Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Confused By Test Results


simply

Recommended Posts

simply Newbie

I'm thinking that at this point, it doesn't look like I have

celiac. My test results that I have so far are as follows:

Gliadin IGA Antibody: Negative (12.6 --- Negative is anything under

20 - Two weeks off gluten at the time)

Gliadin IGG Antibody: Weak Positive (29 --- Weak Positive is between

20 and 30 - Two weeks off gluten at the time).

Antiendomysial Antibody (EMA): Negative (was not able to get an

exact value even though I asked for it - After five weeks of LOTS of gluten, every day.)

Antitransglutaminase (tTG): I don't have this one yet, but based on

what I've read, if the EMA is negative, the tTG will probably be

negative as well. - After five weeks of LOTS of gluten, every day.

I would think that maybe I have IGA deficiency, except that I

obviously have some IGA...I'm in the middle of the normal range for the IGA Gliadin test.

I don't know what to think about all this. On the one hand, I'm

happy because I really like bread and it looks like I can keep

eating it. However, my having Celiac explained so much. I was

thinking that if this was the root cause to all my gastro-intestinal

problems, maybe I could give up gluten and then get some energy

back. Maybe I could stop having diarrhea and floating stools. Maybe

I could actually get my HDL cholesterol up (the good kind.)

Now, it seems like I'm back at square one, with no bloody clue as to

what's wrong. After 13 years of Chronic diarrhea, I'm just a little

tired. And with my moving in four weeks, it's not like I have a lot

of time to do all the sleuthing with the doctors that I have now.

I'll have to go DC, get a whole new slew of doctors, and on and on.

So, do I have to be on gluten for an accurate Total IgA test?

This is incredibly frustrating. Any insights will be greatly appreciated.

Simply.

P.S. I thought I posted a similar thing...however, I think I messed it up. Anyway, it's not showing up. If I did, you can ignore this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gf4life Enthusiast

Hi Simply,

No you do not have to be on gluten to have your total IgA tested. And it is possible to have a weak positive and still be IgA deficient. Although after two weeks off gluten those first tests for Gliadin are not accurate. You have to have been on gluten for them to show anything, even then you never know. I tested negative on all the bloodtests and the biopsy, yet I am still gluten intolerant. Some people never develop enough antibodies to cross over into their blood, yet they do have the antibodies present in their intestines (where the damage is being done) and in their stool. Have you considered testing through Open Original Shared Link ? They have very sensitive tests and can detect gluten intolerance in many people who are obviously reacting to gluten, yet have tested negative on the inaccurate, yet highly accepted (by conventional medical practice) blood tests.

I can't tell you if you are gluten intolerant or not, but it sure sounds like it. I wish you luck in getting a diagnosis, and have a wonderful move.

God bless,

Mariann :)

Diagnosed by Enterolab Nov. 10, 2003 after testing negative on the Celiac Panel, and 25+ years of symptoms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
simply Newbie

I have some questions about enterolab.

First, I read through some of the information Dr. Fine provided on the site, and it seems to make sense. However, since I am about to be an attorney (if I can get my brain working long enough to pass the bar) and am not anywhere close to being a doctor, I know I don't have the expertise to determine whether he is a quack. What he's written sounds good, seems logical, but he could just write well.

Second, how does the Enterolab process actually work? I've collected stool samples (all last semester, so my doctor could figure out my Diarrhea)...does Enterolab send the container, and then you send it back? How do they keep all the little cells that they will look at alive during the shipping process? Or do I actually need to get myself there so that I can collect the stool using their toilet, then hand it off to them?

Third...I think the tissue transglutimase that was ordered was of the IgG variety. I'm thinking that even with a negative EMA, the tissue one may be positive even if I'm one of the lucky few with selective IgA deficiency.

Thanks for all your help!!!

Simply

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gf4life Enthusiast

I know that the tTg test should be done on IgA, unless you are IgA deficient, since the IgG is not as specific and won't pick up Celiac Disease as easy.

I felt the same way as you about Enterolab at first. I was of course skeptical. But he has been mentioned in some very reliable publications on Gluten Intolerance. To name a few:

Wheat Free, Worry Free by Danna Korn - (the tests are mentioned)

Dangerous Grains by James Braly and Ron Hoggan - (mentions Dr. Fine as a world class researcher in the area of genetic research in Celiac Disease)

Prevalence of Celiac Disease in At-Risk and Not-At-Risk Groups in the United States: A Large Multicenter Study by Alessio Fasano; Irene Berti; Tania Gerarduzzi; Tarcisio Not; Richard B. Colletti; Sandro Drago; Yoram Elitsur; Peter H. R. Green; Stefano Guandalini; Ivor D. Hill; Michelle Pietzak; Alessandro Ventura; Mary Thorpe; Debbie Kryszak; Fabiola Fornaroli; Steven S. Wasserman; Joseph A. Murray; Karoly Horvath

Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:286-292. (From the Feb. 10, 2003 publication of the Journal of the American Medical Association) - Thanks Dr. Fine in the credits for his valuable contributions to the study.

I spent many months researching Enterolab and Dr. Fine before I felt confident that he was legitimate. I waited to do the tests until the doctors would not test me anymore and I was still testing negative. The Enterolab tests are fairly new, but the research behind them is not. Here is a link to Open Original Shared Link in which he talks about the history behind his testing procedures.

As for the actual testing, they send you a test kit in the mail with detailed instructions. The stool is collected using the kit (a container inside of a plastic toilet ring) and then the lid is placed on the container and the container is sealed completely with packing tape to make sure the lid doesn't come off during shipping. Then the specimen is frozen, overnight or longer, and the package is shipped using overnight delivery (mine was Airborne Express) and can only be shipped on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday, so the lab has time to start the tests before the weekend. Dr. Fine's reasoning is that if the antibodies can withstand the intense conditions inside the intestines, they will be fine during this shipping procedure. If something goes wrong during the shipment, they will send you another kit. But usually everything is fine.

As for the gene test, the swabs are rubbed on the inside of your cheeks and then you let them dry and place them in the envelope provided and put them in the package with the container of stool. The box you recieved becomes your return mailer, with the express "lab specimen" plastic envelope.

Enterolab has helped many people to know that they really do need the gluten free diet. I personally think they are the most accurate tests currently available. I have heard of far too many people who have been failed by the blood tests and biopsy.

But the decision to test with them has to be your own.

God bless,

Mariann

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gf4life Enthusiast

Also, Dr. Fine is a guest speaker at many celiac disease support groups. If you go to the Celiac.com Forum home page, and look at the calendar events, he is listed half a dozen times for speaking engagements across the US in the next 3 months. Just thought I'd mention it. :D

Mariann :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
simply Newbie

gf4life,

Since the way he tests is still so new, will mainstream doctors accept the diagnosis?

Like most people on this board, this is not my only medical problem. I'm positive that sometime in my future, I'm going to have to go on yet another drug, and there is a strong possibility that the drug will not be gluten free.

If I tell a doctor that I have to be gluten free based on one of these tests, will he buy it? Will pharmacies buy it?

I'm asking all the questions because $400 is a lot of money (at least to me right now, I'm of course hoping that in the future it won't be, but c'est la vie). I want to know all the ins and outs before I commit to it.

Thanks for all your help in answering these questions...it's nice that those who have gone before are willing to spend all the time helping those that follow.

Simply

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gf4life Enthusiast

Hi Simply,

No, not very many doctors will support the diagnosis from the Enterolab tests. I am concerned about my future health care as well, but I had no choice in the matter. I am hoping that in the future they will accept the tests.

I may have to get the tests done for my children, but I am also concerned for them. I mean, how are we going to get a doctor to only prescribe gluten-free medications, what if we are hospitalized and need gluten-free meals, etc. I don't have the answers to that, other than there are lists of gluten-free medications and just try your hardest to get the ones on that list should you need some. Also, if you are hospitalized and they give you gluten, you will probably get pretty darn sick, so it shouldn't be hard to convince them it was the meal. So I guess what I am trying to say is that the system is all messed up and we just have to do what is best for us.

I know what you mean about the cost. I am looking at $400 X 3 for my kids testing. But that is opposed to the $1600+($over 2000 if I don't put it on a credit card up front) testing through Prometheus labs for the blood and gene tests. They are the most credible and highest respected lab for testing for celiac disease, and of course my insurance will not cover the cost. So I am looking at out of pocket expenses here of over $1000 minimum and I just don't have that kind of money. I hate to put more on my credit card, knowing I won't be able to pay it off anytime soon, but I guess I might just have to do that. I need to know for sure before I put my kids on that restrictive of a diet. I want to know that they really need it.

God bless,

Mariann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gf4life Enthusiast

Simply,

This might come in handy. They have the most comprehensive list of gluten-free medications and supplements.

Open Original Shared Link

Mariann

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oreyes Newbie

Mariann,

Thanks so much for posting the site for the gluten-free drugs. I'd never seen a list and wasn't sure where to find it. There was so much information on that site and the others that linked to it. I was diagnosed three years ago after seven miserable years but this site has made me so much more aware of others problems.

Thanks again for the information...............Judy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
simply Newbie

I was just reading some of the FAQ's, here on Celiac.com.

One of the FAQs said something that totally contradicts everything I've been reading today.

Here it is:

One case I know of had elevated gliadins (both types) but normal EMA and ARA, plus an inconclusive biopsy. Do you see this often?**

Vijay Kumar, M.D., Research Associate Professor at the University of Buffalo and President and Director of IMMCO Diagnostics: If the tests are performed using well standardized tests with known positive and negative predictive values then you can make the statement that if the serological tests are negative celiac disease can virtually be ruled out. The problem is that some of these assays, especially the gliadin, can give you false positive results. In our laboratory we rarely see positive AGA results in the absence of EMA and ARA antibodies.

Is this true? I thought that if the EMA and transglutamaise (sp?) tests were positive, you can be 100% certain that you have celiac and that the damage to your small intestine is fairly advanced. However, if they are negative. you may have celiac, you may be gluten intolerant, you may have nothing...it would be hard to say.

Am I right about this?

Thanks,

Simply.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gf4life Enthusiast

Most doctor still believe the blood tests are accurate. There are just too many variables. First, dietary. If you are not eating a high gluten diet before the tests are taken, then they aren't very reliable. Second, human error. Either on the part of the lab tech performing the test (most labs are not very knowledgable or skilled at performing these delicate tests) or on the part of the doctor who interprets the results. They get a bunch of numbers from the tests and they have to make sense of it to come up with the numbers you actually recieve on the test results. If the doctor interpreting the results doen't know what they are doing (again, most lab doctors are not trained in the highly specified field of celiac disease blood tests) then they may interpret the results inaccurately. There are only 2 or 3 labs in the country that are skilled at Celiac Blood Testing. Prometheus labs, The Mayo clinic and one other I think, but I can't recall the name of it. Most insurance plans do not cover these labs and so the tests are done by your run of the mill lab that doesn't really know what they are doing.

Take the tTg test for example. Most people don't realise that the only accurate tTg test has to be the anti-human tissue transglutaminase test, but most labs don't use human tissue transglutaminase, they use animal tissue transglutaminase, usually from pigs and that makes the test not as accurate for detecting Celiac Disease.

If the tests are performed using well standardized tests...

That "if" is a big one. But most doctors will argue with you about this. My GI doctor doesn't believe me, even when I bring in documentation from reliable sources (which she asked for, but didn't bother to read!). The information about the tTg testing I got from my children's pediatric GI, who unfortunately is tied into a medical field that has basically tied his hands behind his back and he can't really help us. He is the most knowledgable doctor I have ever met personally regarding the issue of celiac disease, and he only trusts Prometheus labs for Celiac Testing. In his opinion all the other labs shouldn't even bother with the testing, because in most cases they are going to get it wrong.

God bless,

Mariann

Link to comment
Share on other sites
simply Newbie

Yesterday, I spent a lot of time reading through what the various tests meant, Entrolab, etc.

Is it possible to test positive on the EMA and tissue transglutamaise without having blood in the stool? It seems like most of the anti-bodies are actually in the small intestine, a place were I have no blood (at least according to all the stool tests performed last semeter). So I'm curious how the anti-bodies get to the blood from the small intestine if the small intestine has no blood. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Just curious.

Simply

P.S. Note to gf4life...I'm very happy that your husband has OK'd the money for the tests. Hopefully, you can get some answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gf4life Enthusiast

Thanks Simply,

In answer to your question about how the antibodies get from the intestines into the blood, have you ever heard of Leaky-gut syndrome? It is where there is damage to the intestines enough for the "bad" stuff that should be expelled with the waste leaks into the blood stream and causes a lot of health problems. This happens whenever anyone has any type of digestive disorder, but even more so when you have damage from gluten. Not everyone will produce enough damage or enough antibodies to "cross over" into the blood stream, so the blood tests will miss a lot of people who are gluten intolerant. Have you read the book "Wheat Free, Worry Free" by Danna Korn? It talks about all the tests, in detail and the pros and cons of all of the tests. I highly recommend this book. I have a newsletter from Gluten Solutions website that includes exerpts from her book and the chapter on the tests. If you would like, I can forward it to you, since it says to forward it to anyone who needs the information. Just let me know.

I hope this helps, I know it isn't very detailed, but I don't have all the information right at hand.

God bless,

Mariann

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Help Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    2. - Julie Riordan replied to Julie Riordan's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      3

      Any ideas for travelling

    3. - Nedast replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to SuzanneL's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test

    5. - SuzanneL posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,497
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kim.cervone513
    Newest Member
    Kim.cervone513
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @SuzanneL! Which tTG was that? tTG-IGA? tTG-IGG? Were there other celiac antibody tests run from that blood draw? Was total IGA measured? By some chance were you already cutting back on gluten by the time the blood draw was taken or just not eating much? For the celiac antibody tests to be accurate a person needs to be eating about 10g of gluten daily which is about 4-6 pieces of bread.
    • SuzanneL
      I've recently received a weak positive tTG, 6. For about six years, I've been sick almost everyday. I was told it was just my IBS. I have constant nausea. Sometimes after I eat, I have sharp, upper pain in my abdomen. I sometimes feel or vomit (bile) after eating. The doctor wanted me to try a stronger anti acid before doing an endoscopy. I'm just curious if these symptoms are pointing towards Celiac Disease? 
×
×
  • Create New...