Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Any Scientific Evidence Than Less Than 20Ppm Can Cause Ttg Rise?


greenbeanie

Recommended Posts

greenbeanie Enthusiast

[Oops, title was supposed to say "thaT less than 20ppm"...]

Does anyone know if there's reliable scientific evidence showing that some celiacs have a rise in tTG caused by gluten levels less than 20ppm? I'm wondering about actual antibody rises, not just symptoms.

As I posted in another thread, my daughter's tTG had gone way down since diagnosis and then rose again recently. Aside from Schar bread, which she was eating before with no problem, I make almost all our baked goods from scratch. Triple-checked everything. But I did just find reliable evidence that one of the gluten-free flours I've been using has tested at 7-9ppm. I'd estimate that she probably eats three or four muffins a week made from scratch that include that flour mixed with others. So she's maybe getting 1 cup or so of the 7-9ppm flour per week. Is it even conceivable that that could be enough to cause an actual rise in tTG?

For what it's worth, her celiac symptoms clearly started when she was a young infant who was exclusively breastfed, before she ever ate wheat directly herself. And she also had an extremely clear reaction to Rice Dream after going gluten free. So I do know she's very sensitive. I had been using this flour all along, and the tTg rise was only recent, but her tTG had never dropped completely into the negative range and I have been baking muffins more frequently lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gemini Experienced

I have never seen anything that would indicate that such low levels of gluten would cause a jump in tTg. I think that if her DGP is negative, then the cause of the jump would not be gluten ingestion. If it were possible that low levels, by chance, caused the jump, then it would also show in her DGP results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LauraTX Rising Star

You may find this article an interesting read... some people who still have symptoms on a gluten-free diet have gone on the Fasano Gluten Contamination Elimination diet which cuts out basically anything processed.  Some see improvement. Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
greenbeanie Enthusiast

Thank you both. That is the first article I've seen that discusses tTG values (rather than just symptoms) in situations like this - very helpful!

She isn't even quite six yet, and it would be so incredibly isolating to do a completely whole-foods-only diet, given the million and one birthday parties and pizza days at school. Different treats are one thing, but no treats at all would be socially devastating. I hope it doesn't come to that...but I have a feeling this is probably where we're headed. I am also seriously concerned about her arsenic intake already, since she drank rice milk daily for several years and ate lots of rice products even before diagnosis, so even a three-month trial with rice as her only grain is worrisome. I suppose that may be the lesser of two evils, though.

We did just make an appointment with a celiac specialist at a children's hospital. I'm sure they'll agree to order DGPs routinely for follow-up. The one time I convinced her current GI to order the DGPs, they were negative (despite a tTG that had been hanging out at "weak positive" level for over a year). If we did have DGP results now, and they were positive, I'd be inclined to think that this tTG rise might be coming from the 7-9ppm of cc in the flour, as unlikely as that sounds. But without current DGP results, I'm at a total loss. That problem will be solved soon, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BlessedMommy Rising Star

If you do rice as her only grain, you could choose Indian white basmati rice. That is one of the safest.

 

In our family, we rarely ever eat brown rice anymore, as all brown rices have substantially higher levels of arsenic than white rice. My husband and I decided that the extra nutrients and fiber in the brown rice wasn't worth the extra arsenic exposure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RollingAlong Explorer

Open Original Shared Link

 

There was a research review put together before the US gluten free standards were set.  Basically, the standard was set at 20ppm because the "vast majority" of celiacs could tolerate exposure at that level.  

 

I think this link will take you to the PDF entitled Health Hazard Assessment for Gluten Exposure

in Individuals with Celiac Disease:
Determination of Tolerable Daily Intake Levels
and Levels of Concern for Gluten  
 
 
(US FDA May, 2011)
 
 
A very detailed look at the issues. 
 
An opinion piece with links to the research. This is actually a pretty good place to start, I think; but the 1st paper has an interesting discussion of slow, long term reactions, that may pertinent.
 
Open Original Shared Link
 
Good luck sorting things out for your daughter. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites
greenbeanie Enthusiast

Thank you, thank you! The citations in the FDA report are just what I was looking for! I'd found a few of them separately through PubMed searches, but this is by far the most systematic source I've seen with actual gluten levels and documented reactions discussed in depth. And it's somewhat of a relief to see evidence that yes, even some kids do react to levels under 20ppm - because we've been through every item in our house and at school a million times and found no hidden gluten source that we'd missed.

We're awaiting an appointment for a second opinion at children's hospital with reputable celiac specialists, but meanwhile I've removed all but a few processed foods, even GFCO-certified ones, unless they've been independently tested no have no detectable gluten at all (with tests sensitive to 5ppm). And I've stopped baking from scratch with gluten-free flours on my own. We're back on a high-rice diet and had been using white basmati from California anyhow, so I'm trying not to worry about the arsenic thing for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RollingAlong Explorer

Your tax dollars at work! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
greenbeanie Enthusiast

Update: I'm thrilled to say that her tTG dropped by almost half in less than a month! I removed that certified gluten-free flour with 7-9ppm cc traces, and also removed milk. Normally we wouldn't have checked tTG again so soon, but her GI ordered a re-check because we're headed to a celiac specialist soon and wanted the most up-to-date results. She has continued eating a few other processed gluten-free foods that have been independently tested by a reliable source and found to have no measurable cc. She has also been super happy and in a great mood.

Her GI did agree to run the DGP tests too, and they were negative but higher than six months ago. So we only have a few DGP values for comparison, but she had a big drop in DGP from strong positives at diagnosis to negative 18 months later (which corresponded to her huge tTG drop), then no DGPs drawn with the tTG spike last month, then negative-but-higher-than-before DGP now (corresponding to her tTG falling again but still remaining higher than it was last time DGP was tested - so we probably caught it on the way back down). So this all makes sense!

Before anyone jumps all over the milk comment, I'll just say that she had clear, obvious (in retrospect) celiac symptoms as an exclusively breastfed infant, before she ever had a single bite of gluten herself. The symptoms went away when I stopped breastfeeding and put her on Neocate formula, then returned when she began solids. She wasn't tested for celiac until age 4, but she repeatedly tested negative for milk allergy (which wouldn't affect tTG anyhow). She tested negative for lactose intolerance last fall, after she'd been gluten-free for a year and a half. Actually, that's the one major change in her diet that correponded to the tTG spike: she began having milk in her cereal every day after passing the test (the same cereal she'd previously eaten dry). If the miniscule amounts in breastmilk were enough to cause problems, it makes sense that the miniscule amounts in cow's milk might too, given that dairy cows are fed barley. I realize that most celiacs don't get tTG rises from plain dairy - but most don't get tTG rises from occasionally eating baked goods made with a flour that contains 7-9ppm of gluten either! In any case, we now have strong evidence that it was one of those two things. I want to see her tTG completely negative before trying either again, but once that happens we can test them separately. I'll be curious to see what the new celiac specialist says. Her current GI seems to agree that, as unlikely as it sounds, the tTG rise was caused by way less than 20ppm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RollingAlong Explorer

Wow, great news!  I can't help but think that the mood improvements are an especially good sign.  I hope your daughter continues to improve and eventually joins the "vast majority."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular

I'm so glad that she is doing better and all the pieces are falling into place!  :)

 

When I read your comments about milk, my initial response was to think, "No way, gluten isn't in milk," but you are right that gluten can get into breast milk, so why not into cow's milk too.... Interesting.  I feel the need to research. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RMJ Mentor

I was wondering the same thing (about cow vs human milk). Cows (ruminants) have a very different digestive system than we do - perhaps they do a better job of breaking down gluten all the way into amino acids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
greenbeanie Enthusiast

I'm wondering if the milk thing might be a fairly straightforward cc issue fom barley fodder blowing around in barns, even if the actual milk itself is totally digested and contains no gluten fragments. I've never worked on a dairy farm, but I have worked on a farm with other animals, and their hay and feed made dust everywhere! Seriously, it blew around and coated everything. I have no idea how milking equipment is stored or cleaned, and maybe I just worked on an unusually windy farm; it may be much less of an issue in large commercial farms.

In any case, our problem could be from the 7-9ppm in the flour alone, so I'm not necessarily assuming milk is the problem. It could be either - and both seem so unlikely that it's hard to tell which is more plausible. My daughter is dancing around and laughing as I write, so at this point I'm just so happy she's feeling this good that I'm happy to stick to our current diet for as long as it takes to get to the bottom of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular

All I can find is that unlike breast milk, they have never found gliadin in cow milk, so it has been labelled gluten-free.  I suppose that there could be parts of the gliadin in the milk (like in a gluten removed beer such as Daura) or it could be another "gluten" protein that hasn't been identified.  It appears cow milk is thought to be gluten-free at this time.

 

I find it unlikely that barely would get into the milking equipment.  It's usually stored closed, or at least it was at my uncle's farm.  I think allowing dust and grit to get in would eventually cause problems for the cows too.

 

I think the 7-9 ppm flour is probably the culprit, but human's don't need cow milk (just cows do   ;) ) so removing dairy (just to be safe) is no big deal.  You could always try organic (pasture fed) dairy at a later date - those cows aren't fed barley.

 

Hope she is well soon.   :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
shanasun Newbie

I am struggling with similar issue as greenbeanie and would love some advice. 

 

My daughter's ttg dropped from 207 at time of diagnosis to 97 at 3 months-post, and then 2 after 6 months of being gluten-free.  Then at her 1 year bloodwork she was 28.  We had permitted her to play with play-dough at school starting about 6-8 weeks before the result of 28, with the caveat that the teachers help her scrub her fingers with a toothbrush.  That was clearly a bad idea, so we discontinued that (failed) experiment.  We also realized that her symptoms of minor glutening were difficult to detect as they could just as easily be from not enough sleep, but that we had to pay very close attention--I now track her daily in a notebook.  Three months later, ttg is still at 21, and she is symptomatic with occasional mild headaches and emotional unpleasantness.  Given her original drop of 205 points in 6 months, I have to assume that she continues to be exposed to gluten, even after removing the play-dough..

 

Her GI is unconcerned, because 21 is barely positive.  But  it is killing me.  We are just as extremely careful as we were when she dropped from 207 to 2.  She was symptom-free, now she's not. 

 

Can someone tell me more about this DPG test?  What does it tell us, and why does it need to be tracked as regularly as greenbeanie advocates?

 

Also, has anyone else seen their child drop to strongly negative, then rise again without any obvious explanation, as her food situation has not changed? 

 

Finally, how do you (@greenbeanie) know that the flours you are using are 7-9 ppm?  I buy all my flours as individual flours from Bob's Redmill and mix them in various ways for my baking.  I make all our bread, because the store-bought is too low quality (mostly tapioca) and too expensive).  All the flours are gluten-free, but I don't know what the exact ppm is for any given flour.  When I called Bob's, they said it varies from batch to batch because each shipment they receive can differ--it just has to meet the 20ppm standard.  Would you mind sharing more about how you source stuff?

 

We have a dedicated gluten-free kitchen and eat very little processed food, but my daughter does have a sandwich every day of Bob's flours, and I do bake other bready things regularly (~ once a week). That said, this was also true when she had a ttg of 2 and no symptoms.  Likewise, she has oatmeal almost every morning, but it's made from Bob's gluten-free oats, and this too hasn't changed during our entire time being gluten-free.  Why would it bother her now? 

 

Help, please.  I don't know what to do.

 

These are my hypotheses so far, but none of them seem particularly plausible:

 

1.  She has developed a new and acute sensitivity to trace amounts of gluten in the last 6 months.  Her GI says people are usually sensitive from the beginning, so pooh-poohed it.

2.  She has an elevated ttg from eisonophilic esophogitis, which can elevate ttg, but does not explain her glutening symptoms.

3.  She has developed an oat sensitivity in the last few months and is one of the 8% for whom it can cause a rise in ttg.

 

Thank you!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

I am struggling with similar issue as greenbeanie and would love some advice. 

 

My daughter's ttg dropped from 207 at time of diagnosis to 97 at 3 months-post, and then 2 after 6 months of being gluten-free.  Then at her 1 year bloodwork she was 28.  We had permitted her to play with play-dough at school starting about 6-8 weeks before the result of 28, with the caveat that the teachers help her scrub her fingers with a toothbrush.  That was clearly a bad idea, so we discontinued that (failed) experiment.  We also realized that her symptoms of minor glutening were difficult to detect as they could just as easily be from not enough sleep, but that we had to pay very close attention--I now track her daily in a notebook.  Three months later, ttg is still at 21, and she is symptomatic with occasional mild headaches and emotional unpleasantness.  Given her original drop of 205 points in 6 months, I have to assume that she continues to be exposed to gluten, even after removing the play-dough..

 

Her GI is unconcerned, because 21 is barely positive.  But  it is killing me.  We are just as extremely careful as we were when she dropped from 207 to 2.  She was symptom-free, now she's not. 

 

Can someone tell me more about this DPG test?  What does it tell us, and why does it need to be tracked as regularly as greenbeanie advocates?

 

Also, has anyone else seen their child drop to strongly negative, then rise again without any obvious explanation, as her food situation has not changed? 

 

Finally, how do you (@greenbeanie) know that the flours you are using are 7-9 ppm?  I buy all my flours as individual flours from Bob's Redmill and mix them in various ways for my baking.  I make all our bread, because the store-bought is too low quality (mostly tapioca) and too expensive).  All the flours are gluten-free, but I don't know what the exact ppm is for any given flour.  When I called Bob's, they said it varies from batch to batch because each shipment they receive can differ--it just has to meet the 20ppm standard.  Would you mind sharing more about how you source stuff?

 

We have a dedicated gluten-free kitchen and eat very little processed food, but my daughter does have a sandwich every day of Bob's flours, and I do bake other bready things regularly (~ once a week). That said, this was also true when she had a ttg of 2 and no symptoms.  Likewise, she has oatmeal almost every morning, but it's made from Bob's gluten-free oats, and this too hasn't changed during our entire time being gluten-free.  Why would it bother her now? 

 

Help, please.  I don't know what to do.

 

These are my hypotheses so far, but none of them seem particularly plausible:

 

1.  She has developed a new and acute sensitivity to trace amounts of gluten in the last 6 months.  Her GI says people are usually sensitive from the beginning, so pooh-poohed it.

2.  She has an elevated ttg from eisonophilic esophogitis, which can elevate ttg, but does not explain her glutening symptoms.

3.  She has developed an oat sensitivity in the last few months and is one of the 8% for whom it can cause a rise in ttg.

 

Thank you!!

 

 

 I think you should consider the most likely explanation - she is getting gluten at day care.  Or someone else who watches her for you?  Maybe keep her home for a couple of  months and test again?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shanasun Newbie

Well, that's always possible, but it's actually more unlikely than the other possibilities, because her pre-school situation and her mornings with her grandparents did not change over the course of the year---in other words, she dropped to a ttg of 2 and was symptom-free while at pre-school and spending time with her grandparents.  I have an excellent relationship with the people in both settings and exercise total control over how they handled food and art supplies, so that is unlikely to be the source.

 

You've kind of nailed the problem on it's head---she dropped to a 2 and then rose again to the 20's, all while nothing changed in all her environments, with the exception of the playdough experiment.  And that is unlikely to be the cause of her still-elevated ttg because she dropped from 97 to 2 in 3 months, so surely she can drop from 28 to negative in 3 months if that was the only source of gluten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

Well, that's always possible, but it's actually more unlikely than the other possibilities, because her pre-school situation and her mornings with her grandparents did not change over the course of the year---in other words, she dropped to a ttg of 2 and was symptom-free while at pre-school and spending time with her grandparents.  I have an excellent relationship with the people in both settings and exercise total control over how they handled food and art supplies, so that is unlikely to be the source.

 

You've kind of nailed the problem on it's head---she dropped to a 2 and then rose again to the 20's, all while nothing changed in all her environments, with the exception of the playdough experiment.  And that is unlikely to be the cause of her still-elevated ttg because she dropped from 97 to 2 in 3 months, so surely she can drop from 28 to negative in 3 months if that was the only source of gluten.

 

 

When she is out of your control, you don't really know what is going on.  People change at day care.  Grandparents give a kid something they are sure is gluten-free but isn't.  Kids accept treats from other kids.  

 

Let me give you a few examples I have seen over the years - 

 

- The person who started eating the generic Rice Chex assuming that all Rice Chez are gluten-free.  The generic still had malt. 

- The person who started eating corn flakes because they always liked them, hadn't had any in a while & they are just corn, right?  Of course the answer to that is that they might not be.

- The kid who eats Rice Krispie treats at home - so they must be fine from another kids house.

- kids sharing food when the day care workers aren't looking.  As kids get older, there are less people helping them with food.  IF they saw a kid sharing, they might even be afraid to mention it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shanasun Newbie

I really appreciate that you are trying to help, but this is tangential to the questions that I asked in my post.

 

While mistakes are always possible, they do not explain a mildly elevated ttg for the last 5-6 months, because probabilities say she would also have been glutened by similar mistakes in the months prior, which she wasn't, because her ttg was 2.  Her teachers did not change.  Her grandparents have her while I am in the house with them.  She is not getting glutened by school or her grandparents.  We talk continuously.  They do not give her ANYTHING without discussing it with me.  They have not repeatedly glutened her and lied about it, either.   You can accept this or not.  She does not eat at other children's houses.  She does not accept food from anyone, without running it by me. 

 

She has had an elevated ttg this last time after being home with me for a month!!  If she is getting glutened, it is at home, by me.  Which is why I am on this forum, because I am anal, and I bake everything myself, and everything I use is safe.  

 

I asked very specific questions, and am hoping to get thoughts from people who have knowledge to offer regarding my questions, or experience with a similar situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

Well. If you are certain she is not getting any gluten, then I would suggest you look up " the Fasano Diet". It's for people who can't get thier TTg down - before it becomes labelled as refractory Celiac.

I just like to try the simple things first, that's why I suggested she might be getting glutened somewhere. I would hate for you to jump to refractory or super sensitive if that isn't the case. From the Super Sensitives I have seen, many would not go to school, eat any thing processed, etc. it's very hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

Open Original Shared Link

does she have another immune disease?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

You might find this helpful. The Fasano diet

https://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/blog/1038/entry-1780-the-gluten-contamination-elimination-diet-summary-of-dr-fasanos-recent-paper/

Also, from things I have read, a slightly positive tTg may mean nothing. It could be possible her symptoms are from something else? Another food or illnesses? Sorry. That isn't easy to figure out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shanasun Newbie

As you say, the Fasano diet is for helping people get their ttg down.  But she HAD it down.  And judging by her symptoms, she had it down for at least 6 months.

 

She is not getting any more gluten than she did while having a negative ttg.

 

So my questions are more concerned with:

 

1.  Has anyone had the experience of their child developing a super sensitivity AFTER getting their ttg down very low.

2.  What does the DPG tell us that the ttg does not?  Why is it useful?

 

 

It is possible she is developing eisonophilic esophagitis.  Very early stages, if so.  Otherwise no other autoimmune diseases.  As I said previously, it would explain the ttg, but NOT the gluten symptoms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular

I thought I responded but my answer was lost.  Oops.

 

1.  After going gluten-free, your tTG is not going to respond quickly to minute exposures to gluten.  I doubt 1 crumb of a crumb would kick the tTG out of normal.  I saw one study that showed it took most people two weeks on a gluten challenge (~2slices of bread per day) before their tTG levels rose noticeably.

 

2.  The DGP indicates a reaction to gliadin.  First the body reacts to the gliadin, then it makes tTG to attack the intestines (where the gliadin is), and then it would make EMA to wipe out the whole top layer of the intestines (overkill).  DGP usually rises first.

 

My guesses are that she is getting more gluten than you realize, or she is just having a blip in her recovery.  Perhaps her immune system was re-stimulated for some reason?

 

Another guess is lab error.  Maybe her negative was low and that positive was high.

 

A weak positive tTG can also be caused by diabetes (T1), chronic liver disease, crohn's, colitis, thyroiditis or a serious infection.  These tend to be a weak influence though.  For example, I have Hashimoto's thyroiditis.  My tTG was over 200 at diagnosis, down to 40 something by 6 months, and at a very low 20 at 9 months.  I retested at 2.5 years and it was 4 something and they had lowered the top end of normal from 20 to 14, so my normal wasn't close to zero.  It's still measurable yet low.  I KNOW I am gluten-free, so I guess it stays measurable, but normal, partly due to Hashi's.

 

I don't know.  If she has gluten symptoms and her tTG is elevated, the most obvious answer is that she is getting gluten.  Even if you think it is tiny, less than 20ppm, it is too much for her.  You'll need to change things and be more vigilant because something is getting her. :(

 

Best wishes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
greenbeanie Enthusiast

Hi shanasun,

We finally got my daughter's tTG into the normal range - for the first time ever - last month. For her, it did end up being the trace gluten of less than 20ppm in some combination of three different certified gluten free flours and spices. All were certified by the GFCO. They were the only ground/powdery products that we used from facilities that weren't dedicated gluten free. I'd been trusting both dedicated facilities and certified products that came from mixed facilities. Many celiacs apparently eat those products with no problem, but unfortunately my daughter is clearly sensitive to amounts less than 20ppm, even when she was only getting a small amount of those flours mixed in with others in homemade baked goods in a gluten free kitchen. Her tTG finally dropped into the normal range about eight (?) weeks after we eliminated those products. Both of her DGP tests became negative too. Both her local GI and a celiac specialist at a children's hospital agreed that the two flours and one spice we identified and eliminated were the problem. We never found any other gluten we'd missed, and her school and other habits had not changed during this time period.

I discovered that those products had trace gluten through an independent gluten testing service that I subscribe to. I believe there may be a rule against posting info about other specific websites here, and the test results from that site are available to subscribers only, so I can't say more in detail. But with a bit of Googling, I'm sure you can find it!

Sorry if I've repeated stuff from elsewhere in this thread - I'm away from home and only had a chance to read over it briefly. Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,090
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nicole K
    Newest Member
    Nicole K
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Denise I
      I am looking to find a Celiac Dietician who is affiliated with the Celiac Disease Foundation who I can set up an appointment with.  Can you possibly give some guidance on this?  Thank you!
    • Posterboy
      Nacina, Knitty Kitty has given you good advice. But I would say/add find a Fat Soluble B-1 like Benfotiamine for best results.  The kind found in most Multivitamins have a very low absorption rate. This article shows how taking a Fat Soluble B-1 can effectively help absorption by 6x to7x times. https://www.naturalmedicinejournal.com/journal/thiamine-deficiency-and-diabetic-polyneuropathy quoting from the article.... "The group ingesting benfotiamine had maximum plasma thiamine levels that were 6.7 times higher than the group ingesting thiamine mononitrate.32" Also, frequency is much more important than amount when it comes to B-Vitamin. These are best taken with meals because they provide the fat for better absorption. You will know your B-Vitamin is working properly when your urine becomes bright yellow all the time. This may take two or three months to achieve this.......maybe even longer depending on how low he/you are. The Yellow color is from excess Riboflavin bypassing the Kidneys....... Don't stop them until when 2x a day with meals they start producing a bright yellow urine with in 2 or 3 hours after the ingesting the B-Complex...... You will be able to see the color of your urine change as the hours go by and bounce back up after you take them in the evening. When this happens quickly......you are now bypassing all the Riboflavin that is in the supplement. The body won't absorb more than it needs! This can be taken as a "proxy" for your other B-Vitamin levels (if taken a B-Complex) ...... at least at a quick and dirty level......this will only be so for the B-1 Thiamine levels if you are taking the Fat Soluble forms with the Magnesium as Knitty Kitty mentioned. Magnesium is a Co-Factor is a Co-factor for both Thiamine and Vitamin D and your sons levels won't improve unless he also takes Magnesium with his Thiamine and B-Complex. You will notice his energy levels really pick up.  His sleeping will improve and his muscle cramps will get better from the Magnesium! Here is nice blog post that can help you Thiamine and it's many benefits. I hope this is helpful but it is not medical advice God speed on your son's continued journey I used to be him. There is hope! 2 Tim 2:7 “Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things” this included. Posterboy by the grace of God,  
    • trents
      I'll answer your second question first. The single best antibody test for monitoring celiac blood antibody levels is the tTG-IGA and it is very cost effective. For this reason, it is the most popular and often the only test ordered by physicians when checking for celiac disease. There are some people who actually do have celiac disease who will score negatives on this test anyway because of anomalies in their immune system but your wife is not one of them. So for her, the tTG-IGA should be sufficient. It is highly sensitive and highly specific for celiac disease. If your wife gets serious about eating gluten free and stays on a gluten free diet for the duration, she should experience healing in her villous lining, normalization in her antibody numbers and avoid reaching a celiac health crisis tipping point. I am attaching an article that will provide guidance for getting serious about gluten free living. It really is an advantage if all wheat products are taken out of the house and other household members adopt gluten free eating in order to avoid cross contamination and mistakes.  
    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
×
×
  • Create New...