Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Results - Low Positive


Woolygimp

Recommended Posts

Woolygimp Contributor

Some of you may remember some of my posts, but I've suspected Celiac in the family for a while. Even went gluten-free for about 2-3 months, lost a lot of weight and definitely showed an improvement. Most of my major symptoms are coming from what I think are Hashimoto antibodies since both my sister and mother suffer from them (will have results Monday). Anyway, I go up to the lab to get all of the lab results from the ton of bloodwork I've had done and I see my Celiac antibody sheet and the results are:

Anticardiolipin IGG (14) Expected Range: <10

Anticardiolipin IGM (7) Expected Range: <10

Anticardiolipin IGA (14) Expected Range: <13

I even had this test ran about a year ago when I had a full blood panel done, and my Anticardiolipin IGA was 16.

According to the lab Low positive is 10-20, but should I begin to suspect Celiac seriously? Or is my Dr. right, and a low positive isn't really an indicator at all?

I've already ordered an Enterolab kit, but if I have Celiac, then there's a good chance it's pretty heavily embedded into my immediate family. So how do you guys interpret these results?

Edit: These tests have to do with Lupus, and I had asked them to do the anti-gliadin tests. There's no way that they ordered Lupus tests, when I specifically asked for a Celiac blood panel...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

It appears that your doctor is ill informed. When it comes to celiac disease there is no such thing as a 'low positive' that you can ignore. Either you are positive, meaning your body is producing antibodies to gluten, or you are negative. A low positive is every bit as positive as a higher number.

I am sure your Enterolab tests will confirm what you already know, that you have a definite problem with gluten and should stay away from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Woolygimp Contributor
It appears that your doctor is ill informed. When it comes to celiac disease there is no such thing as a 'low positive' that you can ignore. Either you are positive, meaning your body is producing antibodies to gluten, or you are negative. A low positive is every bit as positive as a higher number.

I am sure your Enterolab tests will confirm what you already know, that you have a definite problem with gluten and should stay away from it.

It's because he ordered a lupus test instead of a celiac antibody. I almost didn't catch it. I've gone through every sheet of paper, and I can't find any Celiac antibody tests, so I'm pretty amazed that he ordered the wrong test, charged me for it, and said it was negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ursa Major Collaborator

Actually, if you can prove that he ordered the wrong test, you should either get reimbursed, or he better order the right test now! After all, you paid for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chrissy Collaborator

those test results aren't going to tell you anything about celiac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor
Some of you may remember some of my posts, but I've suspected Celiac in the family for a while. Even went gluten-free for about 2-3 months, lost a lot of weight and definitely showed an improvement.

To me the most telling part of your post is this sentence. If you showed an improvment after being on the diet for a bit that is your best way to tell if you need to be gluten free.

Hopefully the Enterolab tests will be able to clarify things for you. Let us know how those turn out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Bayb replied to Bayb's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Trying to read my lab results

    2. - Aussienae replied to Aussienae's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      65

      Constant low back, abdominal and pelvic pain!

    3. - trents replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?

    4. - trents replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?

    5. - mishyj replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,221
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    lortaine
    Newest Member
    lortaine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Bayb
      Hi Scott, yes I have had symptoms for years and this is the second GI I have seen and he could not believe I have never been tested. He called later today and I am scheduled for an endoscopy. Is there a way to tell how severe my potential celiac is from the results above? What are the chances I will have the biopsy and come back negative and we have to keep searching for a cause? 
    • Aussienae
      I agree christina, there is definitely many contributing factors! I have the pain today, my pelvis, hips and thighs ache! No idea why. But i have been sitting at work for 3 days so im thinking its my back. This disease is very mysterious (and frustrating) but not always to blame for every pain. 
    • trents
      "her stool study showed she had extreme reactions to everything achievement on it long course of microbials to treat that." The wording of this part of the sentence does not make any sense at all. I don't mean to insult you, but is English your first language? This part of the sentence sounds like it was generated by translation software.
    • trents
      What kind of stool test was done? Can you be more specific? 
    • mishyj
      Perhaps I should also have said that in addition to showing a very high response to gluten, her stool study showed that she had extreme reactions to everything achievement on it long course of microbials to treat that.
×
×
  • Create New...