Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Celiac Versus Gluten Sensitive Enteropathy
0

6 posts in this topic

Hello,

My name is Lynette, I am 29, live in Australia, married and have one child.

I have been given two different diagnosis from one biopsy result. I would really appreciate if you could shed some light, or maybe clarify the situation.

In 2000, I was diagnosed with Hashimotos. To this day, it has not settled down. In January this year, I went to a new G.P. who went through my history and symptoms and ran a few blood tests. From these tests, I tested positive for antiendomysal antibodies. Foolishly I then went off gluten for a couple of months and started to feel better. I then decided I could not live the rest of my life following such a strict diet unless I had to, so I went back on a gluten diet for 4 weeks to have a biopsy to confirm a diagnosis. I had the biopsy, discovered I had grade 2 reflux and waited for the results. I went to my G.P. who said I had Gluten Sensitive Enteropathy - which he explained was the same as Celiac but not anywhere near as severe (I am finding it very difficult to find informationt to colaborate this). I then received a letter from the gastro that performed the biopsy saying I had Celiac disease. I rang the gastro and told her what the G.P. had told me and she said to me that if I were her patient, she would treat me as though I have Celiac disease. She told me to take the letter to the G.P. and show him her diagnosis and that my siblings also needed to be tested. I took the letter to the G.P. who then said he didn't actually know if it was Celiac disease at this stage as the changes in the biopsy were only mild.

The summary part of my biopsy results reads:

"small intestinal mucosa - intraepithelial lymphocytosis consistent with gluten sensitivity."

Sorry for the length of this post. I would be greatly appreciative of someone could clear some of my current confusion. At present, I don't know whether to answer yes or no when someone asks me if I have Celiac disease.

Kind Regards,

Lynette

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Given the results you have it really doesn't matter if you "officially" have celiac. If you don't have it now you will have it if you keep eating gluten. If you don't yet have celiac now, what you do have is the stage before your small bowel is so damaged that you do officially have celiac.

Some doctors consider this stage celiac even if it doesn't fit the the clinical description and that could be what's happening with your doctors. Or it could be you're right on the line and so the different doctors have different opinions.

From what you've told us I think the bottom line is the same, you have to go gluten-free.

richard

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it means that your intesetines were not damaged enough probably because you had been gluten-free and they are just going to keep getting damaged and then you will be diagnosed as clinically having celiac disease, but you don't need to go thhrough that. Go completely gluten-free and you will probably feel 100 times better.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies. I started telling people I didn't have celiac, but it was something similar (gluten sensitive enteropathy) and I don't think a lot of people believed me. A lady who has celiac (from a family of celiacs), proceeded to tell a group of friends that she is quite sure there is no such thing as gluten sensitive enteropathy. She believes it is celiac or nothing, therefore I don't have any need to be gluten free.

I have found it much easier to tell people I have celiac disease. I have found community awareness of celiac is much better than gluten sensitive enteropathy. Most people understand what celiac is to some degree. I just didn't want to feel like a fraud telling people I had celiac if I didn't really. Considering I have to be gluten-free for the rest of my life, and the gastro diagnosed celiac, it is probably much simpler to use the term celiac to those who are less educated on the matter.

Again, thank you for your help.

Kind Regards,

Lynette

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sperlyn,

You do have Celiac, it is just in the early stages. Here it is also called gluten intolerance, and sometimes gluten sensitive enteropathy. It just means that gluten is causing damage in your intestines. Some doctors won't call it Celiac, yet. Regardless, it still requires lifelong adherence to the gluten free diet. Since you had been gluten free for a time before the biopsy, it most likely altered your results. But you are very fortunate that they looked at the cellular level and saw the increase in the intraepithelial lymphocytes. Here in the US that is not standard practice and this was not done for me at my biopsy. I had also been gluten free before hand and had minimal damage, so they said "NOT Celiac". Don't feel bad about telling people that you have celiac. Gluten sensitive enteropathy is just another name for the same thing.

I have found community awareness of celiac is much better than gluten sensitive enteropathy. Most people understand what celiac is to some degree.

You are also very fortunate to live in a community that does know about Celiac. This is not the case here in the US. Most people have never heard of celiac and don't know what gluten is. I've even run into people who don't realise that the flour they cook with is made from wheat! I'm not sure what they think it is, but it sure is wheat! We are starting to get more press time in regards to Celiac Disease and gluten intolerance, but are a long way away from most people having heard of the disease.

God bless,

Mariann

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Just remembered that here in the states gluten sensitive enteropathy is simply another name for celiac.

richard

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,681
    • Total Posts
      921,728
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Breakfast on the go is always trickiest for me - I go with a whole fruit - banana, apple - or a yogurt, or a small bag of nuts.  Occasionally, I have a couple of hardboiled eggs at my local pret a manger.  Much prefer breakfast at home, where I can make myself an egg and cheese sandwich with avocado on gluten free toast.  Or cereal ;-)
    • thanks for your input, the reason I do the blood test is because I found out my duagther has it recently and she carry dq2 gene,so must be from my husband or me...im in the process waiting for my genetic test back,,by the way,I do have lots of celiac symptom,so it could be gluten sensitiive you said,thanks again.  
    • No I'm in the UK, from what I've been told that's a good thing for gluten labeling and standards compliance. What you and everyone else on here says makes me sense than what the doctors are saying (a confused message at best is what they're giving me, each one with a slightly different version of it). My referral letter is in the post so on theory appointment may not be that far away. I have a load of my favourite Quorn stuff (non-gluten-free version) in the freezer so perhaps using that up may be a good way to proceed for now. I'm out at the moment and torn whether to try chips from a café, in the strict gluten-free future would probably be a no-no but in current situation probably not so bad...
    • I also only really eat one meal a day and always after I get home. I never really feel hungrey. I call it 'Pavlov's dog in reverse'.  I think it comes from so many years of food making me sick. I have gotten to the point where I now at least can eat a sandwhich and some fruit during the day but it wasn't a quick process. When folks get like that it is very important to make sure that one meal has a good amount of both calories and nutrtion.  If your diet is how you describe you are starving yourself.  You need to get yourself used to eating again.  What helped me was carrying a baggie with some nuts and dry fruit with maybe even a handful of gluten free pretzels and always some chocolate baking chips. I just ate couple pieces when I thought of it throughout the day. A little bit of cheese and a couple safe crackers, a piece of fruit or a small tin or individual serving snack pack are also good. You need to get some nutrition during the day so you can feel up to cooking a simple full meal  for dinner. I hope your feeling better soon.
    • Ok, I can't seem to find my first lot of blood tests that were done for Celiac screening, they did include TTG I remember that much, and I am getting another copy of it but another test did come in today.  I don't know how different tests are done around the world and I don't get all the medical jargon but this is what it states, ******************************************************************************* HLA DR/DQ Genotyping for Coeliac Disease, Specimen type : EDTA blood Method : Detection of sequence-specific oligonucleotides (Gen-Probe). HLA-DR - 1, 13          DRB1 - 01, 13 HLA-DQ - 5,6        HLA-DQA1 - 5,6      HLA-DB1 - 05, 06 Interpretation : No genotype susceptibility for coeliac disease.  The DQ2 and DQ8 antigens associated with increased risk of coeliac disease were not identified in this patient.  In the absence of these antigens, coeliac disease is extremely unlikely.   *******************************************************************************   I have read the horror stories of blood tests and scope biopsies not be done right or flawed but here is what I do know as of now, At the moment the most non invasive test I can have done say negative.  I have double scopes (endoscopy and colonoscopy) booked for the 12th of October with results from biopsies expected a week or two after. Chances are they will show, a) signs of coeliac disease (even if the odds are low it can still happen), b) show signs of something else entirely and we will be busy dealing with the ramifications of that or c) it will show no signs of coeliac but I will still be suffering from gluten sensitivity (which is harder/impossible to measure clinically). My GP has told me that stress and anxiety can be a cause of all the symptoms I have been experiencing and suggests if the scopes show nothing that I may benefit from something to treat anxiety, i.e. antidepressants.  Not in a, "Oh we don't know what it is so have these," kind of way, he agrees with the thought that the scopes could indeed show coeliac, something else or even be negative. I did tell him that I could have a sensitivity and that even without benefit of clinical results, some people have gone on a gluten elimination diet for a period of time to see if they get any relief.  My question is this, if the scopes come up negative and I try eliminating gluten, how long would it be before I saw any results or improvements?  I have read enough here and elsewhere to know that everybody is different, some see results within days, some see results longer but are there any guidelines for how long a test like this should be undertaken for?  I have heard everything thing from two weeks to two months.  All of this is entirely moot at this point but I know that even if the results said clear, there would always be a little part of me that wonders if it could be a sensitivity that is the problem.  Any thoughts or advice greatly appreciated, and a thank you to all those who have taken the time to respond and offer advice and encouragement so far.        
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,682
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Russ Phelps
    Joined