Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Doubting Dr. Thomas


L.A.

Recommended Posts

L.A. Contributor

My gastro guy is having issues commiting 100% to me having celiac disease <_< . A specialist did the blood test which came back positive for Celiacs. My gastro guy decided to do a biopsy and it was negative. Is the blood test proof positive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mouse Enthusiast

Yes, it is. You can never have a false positive, but you can have a false negative. Many doctors still think of the biopsy as the gold standard. The problem with it, is if he does not take enough biopsies from the right areas, then the test can be negative. I only had the blood test and never the biopsy. But, I had also become the "classic celiac" before the diagnosis. So, my doctor did not think it was necessary for me to have it done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phila Rookie

My doc diagnosed me based on symptoms alone, but then again I had a tonne of symptoms. He's a huge proponent of looking at dietary response to come to a diagnosis. I must say that I do regret not having all of the tests, although I am absolutely convinced I have celiac disease.

Today was actually a scary day for me. My prolactin levels are high again so doc has ordered a CT scan to check for a pituitary tumour. I'd been having a tonne of issues lately which I thought were biliary related, but my doc seems to have dismissed that. He's worried about the prolactin and kept staring at those numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest nini

a pos. blood test is absolutely proof positive... just because the biopsy didn't find anything, it doesn't mean diddly squat... you have Celiac... welcome to the club! Get on with the business of getting well.

I was dx'ed on positive blood work and positive dietary response alone, I did not have a biopsy at all... my Dr. had said that since my blood work was positive I absolutely have it and did not need to go through a biopsy to confirm it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Robbin
My doc diagnosed me based on symptoms alone, but then again I had a tonne of symptoms. He's a huge proponent of looking at dietary response to come to a diagnosis. I must say that I do regret not having all of the tests, although I am absolutely convinced I have celiac disease.

Today was actually a scary day for me. My prolactin levels are high again so doc has ordered a CT scan to check for a pituitary tumour. I'd been having a tonne of issues lately which I thought were biliary related, but my doc seems to have dismissed that. He's worried about the prolactin and kept staring at those numbers.

:( I am sorry you have been having these problems. I haven't seen you post before, so welcome.

Also, ditto for me--the positive bloodwork means just that--positive. Why the medical community does this "song and dance act" around diagnosing this disease, is beyond me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayhawkmom Enthusiast

I'm very new here, and still wondering around just reading, reading, and reading. I came across this and wanted to ask, where do you think my daughter fits in here?

For reference purposes - the lab we used gave us the following information as THEIR norms. I realize other labs have other standards.

Ttg - <5 (my daughter's was 4)

IgA - <10 (hers was 9)

IgG - <11 (hers was 72)

EMA - Negative (no number provided)

Total IgE <20 - (hers was over 100 - 170 if I correctly recall)

Positive SPT - wheat/egg

Positive RAST - wheat/egg

(She has other allergies as well)

Negative biopsy for Villi damage, however... she has duadenal ulcers that I'm told are consistant with Celiac.

So, is she.... or isn't she?

She wasn't diagnosed Celiac. She was diagnosed with a Gluten Intolerance. What's the difference? Nothing, as far as the diet is concerned, right??

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aikiducky Apprentice

You're right, gluten intolerance means exactly the same diet-wise as celiac, and you need to exactly as careful about cross-contamination, too.

"Celiac" is a name that the doc gives to a disease when all the symptoms and test results are present that the medical community has agreed on have to be there. So when the test results and symptoms aren't exactly according to that list, but it's obvious that gluten is a problem, they call it "gluten intolerance" instead to be completely PC. You need to realize that the definition of "celiac" keeps changing, so in the future, someone with the exact same picture as your daughter may well get diagnosed celiac. They keep changing the definition as more information comes available with reseach, but that of course happens slowly.

Pauliina

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,224
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Suzi374
    Newest Member
    Suzi374
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Peace lily
      Im still not gaining weight I’m on a gluten free diet . And still having issues with constapation started priobiocs figured it would help been over two weeks . I guess it’s going to be a long road for me .
    • Smith-Ronald
      Enlarged lymph nodes in neck and groin with celiac are not uncommon. They can take time to reduce even after going gluten-free. Monitoring is key.
    • Bayb
      Hi Scott, yes I have had symptoms for years and this is the second GI I have seen and he could not believe I have never been tested. He called later today and I am scheduled for an endoscopy. Is there a way to tell how severe my potential celiac is from the results above? What are the chances I will have the biopsy and come back negative and we have to keep searching for a cause? 
    • Aussienae
      I agree christina, there is definitely many contributing factors! I have the pain today, my pelvis, hips and thighs ache! No idea why. But i have been sitting at work for 3 days so im thinking its my back. This disease is very mysterious (and frustrating) but not always to blame for every pain. 
    • trents
      "her stool study showed she had extreme reactions to everything achievement on it long course of microbials to treat that." The wording of this part of the sentence does not make any sense at all. I don't mean to insult you, but is English your first language? This part of the sentence sounds like it was generated by translation software.
×
×
  • Create New...