Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Help With Results Pls
0

5 posts in this topic

Hi all,

I recently had blood work done on my 2 children. My Daughters came back as follows

GLIADIN AB IgG 67 (moderate to strong positive)

GLIADIN AB IgA 7 (negative)

ENDOMYSIAL IgA AB 3 (negative)

Could somebody please help me interpret these results and advise me of any other tests that may or may not be needed to determine if she is celiac or not.

I have discussed this with the Doctor but would like to hear some opinions if possible.

Many thanks in advance

Chris

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Okay...there's some stuff on Celiac.com on interpreting stuff, but I couldn't get through it, so I found another site...........which I also can't get through.... :) ....they make this stuff hard to understand: :)

1. Serological

a. The blood tests recently developed for the detection and screening of celiacs and their relatives are a useful aid to diagnosis and monitoring. The tests have a clinical utility in:

Screening at-risk populations to identify biopsy candidates

Providing information to support a diagnosis of celiac disease

Monitoring adherence to a gluten-free diet

b. There are two classes of antibodies seen in untreated celiac disease: Antibodies directed against a fragment of gluten called gliadin and antibodies directed against some tissue in the body itself, endomysial (the covering of muscle), and reticulin (the framework for kidney and liver). There are other types of antibodies to the body's own tissues.

The actual tests are done using blood from the patient. The blood cells are removed. The gliadin test is usually an automated machine read test. While this means there is little room for interpreter error, there are no standardized tests, normal ranges, or even standardized methods in use in the US.

The endomysial tests are more dependent on the experience and ability of a pathologist in looking at a pattern of staining produced by the patient's serum on a slice of monkey esophagus or human umbillical cord. While this test is done in a similar way in most labs there are differences in how these are interpreted.

c. How good are these tests?

If all of the tests are positive then they are pretty accurate, GT 95% right. However, there are several reasons and circumstances when they are not so accurate. IgA and IgG are two different varieties of antibodies we have in our immune systems. The IgA gliadin and IgA endomysial tests are the most accurate and also become negative relatively quickly after stopping gluten (3-6 months). The IgG is not as specific (it can be positive in non celiacs). However it is important to do both, as about 4% of celiacs have low enough levels of IgA to make the IgA tests inaccurate.

These tests can only be given to a patient that is consuming gluten. The amount and time require for a gluten challenge varies and is a factor for consideration when scheduling the test.

Negative results do not indicate that the patient will never develop Celiac Disease, only that it is not currently a factor. HLA typing can be used to determine if a person has the genetic factors that are associated with celiac disease; without these genetic factors celiac disease is very unlikely to ever develop. For more information, access the file CELIAC CEL-HLA with the GET command from listserv@maelstrom.stjohns.edu.

Needless to say the interpretation of mixed results (i.e. some positive and some negative) is complicated. Also the interpretation and use of these tests in infants may be different, due to lower levels of IgA.

Okay, then there was a table I found in the FAQs of this site, which tells you how important each of the tests are for telling you "yes" or "no" with celiac disease:

Each of these three tests provide a certain degree of reliability for diagnosing celiac disease. Of these, endomysial antibody is the most specific test. The following table is taken from our studies (Lerner, Kumar, Iancu, Immunological diagnosis of childhood coeliac disease: comparison between antigliadin, antireticulin and antiendomysial antibodies).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most doctors would say the results are negative and not test further, others are willing to do the biopsy just to be sure. All three of my kids tested similar to your daughter. All had positive IGG only, negative on everything else. While waiting for the follow-up appointment (two months later) I had the kids tested through Enterolab. All three tested positive on Gliadin IgA and tTg stool tests and have genes that cause either Celiac or gluten intolerance. With this information and the improvement on the diet the doctor and I agreed not to do a biopsy on any of them. This means that they are getting healthy, but do not have an official diagnosis.

I personally tested negative on all the blood tests including the biopsy, yet positive on the stool tests. I was not too surprised at the negative test results given that I had previously been on a gluten free diet and being gluten free before testing can mess things up for future testing. I feel so much better off gluten and was getting sicker everyday on gluten. So I know that is my problem.

As for whether you should ask fo rmore testing, that is a decision you have to make, but from my personal experience even a positive IGG blood test suggests further testing would be a good idea.

Do you mind me asking what your daughters symptoms are, and how you came about getting them tested? Do other family members have it? Just curious.

God bless,

Mariann

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Chris.

I'm sure it will be of some comfort to know that you're not the only one who's wondering about what your results mean. I too am IGG positive only. I had an endoscopy and it was normal, so at least I know I'm not celiac. It still doesn't rule out gluten intolerance though. I'm still in the process of getting tests done with my doctor, but from what I've heard is that if you're IGG is positive, it might not be celiac, it could be something else causing that anti-gliadin to show up. There are many, many people that will tell you that it took a while for the other anti-gliadins to show up in their blood, or even for an endoscopy to show any signs of damage to the intestine. I know how you're feeling, believe me... keep searching, keep asking until you get your answers. My family is pre-disposed to auto-immune disease (lupus)... if you have anything of the sort in your family, see if your doctor can run an ANA. If I test positive, I'll probably have to go gluten-free anyway... I just really would like to know where the root of the problem is. Anyhow, keep searching, keep asking questions and I hope you'll get some answers and feel better soon.

Gretchen

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you mind me asking what your daughters symptoms are, and how you came about getting them tested?  Do other family members have it?  Just curious.

God bless,

Mariann

Thankyou for your replies.

My daughter does not really present any symptoms continuously. She has in the past suffered nausea and diarrohrea *sp. The test are more for peace of mind really.

I hadn't really noted how serious the disease was until i found this site. Growing up all my mum told me was, not to eat flour it will make you ill.

Thanks again

Chris

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,681
    • Total Posts
      921,725
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I also only really eat one meal a day and always after I get home. I never really feel hungrey. I call it 'Pavlov's dog in reverse'.  I think it comes from so many years of food making me sick. I have gotten to the point where I now at least can eat a sandwhich and some fruit during the day but it wasn't a quick process. When folks get like that it is very important to make sure that one meal has a good amount of both calories and nutrtion.  If your diet is how you describe you are starving yourself.  You need to get yourself used to eating again.  What helped me was carrying a baggie with some nuts and dry fruit with maybe even a handful of gluten free pretzels and always some chocolate baking chips. I just ate couple pieces when I thought of it throughout the day. A little bit of cheese and a couple safe crackers, a piece of fruit or a small tin or individual serving snack pack are also good. You need to get some nutrition during the day so you can feel up to cooking a simple full meal  for dinner. I hope your feeling better soon.
    • Ok, I can't seem to find my first lot of blood tests that were done for Celiac screening, they did include TTG I remember that much, and I am getting another copy of it but another test did come in today.  I don't know how different tests are done around the world and I don't get all the medical jargon but this is what it states, ******************************************************************************* HLA DR/DQ Genotyping for Coeliac Disease, Specimen type : EDTA blood Method : Detection of sequence-specific oligonucleotides (Gen-Probe). HLA-DR - 1, 13          DRB1 - 01, 13 HLA-DQ - 5,6        HLA-DQA1 - 5,6      HLA-DB1 - 05, 06 Interpretation : No genotype susceptibility for coeliac disease.  The DQ2 and DQ8 antigens associated with increased risk of coeliac disease were not identified in this patient.  In the absence of these antigens, coeliac disease is extremely unlikely.   *******************************************************************************   I have read the horror stories of blood tests and scope biopsies not be done right or flawed but here is what I do know as of now, At the moment the most non invasive test I can have done say negative.  I have double scopes (endoscopy and colonoscopy) booked for the 12th of October with results from biopsies expected a week or two after. Chances are they will show, a) signs of coeliac disease (even if the odds are low it can still happen), b) show signs of something else entirely and we will be busy dealing with the ramifications of that or c) it will show no signs of coeliac but I will still be suffering from gluten sensitivity (which is harder/impossible to measure clinically). My GP has told me that stress and anxiety can be a cause of all the symptoms I have been experiencing and suggests if the scopes show nothing that I may benefit from something to treat anxiety, i.e. antidepressants.  Not in a, "Oh we don't know what it is so have these," kind of way, he agrees with the thought that the scopes could indeed show coeliac, something else or even be negative. I did tell him that I could have a sensitivity and that even without benefit of clinical results, some people have gone on a gluten elimination diet for a period of time to see if they get any relief.  My question is this, if the scopes come up negative and I try eliminating gluten, how long would it be before I saw any results or improvements?  I have read enough here and elsewhere to know that everybody is different, some see results within days, some see results longer but are there any guidelines for how long a test like this should be undertaken for?  I have heard everything thing from two weeks to two months.  All of this is entirely moot at this point but I know that even if the results said clear, there would always be a little part of me that wonders if it could be a sensitivity that is the problem.  Any thoughts or advice greatly appreciated, and a thank you to all those who have taken the time to respond and offer advice and encouragement so far.        
    • We don't delete accounts but can delete any personal information and change your screen name if you would like. Just send me a personal message with three possible screen names. For the record you can edit most things in your account area with the exception of your screen name.
    • Thanks I never heard of that dye before, I guess I have to find more natural meat thanks for the suggestion. 
    • Yes, I only eat one meal a day. Sometimes salad or fries or whatever I can find. And thanks for the replies again.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,681
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Misalina
    Joined