Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Prometheus Labs Vs Enterolab For Genetic Testing

Guest cassidy

By Guest cassidy
in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms

Recommended Posts

Guest cassidy
Guest cassidy
Posted

I don't know if I have celiac or gluten intolerance but I know I have some genetic problem with gluten because my mom has it to. I'm pregnant and want genetic testing on my baby on the off chance he has no genes and I can relax and not worry about him developing my problem.

I know Enterolab and Prometheus do genetic testing. I looked at the Prometheus website and it looked like they only tested for celiac genes, with no mention of gluten intolerant genes. I think Enterolab tests for both. I never had any of this done on me, so I'm not sure that I have it right.

So, since I don't know what I have, does it make sense to go with Enterolab so they can check for both, or can Prometheus check for both as well?

Any age limits on this? Can you do it on a newborn?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted

Enterolab is the only lab who tests for "sensitivity" genes. If you get tested for Celiac genes using Prometheus....and dont have a Celiac gene.....then you can be 100% positive that you *do* have sensitivity genes.

I would go for whichever test is more affordable for you. You are *guaranteed* to be positive either way with Enterolab because basically the entire population carries these genes in some combination or another. In my opinion the "sensitivity" genes dont really tell us much.....unless you are of Asian decent you will have either sensitivity genes, or celiac genes...or one of each.

If you do not have a Celiac gene.....your baby could still have a gene from your hubby.

The "sensitivity" genes arent really diagnostic of anything. Like I said, if you dont have either of the Celiac genes you're guaranteed to have 2 "sensitivity" genes. You can take it for what its worth. They are not recognized by any lab other than Enterolab.

I would assume that even if you dont have Celiac genes and the gluten-free diet is beneficial to your health you would continue with it regardless. As far as finding out the genetics to see if your baby may develop Celiac...you can find this out with either lab.

The test is a "cheek swab" so it can be done at any age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
larry mac Enthusiast
larry mac
Posted
.......

The test is a "cheek swab" so it can be done at any age.

Rachel,

I had blood drawn & sent to Prometheus. I don't have it at the moment, but I think it was:

Celiac Serology:

5-marker serology panel (Anti-human tissue transglutaminase IgA, Anti-endomysial IgA, Total Serum IgA, Anti-gliadin IgA, Anti-gliadin IgG).

And the Crohn's disease test also. In all, it was about $425. I'm not sure, but I don't think we ever did the genetic testing.

best regards, lm

Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest cassidy
Guest cassidy
Posted

So, if you will either have celiac genes or gluten sensitivity genes, then what is the point of genetic testing? I was hoping that they was an option where you had neither gene.

Since both are treated the same and if my son ever had symptoms I would put him on a gluten-free diet and not go through testing anyway, I guess it really doesn't matter what genes he has.

Thanks for clearing things up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted
So, if you will either have celiac genes or gluten sensitivity genes, then what is the point of genetic testing? I was hoping that they was an option where you had neither gene.

Some people want to know if they are actually susceptible to Celiac. If they carry genes which can predispose them to the disease....in this case the genetic testing can be helpful.

I agree...if your son has symptoms which clear up on the diet...it doesnt really matter what his genes are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

Cassidy:

Important to note that there really isn't a lot of research linking dr. fine's "gluten sensitive" genes to anything.

Wht I'm interested in---do all people with some sort of allergic response have a "gene" for it? If not (which I've never heard of), then why are there ones for gluten (supposedly)?

Laura

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted
Wht I'm interested in---do all people with some sort of allergic response have a "gene" for it? If not (which I've never heard of), then why are there ones for gluten (supposedly)?

Laura

Laura,

Personally I dont think there is such a thing as gluten sensitivity genes. Like you said.....there is no real research/studies to support Dr. Fine's claim.

I think anyone who develops leaky gut will become sensitive to gluten....even those of Asian decent with the DQ4 gene (the only gene not recognized as a sensitivity gene by Dr. Fine).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest cassidy
Guest cassidy
Posted

My mother has a problem with gluten and when she found out she sent an email to the entire family. We found out yesterday that her brother (my uncle) and his daughter are now gluten-free and doing great. So, I know something runs in my family. My grandfather also died of stomach cancer. None of us were officially tested, we all just went the diet route, so would it seem more like celiac and less like gluten intolerance since there is such a family history? I didn't realize that gluten sensitivity genes were controversial. Does Dr. Fine think that gluten sensitivity is genetic as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
celiacgirls Apprentice
celiacgirls
Posted

I did the Enterolab testing because it would tell me if I had the DQ1 gene as well as the DQ2 and DQ8.

I believe DQ1 is recognized by some neurologists as being linked to neurological problems due to gluten.

I also did want to know the likelihood of getting "official" celiac disease.

Since you already know there is some genetic link in your family, it might not be worth it to have your baby tested. He'll probably eat mostly gluten-free anyway and you will be quick to notice if gluten does cause a problem.

I haven't yet tested my kids but they are both gluten-free. I plan to test them at some point but it is more for curiosity than anything else. Also, if they do have one of the widely-accepted celiac genes, they might be more likely to stay on the diet as adults.

The Enterolab test was $149 when I did it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JerryK Community Regular
JerryK
Posted

I did the gene test specifically because I wanted to know whether or not I carried the Celiac gene. I don't think there is a whole lot of value, as the earlier posters said, in the gluten sensitive gene markers, because everyone has them. In my case I have two, but do not have the Celiac gene.

In my case, the stool test and gene test indicated gluten sensitivity. Blood tests and the gene test ruled out Celiac. That's pretty much as good of an answer as you can expect.

Another thing to realize is (in my opinion and correct me if I am wrong) the gluten sensitivity genes are certainly arguable, because they are interpreted by Enterolab..and it is Enterolab that indicates which genes they think are pointers to gluten sensitivity. Granted the guy probably knows what he is talking about, but I'm sure there's plenty of room for debate.

So if you want to rule out Celiac, but not gluten sensitivity, the gene test is of value..

Of course then you could end up like me :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mtndog Collaborator
Mtndog
Posted

The good thing about Prometheus is that insurance will cover it if your doctor orders it. By the time I saw a celiac GI I was already gluten-free and had such severe reactions to gluten that she just went straight to the gene test. I ended up with the DQ8.

I don't know if insurance will pay for Enterolab.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted
My mother has a problem with gluten and when she found out she sent an email to the entire family. We found out yesterday that her brother (my uncle) and his daughter are now gluten-free and doing great. So, I know something runs in my family. My grandfather also died of stomach cancer. None of us were officially tested, we all just went the diet route, so would it seem more like celiac and less like gluten intolerance since there is such a family history? I didn't realize that gluten sensitivity genes were controversial. Does Dr. Fine think that gluten sensitivity is genetic as well?

Cassidy: To my knowledge, Dr. Fine is the only one who recognizes the gluten sensitive genes. So yes, I would definitely say it is controversial in that we just don't know enough. I see it two ways---there are multiple genes linked to multiple foods (milk, soy, eggs, etc) that we don't know about, or there aren't genes. I don't really know what to think, considering gluten intolerance should typically be just like a casein, or soy, or egg, etc. intolerance....we never hear anything about those with "true" allergies (IgE) having specific genes....so why is there one for only gluten (delayed) allergy (IgG)?

Again, I don't know, I'm just throwing out the devil's advocate conversation that runs in my head. My problem is that I'm often too logical and can see the potentials in both sides of the argument! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chrissy Collaborator
chrissy
Posted

my family is involved in a celiac study being done at the university of california, irvine. there is no question that this is a reputable institution. the gal in charge of the study says she is not aware of any gluten sensitivity gene, and she said that they do not accept anyone into the study that has been diagnosed by enterolab.

dr. fine has been testing people for how many years? and he still can't get together his notes to publish??????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Anmol
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By Anmol · Posted

      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      14 year old with Celiac & EOE still suffering...

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      50 YO Male Recently Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Recently Diagnosed Celiac- Need advice

      By Anmol · Posted

      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
×
×
  • Create New...