Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

The Truth About Splenda
0

29 posts in this topic



Ads by Google:

I've seen this before! I immediately quit buying splenda and any beverages/gums/candy with splenda in them!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've gone off Splenda, too (also, the individual packages contain dextrose and I'm allergic to corn). I used it when it first came on the market, but then figured I was better off not using any artificial sweetner and went back to sugar and stevia.

As a nation we are really addicted to sweet things (and high carbs, which is in reality the same thing), and are not used to using self-control about our diets (just look at all the overweight people and the crowds at fast-food restaurants). So we are willingly gullible to people who will give us what we want with the promise of no consequenses in our indulgence.

I'm just as bad as everyone else about wanting sweet things. It's a really tough addiction to break. I'm better, but certainly not "cured". I'm hoping that a few months down the road with having eliminated those food allergens in my system that the sweet cravings will significantly diminsh. :(

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That wnho website has some mighty strange articles posted on it. You might want to browse through their authors and see what some of the others have to say.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my....thanks for posting this. I am very upset to find out that once again we have been mislead by a food company...like I should be surprised. I for one had no clue and thought it was "made from real sugar" therefore not bad for you....well any more than real sugar. I for one can not have the other fake sugar. If I even have a couple of sips of diet pop I get an almost instant headache and stomachache. I will make sure I spread the word and that my family consumes no FAKE sugar what so ever.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




There's very little truth in that web site. You're being manipulated by the sugar industry.

Dr. Eades article

These ads are the brainchild of Rick Masters, a former Democratic operative who has gone into the public relations business. He was profiled last March in the Atlantic Monthly in an article entitled "J-School for Jerks," which was a piece about how Mr. Masters conducts a course for people who want to be the next Bill O'Reilly. Mr. Masters works for Qorvis Communications, a large, Washington, DC based public relations firm.

Qorvis Communications and Mr. Masters were hired by non other than the sugar lobby to mount an attack against Splenda. Why the sugar lobby would want to attack the folks who make Splenda, I can't imagine.

Mr. Masters and "a group of concerned consumers, led by sugar cane and sugar beet farmers across America" (read: Sugar Association, the sugar lobby) put up a website purporting to tell the horrible truth about Splenda. But does this website tell the truth or is it simply sugar lobby propaganda? Let's take a look.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like any site member can post whatever they want on that site. My favorite is the doctor who has several articles objecting to the socialist practice of forced sharing of gluesticks in classrooms.

Also, there's a book-length article on how MS is caused by barium poisoning (lyme proponents take note).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And another little twist that may also affect some of you. I just found out in August after my blood panel that I am also allergic to sugar cane. Other forms of sugar are fine (ex. beet sugar, honey, maple sugar, agave, etc.) but there's something about the protein in sugar cane I can't handle. That includes Splenda, as it's made from sugar cane and has the same protein makeup. I was shocked when I saw the results of my blood panel. I rarely eat sugar but was using a whole lot of Splenda, especially in my coffee. Most of my intestinal problems vanished last winter after being diagnosed with gluten intolerance and going completely gluten-free, but my exzema just wouldn't go away (something that has been off and on now for over four years). For over a month now I've also removed the cane sugar from my life, and the exzema is now finally almost completely gone! Hopefully this is the last food I need to get rid of. At any rate, the testing doesn't show me being highly reactive to anything else but sugar cane and gluten, so if that's all I have to deal with, I'm happy with it!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like any site member can post whatever they want on that site. My favorite is the doctor who has several articles objecting to the socialist practice of forced sharing of gluesticks in classrooms.

hehehehhee! :D

Also, there's a book-length article on how MS is caused by barium poisoning (lyme proponents take note).

What about Lyme????

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

artifical sweetners are usually not good for ones health. years ago a doctor told my diabetic relative that he would much rather him use a tsp of sugar in his tea rather than use one of the fake sweetners. He said the real deal would do less harm to his body.My relative took insulin twice daily. this was many years ago & i for one believed what he said as he was one of the leading doctors for diabetes.....

Most art.sweetners make me feel sick.......

just my two cents .....

mamaw

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

heh, dont both posting anything in defense of Splenda... or even mention how bad the highly processed white junk that ppl call sugar realy is... the Sugar Mafia will just come after you. After all its "all natural" just like cyanide and cocain :D THought to be fair. cocain is probably processed less then that white junk :lol:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also have read a lot of scary stuff about Splenda, but you can't believe everything you read, right? I also believe where's there's smoke there's fire. Anyhow, what I do know is that Splenda is not for me. I get intense stomach pain when I have too much Splenda. If I have a little now and then, I'm ok. But, if I have a too much, I'm in pain. For example, if I have Spenda in my coffee for 3 day in a row, I'm in trouble.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I also have read a lot of scary stuff about Splenda, but you can't believe everything you read, right? I also believe where's there's smoke there's fire. Anyhow, what I do know is that Splenda is not for me. I get intense stomach pain when I have too much Splenda. If I have a little now and then, I'm ok. But, if I have a too much, I'm in pain. For example, if I have Spenda in my coffee for 3 day in a row, I'm in trouble.

Some ppl can not east certin foods regaurdless of how healthy/safe it is. For example my son cannot eat wheat/barley/rye/malt/etc or eggs... my wife has to aviod brazil nuts... my SIL has to aviod rice/corn... and so on. Ppl that react to a food, no matter how "safe" it maybe, should aviod it. In your case that means aviod Splenda. In fact since Splenda is not digestible it is hard on some ppls digestive systems, and that is probably your case at a guess. :D

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Some ppl can not east certin foods regaurdless of how healthy/safe it is. For example my son cannot eat wheat/barley/rye/malt/etc or eggs... my wife has to aviod brazil nuts... my SIL has to aviod rice/corn... and so on. Ppl that react to a food, no matter how "safe" it maybe, should aviod it. In your case that means aviod Splenda. In fact since Splenda is not digestible it is hard on some ppls digestive systems, and that is probably your case at a guess. :D

Yes - It is not for me for sure. My dad has it all the time, with no problems. Everyone is different.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone interested in some in-depth, reputable articles on the real health dangers of not just Splenda (chlorinated sugar) but Aspartame as well, can peruse the library of Joseph Mercola, at mercola.com. I now use stevia for my coffee...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In preindustrial ages they refined sugar like this:

Clarify the cane juice

Boil it down into a thick syrup to concentrate and crystallize the sucrose

Drain off the impurity-laden syrup (molasses)

Washing the remaining syrup from the crystals

Sounds innocent?

Well... the cane stalks were first crushed and pressed and the resulting juice was heated with lime (not the fruit, the chemical) and a substance such as egg white or animal blood, which would coagulate and trap the impurities in a scum that could be skimmed off.

(bunch of other stuff)

Then it was poured into a cone-shaped clay mold where it crystalized into raw sugar. The cones were left to stand inverted for a few days, and the molasses would run off through a hole in the tip.

Then a fine wet clay was packed over the wide end of the cone.

Heh! So much for thinking sugar is pure and natural.

They still use lime though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone interested in some in-depth, reputable articles on the real health dangers of not just Splenda (chlorinated sugar) but Aspartame as well, can peruse the library of Joseph Mercola, at mercola.com. I now use stevia for my coffee...

Hmm a site buy a guy selling books/etc that forces you to sign up with your email to his spam list before you can read his articls... most of which are full of "maybes" and "mights"... not what I would call "reputbable".

The only thing I could find on his site to do with Splenda that is based on fact is that some ppl react to it. Yes some ppl do, just like some ppl die from eating peanuts. That does not mean the world should exterminate the peanut plant.

Ugh here I go again getting drawn in to a debeat I want no part of... I wont post/check this thread anymore.

I agree Stevia is a great option and when it falls in price (as of last week in my store its 2.5 times the cost of splenda per serving, thats liquid stevai vs powered splenda, cheapest of both lines) I plan to try it myself.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny, this is the second thread I've been on in the last two weeks where I found myself defending Dr. Mercola. Ursula, where are you?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about Stevia, its none chemical

my niece has ms.

She used splenda and after a few weeks she had an attack of unknown origin. The attack receded when she quit the splenda. So I stay away from it as a rule.

Stevia is a natural plant from south america that has been used their for a long time without the contorversy that surrounds splenda arising. Taste is as good or better than splenda to me.

A couple things to be aware of with stevia. it is sold in two forms one is packets and that is not pure and has a corn derivitive mixed in.

The pure stuff is like 28 dollars for about 6-8 oz. However, 1/4 teaspoon equals 3/4 cup approximately. thats why they cut ist with the corn derivtive in the packets- to make it more equivalent in measurement.

Be very careful to add just a very little stevia at a time. if you put too much in it tastes really bad.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pointing out the obvious here but someone has to do it! Natural doesn't always mean harmless.

Dr. Mecola is very interested in inspiring fear, uncertainty and doubt in order to get you to buy his products. While not everything on his web site is utter BS, IMHO, a lot of it is. Or is at least somewhat tainted with the FUD factor. Personally, I prefer to get my information from more objective sources who don't stand to make a lot of money on fear mongering.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How about Stevia, its none chemical

my niece has ms.

She used splenda and after a few weeks she had an attack of unknown origin. The attack receded when she quit the splenda. So I stay away from it as a rule.

Stevia is a natural plant from south america that has been used their for a long time without the contorversy that surrounds splenda arising. Taste is as good or better than splenda to me.

A couple things to be aware of with stevia. it is sold in two forms one is packets and that is not pure and has a corn derivitive mixed in.

The pure stuff is like 28 dollars for about 6-8 oz. However, 1/4 teaspoon equals 3/4 cup approximately. thats why they cut ist with the corn derivtive in the packets- to make it more equivalent in measurement.

Be very careful to add just a very little stevia at a time. if you put too much in it tastes really bad.

I have heard about Stevia. A friend of mine who swears for it and against Splenda loves it. I will check out my local food store. Thanks for mentioning it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have heard about Stevia. A friend of mine who swears for it and against Splenda loves it. I will check out my local food store. Thanks for mentioning it.

glad it may help. there is also a liquid form. It doesn't effect your blood sugar, it has no calories, and its sweeter than sugar.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a believer in Splenda being "evil" as with all artificial sweeteners... I mean I'm not about to run a one-woman campaign to get people to stop eating it, but I know that it makes me feel ill and I don't trust it one bit. Not saying I trust the sugar industry more, but rather that I wouldn't touch Splenda or any other artificial sweetener with a 10-foot pool.

As for Dr Mercola - I can't even spend 2 minutes on that site and actually think he's legit. That site screams "profiteering shyster" to me. Some people talk about him like he's G-d and all he says is the gospel. That scares me. More power to you if you've found stuff on there that's helped you - That's great. Everyone deserves to find things that work for them to have a healthier life. I'm sure much of what he says holds some truth and some value and some of his theories are dead-on (especially his advocacy of gluten-free diets). But I would take everything I read on there with a grain of salt... I think he gives a bad name to natural health practitioners.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Be very careful to add just a very little stevia at a time. if you put too much in it tastes really bad.

You've got that right! I put one of those packets of stevia in my coffee, and it rendered it undrinkable. Yuck! I'd like to give it a shot again, but with the "pure" stevia...in a very small dosage...I like my coffee sweet, but not that sweet!

As for Dr Mercola - I can't even spend 2 minutes on that site and actually think he's legit. That site screams "profiteering shyster" to me. Some people talk about him like he's G-d and all he says is the gospel. That scares me. More power to you if you've found stuff on there that's helped you - That's great. Everyone deserves to find things that work for them to have a healthier life. I'm sure much of what he says holds some truth and some value and some of his theories are dead-on (especially his advocacy of gluten-free diets). But I would take everything I read on there with a grain of salt... I think he gives a bad name to natural health practitioners.

Any website has to be read with a grain of salt...after all, you can't believe everything you read! Besides, I'm totally disgusted that I have to give up my email addy to read an article on Dr Mercola's (or anyone else's) website. No information is worth getting spam email. ;)

Michelle

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,144
    • Total Posts
      919,568
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the posters above have given you very good information and I will throw in my 2 cents worth.  I am surprised that they did not test her DGP IgA also.  I am sure that would have been positive.  They switched off with antibody classes and usually they do both tests for both antibodies.  IgA is more specific to Celiac but the IgG is also useful.  The testing shows your daughter is producing antibodies to the gluten in her diet. (DGP IGG). THe tTg shows positive for some damage or inflammation. You know........your daughter is only 4.  She hasn't been on the planet or eating gluten that long. It can take years for enough damage to occur for it to be able to be found on biopsy.  I would say it is highly likely that this is Celiac, especially with her symptoms. But because the damage hasn't graduated to bad enough yet, they won't diagnose her. I think you need to do what others have said and get all copies of testing and find someone else who will take a look and give a diagnosis, especially if they have you do a dietary trial and her symptoms go away.  That might be the only recourse if you want faster proof. I know I would want faster.  I would not really be happy if I thought I had to keep feeding her something that was making her sick.  If you keep her on gluten long enough, the diarrhea will probably show up. BTW.........the criteria mentioned regarding diagnosis does not apply to kids.  I know it's silly and stupid but most leading Celiac specialists do not go by this criteria for kids.......adults only.  Keep that in mind because it might come up.  You could recognize it but they might not. Have you considered gene testing, to help bolster a diagnosis? As far as false positives go, it's the other way around. False negatives happen more frequently than many people think.  It's a recurring theme here.  With her symptoms, which is what I had, a bloated belly and tummy aches are telling.  Have they tested her for lactose intolerance?  That can cause similar symptoms, although it sure won't raise those 2 blood tests.  Keep looking for Celiac because there are many red flags here.
    • This 4 out of 5 criteria does not apply to children. I was never given a reason why, but it isn't.     That said, you may try to get a second opinion from another GI who may be willing to give her a firm dx.  We were in your boat 6 years ago and while I'm sure I'll get slammed for it, I wish we had kept gluten in our kiddos diet till he scoped positive for a variety of reasons.  Again, even family is different and you have to find what is best for you!
    • Mnoosh, I had swollen lymph nodes prior to celiac dx and for a while after going gluten free. My neck as well as groin. The groin ones were the worst. Guess what? All gone! It's hard to recall a time line & consider that everyone is different but I think mine completely resolved within a year.  You've been given great information. Just breathe and then again, breathe. You're going to be fine. 
    • It is the only thing you have eaten, so it can't be anything else?  I eat it with no issues so I am not sure how you can be certain that is the problem.  All I am saying is that its sort of "your word against mine and the company's word".  
    • Thanks cyclinglady & manasota! I appreciate it. I came to give an update...... I'm still 99% itch free. I get a "place" like a bug bite once in a while that itches and I just use the prescription steroid cream on it & that takes care of the itch. My rash is healing up rapidly everywhere. Almost clear skin now! Yaaaaayyyyyyyyyy! Now for a rundown of the "treatment". For 20 days I took a 100mg doxycycline twice a day. Then we upped it to two 100mg doxy twice per day. I took those for 5 days & made rapid progress and the itching stopped. The doxy was getting my tummy though. It was getting really rough despite my eating yogurt. So on day 6 and day 7, I took two 100mg doxy in the am but in the pm I just took 1 of them. On day 7, I was nauseous for hours on end. So since I was still doing well without itching and the rash was healing everywhere, I decided to cut back some more. On days 8, 9, & 10 I have only taken two 100mg doxy in the am and none at night. I'm doing good and my tummy is much, much happier! No more nausea!  I'll update as things go along.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,176
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Red Butt in hemet
    Joined