Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Help...


cynicaltomorrow

Recommended Posts

cynicaltomorrow Contributor

My GI gave me a blood test for gluten antibodies in early June. I came back "highly positive" in one area.. I believe it was Igg. My biopsy was negative and he diagnosed me with gluten sensitive enteropathy. I went to an allergist a few weeks ago to test for other food allergies, because I'm still getting sick. My blood tests for food allergies all came back negative.. including wheat. The nurse there said that I may have a sensitivity to sulfites. I don't even know what is going on right now. I feel like I'm at the beginning again. How can 2 blood tests say completely different things? I am so frustrated. Any sugggestions... comments.. etc.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

Celiac blood tests and wheat allergy tests are completely different things. The vast majority of people with celiac are not allergic to wheat. I'm not but I certainly have celiac.

richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
byuiemily Newbie

lovegrov, i'm a bit confused. You say that the majority of people with celiac are not allergic to wheat, but wheat (amongst other grains) has gluten in it, which is what makes us "Celiac", therefore, we would not be able to have wheat..or "allergic" to wheat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gf4life Enthusiast

Our immune systems are a bit complicated. We have 5 different kinds of immunoglobulins (abbreviated as Ig). There are IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG and IgM.

The celiac tests are done on IgA (most specific to testing celiac) and IgG.

Allergy tests are done on IgE. So it is not uncommon to be Celiac, but not wheat allergic, or wheat allergic and not Celiac. And some people are both.

Either way it sounds like you should avoid gluten since you came back as gluten sensitive. Have you tried the diet? And if you have, do you feel better off gluten?

God bless,

Mariann

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cynicaltomorrow Contributor

I felt better when I first went off gluten.. but now I feel the same as I did before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

It's true that most people - and probably most celiacs - are not allergic to wheat. That's because an allergy is defined as being an IgE mediated response to a substance (and the subsequent histamine related symptoms). Celiac disease/gluten-intolerance is not IgE mediated, but rather through IgA and IgG. Some people are both, of course, but _technically_ calling celiac an allergy is medically incorrect. That's why you can test positive for an allergy or an intolerance and not the other one. It just matters what method your body is using to react to the protein that determines which label you get. (As an aside, wheat allergies usually mean you don't have to avoid barley or rye, and particularly oats. While _rare_ cases of _very serious_ wheat allergy could lead to anaphylaxis (this isn't common among any allergy, and is even less so among wheat - peanut and shellfish are the bigger worry on this one), in general, a wheat allergy does not cause internal damage to the body, where celiac disease certainly can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gf4life Enthusiast

Part of the testing problem is that even most doctors don't realise that allergies and intolerances are different and they just order the food allergy tests and tell you that you don't have a problem with wheat.

I have a friend who took her daughter in to be tested for gluten intolerance and the doctor not realising the difference ordered food allergy tests instead. It ends up her daughter is highly allergic to milk (not a surprise) and eggs (totally a surprise), and is also allergic to wheat (and possibly gluten intolerant, since her main symptoms are GI related). She still doesn't know for sure if she is gluten intolerant, but is keeping her gluten and dairy free anyhow, since wheat is the primary source of gluten and she has to avoid that anyhow.

I'm just saying that if it seems confusing to you, that's not surprising since it isn't clear to most doctors either. And there doesn't appear to be any mainstream tests that are accurate for testing for food intolerances either. If there are, doctors don't know how to order them! :rolleyes:

God bless,

Mariann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



FreyaUSA Contributor
Part of the testing problem is that even most doctors don't realise that allergies and intolerances are different and they just order the food allergy tests and tell you that you don't have a problem with wheat.

This is exactly what happened to me. I was sent to an allergist and I didn't even react to the control! Lol! (Does that mean I have no IgE at all? :rolleyes:) The thing that astounded me was that when I spoke with the allergist about being intolerant (this was all new to me too,) she was clueless (she acted like she'd never even heard the term before.) When I said what my symptoms were, she said she doesn't know anything about that, I would have to see a gastro.

Marian (gf4life), thank you for that explanation about the Ig's! With all the confusing, new things I've been reading trying to understand all this, your explanation made it click.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lovegrov Collaborator

Emily,

What Marianne and Tiffany said about Igg, Iga, and Ige.

There is also a difference in reactions for some people. Also, some people with wheat allergy can have a low-gluten wheat like spelt, and of course they can eat rye and barley.

richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cynicaltomorrow Contributor

So, should I go back and get the skin test? Do those detect intolerances?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

No, skin tests are for allergies (IgE mediated responses). And even then they aren't that great at picking up food allergies. Blood tests for allergie are better, but even an allergist will do an elimination diet and a food challenge (in office). (Though, in this case, the challenge is looking for immediate symptoms - which is what you get with IgE mediated responses. IgG mediated responses give you longer term responses - they don't start for anywhere from two hours to a day after you ingest the food.) Different blood tests are used to determine intolerances, though for things other than gluten-intolerance, this is still somewhat controversial in the scientific community.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cynicaltomorrow Contributor

Thanks for all of your help, guys. I just feel so lost. I know gluten makes me sick.. so obviously I stay gluten-free. But, I still get nauseated quite frequently when I eat. Before my doctor diagnosed me as being gluten sensitive.. he told me I had chronic gastritis. But, he never mentioned it again after that one time. He diagnosed me with the gastritis from analyzing a biopsy of my stomach lining. Could that be it? I would think if that was it.. my stomach wouldn't have hurt SO much more whenever I took Nexium. I also guess that I'm lactose intolerant.. even though there was no visible damage to my villi. But, I still get sick even when I eat gluten and lactose-free. I've also considered IBS.. but I'm not sure. That's what I thought I had to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

You may want to look for other food intolerances. There could be other foods causing the nausea. (When you say you eat lactose-free, does that mean you are completely dairy free? Milk has two potentially offending components: lactose and casein. You may have a problem with the casein. (It gives me symptoms similar - but not identical - to getting gluten.) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cynicaltomorrow Contributor

How can I tell when I have a food intolerance?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

Some people find keeping a food and symptom diary enough. Some people remove the food from their diet for a number of days and then reintroduce it. Some people - like me - do a relatively strict elimination diet, removing all high-potential foods and then challenging their system with a questionable one, one at a time. Some people do a water fast and then challenge with the questionable foods, one at a time. Some people do IgG blood testing (by York, for example), but some doctors may hesitate to accept this as the scientific value of these methods is still under discussion. (I won't quite label it controversial, but there isn't community agreement on it's value.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,503
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PBunny39
    Newest Member
    PBunny39
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...