Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

The school will not accomodate gluten-free/DF!


IntheMiddleofNowhere

Recommended Posts

IntheMiddleofNowhere Newbie

I am a nursing student, and my children attend preschool.  The preschool uses the college's dining facility to cater all of their meals.  I spent time providing a training for the community college's dining facility staff on allergens, cross-contamination, and understanding the importance of strict avoidance for allergic individuals or in celiac disease.

There are a number of small children with celiac disease, allergies, and intolerances, whose parents are required to pay the same amount, but do not receive meals, and must send food to school with their children, because the dining facility cannot accommodate.  Of course, our family is one of them.  My daughter must be gluten and dairy free, while my son is only gluten free. 

I know that this is somehow illegal, wrong, or unethical, but don't know what steps should be taken.  The school claims no responsibility, and will not budge on the payment system to adjust the price for children unable to participate in the  meals.  The dining facility has claimed for many months that they are working on being able to accommodate, but it was recently revealed that they are actually working on a letter from their attorney to force parents to sign a "release of liability waiver" before serving the allergic children. When I provided the training 4 months ago, all of the staff displayed decent levels of understanding and interest.


What can I do to rectify this situation?  Who needs to be informed, or who can help "encourage" (force is okay as well, as long as my family doesn't have to get involved in a lawsuit) the preschool to provide an adjusted cost to these families?  If the dining facility is requiring a waiver, I am not confident in their ability to prepare, nor determination/dedication to provide "safe" food. (albeit, I understand why)

I am the person who initiated the chain of events, and have been pushing everyone along the way to be able to provide "safe" meals for the children, but at this point, I am fed up with everyone involved, particularly the preschool, because they seem to want nothing to do with the situation, and are making me deal directly with their vendor.

Advice please?!?! I don't want to ruin our relationship with the preschool, because the teachers are wonderful and my kids really enjoy it there... but for the sake of my family and many other current and future families... I don't want to just look the other way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

This is not my area of expertise but here's a link about a 504 plan and the American Disabilities Act as it pertains to celiac disease:

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

I do not think that preschool,  which is not receiving government funding, falls under a 504 plan.  Preschool is optional (I think).  

Personally, I wouldn't trust anyone to prepare GF meals safely every single day ( I worked in food service all through college and I do not think it has changed).    It is a risk that I rarely take as an adult.  My child is 15 and does not have celiac disease, but she only bought lunch ONCE back in the first grade.  It was horrible.  Every morning for the past 10 years, I have made her lunch.  Every...single...day.  Her lunches are much healthier and I purchased a Thermos for hot lunches.  She gets hot left overs like meatloaf, soup, stews, etc.

I can see why the school would want to have parent's sign a waiver.  It is scary to think you could cause a child's death who has an allergy.  Fortunately, this would not happen to a child with just celiac disease.  Not sure how such a waiver would stand up in court for a parent to sign-away a child's rights.  

See what other parent's have to say.  I think most end up just packing a lunch and working on how to avoid cross contamination within the classroom.  

Good Luck! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StephanieL Enthusiast

I would perhaps call the OCR/DOJ and discuss the situation with them.  It it wrong? Maybe. Is it legal? Perhaps.  Depending on if there is government funding and many other factors will play into this stuff. 

In reality, most people with allergies/Celiac won't trust an institution to actually be able to manage these issues.  While many *could* force the issue through the DOJ, there has to be a LOT of trust that they know what they are doing. Reading every label every time. Calling for cross contact because it doesn't have to be listed to be sure it's safe.  The reality is most people just don't get it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SLLRunner Enthusiast

In addition to what others have said, it seems to me the cost for the preschool is one thing, and then those who want meals should have to pay extra for them.  I would certainly write a letter to the head of the school asking that this be done.  If certain children are not getting meals then they should not have to pay for them, period. 

Even though you have educated the staff on precautions for children with celiac and food allergy, I would not trust that they would always do things to avoid cross-contamination.  It's probably a good thing they are not complying at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

I think it is actually easier for the day care to serve meals they make than have to help a bunch of 3 year olds open all the packets and containers in individual sack lunches.  Harder to keep track of other, more lethal allergens, like peanuts.  So I doubt they would want to make buying lunch an option at this age.

Fair or not, I wouldn't let them feed my toddler.   They have made it very clear that they can't handle Celiac.  You have a few options,that I can think of right now,  like them or not - put your kids somewhere else, keep them home with a safe care provider or parent, bring their lunch and make sure the day care knows not to give your children any food that is not sent by you.  

Edit to fix bad typing

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StephanieL Enthusiast
27 minutes ago, kareng said:

  Harder to keep track I'd other, more lethal allergens, like peanuts.  

Just a note, milk, egg, soy and so on can all be lethal.  I'm sure you know that but I just like to be sure people understand that the peanuts are not the only lethal allergy.  My kid has life threatening allergies to all of the above, 1 small bite of egg even baked into something and he has an anaphylactic reaction and it's very common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master
19 minutes ago, StephanieL said:

Just a note, milk, egg, soy and so on can all be lethal.  I'm sure you know that but I just like to be sure people understand that the peanuts are not the only lethal allergy.  My kid has life threatening allergies to all of the above, 1 small bite of egg even baked into something and he has an anaphylactic reaction and it's very common.

Sure.  Peanuts were just an example that most people recognize.   But if a kid in the class had a bad egg or banana or any other food allergy - it's easier to keep them away from the whole group, if the place is feeding them.   But I still think I would send thier lunch or find other arrangements.  Too scary for me.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



IntheMiddleofNowhere Newbie

I really appreciate all of your responses!  You guys all realigned my thinking on one thing... what was I thinking to try to get the school to provide lunches.  I know what I was thinking... easier, "free" (since I'm already paying for it), and more variety than I send. ... but you guys nailed it.  We don't eat out, because I get sick almost everywhere that claims they do gluten free.  I am obsessive about not having gluten in our house, and not allowing any cross contamination with the small amount of dairy we do use now and then... yada yada...

You guys were right, I shouldn't have been pushing for them to be able to accommodate us.  I guess I was just so frustrated with the fact that the childcare is so expensive to begin with, and that part of that cost assumes that my children are getting the meals. When the school wouldn't change the price, I felt like my only option was to make the $$$ worth it somehow.  No price is worth my children's health.

SLLRunner and StephanieL - I agree with and appreciate those suggestions.  I think I can/will/should write a letter to the school about the situation.  I'm really not one of those crazy people who thinks that everyone should accommodate us, quite the opposite actually... so I think what it boils down to is that we are paying for a product that we are not receiving. 

Now the challenging risk is... will there be indirect ramifications to speaking up? Perhaps :-\  And if nothing comes of it... and I chose to keep my kids there... I will both look like I was whining with no back bone, and risk damaged relationships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SLLRunner Enthusiast
Quote

Now the challenging risk is... will there be indirect ramifications to speaking up? Perhaps :-\  And if nothing comes of it... and I chose to keep my kids there... I will both look like I was whining with no back bone, and risk damaged relationships.

It's all in the perception: I think you will come across a strong advocate. Besides this, it doesn't matter what other people think. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,505
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Afton Horvath
    Newest Member
    Afton Horvath
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...