Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Safe Or Not?


Guest spruette

Are Oats safe or not?  

13 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Guest spruette

Since I am new to Celiac, was wondering what the experiences were with Oats and other Celiacs. Has anyone had a bad experience? Do you eat oats?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Since I have been gluten-free I have stayed away from oats. It has been highly debateable if celiacs can have oats or not. At this point I will personally not eat oats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
angel-jd1 Community Regular

There is an article in the most recent issue of Gluten Free Living. It talks about contamination of oats.

A registered dietician took 12 containers of rolled or steel cut oats that represented 4 different lots of three brand names. The brands being McCanns, Country Choice, and Quaker.

The ELISA R5 test was used on the 12 samples. All of the brands showed contamination!!!

McCann's

1st- below level of detection (so under 3ppm)

2st- below 20ppm

3nd- 23ppm

4rd- 725ppm

Country Choice

1st- below 20ppm

2nd-4th ranged from 120-210ppm

Quaker

All four tested from 338-1807ppm

Under 20ppm is the codex standard used to determine Gluten free.........but all of the brands showed some crazy levels of contamination and were inconsistent. I wouldn't trust them!!

-Jessica :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest spruette

Wow! :o I am not sure what those numbers mean, but it does seem highly contamintated. That is enough to shy me away from them. Thank you so much for your input. I haven't had any oats yet, and so grateful now that I haven't. **BIG THANK YOU**

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

In addition to the contamination, another recent study (which, I believe, I found on the celiac.com main site) has shown that there are some people who do have reactions specifically to avenin (the oat protein that is similar, but not identical, in structure to gliandin, the wheat protein). Antibodies specifically addressing avenin were found in - I think - about a third of the celiac patients studied. So even without contamination, it appears that some celiacs really are intolerant to oats as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
celiac3270 Collaborator

Yes--it's not that debatable anymore--the contamination is just so likely that you'd be taking a huge chance of being contaminated, either from the fields that had previously been used for growing wheat or rye, from the mill, etc. The odds are so great that we don't even need to go into the structure of the oats--because they're already problematic just from contamination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jknnej Collaborator

I don't eat them, either, and I used to love oatmeal!

Every time I feel a complaint about the diet coming on, I just think:

Is it worth it to have something that makes me feel so bad?

So I stay away from anything questionable. I'm even giving up gluten-free restaurants now, which is my saddest moment ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,194
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Marianne Davis
    Newest Member
    Marianne Davis
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Kmd2024
      No they did not run a total IGA. But wouldn’t the DPG-IGA also be negative also if I was IGA deficient? They did also run a TTG-IGG and a DPG-IGG and they were also negative.
    • trents
      The DGP-IGA is valuable when celiac is suspected but the person being tested is IGA deficient. Were you tested for IGA deficiency. In other words, was there a test known as "Total IGA" ordered? Here is an overview of the various blood tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease:   
    • Kmd2024
      Has anyone ever negative blood work except for the DPG-IGA? Mine was 42 (reference range negative is >20. The TTG iga was negative. I have always suffered from bad gas issues and lately have been having bouts of diarrhea and constipation. I also have a bumpy rash that comes and goes below both elbows. i have an endoscopy scheduled in May but I was just wondering if anyone else had bloodwork like this and what was the end result?
    • trents
      Welcome to he forum community, @DjinnDjab! You wrote: "i just found out i may have celiac. so needless to say i no longer have friends or relationships." Are you saying that the need to eat gluten free has resulted in losing all your friends and your entire social life?
    • DjinnDjab
      i am a 37 yo male and this describes me perfectly. on a scale of 1-10, i am at 8. 9. 10, 11 for 8-12 hours a day, 6-7 days a week. this has been going on for about 5 years and i just found out i may have celiac. so needless to say i no longer have friends or relationships so i spend a lot of time with myself. and uhhh what really sucks is uhh, sorry to say, "enjoying myself" is a trigger for this pain. i can be fine all day until i take 5 mins to "myself" and then its all downhill from there. this has robbed me of every.single.thing in my once colorful life. 
×
×
  • Create New...