elevated so I proceeded with the biopsy. I am now confused by the results... I do not have any severe GI symptoms. I have always had acid reflux and as a child my stomach always hurt off and on due to the acid. I have fatigue, headaches, and depression...but I guess I attribute those symptoms to being a tired mom. Over the past 6 years I have had a blistering rash that was undiagnosed by 2 dermatologist. Currently, I don't actively have the rash so could not biopsy it. I think I don't have celiacs according to the results.

Here they are:

tTG AB, IgA = 30. (Normal <4)

tTG AB IgG = 2 normal (normal <6)

HLA positive for DQ2

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) in range at 177 (normal 81-463)

Biopsy:

Biopsy showed mild suspicion for wheat allergies

Small hiatal hernia & esophagitis from acid reflux.

The biopsy results showing wheat allergy really confuses me. What do they see on a biopsy to think I have a wheat allergy?? I guess that means I shouldn't eat wheat but won't kill me to eat it as it does a person with celiac disease.

Thanks for any input!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Did they give you the whole pathology report?  This is odd for a pathology report. Celiac isn't an allergy and a wheat allergy wouldn't leave damage in the small intestine.  I am wondering if that is just what your docotor wrote on a report he gave you?  I would ask for the whole pathology report.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did they give you the whole pathology report?  This is odd for a pathology report. Celiac isn't an allergy and a wheat allergy wouldn't leave damage in the small intestine.  I am wondering if that is just what your docotor wrote on a report he gave you?  I would ask for the whole pathology report.

I guess these are his reports on the biopsy results. Would the doctors office be able to fax me my detailed biopsy results?

I have no idea why he thinks it may be a wheat allergy....I thought a wheat allergy wouldn't elevate my bloodwork and wouldn't be visually seen on a biopsy?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess these are his reports on the biopsy results. Would the doctors office be able to fax me my detailed biopsy results?

I have no idea why he thinks it may be a wheat allergy....I thought a wheat allergy wouldn't elevate my bloodwork and wouldn't be visually seen on a biopsy?

 

 

I think he is using the wrong term "allergy".  Maybe he thinks that is easier for you to understand?  I would ask for the actual pathology report - the doctor who did the biopsy will have it.  And then I would ask him does he mean Celiac? 

 

A wheat allergy would not give you positive Celiac blood work.  Its a whole different thing.

 

 

"As with most allergies, a wheat allergy causes the immune system to respond to a food protein because it considers it dangerous to the body when it actually isn’t. This immune response is often time-limited and does not cause lasting harm to body tissues"

 

 

http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/archives/faq/what-is-the-difference-between-gluten-intolerance-gluten-sensitivity-and-wheat-allergy

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I received my pathology report. The bloodwork is in my topic post. I assume this means I don't have celiacs disease??? Any opinions?

1. jejunum biopsy: increased infra epithelial lymphocytes. Normal villus architecture; however, up to 35 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 surface epithelial cells are identified. Suggestive of Marsh score 1 lesion (laten gluten sensitive estero patchy); however, in itself this is nonspecific finding and may be seen in several conditions including h.pylor gastritis, bacterial intestinal overgrowth, certain autoimmune states, infectious etiologies and NSAID use. For this reason, clinical and serologic correlation are necessary for full interpretation.

2. Gastric Antrum biopsy: mild chronic antral gastritis, inactive. No intestinal meta plastic, dysplasia, heliobacter or fungal organisms.

3. Lower esophagus biopsy: benign squamous mucosa showing mild active esophagitis.

- less than 5 eosinophils are identified per high power field, largely excluding involvement by an eosinophilia esophagitis.

- no glandular mucosa, intestinal meta plasma, dysplasia or fungal organisms identified

Any thoughts on if you think I can rule out celiac disease or maybe this is very early stage celiac? I am gluten free now because of my concern with cross contamination of my celiac 1.5 yr old. Since I am gluten free, it won't help to retest in a year. I still don't understand why the doc wrote on his report that it is possibly a wheat allergy. My appointment is next week so I will have to see what he says.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I received my pathology report. The bloodwork is in my topic post. I assume this means I don't have celiacs disease??? Any opinions?

1. jejunum biopsy: increased infra epithelial lymphocytes. Normal villus architecture; however, up to 35 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 surface epithelial cells are identified. Suggestive of Marsh score 1 lesion (laten gluten sensitive estero patchy); however, in itself this is nonspecific finding and may be seen in several conditions including h.pylor gastritis, bacterial intestinal overgrowth, certain autoimmune states, infectious etiologies and NSAID use. For this reason, clinical and serologic correlation are necessary for full interpretation.

2. Gastric Antrum biopsy: mild chronic antral gastritis, inactive. No intestinal meta plastic, dysplasia, heliobacter or fungal organisms.

3. Lower esophagus biopsy: benign squamous mucosa showing mild active esophagitis.

- less than 5 eosinophils are identified per high power field, largely excluding involvement by an eosinophilia esophagitis.

- no glandular mucosa, intestinal meta plasma, dysplasia or fungal organisms identified

Any thoughts on if you think I can rule out celiac disease or maybe this is very early stage celiac? I am gluten free now because of my concern with cross contamination of my celiac 1.5 yr old. Since I am gluten free, it won't help to retest in a year. I still don't understand why the doc wrote on his report that it is possibly a wheat allergy. My appointment is next week so I will have to see what he says.

 

You mentioned a rash in your earlier post.  Our DH guru "Squirmingitch" has said that some with DH do not test positive on the blood tests because the antibodies are in the skin.  I'm going from memory here but I'm pretty sure that's the gist of what she said.  You can search her posts if you want.  Since your rash was not diagnosed it may be the connection.  Mind you I am just speculating here.

 

Also, remember that Celiac is an Autoimmune Disease and your biopsy report does state that as a possibility.

 

Colleen

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my tTg IGA was positive, did I just have a false positive? Or is the positive possibly because of the rash? I guess I am trying to figure out if I have celiacs or not so I know whether I should always maintain a gluten free lifestyle.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome Shleya!

You have Celiac Disease. With positive celiac antibodies and increased lymphocytes on the sample taken along with history of symptoms -- not all of the the more than three hundred symptoms associated with Celiac Disease are digestive.

The testing is not perfect, nor are the doctors that take the samples during endoscopy -- looks like a single sample was taken rather than the 6-8 recommended for Celiac Diagnosis because damage can be spotty -- until of course it progresses and destroys all of your villi.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Lisa. With a family history of celiac disease, and a positive celiac disease test - it is celiac disease.  :(

 

The tTG IgA can have false positives but they are rare (5%) and occur in weak positive results whereas your results are over 7 times the normal range - not weak at all.  

 

The biopsy is not specific to celiac disease, There are many other disorders that cause damage to the intestine besides celiac disease. Also, there is a high false negative rate in the biopsies because the damage can be spotty and missed... I don't know why they call it the "gold standard" for diagnosing celiac disease. It just like any other diagnostic test, and a bit worse than some of the other blood tests in my opinion.

 

I hope you have a smooth transition into the diet.  Good luck!  :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice everyone! I had my follow up with the GI doc. He said I have "mild celiacs disease" & he said I can quit eating "wheat" or continue and get follow up bloodwork in a year and see how I feel. Ha! So he gave me the option to go ahead and eat it until I am really sick!! Wow...I am glad I am more educated than the doc on celiacs. Thank goodness my daughter had a good GI doc. It's scary how uneducated some docs are about celiacs disease.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice everyone! I had my follow up with the GI doc. He said I have "mild celiacs disease" & he said I can quit eating "wheat" or continue and get follow up bloodwork in a year and see how I feel. Ha! So he gave me the option to go ahead and eat it until I am really sick!! Wow...I am glad I am more educated than the doc on celiacs. Thank goodness my daughter had a good GI doc. It's scary how uneducated some docs are about celiacs disease.

 

That's just.... Wow.   :blink:  :huh:  :(  Really disturbing.  I pity his patients who haven't put in the time to educate themselves like you have.... Wow.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice everyone! I had my follow up with the GI doc. He said I have "mild celiacs disease" & he said I can quit eating "wheat" or continue and get follow up bloodwork in a year and see how I feel. Ha! So he gave me the option to go ahead and eat it until I am really sick!! Wow...I am glad I am more educated than the doc on celiacs. Thank goodness my daughter had a good GI doc. It's scary how uneducated some docs are about celiacs disease.

 

I wish I was surprised :(

 

and very glad you are more educated than your doc on this one :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,099
    • Total Posts
      920,353
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What if it were something else that glutened you?  Maybe you ate too much of a good thing?  I once (three months post dx) ate too much gluten-free fried chicken, vomited, passed out and fractured my back (osteoporosis) in the process.  Paramedics, ER doc and Cardio all thought I was having a heart attack.   No.  It was sheer gluttony and bad bones.  Not good to overload with a damaged gut.    Maybe you did get some contaminated nuts.  Afterall, anything processed is suspect.  What might be well tolerated by some, might be too much for others.  We all have our various levels of gluten intolerance.   The old 20 parts per million is just a guideline, but science does not really know (lack of funding......doe anyone really care enough to find out?)  My hubby has been gluten-free for 15 years.  When I was first diagnosed, I tried to eat the gluten-free foods that I normally gave him.   Problem was he was healed and I was not.  Things like Xanthan Gum in commercial processed gluten-free breads make me feel like I have been glutened, but it is just (and still is) an intolerance.  So no bread for me unless I make it myself using a different gum.   Too lazy, so I do without.   so, ask your doctor if you really want to know or lay off the cashews and test them again in a month using a certified gluten-free nut.  I wish this was easier!    
    • I have intolerances to a few foods now, so I was wondering about that.. I love cashews though, and a month or two ago I was eating them all the time with no problems at all. I mean, could I really have developed an intolerance to them since then? I don't know if they're made on shared lines (it didn't say on the package so I assumed they weren't), but I'll give them a call. I'm really, really sensitive to cross contamination. Even if something is just made in the same facility (but not on shared lines) it will make me sick. If that's not it, then I'm not really sure
    • Research with KP and find a celiac-savvy GI in your area ( read the biographies). and ask your PCP/GP for a referral to that specific GI (not his buddy).  Ask the GI for the rest  of the celiac panel or proceed with an endoscopy/biopsies -- 4 to six.  Keep eating gluten daily until all testing is complete.  Document and request in writing.  Do not worry about symptoms.  There are over 300 of them and some celiacs have none!   Research all that you can about celiac disease.  The University of Chicago has a great celiac website that has testing Information etc.   Poet me know how it works out.  Hope you feel better soon!  
    • I react to both wheat and barley.  I've opted to just go completely gluten free, for the sake of simplicity and my sanity.  I don't have a diagnosis of celiac disease, but I strongly suspect it.  Unfortunately, I'm not willing to endure the misery of staying on gluten long enough to pursue further testing.  I just know I need to avoid the gluten grains, so I do.  
    • I think that we have to remember that celiacs often develop intolerances due to our  damaged guts.  Our guts do not ncessarily heal either (usually adults) for  a variety of reasons even if their symptoms improve (see links below).   Nuts are just plain hard to digest.   I can not tolerate almonds, but can handle walnuts and cashews in small amounts.  I can eat peanuts too, but resort to Peanutbutter after a Glutening as it is easier to digest (maybe I have to learn to chew better!  😀)  My nut symptoms have  nothing to do with gluten as I have purchased certified gluten-free nuts and suffered with the same symptoms.  .   https://www.verywell.com/celiac-disease-when-will-your-small-intestine-recover-562341 http://www.cureceliacdisease.org/treatment/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23936873 i call the manufacturer when I suspect the manufacturer is sharing the line or if I just want to know.  I bought some Black English walnuts and called the company.  Those are the only nuts they process and they do not have any flavored nuts.   if you really want to test your theory out, buy some nuts from Nuts.com (certified gluten-free).   See if you get a reaction or ask your GI to retest your antibodies (which should be done annually anyway).   I just hate to have Planters get a bum rap when you do not really know for sure.......😥    
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,133
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Mycaringkidsmom
    Joined