Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Celiac V Gluten Intolerance


Kaycee

Recommended Posts

Kaycee Collaborator

I have been diagnosed with celiac, but I was more expecting to be diagnosed as gluten intolerant.

The dr gave me a blank look when I asked if there was a difference. So it has got me to thinking are they both one and the same thing?

Can somebody please tell me if this is the case.

Thank you.

Cathy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Hi Cathy, how were you diagnosed, with blood work and biopsy? Some doctors want that distinction removed, as they say that the only difference is more damage has been done when you have full blown celiac disease. But with gluten intolerance you'll eventually get to that stage unless going gluten-free. So, the difference is just in degree and therefore no real difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wolfie Enthusiast

Well, the end result is the same, a gluten-free diet. Gluten intolerant doesn't mean that you will progress to Celiac (villi damage), but it doesn't mean that you won't either. Were you diagnosed by biopsy? If so, that is the gold standard for diagnosing Celiac for now. There are lots of people who have been diagnosed by positive bloodwork and positve dietary response too.

I know that I am gluten intolerant. Do I have full blown Celiac? I don't know b/c I had already gone gluten-free by the time I saw the gastro and couldn't do the biopsy gluten-free. However, my dietary response was amazing and I can't see eating gluten again to get a biopsy done that may not be conclusive. The biopsy can rule in Celiac, but not rule it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sleepingbean Newbie

In theory a gluten intollerant person may not get the Vilil damage that shows conclusive Celiac with current standards of biopsy testing. BUT that doesn't mean that person won't have other health and autoimmune problems! That is why I feel so strongly that those who get an "all clear" from their biopsy should still try a gluten free diet after the fact if they are still sick. It is the only way to truly know if gluten is the problem. The problem there, is that many people are not strict and you have to be strict, of course! (no gluten, no cross contamination).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kaycee Collaborator

I was diagnosed by a blood test, on Valentines day this year. I am still waiting for a biopsy, but the Dr said it could take a while to get that done. I am not eating gluten, Doctors request, so that might not show up anything in the biopsy, he is quite prepared for that, but he would like to know there is no other damage done.

I have had a couple more blood tests, my levels are going down, slowly. It is so frustrating as I have been trying so hard. It is the hidden gluten that gets me, so I am going totally next to nothing processed. It works. To start with I thought this is easy, but it is harder than it sounds.

But I feel I have had celiac for a while, I am nearly 49, as in next week, and I have had symtoms for as long as I can remember, maybe not as severe as a lot of peoples, but they have been there for years. I thought it was normal well normal for me anyway, as my mum had bowel problems similar to mine. She thinks she is fine now and refuses to get blood tests done, (even her doctor is not too keen on doing them for her) even though she told me to find out what was wrong, meaning she thought that was her problem too. But I just got so sick of it all, and had realised it was something I was eating a lot of giving me the problems, such as diahrea, stomach cramps, low iron levels etc.

Yes being gluten free makes a difference, I thought I would feel a lot better, but not really thinking I was ill, that has not happened, feel pretty much the same. Still walk the dog, walk with a friend and do 30 hours at work a week, and am just as worn out at the end of the week. But I don't think I was too bad worn out to start with, I had been worse years ago with little children.

Still must get up and go to work, I have talked alot.

Hey, you guys are so neat here on this forum. Once I felt alone, now I know I am not and you can all understand the finickity eater that I am now. Hope you can understand all my slang and sayings as you probably can tell I am not American, but come from good old New Zealand.

Cathy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ursa Major Collaborator

Cathy, I didn't figure it out until last year, when I was 52. And if I hadn't gone into full-blown celiac then (not confirmed, but my doctors agree), I would likely have lived with the fibromyalgia and IBS diagnosis, and taking codeine 24 hours a day for the rest of my life.

I am not feeling all that great yet, but yes, I am soooooooooo much better! When a lot of damage is done over so many years, it can take years (definitely many months) to get better, and when diagnosed late in life, it is fairly common never to get completely better. But even 70% better is a huge improvement, and I am sticking with my crazy diet (a lot more than just cutting out gluten).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor
I was diagnosed by a blood test, on Valentines day this year. I am still waiting for a biopsy, but the Dr said it could take a while to get that done. I am not eating gluten, Doctors request, so that might not show up anything in the biopsy, he is quite prepared for that, but he would like to know there is no other damage done.

I have had a couple more blood tests, my levels are going down, slowly. It is so frustrating as I have been trying so hard. It is the hidden gluten that gets me, so I am going totally next to nothing processed. It works. To start with I thought this is easy, but it is harder than it sounds.

But I feel I have had celiac for a while, I am nearly 49, as in next week, and I have had symtoms for as long as I can remember, maybe not as severe as a lot of peoples, but they have been there for years. I thought it was normal well normal for me anyway, as my mum had bowel problems similar to mine. She thinks she is fine now and refuses to get blood tests done, (even her doctor is not too keen on doing them for her) even though she told me to find out what was wrong, meaning she thought that was her problem too. But I just got so sick of it all, and had realised it was something I was eating a lot of giving me the problems, such as diahrea, stomach cramps, low iron levels etc.

Yes being gluten free makes a difference, I thought I would feel a lot better, but not really thinking I was ill, that has not happened, feel pretty much the same. Still walk the dog, walk with a friend and do 30 hours at work a week, and am just as worn out at the end of the week. But I don't think I was too bad worn out to start with, I had been worse years ago with little children.

Still must get up and go to work, I have talked alot.

Hey, you guys are so neat here on this forum. Once I felt alone, now I know I am not and you can all understand the finickity eater that I am now. Hope you can understand all my slang and sayings as you probably can tell I am not American, but come from good old New Zealand.

Cathy

Hi Cathy, I was a late diagnosis as well. It does take a while to recover. While I felt great just having the tummy troubles gone it was many, many more months for me to be pain free and energetic. One thing that helped a lot was sublingual B12 tablets, gluten free of course. You can just add them to the daily gluten-free multiple you already take. I envy you being in New Zealand. Any pictures I've seen and a couple of TV shows and movies have convinced me I want to see it in person some day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Kaycee Collaborator

Yes Ursula, it is so much more than cutting out the gluten. It is cutting out all those additives as well. That struck me in the first few weeks, that I felt better without the additives and preservatives. But it was hard to change the diet after all those years of eating what I want whenever I want. Needless to say, I am a bit overweight, but this diet does agree with me, as I have lost the appetite for overeating. I just eat what I feel I want, probably I eat what I should have as in healthy, and the hunger has gone, but the weight is still there. Not to worry, it is stable. (I did lose 2 stone the previous year, and I was dreading putting it back on)

With this diet I feel more in control, if there is too much fat in the diet, it would be because I put it there, not because the manufacturer did.

And yes New Zealand is beautiful, but I live in the north, and I think the wonderful scenery is further south, with the snow and mountains, but then the beaches are wonderful up here. Just need to lose a bit more weight before summer. And it only takes just over an hour to drive from one side of my country to other from where we live.

Cathy

Cathy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,501
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    fine one
    Newest Member
    fine one
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @SuzanneL! Which tTG was that? tTG-IGA? tTG-IGG? Were there other celiac antibody tests run from that blood draw? Was total IGA measured? By some chance were you already cutting back on gluten by the time the blood draw was taken or just not eating much? For the celiac antibody tests to be accurate a person needs to be eating about 10g of gluten daily which is about 4-6 pieces of bread.
×
×
  • Create New...