Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Neg Bloodwork & Neg Biopsy
0

2 posts in this topic

I've been trying to find an answer and am getting a lot of conflicting information. My bloodwork and biopsy were both normal, so the gastro doc said I didn't have celiac disease. Yet I was extremely symptomatic for six years, which was blamed on IBS. I voluntarily went gluten-free in November and saw dramatic improvement after two months. Could it be that since I never did eat very much gluten, even as a child, that the biopsy sampled an area that still was healthy?

How likely is celiac disease in the presence of normal bloodwork and biopsy? I have a follow up with the gastro doc on Tuesday and am wondering what to tell her.

Dazed and confused.

B)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Hi fanfaire

In my opinion, yes you can have negative blood-work and biopsy and still have celiac disease (I did). A lot of times the reason for this is either the doc did not do that many biopsies or he did not biopsy the section of your small intestines where the damage "could be". Sometimes it takes a while for the damamge to occur.

If you improved on a gluten-free diet then I thihnk you most likely have it. If you want accurate answers please check out Enterolab . Dr. Fine uses stool panel testing which is more sensitive than the blood however not widely accepted by conventional doctors. This is how I was diagnosed along with many others on this board.

Good luck to you.....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,329
    • Total Posts
      920,425
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, Ok good advice and I am sincere when I say how much I appreciate a lot of the responses, advice and encouragement that have been posted here. I'm not sure what a nutrionist is but a dietician (here in the U.K.) is a heavily regulated medical profession and my dietician is based most of her week in a hospital where doctors and MD's as they are known refer patients to her for help. She works every day with celiacs, dh sufferers and people with crohns, ibs etc and seeing my skin, listened to what I was saying (particularly about how my redness and blisters resolved on a gluten free (though not wheat free) diet for several years, and sent a report to my doctor/MD requesting a battery of tests - tests that can indicate dh, celiac and associated complications. I also have a friend with a wheat allergy and two with celiac (all diagnosed) and they are encouraging me to go ahead with getting these particular tests. So that's great but reading the above quote that suggests that situations like sharing an oven used to cook gluten-containing pizza, should not cause a gluten reaction. I thought, my god what's the point of going through these tests if my recent reactions aren't actually to do with gluten. Although my dietician is concerned about possible dh and has been through years of medical school, I also really trust the advice of an advanced member on this site and if they think oven-sharing shouldn't cause any gluten reaction, what hope do I have with an MD? It has taken me years to pluck up the confidence to ask for any medical help because I feared that sort of response along with a focus on psychological issues and hormones etc early on in the thread (even though, I only started feeling depressed since yesterday). Actually, I'm a mental health nurse so it's good to see people are alert to these issues but I am also pretty familiar with depression and I know that many people with physical health problems are fobbed off by doctors with talk of depression, stress, and hormones. I'm sorry that I took the (above) quote to heart and I know that I allowed that to colour my perception of the whole thread, which has been helpful in many ways. Best wishes to you all, even those I didn't agree with! Rhian 
    • I thought maybe doing a trial period to see if he reacts positively to being gluten free and then adding it back to see if symptoms come back would maybe be helpful to the doctor? But I guess that's true, it might skew things regarding any future tests that might be warranted. 
    • If you haven't had her tested yet please do not go gluten free. Get the celiac testing first as if she does feel better gluten free when she has to go back on gluten for testing she may have much worse symptoms.  There will also be a higher risk of false negatives.
    • I did not mean to imply that you should put him on a gluten free diet.    If you suspect a problem with gluten, please get an opinion from a GI who is celiac savvy.  All celiac testing requires a patient to be consuming gluten.  The slightly equivocal TTG?  That warrants a gene test at the very least.   http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/it-mmfiles/Celiac_Disease_Diagnostic_Testing_Algorithm.pdf  
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,386
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Windsurf
    Joined