Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Gluten Free Label With Less Than 20 Parts Per Million


Vanilla Gorilla

Recommended Posts

Vanilla Gorilla Newbie

RE items that have gluten but are less than 20 parts per million still safe?  My doctor says no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gilligan Enthusiast

I don't have a problem with them, and my antibody level couldn't get any better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
psawyer Proficient

There are two parts to this.

1. The threshold defined by FDA rules allows 20 ppm; any level below that, including zero, is fine too. We all want zero ppm, but I realize that that is a goal, not a reality.

2. When an amount appears on a label, it indicates that the product has been actually tested for gluten content, and tested negative at the noted level. If it just says "gluten-free" it may not have been tested at all. Any test will have a threshold, and 20 ppm is a common middle ground between extreme sensitivity and high cost. More sensitive tests exist, but how much did you want to pay for your food? It is scientifically impossible to prove zero content.

So, I welcome such statements, which mean that the manufacturer not only does not include gluten on purpose, but also checks at some level for accidental contamination.

YMMV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
valentina Newbie

Thank you!  For especially agreeing ....it's either "there is gluten OR no gluten"  I wish they would make up their mind!

This morning I called Cheerios, because of the labelling on the front "Gluten Free".....On the Regular Cheerios and also the Honey Nut Cheerios

there are 2 ingredients:  Whole grain oats, oat bran---It is not specified that these ingredients are gluten free unless it says in the actual ingredients gluten-free whole grain oats or gluten-free oat bran.  I will not inform my customers (at the supermarket) to purchase these items unless the Company investigates and corrects this outlandish false advertisement of being "gluten free".  This poses a huge dis-service to the large population of people with Celiac disease.  If there is a single speck of gluten, I would not advise anybody to eat this cereal.  Do you want your original symptoms back?  I do not!  Have we all gone through enough suffering and torment.....Take the gluten out!  Whole wheat, bulghur wheat, oat, rye, barley and all of their derivatives should not be eaten by a person with Celiac disease, period!  

 

Do all of us have to band together and get a petition to stop Cheerios?  Then let's do it!

 

RE items that have gluten but are less than 20 parts per million still safe?  My doctor says no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bartfull Rising Star

Unless the ingredients in an oat-based product say "Certified gluten-free oats", I wouldn't eat it. Most oats are contaminated from being grown in the same field, harvested on the same equipment, and stored it the same bins as wheat. Even then, some (but by no means all) celiacs react to certified gluten-free oats.

 

Most gluten-free items that are tested are only tested for less than 20 PPM because the tests for 10 or 5 PPM are a lot more expensive. But if the label says "less than 20 PPM", that doesn't mean it has 19 PPM. Could be anywhere between zero and 19. I've never had a reaction to anything that has the "less than 20 PPM" label. But that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
squirmingitch Veteran

You might be interested in reading this about Cheerios:

Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vanilla Gorilla Newbie

Thank you for the comments.  What Im curious about is if the FDA says its gluten free because its less than 20 ppm is it then safe to eat if your celiac?  Will these items affect my intestinal tract?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Based on studies by celiac experts, the "less than 20 PPM" is deemed safe and should not cause intestinal damage.

You might find this interesting reading from the FDA:

Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
anthony colatrella Newbie

to be safest, only if that product has been certified gluten free by one of the official certification organizations--CSA, GIG, or NFCA---their certifying label should be on the product--the FDA uses 20ppm as their threshold level and that should be fine for most celiacs--at that level you could eat a pound of such food and still be at only a total of 10mgs of gluten a day which is generally regarded as a safe level---meaning no damage should occur---the certifying orgs actually use stricter levels---5ppm for CSA, and 10ppm for GIG and NFCA---so checking for their labels is best--otherwise you are relying on the food manufacturer itself; the FDA is not actually doing the testing---they just established the level and expect the manufacturer to comply---supposedly there will be periodic checks or they will investigate complaints. As far as CHEERIOS gluten-free, I believe Trish Thompson of The gluten-free Watchdog has been working with them, but I don't think she was ready to fully approve---I believe that was the most recent update---you can check  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
anthony colatrella Newbie

if label indicates less than 20ppm as regulated by FDA that indicates that company has made that measurement and is complying with FDA regulations and hopefuly that company can be trusted--this is still a "new" venture and I guess we will find out who can or cannot be trusted--that is why I advised checking for one of the certifying organizations' labels as they are all national celiac organizations and have been doing this already for many years well before the FDA made their own regulation plus they do use stricter levels---if you do trust a product labeled gluten-free at less than 20ppm, you should be able to eat a pound of such food safely-20ppm=20mgs gluten per kg of food----and 10mgs of gluten daily is considered a safe level so as long as you are not eating more than a pound of such food you should not exceed that 10mg level--of course that is for the majority---there is always individual variability and some will tolerate more, others less

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cap6 Enthusiast

A little over a year ago I attended a one day workshop led by Shelley Case, author of "The Gluten~Free Diet, A Comprehensive Resource Guide". She has worked extensively with both the U.S. FDA and Canadian version (CDR - I believe I have that correct) in regards to gluten free labeling. She is extremely well educated and knowledgeable when it comes to the Celiac disease. According to her, when a product is labeled gluten free, less than 20ppm, then the company has indeed tested for that. She further stated that the majority of company's do, in fact, test for less and most labeled products have far less than the 20ppm even tho not so stated on the label. A food product company does not want gluten free/celiacs to consume their product and then get sick. It makes sense. Eat a mislabeled product consumer get sick, they stop buying said product. The food companies want you to buy their product. A consumer also needs to keep in mind that when consuming a gluten free food product you are also consuming a list of other ingredients (maltodextrin, maltose, soy, xantham gum etc) any number of which can cause "glutend" type symptoms.

Also, if you safely consume a food product that has 5ppm but eat four or five more food products all containing the same 5ppm then you can exceed what is considered "safe" over the course of a day.

For what it's worth. For myself, everything Shelly Case had to say made perfect sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

A little over a year ago I attended a one day workshop led by Shelley Case, author of "The Gluten~Free Diet, A Comprehensive Resource Guide". She has worked extensively with both the U.S. FDA and Canadian version (CDR - I believe I have that correct) in regards to gluten free labeling. She is extremely well educated and knowledgeable when it comes to the Celiac disease. According to her, when a product is labeled gluten free, less than 20ppm, then the company has indeed tested for that. She further stated that the majority of company's do, in fact, test for less and most labeled products have far less than the 20ppm even tho not so stated on the label. A food product company does not want gluten free/celiacs to consume their product and then get sick. It makes sense. Eat a mislabeled product consumer get sick, they stop buying said product. The food companies want you to buy their product. A consumer also needs to keep in mind that when consuming a gluten free food product you are also consuming a list of other ingredients (maltodextrin, maltose, soy, xantham gum etc) any number of which can cause "glutend" type symptoms.Also, if you safely consume a food product that has 5ppm but eat four or five more food products all containing the same 5ppm then you can exceed what is considered "safe" over the course of a day.For what it's worth. For myself, everything Shelly Case had to say made perfect sense.

I don't think that last part is quite right. You don't add 5ppm + 5 ppm and it equal 10 ppm. It's 5 ppm in a million then another 5 ppm and its 999,995 non gluten ppm. So now you have 5 ppm in 2 million - each million contains 5. Maybe you could say you now have 10 parts per 2 million? But that is still, when reduced down, 5 part per 1 million.

I think Dr collatrella has done a good job of explaining it. This parts per million is hard to understand.

Edit - this doesn't even address if there are actually 5 ppm of gluten at all. The test can only say less than 10 ppm or 5 or 20. It doesn't say exactly " 2 ppm". So, returning to some basic math - <5. Could be 0 or 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
psawyer Proficient

A lot of unnecessarily complicated arithmetic can be trotted out when it comes to parts per million (ppm). Even if the content of everything you ate was 19 ppm, you would not ingest a level believed harmful on a normal diet. Two items at 5 ppm are the sum of the two items, still at 5 pm overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FranDaMan Apprentice

Sooo, per the GFWD posting it seems that there could be many boxes of contaminated cereal out there (how many boxes do they produce in 24 hrs?) but when averaged out the batch tests to under 20 ppm and is labeled as safe. I'm not liking my odds on this and I sure do miss Cheerios! I think I will continue to wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
anthony colatrella Newbie

FranDaMan---think waiting is best---follow up with GFWD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,502
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nadaly100
    Newest Member
    Nadaly100
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...