Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Please Read - No Celiacs Can Have Soy!


srokie

Recommended Posts

Michi8 Contributor
I specifically asked her on January 2nd if that information applied to all celiacs and she said yes.

Because, as she said, they are "mostly fat." The more I eat the more my stomach rejects it, but if I do what she says and keep it to a minimum, I'm fine...

She said the casein thing isn't necessarily applicable to all celiacs, and said she suspects my casein intolerance is only temporary.

Are you sure she is talking about casein tolerance, and not lactose intolerance? The lactose levels in various dairy products can vary significantly and will definitely make a difference in how a lactose intolerant person reacts. Lactose levels are lower in higher fat milks, so cream should be better tolerated than skim milk. Lactose levels in butter are very low too. Finally, Lactose intolerance may cease once a celiac's gut heals.

I'm not so sure that there's much difference in the amount of casein though...a casein allergy or intolerance is another thing altogether.

Michelle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply
srokie Newbie
Are you sure she is talking about casein tolerance, and not lactose intolerance? The lactose levels in various dairy products can vary significantly and will definitely make a difference in how a lactose intolerant person reacts. Lactose levels are lower in higher fat milks, so cream should be better tolerated than skim milk. Lactose levels in butter are very low too. Finally, Lactose intolerance may cease once a celiac's gut heals.

I'm not so sure that there's much difference in the amount of casein though...a casein allergy or intolerance is another thing altogether.

Michelle

You're right, but I am sure she was talking about casein. Thanks though :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Eliza13 Contributor

Was asking about the casein because I throw up when I eat butter. I throw up with milk too, but more often with butter (i.e. when eating buttered popcorn).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular
Come on, try to be nice. I am a celiac and I know that having a crumb is not ok. There are several components to milk - lactose, whey, casein, FAT, etc, - and when you have butter which is mostly fat, you eliminate the casein. This is why skim milk has concentrated casein - they have removed the fat component. Here are my Enterolab Results:

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 124 (Normal Range <10 Units)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 51 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score 95 Units (Normal Range <300 Units)

Fecal anti-casein (cow

Link to comment
Share on other sites
eleep Enthusiast
I hope I was a bit clearer... I'm used to being able to wave my hands and wildly gesture as I talk, and I sure want to do that for this one. ;)

I've now officially seen her do this, so I can second this one.

What I'm still wondering is:

1) Does the reaction to prolamines as well as gluten have something to do with similar molecular structures -- i.e. -- is one's body mistaking one for the other because they're shaped like the same lego even if they have different colors?

2) Is this just a similar reaction and not an autoimmune response, or is there an actual autoimmune response happening?

3) Why does this affect some of us and not others -- does it have something to do with genetics, or does it have to do with the kind of damage already done to one's body or something else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chrissy Collaborator

the statement that NO celiacs can have soy is just plain wrong. my girls have soy and milk and we have had their Ttg levels tested---more than once----and their levels, which indicate an autoimmune response, have dropped. if what that doc said was true, my girls levels would not have dropped.

i'm guessing maybe she is up-to-date on some celiac info----but not ALL celiac info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gentleheart Enthusiast
She said the casein thing isn't necessarily applicable to all celiacs, and said she suspects my casein intolerance is only temporary.

I laboratory tested as having a casein intolerance and was told it was genetic and permanent just like gluten. The same with eggs. They are all 3 inherited, genetic protein allergies. Can these kinds of casein allergies and egg allergies be temporary? I was told not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Rusla Enthusiast

Saying all Celiacs can't have soy is like saying all Celiacs can't have dairy, or all Celiacs have the same symptoms. Which we know these statements would be untrue.

In my family so far I am the only positive tester for Celiac but the whole family can not have dairy and we can not have Casein. Not all Celiacs have the same symptoms exactly as any other one.

Let us all remember some doctors have no clue really and their information they get on various things changes also. Today she may get something that says that or she interprets as it saying all Celiacs can't have soy. In three months from now she may get something that says all Celiacs can have soy but not corn gluten. The whole medical profession, medications and treatments is one snafu after another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LL04 Newbie

I went dairy free just after I went gluten-free almost 2 years ago, however I never cut out soy. I have had multiple blood tests and most recently (October) I had another gastroscopy to make sure that I was confirmed gluten-free. My biopsies came back and my GI said that they looked "better than normal". If what this doctor says is true, that soy triggers a celiac reaction, then my biopsies should have come back a mess due to all the soy I've eaten in the past 2 years. In addition, I would still be experiencing my gluten reaction symptoms if this was the case (I am ULTRA sensitive) and I haven't had any in forever. I would definitely have to DISAGREE with that statement! The only think I can think of is that perhaps Chrissy in some way misunderstood what the doctor was actually saying?? Or perhaps the doctor herself misconstued or misinterpreted some new research or info she had just gotten?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
darlindeb25 Collaborator

:P Tiffany, I often tell my sweetheart that if his hands were tied down, he would not beable to talk!!! :lol::lol: Sometimes I actually worry that I may be standing too close in some of his stories!!! :lol:

We are all correct. Doctors do not like being told they do not know it all. Most doctors anyways!!! We must educate them. I am sure that Srokie's doctor thinks she is correct and what she is saying is true of many of us. I am an example of what she says. The doctor I go to wants me to bring him any info I feel would be beneficial for him. He never questions my celiacs and does what he can to help me figure things out. So far, he is the best doc I have found.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chrissy Collaborator

not me lauralee!! i didn't see that doc!!LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RiceGuy Collaborator

While I obviously can't speak for anyone else, I eat both soy and millet, and feel better than without them. No two people will be identical in every way, and this includes Celiacs. Others can eat things I can't, just as I can eat things others cannot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VegasCeliacBuckeye Collaborator

I never said she was "wrong", I said I was skeptical.

Of course, I am skeptical anytime someone makes an all-encompassing generalization about ALL Celiacs.

I have often said that I believe there is a great number of Celiacs who have other intolerances, but to make such a sweeping statement without provuiding research, studies or similar studies by other people is dangerous and ill-advised.

In any event, the theory is essentially destroyed by some of the posters on here who have stated that they have consumed SOy and there have been no symptoms of an auto-immune reaction or "blips" in the blood tests. If it did not bother them, then it doesn't affect ALL Celiacs, right?

JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
srokie Newbie
I never said she was "wrong", I said I was skeptical.

Of course, I am skeptical anytime someone makes an all-encompassing generalization about ALL Celiacs.

I have often said that I believe there is a great number of Celiacs who have other intolerances, but to make such a sweeping statement without provuiding research, studies or similar studies by other people is dangerous and ill-advised.

In any event, the theory is essentially destroyed by some of the posters on here who have stated that they have consumed SOy and there have been no symptoms of an auto-immune reaction or "blips" in the blood tests. If it did not bother them, then it doesn't affect ALL Celiacs, right?

JMHO

All of you make very valid points and I obviously look like the stupid one since I don't have the documentation, but like I said, on January 2nd I specifically asked her if what she said about soy applied to ALL celiacs and she said yes, this is new research that most people don't know. Also, like I said, the second her incompetent receptionist replies to me about the sources, I will be sure to post it.

As for the casein, I said she suspected mine is temporary. I know I made it sound like the same problem, but it's not. I just made a stupid comparison, because again, I'm not the doctor. I know nothing about medicine (obviously) and haven't had science or math since high school. I am a French and music major, and I'm sorry my brain doesn't think that way! So what I say probably won't make any sense but I'm trying my best to convey new, but very concrete, research - and when I get the sources I will show you guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
srokie Newbie
:P Tiffany, I often tell my sweetheart that if his hands were tied down, he would not beable to talk!!! :lol::lol: Sometimes I actually worry that I may be standing too close in some of his stories!!! :lol:

We are all correct. Doctors do not like being told they do not know it all. Most doctors anyways!!! We must educate them. I am sure that Srokie's doctor thinks she is correct and what she is saying is true of many of us. I am an example of what she says. The doctor I go to wants me to bring him any info I feel would be beneficial for him. He never questions my celiacs and does what he can to help me figure things out. So far, he is the best doc I have found.

Yes, and by no means am I saying that my doctor is the all-knowing being who could never be wrong.

But don't you guys think that - in the event she is right - I would be quite negligent as a fellow celiac not to share information that could make you all feel better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
srokie Newbie
I went dairy free just after I went gluten-free almost 2 years ago, however I never cut out soy. I have had multiple blood tests and most recently (October) I had another gastroscopy to make sure that I was confirmed gluten-free. My biopsies came back and my GI said that they looked "better than normal". If what this doctor says is true, that soy triggers a celiac reaction, then my biopsies should have come back a mess due to all the soy I've eaten in the past 2 years. In addition, I would still be experiencing my gluten reaction symptoms if this was the case (I am ULTRA sensitive) and I haven't had any in forever. I would definitely have to DISAGREE with that statement! The only think I can think of is that perhaps Chrissy in some way misunderstood what the doctor was actually saying?? Or perhaps the doctor herself misconstued or misinterpreted some new research or info she had just gotten?

I appreciate your comment and will forward it to Dr. Saviano. As you can imagine, she's really sick of being questioned, but I'd like to see what she says to this. And were you referring to me? My name is Ashley :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
happygirl Collaborator

pubmed has no listing of any recent articles stating that Celiacs cannot have soy. There are articles that deal with overall food intolerances (i.e., multiple food issues) that include Celiac, but none that say that soy causes a Celiac reaction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Electra Enthusiast

wow I have been looking up the dangers and benefits of soy for the last couple of hours and I'm shocked. I genuninely thought soy was very healthy, but it seems as though there is a lot of evidence to the contrary. It seems as though soy can cause all kinds of autoimmune problems and although it may give you a lower chance of some cancers it gives you a higher chance of autoimmune type cancers (like stomach and intestinal cancers)!!

I'm glad I'm not fond of soy, but I'm sure there is a ton more evidence out there that supports both sides of the spectrum.

It sucks to live in a nation that allows marketing and profits to overwhelm us with the positives without giving us the negatives in the same clear fashion.

Hopefully none of the negative things I've read about soy are true!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rusla Enthusiast

I hate to say this but I am sure if we all live long enough we will all die of some sort of cancer or auto accident. So far everything we eat, breath, touch or slather on our bodies seems to cause cancer. The doctors give an FDA approved drug out and a year later you grow horns, cloven hoofs, impregnated by consuming watermelons and licking light bulbs with give warts along with cancer.

What is safe? Nothing is really safe because even staying in your house the furnace can go screwy and posion you. So, maybe Soy causes cancer and maybe it doesn't, they still can't make up their minds on wine and eggs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mango04 Enthusiast
But don't you guys think that - in the event she is right - I would be quite negligent as a fellow celiac not to share information that could make you all feel better?

I think you were right to post the information. I just think some of it got lost in translation so to speak. I have a feeling that if we had all read something that your doctor wrote herself, reactions here would be quite different. If she's written any articles or anything I'd sure be interested in reading them.

It's funny because there are some celiacs out there who remain symptomatic, yet don't want to explore options beyond a mainstream gluten-free diet . Furthermore, I do believe firmly in the dangers of cc, but wonder if some people are sometimes reacting to things such as soy when they blame cc for their problems (I eventually cut out soy, but when I was eating it every day my reactions were very random - it was easy to assume I got "glutened" on days I got "soyed") I don't think soy is always the problem for all celiacs...it might be a preservative or casein or legumes or another condition all together...and for some, gluten-free is enough...Anyway...I guess I'm just kind of rambling here...so hopefully we'll get more information on this soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
srokie Newbie
I hate to say this but I am sure if we all live long enough we will all die of some sort of cancer or auto accident. So far everything we eat, breath, touch or slather on our bodies seems to cause cancer. The doctors give an FDA approved drug out and a year later you grow horns, cloven hoofs, impregnated by consuming watermelons and licking light bulbs with give warts along with cancer.

What is safe? Nothing is really safe because even staying in your house the furnace can go screwy and posion you. So, maybe Soy causes cancer and maybe it doesn't, they still can't make up their minds on wine and eggs.

I agree whole-heartedly. My dad never smoked in his life and died at 59 of a lung disease. My grandfather (other side) drank alcohol and smoked heavily from his teens on, and died at 88. And I've heard of alcoholics having perfectly clean livers. So who the heck knows....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Electra Enthusiast
I hate to say this but I am sure if we all live long enough we will all die of some sort of cancer or auto accident. So far everything we eat, breath, touch or slather on our bodies seems to cause cancer. The doctors give an FDA approved drug out and a year later you grow horns, cloven hoofs, impregnated by consuming watermelons and licking light bulbs with give warts along with cancer.

What is safe? Nothing is really safe because even staying in your house the furnace can go screwy and posion you. So, maybe Soy causes cancer and maybe it doesn't, they still can't make up their minds on wine and eggs.

LOL I kind of agree, but now that I have Celiac and my chances of getting intestinal and stomach cancers are almost doubled then I really don't want to take any chances. I'm sure If I liked soy I would feel differently but I've yet to find a soy product that I found remotely tasteful YUK ;-)!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
srokie Newbie
Hopefully none of the negative things I've read about soy are true!!

I hope so too. I was really looking forward to soymilk because even if it's gross, it's still milk... I tried rice milk (can't steam that to make lattes) and almond milk (really watery).

Unfortunately I think it is true. Once again I will post info the second I get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LL04 Newbie
I appreciate your comment and will forward it to Dr. Saviano. As you can imagine, she's really sick of being questioned, but I'd like to see what she says to this. And were you referring to me? My name is Ashley :)

Yes, sorry to both Chrissy and Ashley for inadvertently putting the wrong name in there. But yes, Ashley, please do forward my info on to your doctor and see what she has to say about it, because logically, if what she says is true, I should still be seriously ill. I am also due to see my GI next Thursday (who is considered the top celiac disease specialist in Vancouver) and I will ask her if she has seen any new research that states what your doctor is proclaiming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lisa Mentor
wow I have been looking up the dangers and benefits of soy for the last couple of hours and I'm shocked. I genuninely thought soy was very healthy, but it seems as though there is a lot of evidence to the contrary. It seems as though soy can cause all kinds of autoimmune problems and although it may give you a lower chance of some cancers it gives you a higher chance of autoimmune type cancers (like stomach and intestinal cancers)!!

I'm glad I'm not fond of soy, but I'm sure there is a ton more evidence out there that supports both sides of the spectrum.

It sucks to live in a nation that allows marketing and profits to overwhelm us with the positives without giving us the negatives in the same clear fashion.

Hopefully none of the negative things I've read about soy are true!!

Angie:

This is a Celiac. com message board. You need to chill on your personal issues and your political stance. We are here to help people, not join people on a personal band wagon.

Alot of people depend on our recommendations and we need to be 100% in that. If you cannnot claime that, you have no need to post here. Recommendation are very serious. "I think" carried no weight here. We deal in facts.

Lisa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,081
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jesmar
    Newest Member
    Jesmar
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Nacina, I would add a B Complex to all that and extra thiamine B 1 and magnesium glycinate, and high dose Vitamin D to get his level up faster.   We need the B vitamins to repair our body and for energy to function.  Thiamine B 1 is especially important for athletes.  Thiamine works with magnesium.  Thiamine and magnesium deficiencies can cause constipation.  All eight essential B vitamins work together.  Due to poor absorption in celiac disease, supplementing with B vitamins boosts our ability to absorb them.  Here's some reading material that is helpful... An open-label, randomized, 10 weeks prospective study on the efficacy of vitamin D (daily low dose and weekly high dose) in vitamin D deficient patients https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6618212/ Micronutrients Dietary Supplementation Advices for Celiac Patients on Long-Term Gluten-Free Diet with Good Compliance: A Review https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681258/ The Effects of Thiamine Tetrahydrofurfuryl Disulfide on Physiological Adaption and Exercise Performance Improvement https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073388/ The Effect of a High-Dose Vitamin B Multivitamin Supplement on the Relationship between Brain Metabolism and Blood Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress: A Randomized Control Trial https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6316433/ B Vitamins: Functions and Uses in Medicine https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9662251/ Vitamins and Minerals for Energy, Fatigue and Cognition: A Narrative Review of the Biochemical and Clinical Evidence https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7019700/ A functional evaluation of anti-fatigue and exercise performance improvement following vitamin B complex supplementation in healthy humans, a randomized double-blind trial https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10542023/ Effects of thiamine supplementation on exercise-induced fatigue https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8815395/ The effects of endurance training and thiamine supplementation on anti-fatigue during exercise https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4241913/ Hope this helps!
    • Jesmar
      Hi all.  I am an 18 year old male. Recently I had anti ttg-igA tested and it came back as 9.1 IU/ml (weak positive) (increased from previous test which was 5.6iU/mL) . What does this mean please? I am booked for an endoscopy however, i am negative for both HLA DQ2 and DQ8. I have a family history of coeliac. 
    • Tanner L
      Yes and variations in their sources for natural and artificial flavors could be the culprit as well.  I might be on the more sensitive side, but I do fine with McDonald's fries and burgers if I take the bun off, and other foods that have certified gluten free ingredients and only cross contamination risk preventing the gluten-free certification. 
    • trents
      Yes, the yeast could have been cultured on a wheat substrate. But another batch may use a yeast extract cultured on something else that did not contain gluten. These food companies will switch suppliers according to what is the cheapest source at any given time. I take it you are a pretty sensitive celiac.
    • Tanner L
      The regular cheddar and sour cream Ruffles have yeast extract, which is probably the source of gluten.  Pinpointing the exact cause of gluten exposure is always tricky, but I've come to learn my initial reaction to gluten compared to the ongoing symptoms that will occur days, weeks, and sometimes months later.  
×
×
  • Create New...