Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

False Negative?


ironic

Recommended Posts

ironic Newbie

I am a 16 year old girl who has had serious stomache problems her whole life. After every single meal my stomache would hurt so bad I was sure I would die, and while it seemed to get better as I got older my parents think it is just because I've learned to deal with the pain. I used to miss a LOT of school - and kids were really mean about it - saying I was faking and such. So finally last year I got a blood test for Celiac disease, and it came back positive. So I went on the diet and felt almost 100% better. Then they had me do an endoscopy which came back negative. So I stopped the diet and got sick again. A few minutes ago my neighbors new wife just came over to borrow and egg, and she mentioned she has Celiac disease. I told her how we thought I had it, but explained how we foud out I didn't. She is a doctor and told me that 1. the blood test is 95% accurate, and 2. that if I had been on the diet the endoscopy would come back negative whether I had it or not.

So - do you think I have it? I'm going to go in for another blood test, but I think regardless I am going to start the diet again. I have pretty much all the symptoms. Lately they thought I had IBS, and I've been on the medication.. but it doesn't help as much as I'd like it too. They also thought I was Lactose intolerent.. but I can eat Ben and Jerrys without a problem.

Any thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest nini

you already have your answer. The blood test you already had was sufficiant enough, couple that with positive dietary response and there you have it... I wouldn't bother with any more testing, based on the positive blood test and the positive dietary response that you already had, that is more than enough evidence in my book to say you definitly have this and need to be gluten-free. Good luck with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarlaB Enthusiast

Welcome. If your blood test came back positive and you had a positive dietary response, then you felt bad again when you went on the diet, I really see no need for any additional testing. You've got it! Even if you had been eating gluten for the biopsy, it still can have false negatives -- it can only prove you have celiac but cannot rule it out. Also, as far as I know, the blood test is not known for having false positives -- it is known for having false negatives, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rinne Apprentice

I think you are very fortunate that your new neighbour has Celiac and is a doctor. I also think you should talk to your parents about seeing a new doctor.

And welcome, this is a great place for questions and remember there are no dumb questions. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rachel--24 Collaborator

Yup...thank goodness for your neighbor stopping by to borrow that egg!

I agree with the others....no need for further testing. Biopsies often give false negatives but having been already on the diet you are almost guaranteed to have a negative test result. You said you felt great on the diet so this means your body was healing and that the diet was working....hence a negative biopsy. The positive bloodwork and your positive response to the diet was enough for a diagnosis.

Get back on the diet and feel better. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ironic Newbie

Thank you all so much. I know this sounds stupid, but it is a relief. When you know something is wrong- once you find out what it is (even if it means a major life change) you feel better. Fear in the unknown and so on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kbtoyssni Contributor

Your neighbor is right - you definitely have it. About the lactose intolerance: you may have a temporary intolerance to lactose while your body is healing. Lactose is digested by the tips of your villi so if they're worn away you'll have trouble digesting it.

Congrats on finally getting a diagnosis! I was also thrilled to get a diagnosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

You can have false negatives with blood tests or biopsies

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mommida Enthusiast

We should get the name of your neighbor, the doctor (who is absolutely correct in what she told you) and refer those who are going for testing in your area. :D

L.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ironic Newbie

I just got back from my doctor..

she said that endo. are much more reliable than blood tests, and even if I had been on the diet, if the endo. came back neg. then I don't have it. She also said (in a nicer way) that I shouldn't listen to people on the internet, or neighbors who don't know my case personally. She said the diet doesn't affect the endo.

I trust her, it's just very different from everything I've heard/read. I asked about people who only get blood tests (not endoscopies) and she said that most of them don't really have Celiac disease. So I asked why we all had positive dietary responses, but I don't remember what she said.

But I got a referral to childrens hospital in boston. But now I have to wait to start the diet (again) to see what tests the new dr. is going to want to do. Either way - neg or pos - I'm starting the diet. Cause I think I have it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nikki-uk Enthusiast
she said that endo. are much more reliable than blood tests, and even if I had been on the diet, if the endo. came back neg. then I don't have it. She also said (in a nicer way) that I shouldn't listen to people on the internet, or neighbors who don't know my case personally. She said the diet doesn't affect the endo.

My son recently had an endo last Fri.

The doctor repeatedly asked me if he was still eating gluten.-otherwise the villi (lining of the intestines) will have started to heal-and you could end up with a false negative.

Once you stop eating gluten,the inflammation starts to heal itself.

For you to have another endoscopy you will need to eat gluten for at least 6 weeks prior to the biopsy for the damage to start occuring again,-and for it to be noticable in a biopsy.

You certainately don't have to listen to people on the internet-but facts are facts.You must be eating gluten to get an accurate diagnosis of celiac disease via biopsy.Your doctor is misinformed (sadly alot docs are about celiac disease)

Scroll down and read No2 on this link

Open Original Shared Link

Good Luck :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mythreesuns Contributor
she said that endo. are much more reliable than blood tests, and even if I had been on the diet, if the endo. came back neg. then I don't have it.

I think a lot of us have proven (if only anecdotally) that not only is the biopsy less reliable than the endo, neither are very reliable at all.

Sadly, it seems that your dr is not very well informed about celiac. I agree with everyone else--stay on the diet since you KNOW you feel better on it.

I had a negative blood test and endo, but a positive result from EnteroLab (including the genes!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rikki Tikki Explorer

Welcome Ironic:

I am saddened by your doctor giving you that information. Everything I have read has stated that if you are not eating gluten the intestines will heal and show a negative biopsy.

If you feel better off gluten then stay off it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rez Apprentice
Welcome Ironic:

I am saddened by your doctor giving you that information. Everything I have read has stated that if you are not eating gluten the intestines will heal and show a negative biopsy.

If you feel better off gluten then stay off it.

Remember, the art of medicine is a practice. I have had two doctors tell me I know more about the disease than they do. My pediatric allergist called me back and said he and his partner were wrong. He thanked me for "teaching the doctors". He claimed the blood test would be positive even if my son had been off gluten for a month. He did some further research and that's when he found out he was mistaken. You have to trust your gut. No pun intended. :) I think in 20 years people will be more educated on this disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
aikiducky Apprentice

You only really need to think about it logically for a moment to realize that the doctor is wrong. :) The whole POINT of the gluten free diet is to allow the intestine to heal again... :blink:

Of course if there's a lot of damage it's possible that there's still damage to be found after a while gluten free, but there's no guarantee that would be the case. Also, there's no way to biopsy all of the small intestine, so if the damage is in a place that can't be reached in the endoscopy, the result will be inconclusive. And endo can't prove you don't have celiac, it can only prove you have it, if it turns out to be positive.

Pauliina

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nancym Enthusiast

You should listen to your body. Your doctor doesn't have the opportunity to walk around in your body and experience the pain you have and the lack of pain when you change your diet.

Ultimately this comes down to who has control over your body. You, or your doctor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ironic Newbie

Thank you guys.

I'm going to talk to my friends and family to decide if I want to have another edoscopy, or if I should just start the diet again.

What do all of you think.

I'm leaning towards just doing the diet, but I think it would also be good to have my med. records to say I have it. So I don't know.

What I really hate is that she basically called me a hypocondriac (I have no idea how to spell that word). I have had to convice so many people that the pain is real, I shouldn't have to convince my doctor too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sagemoon Newbie

I was treated with the same dismissiveness as you are by your current doctor. That was in 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005. After years of sickness I was diagnosed with Celiac in January 2006, only after I refused to leave the doctor's office until I was properly tested and then paid for my own gene testing as well. I suffered for 6 years because of Drs. Know-It-All. Doctors are not Gods, they are fallible human beings that are extremely busy and have stubborn streaks just like the rest of us and they HATE to be proven wrong, just like the rest of us. Take this as a lesson in life and move on to the specialist and leave your overwhelmed doctor behind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nancym Enthusiast
I'm going to talk to my friends and family to decide if I want to have another edoscopy, or if I should just start the diet again.

What do all of you think.

I'm leaning towards just doing the diet, but I think it would also be good to have my med. records to say I have it. So I don't know.

Are your parents supportive of the dietary change? If so, I'd skip the doctor business, especially since you really need to eat a LOT of gluten for 8 weeks or more. I mean, a piece of bread at every meal. And even then, you might have another negative biopsy but you're still gluten sensitive.

There's a lot of doctors who will take positive blood work as a diagnosis. Gee, I was just reading something today... can't find the link now. Oh here it is!

Open Original Shared Link

Positive antibody, negative biopsy

If by positive antibodies you mean either IgA endomysial (EMA), IgA gliadin or IgA tissue transglutaminase, then I�€™d agree, you probably have celiac disease. If it�€™s an IgG gliadin or any reticulin antibody then it is less certain since other conditions will give these reactions.

Biopsy should be interpreted by someone familiar with pathologic findings for celiac disease. Earliest change is just increase in lymphocytes (immune cells) in the tissue all the way up to full-blown villous flattening. Many centers use the �€œMarsh index�€� to �€œscore�€� the pathology findings in presumptive cases of celiac disease. Low grade changes like intraepithelial lymphocytosis or increased crypt mitotic figures may be regarded as normal variants by reading pathologist, especially if they don't know they are looking for Celiac disease.

Ask your GI to get a second opinion on your slides from someone who does GI path.

Strict gluten-free diet should result in decreases in antibody titers over time. EMA (tTG) will go down first, usually negative by 4-6 months. IgA gliadin next then IgG gliadin which may persist for a year.

Another study has shown that patients (who were ultimately diagnosed with celiac disease) with equivocal biopsies when given large "doses" of gluten containing protein over 2 month period will develop the typical changes of villous flattening. This is also known as a "Gluten Challenge".

If presumptive celiac disease then be sure to get the rest of the workup for iron/vitamin deficiency, osteoporosis, etc. Low bone density, e.g., would corroborate the positive antibodies.

Ultimately its the dietary challenge that SHOULD matter. If your symptoms go away when you stop eating gluten, why on earth would any doctor on the face of this planet deny the obvious?

If your parents aren't supportive, is there any chance you could get them to come here and talk to us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Help Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    2. - Julie Riordan replied to Julie Riordan's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      3

      Any ideas for travelling

    3. - Nedast replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to SuzanneL's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test

    5. - SuzanneL posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,498
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kim.cervone513
    Newest Member
    Kim.cervone513
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @SuzanneL! Which tTG was that? tTG-IGA? tTG-IGG? Were there other celiac antibody tests run from that blood draw? Was total IGA measured? By some chance were you already cutting back on gluten by the time the blood draw was taken or just not eating much? For the celiac antibody tests to be accurate a person needs to be eating about 10g of gluten daily which is about 4-6 pieces of bread.
    • SuzanneL
      I've recently received a weak positive tTG, 6. For about six years, I've been sick almost everyday. I was told it was just my IBS. I have constant nausea. Sometimes after I eat, I have sharp, upper pain in my abdomen. I sometimes feel or vomit (bile) after eating. The doctor wanted me to try a stronger anti acid before doing an endoscopy. I'm just curious if these symptoms are pointing towards Celiac Disease? 
×
×
  • Create New...