Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Gluten Intolerance


DaCat

Recommended Posts

DaCat Rookie

I really need some help here......

I am currently seeing a naturopath and an MD that practices holistic medicine. One is telling me that my gut can be healed and eventually I can ingest gluten again (naturopath) and the other is telling me after staying off gluten for 6 months, I can then ingest, but only once a week for life - if I can tolerate (holistic MD). Which is true? At this point, I have not been diagnosed with Celiac.

Testing I've had done specific to gluten issues:

gliadin AB, SIgA (saliva): 34 (range: positive if >15 U/ml *high* [Diagnos-Techs]

food sensitivity IgG & IgE (blood): low for "wheat" gluten & "wheat" gliadin [uS Bio Tek]

Gliadin IGG (blood): 59.5 (equivocal: 25.1-49.9) *high* [Mayo Clinic]

Gliadin IGA (blood): 28.2 (equivocal: 25.1-49.9) [Mayo Clinic]

Enodmysial AB: negative [Mayo Clinic]

Reticulin ABS: negative [Mayo Clinic]

(I did ingest gluten for a few months before having the Enodmysial, Reticulin, IGG & IGA (blood) test.)

How can I show positive for gliadin on a saliva and blood test, but not show positive for wheat gluten or wheat gliadin on the food sensitivity test? That baffles me!

I would really like to know if I must remain gluten free for life or not. If anyone can help me with this I would greatly appreciate it.

Also, what occurs in the body when one is gluten intolerant and ingests gluten? Any web sites/links you could post?

Thank you for your time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SunnyDyRain Enthusiast
I really need some help here......

I am currently seeing a naturopath and an MD that practices holistic medicine. One is telling me that my gut can be healed and eventually I can ingest gluten again (naturopath) and the other is telling me after staying off gluten for 6 months, I can then ingest, but only once a week for life - if I can tolerate (holistic MD). Which is true? At this point, I have not been diagnosed with Celiac.

Testing I've had done specific to gluten issues:

gliadin AB, SIgA (saliva): 34 (range: positive if >15 U/ml *high* [Diagnos-Techs]

food sensitivity IgG & IgE (blood): low for "wheat" gluten & "wheat" gliadin [uS Bio Tek]

Gliadin IGG (blood): 59.5 (equivocal: 25.1-49.9) *high* [Mayo Clinic]

Gliadin IGA (blood): 28.2 (equivocal: 25.1-49.9) [Mayo Clinic]

Enodmysial AB: negative [Mayo Clinic]

Reticulin ABS: negative [Mayo Clinic]

(I did ingest gluten for a few months before having the Enodmysial, Reticulin, IGG & IGA (blood) test.)

How can I show positive for gliadin on a saliva and blood test, but not show positive for wheat gluten or wheat gliadin on the food sensitivity test? That baffles me!

I would really like to know if I must remain gluten free for life or not. If anyone can help me with this I would greatly appreciate it.

Also, what occurs in the body when one is gluten intolerant and ingests gluten? Any web sites/links you could post?

Thank you for your time! :o)

I don't understand the bloodwork, I'm still learning. But this is what I understand...

If you have a Wheat allergy, this may get better.

If you have some gluten intolerance, you may be able to eat small amounts and tolerate them. I stand corrected.... the girls below know much more than me.

If you have Celiac Disease, there is no acceptable amount of gluten to eat. The smallest amounts can still damage your intestines.

This site has massive amounts of infromation. Take a deep breath, and just start reading. Try not to get overwhelmed. This diet is doable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

Given the IgG responses, I'd say that you are at least gluten intolerant - for life. They didn't run a tTg, so it's hard to guess at damage - and hence a celiac diagnosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lisa Mentor

Let me state this upfront, I do not deal with numbers.

But you need to get some new doctors. They have now right to give you that source of information. Both are seriously misinformed.

If in fact you have Celiac, it is forever, It is a lifetime commitment. Yes, the gut can be heal, but only with a complete commitment to a gluten free diet.

Both of your recommendations have no clue.

You will get more answers here. Glad that you have joined us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ArtGirl Enthusiast

I'm afraid Lisa (MommaGoose) is right. Once you become intolerant to gluten, you can never go back to eating it. There's more going on than just what's happening in the gut. Celiac or intolerant. Maybe there's less intestinal damage being done if you're "only" intolerant, but there's also other problems that you probably aren't aware are gluten related. And you'll not be able to resolve these other issues if you're still eating gluten.

I'll give you an example about myself. The GI issues were slow to clear up, but I did notice a lightening of my spirits and eventually I came out of a funk I had been in for I don't know how many years - probably 30 or more. I can say that I now know what it is to be happy. Something that never happened to me while eating gluten. Also, just this week, after being gluten-free for nearly a year, I noticed the exzema on my face has disappeared.

Some people who post on this forum regularly, who are "only" gluten intolerant, had serious psycological issues - depression, anxiety - for which they were on many meds. After going gluten-free they found that these things improved and they were able to go off the meds. It was gluten all the time, but no one knew that.

If you choose to begin eating gluten-free, take the diet seriuosly and go 100% gluten-free - no eating gluten once a week, or even once a month. I'm sure you'll be glad you did.

And, yes, you'll learn more here than from anyother source, especially doctors who really aren't that well informed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lonewolf Collaborator

Eleven years ago I was told to avoid wheat and that I should "watch" gluten. The test I had done showed off the chart numbers for wheat gluten, gliadin, rye, barley and oats, but the doctor crossed those out and said I really just needed to avoid wheat, that so many people had high scores on those that he thought they were false positives.

I was told that if I avoided wheat for several years that I'd be able to add it back in once my gut healed. I stayed "mostly" gluten-free for about 7 years and had a dramatic improvement in my health, although I noticed that I would sometimes get stomach aches that I couldn't figure out. (I now know that it was things like barley malt that I didn't think I had to avoid.) I decided to add spelt, since I'd heard it was low in gluten and that many people who were allergic to wheat could have it. Big mistake. I started having GI problems again and developed an autoimmune kidney disease. After going gluten-free (and taking some nasty medications) I regained my good health, kidney disease in remission for just over 3 years now. I learned a bit more about hidden glutens and have been fanatically gluten-free for about 1-1/2 years now.

I don't have Celiac. I can't have it because I don't have the correct genes. I'm only gluten intolerant for whatever reason. BUT I CAN'T HAVE GLUTEN EVER AGAIN, NO MATTER WHAT ANY DOCTOR OR ANYONE ELSE TELLS ME.

My guess would be that if you are gluten intolerant it's for life. But take it from me - it's worth it. I wouldn't trade my good health for all the Krispy Kreme's in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VydorScope Proficient

Everyone in this thread that said stay away from gluten , for life is correct. I am guessing that these docs are confused by:

The so called CODEX standard that implies "very low gluten" is good enough (unless its been updated?)

OR

The fact that different people react to different levels of gluten in different ways because they are different. Some one with celiac disease or gluten intolerance, or what ever label is given CAN eat gluten with NO SYMPTONS occasionally. Unfortunitly this does NOT mean no damage is done, just that they did not have out ward symptoms that time.

OR

(this is what I suspect) This docs in question worship at the church of the great FDA pyramid and can not imagine a life not based on the most holy of all whole grains... WHEAT.. so they figure that once a weak will limit any damage to a healable / acceptable amount and allow you to consume the greatest of all the worlds food.. WONDER BREAD! :) (yes you did detect the ever so slightest amount of sarcasm in that...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



DaCat Rookie

Thank you ALL for your responses. It helps having others share their experiences & knowledge. I love forums for that reason! Anyway, "knowing" it's a lifelong thing helps me right now.

I know I felt better being completely off gluten for months after finding out I had a problem with it so I guess it will be encouraging to see how I feel after more time goes by this time (I'm off gluten again since tests are over). I mean, I didn't feel great when I was off it before because I have other issues being dealt with too, like: high mercury/lead levels, leaky gut etc.), but some of my symptoms seemed to improve.

By the way, does anyone have any web sites/links suggestions that is soley about gluten "intolerance" and how that affects the body? I know the "treatment" is the same for GI and Celiacs, but gluten does affect the body differently in each case. I know symptoms can be the same, but the damage in the body is apparently different. I don't think a person who is only gluten intolerant has flatten villi. I would like to know what does happen in the body then. Seems like I read somewhere that there can be damage to internal organs etc. I read the book Dngerous Grains which is good, but I'd like more info. Thanks to anyone who can help me. I want to know as much as I possibly can re: what I am dealing with.

Oh, one more question: has anyone here who is gluten intolerant only been to a "celiac" support group and found it to be helpful? I'm considering this for myself. Not sure we have a gluten intolerance support group. Heard those are hard to come by anyway. <_<

Thank you and God Bless!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Momelf Newbie

I am very grateful to everyone on this thread. It's been extremely helpful to me as I am in the same place, dealing with other health issues also (interstitial cystitis). I'll learn to become a "regular" on these message boards!

Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wowzer Community Regular

Although I had negative bloodwork, I went gluten free anyways. I had so much improvement even in the first couple weeks that my family doctor said to stay gluten free for 3 months. It'sl been 6 months now for me. I know that I can't go back to gluten. If I even get a trace of it I know now. I have a little sister that was diagnosed at a year. In her teenage years, my family thought she was in "remission" because she seemed to tolerate it. She was anemic as a teenager. I'm sure the gluten didn't help. She now has persnickity anemia, fibromyalgia, rhemuatoid arthritis and thyroid. I'm sure that maybe these things could have been avoided if she remained gluten free. She is 7 years younger than I am. I do have asthma and thyroid. I'm hoping to avoid any other problems myself. I just wish it had been figured out sooner for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
mamaloca2 Apprentice
By the way, does anyone have any web sites/links suggestions that is soley about gluten "intolerance" and how that affects the body? I know the "treatment" is the same for GI and Celiacs, but gluten does affect the body differently in each case. I know symptoms can be the same, but the damage in the body is apparently different. I don't think a person who is only gluten intolerant has flatten villi. I would like to know what does happen in the body then. Seems like I read somewhere that there can be damage to internal organs etc. <_<

I am still learning as well, but pretty sure Daughter and I are gluten intolerant. I have many of the same symptoms of celiac and this forum has helped me so much. I don't know much about the differences yet. I am very skeptical of doctors now, but my naturalpath is very good and seems to know the most. he told me that gluten intolerance causes intestines to become inflamed and leads to basically all the same problems as celiac because inflamed intestines cannot absorb nutrients effectively. But I think there is still a big debate about the difference between the two. But I've noticed that my symptoms clear up faster after gluttening than most people with celiac say theirs does. It would make sense if my doc is right. Good luck with the research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Doll
Although I had negative bloodwork, I went gluten free anyways. I had so much improvement even in the first couple weeks that my family doctor said to stay gluten free for 3 months. It'sl been 6 months now for me. I know that I can't go back to gluten. If I even get a trace of it I know now. I have a little sister that was diagnosed at a year. In her teenage years, my family thought she was in "remission" because she seemed to tolerate it. She was anemic as a teenager. I'm sure the gluten didn't help. She now has persnickity anemia, fibromyalgia, rhemuatoid arthritis and thyroid. I'm sure that maybe these things could have been avoided if she remained gluten free. She is 7 years younger than I am. I do have asthma and thyroid. I'm hoping to avoid any other problems myself. I just wish it had been figured out sooner for me.

I wouldn't worry about the past. There is no published scientific evidence to suggest that being gluten free would have entirely prevented either your other diseases or hers. Perhaps *delayed* them, but not prevented them entirely.

All of those diseases are genetically related, beyond that, nothing more can be drawn at this point. It is likely they all have different triggers.

Asthma is an inflammatory state that is basically the "leaky gut" of lung tissue. People with the genetics for a leaky gut and/or "leaky lungs" often have allergies, asthma, and autoimmune diseases. It's not unheard of for these all to cluster. Some researchers consider asthma to be an autoimmune disease.

Basically, you (and your sister) have an over-reactive immune system, a lack of regulatory T-cells and/or a misguided immune system, and "leaky" points of entry for increased exposure to poossible triggers. The cause of autoimmunity is thought to be genetic disposition and an environmental trigger such as a virus. Exposure to dietary proteins like gluten *may* cause these diseases to appear sooner, but gluten itself is NOT the cause. Children on the strict gluten-free diet *still* go on to develop other autoimmune diseases as well. For some reason people seem to forget this. Gluten *may* play a role, but the gluten free diet is only part of the puzzle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
kbtoyssni Contributor

Gluten is what damaged your gut to start with so if your gut heals and you start eating gluten again, you'll be right back where you are now. I think of gluten intolerance as the first stage on the road to getting celiaa. Think of yourself as lucky - at this point you're "only" gluten intolerant and you haven't damaged your gut enough to have full-blown celiac. If you continued to eat gluten for a few more years, you likely would be diagnosed with celiac and have a lot more damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
NY547 Newbie
Gluten is what damaged your gut to start with so if your gut heals and you start eating gluten again, you'll be right back where you are now. I think of gluten intolerance as the first stage on the road to getting celiaa. Think of yourself as lucky - at this point you're "only" gluten intolerant and you haven't damaged your gut enough to have full-blown celiac. If you continued to eat gluten for a few more years, you likely would be diagnosed with celiac and have a lot more damage.

OK, I have to jump in here. Maybe I'm missing something...

I do agree with kbtoyssni in that gluten intolerance can often become celiac down the road. And I also agree you can have all the same symptoms as a person with diagnosed celiac disease even without the villous atrophy.

My concern after reading all the posts is DACAT, how do you know you do NOT have celiac disease? From what I read you have only been tested for Gliadin antibodies. The ema and reticulin have been known to come back negative in 60% of people with DIAGNOSED celiac!

You may want to consider asking for the TTg antibody (tissue transglutaminase) and a total IgA level. Your Gliadin IgG is high in both blood and saliva, yet your gliadin IgA was in the normal range. I would not rule out a diagnosis of celiac just yet. Especially since you mentioned "leaky gut"

I would talk this over with your doctor before staying gluten free any longer. Also, there are many seronegative celiacs out there, who test negative for the TTg Iga and still go on to show signs of damage on the endoscopy. The IgA levels are indicators of the amount of damage that's been done, so if you only have partial villous atrophy at this point, or only the intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) your blood tests could still come out negative.

One last point, the celiac genes they test for are the DQ2 and DQ8. It has also been shown that people with DQ1 can develope celiac, but their symptoms are often more outside the gut (ie neurological, dermatitis herpetiformis, etc). Just because you didn't test positive for DQ2 or DQ8 doesn't mean you will never develop celiac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AndreaB Contributor

Hi. I have come to believe that gluten is not a good thing.

If you are intolerant and your symptoms clear up gluten free you have your answer. Whether or not you have celiac you would be gluten free for life.

There is a small chance that something else could be causing the gluten sensitivity BUT I still don't think gluten is good for you. If your symptoms don't resolve then you need to dig deeper. If something else is causing the intolerance then I'd still suggest gluten free, you just wouldn't have to be as careful with cross contamination.

I have a book called Dangerous Grains that list gluten free as helping with symptoms of 150 different diseases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Karen B. Explorer
Oh, one more question: has anyone here who is gluten intolerant only been to a "celiac" support group and found it to be helpful? I'm considering this for myself. Not sure we have a gluten intolerance support group. Heard those are hard to come by anyway. <_<

Thank you and God Bless!

Celiacs and the gluten intolerant share a common "enemy" and we have people at our group that weren't biopsy diagnosed or have been diagnosed as gluten intolerant or even just have a wheat allergy.

Have you checked the list on this website for a local group?

List of Local Celiac Disease Support Groups/Chapters

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ArtGirl Enthusiast

After spending a little over a year on this board and reading many people's responses - some scientific, most just relating experiences, it is my personal opinion that all who react to gluten are Gluten Intolerant, even though there are many contributing factors that result in this condition.

Those who have been diagnosed with villi damage (with the associated malabsorbtion issues) or DH and/or have certain genes are labeled as Celiac. Those without intestinal damage, no detectible malabsorbtion and certain other genes are labeled Gluten Intolerant. Both conditions can contribute to other autoimmune diseases and/or neurological and psychological problems. Each individual's body handles gluten in a different way with varying results.

I feel fairly certain that after some more years of research that it will all be listed under the same condition with subclassifications. However, whatever the label, the treatment for all is the same - gluten-free for life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Babygirl6915 Explorer
Oh, one more question: has anyone here who is gluten intolerant only been to a "celiac" support group and found it to be helpful? I'm considering this for myself. Not sure we have a gluten intolerance support group. Heard those are hard to come by anyway. <_<

Thank you and God Bless!

So here is my input for something a little different... I have a wheat allergy. It has been "medically confirmed" that i do not have celiac. But I post on this board & talk to some people in the Dallas Area celiac group as they are much more in tune with my experiences than others you will find on general allergy boards.

That being said, I have no different a view on gluten than anyone else here does. Just b/c you have no seen symptoms does not mean you are not doing harm to your body. Even if my allergy magically "goes away" (which hardly seems possible) I will continue to not eat wheat. IMO once gluten intolerant, always gluten intolerant. Wheat & grains are not all they are cracked up to be. It is very tough @ first & I still have moments of weakness but in the end I feel like an entirely new person now that I am gluten-free. And I would like to stay that person too!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
munchkinette Collaborator

I would strongly recommend committing to the diet. Here's what happened to my grandmother:

She was diagnosed with some kind of wheat problem in her 20s, just like me. This was the 1940s, so the tests weren't advanced enough to distinguish between celiac, non-celiac gluten intolerance, etc. She went on a strict diet for a few years. They told her she grew out of it because he insides did heal. At that time I'm sure they thought she did grow out of it. By the time she died at 85, she had about half the problems listed in books about untreated celiac disease, including diabetes (and eventually carpal tunnels), one autoimmune disease (scleroderma), arthritis from a young age, trouble conceiving and keeping babies, and eventually liver failure from a lifetime of all the drugs needed to compensate for her various conditions.

I'm leaving out a lot of things on the list because I can't find it right now. My point is that I have no trouble keeping to the diet after seeing what 85 years of eating gluten can do to a person who shouldn't have gluten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rachel--24 Collaborator

I'm gluten intolerant (non-Celiac). At this point I have no reason to believe that this is indeed a life-long situation for me.

I'm working with some great Dr.'s and its definately possible for some people to lose this intolerance with treatment of underlying issues and healing.

Everyone is different...I'm told I will have to wait until I'm well to determine whether or not gluten will continue to be a problem for me.

For now...I am being treated for the things which have led to the gluten intolerance in the first place.

If I chose not to address these underlying issues...then YES...I most certainly would need to avoid gluten for life. It would be a life-long situation because the circumstances which have caused my body to no longer tolerate gluten (as well as a long list of other foods) would remain unchanged.

I dont think its accurate to state that ALL cases of non-celiac gluten intolerance require life-long dietary restrictions. It really depends on the actual *cause* of the individual's gluten intolerance. If its not Celiac...then what is it??

There are many *treatable* conditions that can lead to a gluten intolerance.

If some people are not looking into underlying issues that may be contributing....they *may* remain at risk for many of the same conditions they are trying avoid by not consuming gluten.

Alot of those who have non-celiac gluten intolerance are not well even while following the diet...this is a good reason to dig a little deeper for answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarlaB Enthusiast

Yes, I agree with Rachel 100%. In fact, I am an example of it.

People like Munchkinette's grandmother are undiagnosed celiacs and need a lifetime of eating gluten-free.

However, my own gluten intolerance, which was very severe, I was sensitive to even the smallest crumb, is completely gone! I have Lyme Disease and had heavy metal toxcity. With both of those being treated, my intolerance to gluten has now gone away completely.

It has taken a couple months for me to be sure, but I am sure, it is gone.

I was one of those who got sicker when I ate gluten or got any kind of contamination, but never got completely well on a gluten-free diet. I tried cutting out soy, corn and dairy for 6 months as well, but no improvement over the intitial improvement I had upon starting to eat gluten-free.

I am not implying that everyone who is non-celiac gluten intolerant will get better and be able to eat gluten again. I think some people truly have gluten problems and have negative celiac tests. Obviously there is much to be learned about this.

I also find it interesting that the ONLY sensitivity to food I had was to gluten. This happened to my daughter as well. Once her Lyme and heavy metals were treated, she was no longer sensitive to gluten at all. This is the same daughter who was begging to end a gluten challenge after only three days back in December.

For those who are curious, my Enterolab score was IgA 60. I also was over 30 on my casein score, but never had any changes dairy-free for six months. I was obviously having a very strong immune reaction, but I think that was from my leaky gut and my overactive immune system due to the Lyme Disease. My celiac blood tests were negative and I am negative for celiac genes.

I still eat gluten-free at home because I think it's a healthy lifestyle ... and I mostly eat gluten-free out, but I don't worry about ingredients like I used to. I believe that gluten is not very healthy for many reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
marciab Enthusiast

Is it possible that those who are gluten intolerant and find that they can eat gluten again don't have the celiac genes DQ2 or DQ8 ?

It would explain why some can eat gluten again and others can't ... And goes along with what someone else said about only people with those genes getting celiac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarlaB Enthusiast
Is it possible that those who are gluten intolerant and find that they can eat gluten again don't have the celiac genes DQ2 or DQ8 ?

I do not have celiac genes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rachel--24 Collaborator
Is it possible that those who are gluten intolerant and find that they can eat gluten again don't have the celiac genes DQ2 or DQ8 ?

It would explain why some can eat gluten again and others can't ... And goes along with what someone else said about only people with those genes getting celiac.

Yes...Celiac is genetic....so those who do not carry these genes do not necessarily require a life-long gluten-free diet.

If they can identify and resolve what might be causing their gluten intolerance...it may be something that they can overcome with proper treatment.

I do not carry Celiac genes.

My concern is that in saying that EVERY person with gluten intolerance requires a life-long diet.....it may lead them to believe that gluten is the sole cause for their symptoms/suffering....when often there are underlying issues that end up getting ignored.

If other health problems are left undiagnosed....the consequences may be just as damaging as continuing to consume gluten (while intolerant).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
marciab Enthusiast

Thanks Carla,

Thats what I was wondering. I noticed that Rachel doesn't have the DQ2 or DQ8 gene either.

I'm a DQ2, who was diagnosed a celiac earlier this year by my GI based on an EGD done 17 months post gluten-free which showed damage. It was noted as possible healed celiac.

You know, it'd be just my luck that I'm a celiac who was bitten by a tick ... :rolleyes:

Hi Rachel,

We were posting at the same time ..

BTW. Did either of you have problems with gluten as a child ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Help Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    2. - Julie Riordan replied to Julie Riordan's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      3

      Any ideas for travelling

    3. - Nedast replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to SuzanneL's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test

    5. - SuzanneL posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,495
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Zofosho
    Newest Member
    Zofosho
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. There have been many posts on this subject on the forum, it is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, except from time to time have had a bit of mild tension in my jaw, I have had issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.   Thank you again for your input.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @SuzanneL! Which tTG was that? tTG-IGA? tTG-IGG? Were there other celiac antibody tests run from that blood draw? Was total IGA measured? By some chance were you already cutting back on gluten by the time the blood draw was taken or just not eating much? For the celiac antibody tests to be accurate a person needs to be eating about 10g of gluten daily which is about 4-6 pieces of bread.
    • SuzanneL
      I've recently received a weak positive tTG, 6. For about six years, I've been sick almost everyday. I was told it was just my IBS. I have constant nausea. Sometimes after I eat, I have sharp, upper pain in my abdomen. I sometimes feel or vomit (bile) after eating. The doctor wanted me to try a stronger anti acid before doing an endoscopy. I'm just curious if these symptoms are pointing towards Celiac Disease? 
×
×
  • Create New...