Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

No Biopsy But Positive Blood Work For celiac disease


Kris Fisher

Recommended Posts

Kris Fisher Rookie

In April is was diagnosed as having celiac by a blood test. The Dr said I should then have a biopsy of my small intesting and then go on the celiac diet. I thought hey lets skip the biopsy and just go straight to the diet. Well now I'm wondering if I should have the biopsy to prove that I have celiac disease 100%. What are your thoughts. I have reflux which I had a surgery to correct and ever since I've has very painful bloating problems. Celiac seemed to be the answer but the other day my stomach blew up before I ate anything so that makes me wonder if it's celiac and maybe something else. Do you think having the biopsy 2 months later is going to show anything? I also have small blisters on my hands, which I've has since I can remember. Is this the rash related to Celiac. They are not itchy just very small lister bumps on my fingers and palms. They only bother me because I can see them.

My youngest Daughter was diagnosed with gastritis early last year so I thought being I'm a celiac maybe she has it. Gastritis is caused by alcohol, smoking and stress. She is 6 so she could have been misdiagnosed! I brought her in and my Dr said to keep her on prilosec for 3 months and see how it goes. Should I bring her in and demand the test or wait. I want to bring her back in but the Dr makes me feel like I'm crazy. I know Celiac is 100% so why wouldn't he want to rule her out?

By the way, this is a great website!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



flagbabyds Collaborator

Welcome

and I think that a blood test is a 100% procedure, and a lot less invasive, that proves that you have it, and you hould be on the diet. About the continuing stomach stuff, you need to make sure there is no cross contamination in your house, also look into all your beauty products, because those could make you sick.

I woudl say get your daughter tested ASAP because the earlier you do it, the less pain she will go through later in life.

~molly

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest nini

If your blood test was positive, you absolutely have it and do not need to confirm it with a biopsy. I did not have the biopsy nor will I ever. My daughter's blood test was negative, but I put her on the diet and she has improved miraculously on the diet. She eats healthier than most kids her age, she doesn't like a lot of the junk food even if it's gluten-free... In my personal opinion, how you respond to the diet is the most valid diagnostic tool... Dr.s aren't going to tell you that because they don't make any money off of a diet!

My daughter had been diagnosed with reflux (GERD) and IBS as an infant... I definitely think those were mis diagnosis...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kris Fisher Rookie

Thanks Nini, I will probably stay away from the biopsy, not because I'm a fraid of procedures but If the Dr didn't push it maybe I really don't need it. I'm feeling better now that I'm not eating so many vegy's. Those were making me feel horrible. Anyway, I will call and get my Daughter in and rule her out hopefully. My other two daughters don't seem to have any sypmtoms so I leave them be for now. I appreciate your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kaycee Collaborator

Kris, I had a blood test, and it was positive. The doctor told me to keep going with the the gluten free diet, and that I would need a biopsy. His main reason for me to have the biopsy was to make sure that there was no other damage done through being coeliac. He wasn't too worried if that showed up nothing, as nothing would change his mind that I had coeliac. By the time I get my biopsy it might be a few months away, and he did not want me to continue eating gluten all that time.

I do want to have the biopsy done, as I am older, 49, and have only been diagnosed this year, and I am worried there could be a bit of damage. On top of that my father's family have a history of bowel cancer, so I know I will have to go that way too eventually. In New Zealand we can go through the public health system which takes a bit of time, but at least we don't have to pay. Otherwise if we have insurance, or can afford to pay, we can go private, and the biopsy would be done sooner.

So I am just waiting.

Cathy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gfp Enthusiast
If your blood test was positive, you absolutely have it and do not need to confirm it with a biopsy.

I absolutely agree ...moreoever if you are to have a biopsy you have to eat gluten while you wait ...

To me the usefulness of a biopsy is pretty limited diagnosis wise, even if its negative and you have a full celiac suite of +ve bloodtests you are not going to just keep eating gluten until you do get a positive biopsy!

However if the Dr. has a valid reason or you have a history of cancer in the family it might be something to put minds at rest or to have in a few years to check for damage but as a means to diagnose its pretty meaningless and a bad sampling or half and half results will just cast doubt on the diagnosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,479
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Charlotte Smith
    Newest Member
    Charlotte Smith
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Tlbaked13
      Thank you and I am aware that I should be eating a "normal" diet until tested it's kind of been trial and error for my diet or more like just ERROR! I about 1-3 bites a meal I'm to a point that 99 percent of the time I'm having trouble swallowing just about everything occasionally I find either something or a very small window of time that allows me to get very little of something! I am basically getting zero nutrition what so ever because I take one bite of the meal that I usually just slaved over just to end up tossing it when it's all said and done...did anyone else ever experience anything like this?  I am more then open to suggestions! It is taking a very extreme toll on me and my body forsure 
    • JustGemi
    • trents
      No! Do not start the gluten free diet until you know whether or not you will be having an endoscopy/biopsy to verify the blood antibody test results. Starting gluten free eating ahead of either form of diagnostic testing can invalidate the results. You don't want to allow the villous lining of the small bowel to experience healing ahead of testing by removing gluten.
    • Scott Adams
      We offer a ton of recipes here: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/gluten-free-recipes/ and have done some articles on fast food places, but keep in mind that eating out is a common source of gluten contamination: https://www.celiac.com/search/?q=fast food&quick=1&type=cms_records2 Many colleges now offer allergen-friendly, and sometimes gluten-free options in their student cafeterias: https://www.celiac.com/search/?&q=colleges&type=cms_records2&quick=1&search_and_or=and&sortby=relevancy PS - Look into GliadinX, which is a sponsor here, but many studies have been done on it which show that it may break down small amounts of gluten in the stomach, before it reaches the intestines.
    • JustGemi
      Thank you! What do you recommend in the next 7 weeks until I see my Doctor?  Just start my Gluten free diet?
×
×
  • Create New...