Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Anyone Turn Down A Biopsy For Their Child?


EmmyLouWho?

Recommended Posts

EmmyLouWho? Newbie

I just had a high-pressure discussion on the phone with my son

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply
dandelionmom Enthusiast

We opted not to have the biopsy done for our daughter. She was too sick and had very positive blood work. Her pediatrician suggested forgoing the biopsy unless we really needed additional proof (her instant improvement with the diet was enough convincing for us!).

The GI we consulted with was kind of pushy too and a little rude about us deciding not to do the biopsy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gemini Experienced
I just had a high-pressure discussion on the phone with my son
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dilettantesteph Collaborator

I must admit that I was pretty ignorant when I made these choices, but I not only refused a biopsy, I refused the blood test too. My son was ten and very scared of needles. I thought, why not just try the gluten free diet? If necessary he could always go back on later. I had no idea how hard that would be. I also had no idea how stubborn some doctors can be about believing reaction to diet as conclusive. He was throwing up 10 times a day and I just wanted it to stop. The GERD drugs weren't working and the diet worked right away. By that time we were really sick of going to the doctor, and he was better. The pediatrician also told me that it would have taken months to get into the pediatric gastroenterologist and the whole time while we were waiting my son would have to be eating gluten. I just couldn't see making him that sick again for a diagnosis. It is obvious to both of us that he can't eat gluten. I can see when going through difficult times with the diet and unknown gluten come in that it would have been nice to have a more definitive diagnosis. We got through it and over a year later he is doing great.

Partly why the GI doctors want to give everyone biopsies is to help to figure out the disease. I don't know why my kid should have to suffer for that.

You should be proud that you are putting your child's welfare first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
littleguyw/CD Newbie

I have a question....

Our son was DX on 12-05-08 (blood work) and he is 3 1/2 years old having said that our GI apt is at the end of the month. What I would like to know, what is a "high level"? How do I know if our son tested high? I have his results... should we do the scoop or not. I dont really want to stick s tube down him. He has been gluten free from day 1 of his DX and is doing wonderful! I love the new little guy I have now LOL!!

sonia

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EmmyLouWho? Newbie

Thank you for the responses!

Dandelionmom

Link to comment
Share on other sites
neesee Apprentice
I have a question....

Our son was DX on 12-05-08 (blood work) and he is 3 1/2 years old having said that our GI apt is at the end of the month. What I would like to know, what is a "high level"? How do I know if our son tested high? I have his results... should we do the scoop or not. I dont really want to stick s tube down him. He has been gluten free from day 1 of his DX and is doing wonderful! I love the new little guy I have now LOL!!

sonia

I would probably go for the scope. It will give you a better overall picture of what exactly is going on inside.

Which blood test was positive? TTG and or EMA are the most specific for celiac.

neesee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



EmmyLouWho? Newbie

Sonia

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EmmyLouWho? Newbie
It will give you a better overall picture of what exactly is going on inside.

Just a question...since my doctor wasn't able to give me a good answer. I'm wondering if maybe you've had better luck with doctors being able to explain....what exactly is a better overall picture? Do you mean the damage sustained? From what I understood it acts more as a confirmation to a blood test diagnosis. My son's doctor spoke very quickly though.

Also, one of the things my dad brought up was that damage may not be done to the entire small intestine. Therefore, you may get a false negative b/c the biopsy they took was from an undamaged part of the intestine. He does many scopes himself (as the doctor, not patient) so I found this interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sbj Rookie

It's up to the individual, for sure. Best of luck to all who ignore their doctor and instead trust their own instincts. I urge people to listen to their doctors. It is NOT common sense to avoid testing that a medical professional recommends because your own layman's common sense or a community forum tells you different. When it comes to your health you can't simply 'listen to your body' and decide for yourself what tests are necessary - you need to get the proper recommended screening.

I think there are two considerations here.

First: you don't need a biopsy to diagnose celiac disease:

"
Biopsy Not Always Necessary for Celiac Disease Diagnosis

Research in the most recent issue of Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics shows that a transglutaminase antibody level can be defined which gives a positive predictive value of 100 percent for celiac disease indicating that small bowel biopsy is no longer regarded as mandatory in patients with such high transglutaminase antibody levels."

Second: You might want an endoscopy for baseline comparison, to assess the state of the bowel, to compare for later follow-up, to look at the esophagus and stomach:

"Biopsies give a baseline for comparison. Suppose a patient starts a gluten-free diet without biopsy
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tallforagirl Rookie
It's up to the individual, for sure. Best of luck to all who ignore their doctor and instead trust their own instincts. I urge people to listen to their doctors. It is NOT common sense to avoid testing that a medical professional recommends because your own layman's common sense or a community forum tells you different. When it comes to your health you can't simply 'listen to your body' and decide for yourself what tests are necessary - you need to get the proper recommended screening.]

I'm with sbj. Now is the time to get the biopsy, because later on, if complications arise and it's neccessary to biopsy, the child will have to do a gluten challenge.

It is not a "garden hose", they use sedation so it's not painful and you don't remember a thing afterwards.

Having said that, I can understand if it's going to take weeks to get an appointment, why you would not want the child to suffer for that long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gemini Experienced
It's up to the individual, for sure. Best of luck to all who ignore their doctor and instead trust their own instincts. I urge people to listen to their doctors. It is NOT common sense to avoid testing that a medical professional recommends because your own layman's common sense or a community forum tells you different. When it comes to your health you can't simply 'listen to your body' and decide for yourself what tests are necessary - you need to get the proper recommended screening.

Yes, and we all know Celiacs who have suffered for years with a mis-diagnosis are just too plain stupid to think for themselves and know what tests are necessary for them. The woman who questioned the doctor originally was correct......the doctor couldn't give her a good reason to do an endoscopy on a 2 year old and her son has responded very well to the gluten-free diet. With other diagnosed Celiacs in the family, what it is that you don't get? If you like to go on the heavy side with testing for yourself, that's your choice and no one would give you a hard time about that but for those who choose otherwise, depending upon circumstances of their illness, they are not wrong for questioning a doctor's reasoning. No doctor should be angry at anyone who refuses more invasive testing, especially if blood work is conclusive and the patient responds well to the gluten-free diet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
littleguyw/CD Newbie
Which blood test was positive? TTG and or EMA are the most specific for celiac.

im looking at his Laboratory report and I do not see anything about TTG or EMA :huh: ?? all we know is that he tested "high" the paper has "Gliadin antibody IgG 35 H U/mL" and that part was high lighted with some big words :D !! When I called the Dr (yes I had to call because an office staff member called with NO answers to my questions!!!) he said, over the phone, you might want to start you son on a gluten free lifestyle and we are going to set you up with a Ped GI Dr at the Children hospt.

and the test was done at Sonora Quest Laboratories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
neesee Apprentice
im looking at his Laboratory report and I do not see anything about TTG or EMA :huh: ?? all we know is that he tested "high" the paper has "Gliadin antibody IgG 35 H U/mL" and that part was high lighted with some big words :D !! When I called the Dr (yes I had to call because an office staff member called with NO answers to my questions!!!) he said, over the phone, you might want to start you son on a gluten free lifestyle and we are going to set you up with a Ped GI Dr at the Children hospt.

and the test was done at Sonora Quest Laboratories.

IgG is the least specific for celiac. I would definately do the biopsy.

neesee

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tallforagirl Rookie
IgG is the least specific for celiac. I would definately do the biopsy.

neesee

This is correct. And with young children, blood tests can be even more unreliable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nathan's mom Apprentice

We finally landed at a GI's office 2 months after my son was gluten-free - after his bloodwork and advice from a doctor to take him off gluten and "see if it makes a difference". He explained that the Ttg was very specific for Celiac disease and advised to have the scope done. Up until then I just thought my son had a gluten intolerance. I decided against the procedure because we just started to see our son begin to get better at that point. I was afraid to put him back on gluten - afraid of what it would do to his immune system.

However, if he turns, let's say 11 and decides he wants "proof" then I will back him up and let him go for it. Honestly though, I don't think he could tolerate eating gluten again. I think he would be so sick after the first day he wouldn't be able to go through with it.

I think I would just like to know and wish we could have had it done. And yet, he's had gluten a couple of times and we've seen him react to it and know he can't have it. I know that doesn't make any sense. I guess I still hold out hope he isn't really celiac.

Debbie

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

We not only turned down biopsy, we turned down bloodwork!

We didn't intend to go that route, we weren't even thinking that our kids had a problem with gluten. The pediatrician said, "well, children get tummy aches, don't worry about it." So we didn't.

But I was diagnosed, and went gluten-free, and decided to make the house gluten-free except for "their" bread for lunches, which made the family sort of gluten-lite.

The tummy aches, which had been 2-3 per week, disappeared almost completely. And #2 son's severe eczema, which had never responded to even the strongest prescription steroid creams, disappeared.

My husband and I gave each other one of those significant looks, and said, "hmm, we'd better double-check this before going to the doctor about it." So we put the kids on more gluten--and they tummy aches and eczema returned. So we went gluten-free, and tummy aches and eczema disappeared.

We did one last challenge--and #2 son sealed the deal by crying (while in the bathroom in misery), "I'm NEVER eating gluten again!"

He was 9 years old. And as far as we know, he has never cheated. His friends' parents tell us he refuses gluteny snacks at their houses.

At this point, we don't WANT a diagnosis of celiac on our health records--too many insurance companies are using it as reason to either deny coverage or raise rates. And at this point, bloodwork/biopsies are useless for us. Why biopsy a healthy child with no symptoms? Our pediatrician is on board with us about this, and says, 'if it ain't broke, don't look for a fix!"

However, if the gluten-free diet did NOT make the symptoms go away, further testing would be the next step.

It always amazes me how doctors want to do INVASIVE procedures that DO carry certain risks (anesthesia in small children is the riskiest part of any operation, and even sedation has been known to cause death even in adults, either from "human error" or from atypical reaction, though admittedly that's rare) when it's not necessary.

I don't know if they are blinded by what's been hammered into them during residency/med school, or if they are just blinded by financial greed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
I guess I still hold out hope he isn't really celiac.

Debbie

Debbie, it doesn't make any difference whether or not he is "really celiac."

If he is "only" gluten intolerant," that could either be early-stage celiac, or a non-celiac gluten-intolerance, but either way, gluten still makes his body attack itself--and he could end up with multiple autoimmune diseases.

I have a 16-year-old student, who has been in physical therapy and on NSAIDS for 3 years because of severe joint pain. They told her she tested negative for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, so it must be fibromyalgia.

I told her about celiac; she tried the gluten-free diet and--no more joint pain! She couldn't care less if she's celiac or gluten intolerant--she knows now what basically stole 3 years of her childhood, and she's not giving gluten one single day more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dyan Rookie

I didn't have my daughter biopsied either. The doctor who dx her said that the blood tests were pretty acurate now a days and said to skip the biopsy. I put her on a gluten free diet and saw major improvements. Not radical and not overnight. But slowly but surely she was feeling better. It wasn't until a few months later that I started to really re think my decision to pass on the biopsy.

We had done all kinds of blood work prior to me insisting on the celiac blood work. So I knew she didn't have an ulcer and she wasn't this or that, we went through the whole work up. The first doc said she was depressed. So when we started her on the diet and she felt better I asked her if she wanted to do the biopsy so she would know 100% for sure it is Celiac. She said no. She doesn't care what it is or what you call it, we call it Celiac, she wants nothing to do with gluten. And this is from a girl who would love to go to KFC and eat a whole bucket to herself.

She is 12 and I can't imagine putting her through that. A toddler would be harder. I get the "I need to know" attitude and I also get the "I already know" attitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
luvthelake21 Rookie

Will you have a letter from your childs doctor stating he has Celiac? Once kids are in school having that peice of paper is Crucil. Mu daughter was 10 and had positive blood work but still did the biopsy which came back positive. She has missed several days of school the last two years whie adjusting to the new diet. If it was not for the offical paperwork in a public school they could had called child services on us. The peice of paper could help if you ever travel and need to take your own food to somewhere where you need your special foods. But as a adult I would not want a official diagnosis on my medical records.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dandelionmom Enthusiast
Will you have a letter from your childs doctor stating he has Celiac? Once kids are in school having that peice of paper is Crucil. Mu daughter was 10 and had positive blood work but still did the biopsy which came back positive. She has missed several days of school the last two years whie adjusting to the new diet. If it was not for the offical paperwork in a public school they could had called child services on us. The peice of paper could help if you ever travel and need to take your own food to somewhere where you need your special foods. But as a adult I would not want a official diagnosis on my medical records.

I'm not sure who you're asking but with the blood work only, we still have the official diagnosis that works for school and everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Will you have a letter from your childs doctor stating he has Celiac? Once kids are in school having that peice of paper is Crucil.

No, it's NOT!!!!

As long as you have a letter from your doctor stating why your kid is missing school (diarrhea, vomiting, cramps, or just a letter stating that the child is ill and under the care of a physician, and is missing school with the physician's knowledge and approval), you don't need a diagnosis of celiac.

The same goes for travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EmmyLouWho? Newbie
It's up to the individual, for sure. Best of luck to all who ignore their doctor and instead trust their own instincts. I urge people to listen to their doctors. It is NOT common sense to avoid testing that a medical professional recommends because your own layman's common sense or a community forum tells you different. When it comes to your health you can't simply 'listen to your body' and decide for yourself what tests are necessary - you need to get the proper recommended screening.

Wow, I'm a little offended that you believe me to have no common sense and purposefully ignoring my doctor. We did the bloodwork. The bloodwork was VERY positive. And funny how I am the one who requested the screening and got laughed at by the pediatrician. Who has the child's best interest in mind? As I stated...I repeatedly asked the doctor what the PURPOSE of the biopsy was. He did not give me a good answer. In fact, he reiterated over and over that it was to confirm diagnosis. That means my son is diagnosed and they just want to re-confirm that. For OUR family, that is not a good enough reason to run the risks involved with a biopsy (nicks that can scar and turn into blockages, etc). Sure risks are rare, but they're there. I stated that I do not see people who choose to do the biopsy any differently than those who do not. Why is it necessary to ridicule? My thread was asking if I was the only one who turned down the biopsy not an invitation for mean remarks.

I suggest not "greeting" everyone on this board for their first time this way. As if the diagnosis isn't hard enough.

I'm not sure who you're asking but with the blood work only, we still have the official diagnosis that works for school and everything else.

Exactly. The doctor yesterday even admitted that even with ONLY the bloodwork, we still have an official diagnosis. It's part of the reason I couldn't understand going on to do the biopsy.

Thank you for the replies everyone. It's nice to see that I'm not the only one who has made this decision. And I urge that I have several doctors in the family (one WITH Celiac himself) so I'm not making off the wall decisions regarding my child. I still can't get over that I have to put that disclaimer down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dandelionmom Enthusiast
I suggest not "greeting" everyone on this board for their first time this way. As if the diagnosis isn't hard enough.

...

I still can't get over that I have to put that disclaimer down.

Tone is hard to interpret on a message board. I learned the hard way that some people come off very harsh but don't mean to sound that way. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
EmmyLouWho? Newbie

Dandelion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,506
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    NanaA
    Newest Member
    NanaA
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...