Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

New Gluten Free Level Of 20ppm To Be Accepted Wordwide


irish daveyboy

Recommended Posts

irish daveyboy Community Regular

Hi All,

While researching the new Codex levels of 20PPM as the New World Standard.

.

I came across a Visual of 1,000,000 (one Million).

When I saw how infinitesimally small 20 was in comparison 1 million I was amazed.

.

This is probably the first time you've seen exactly what 20 parts per million actually looks like.

.

Bear in mind each of the small squares represent 100,

then 20 = 1/5 of a small square !!

.

This is Mind Boggling Stuff!!!!.....You need to scroll right to see 1 million

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

Best Regards,

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

It is nice to see that they are doing worldwide standards and we are not going to have things like 200ppm in one country and 20ppm in another. I do so hope though that they also require that labels have clearly listed gluten ingredients even if the gluten has been 'processed' out. Not all of us eat just a single serving of a food, and if we have multiple items in the course of our day that all have 20ppm of gluten then we would not just be getting 20ppm that day. Some of us react to very, very infintesimal amounts of gluten and we want to know if gluten ingredients are included or part of the processing. If setting a 'safe' gluten level means companies are allowed to hide it then I personally don't feel any safer with this ruling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kenlove Rising Star

Sure is a lot of cut and paste on the computer, not to mention the first 100 dots!

It will be nice to have some worldwide standards although I'll still be paranoid about

any gluten.

Happy Birthday too!

Ken

Hi All,

While researching the new Codex levels of 20PPM as the New World Standard.

.

I came across a Visual of 1,000,000 (one Million).

When I saw how infinitesimally small 20 was in comparison 1 million I was amazed.

.

This is probably the first time you've seen exactly what 20 parts per million actually looks like.

.

Bear in mind each of the small squares represent 100,

then 20 = 1/5 of a small square !!

.

This is Mind Boggling Stuff!!!!.....You need to scroll right to see 1 million

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

Best Regards,

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tim-n-VA Contributor
It is nice to see that they are doing worldwide standards and we are not going to have things like 200ppm in one country and 20ppm in another. I do so hope though that they also require that labels have clearly listed gluten ingredients even if the gluten has been 'processed' out. Not all of us eat just a single serving of a food, and if we have multiple items in the course of our day that all have 20ppm of gluten then we would not just be getting 20ppm that day. Some of us react to very, very infintesimal amounts of gluten and we want to know if gluten ingredients are included or part of the processing. If setting a 'safe' gluten level means companies are allowed to hide it then I personally don't feel any safer with this ruling.

If everything you eat has 20 ppm of something, you consume 20 ppm no matter how many servings you have. The denominator and numerator of that fraction both are increasing.

Edit to add: The comments below explain this better. I meant that the denominator and the numerator of the fraction that you use to calculate the ratio (i.e. standardize the denominator to one million) are both changing as you eat more. Using the million dots from the original post, if 20 of those are gluten and you eat all of the dots, you have consumed 20 ppm. If you eat two million, you have consumed 40 dots of gluten but your total consumption is two million so the ratio is 40 over 2,000,000 or 20 ppm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor
If everything you eat has 20 ppm of something, you consume 20 ppm no matter how many servings you have. The denominator and numerator of that fraction both are increasing.

Rule for Addition of Fractions

When adding fractions, you must make sure that the fractions being added have the same denominator. Then, simply add the numerators of the fractions.

Thus if I have 5 servings of a food that has a 20pmm it would be :

20/1mil + 20/1mil + 20/1mil + 20/1mil +20/1mil = 100/1mil or 100ppm

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

no so much.

if you have $100 and I take 2%.

if you have another $100, and I take 2% again.

repeat 8 more times.

...

...

you've, over the course of this time, gotten $1000. I have $20. that's still just 2%.

(you'll note that this is the equivalent of 20,000ppm.

but it's harder to make representable math with 0.002%, or $1 out of $50,000.)

If you want to make it make more sense, stop fiddling with fractions, densities, etc. and just calculate amounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
psawyer Proficient
no so much.

if you have $100 and I take 2%.

if you have another $100, and I take 2% again.

repeat 8 more times.

...

...

you've, over the course of this time, gotten $1000. I have $20. that's still just 2%.

(you'll note that this is the equivalent of 20,000ppm.

but it's harder to make representable math with 0.002%, or $1 out of $50,000.)

If you want to make it make more sense, stop fiddling with fractions, densities, etc. and just calculate amounts.

What Tiffany said is right. This is not about adding fractional numbers. Yes, if you add half a gram to half a gram, you do get a gram.

These are ratios, and the numerator and denominator are both changing. You can take 20 ppm of an ounce, or 20ppm of a ton--the ratio is still 20ppm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Tim-n-VA Contributor
Rule for Addition of Fractions

When adding fractions, you must make sure that the fractions being added have the same denominator. Then, simply add the numerators of the fractions.

Thus if I have 5 servings of a food that has a 20pmm it would be :

20/1mil + 20/1mil + 20/1mil + 20/1mil +20/1mil = 100/1mil or 100ppm

I edited my post above to clarify but no. You would have consumed 100 units of gluten while consuming 5 million units of food. That is still 20 ppm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

I do understand that the ratio is going to remain the same. My issue is that if you are consuming multiple servings at 20 ppm that the total amount is going to add up. If you are get 20ppm from one food and 20 ppm from another food, and 20 ppm from another food etc those 20 ppm are going to add up in your system. The food is going to stay at the same ratio but the amount of gluten is going to add up. It will not change in the ratio of the food at that level but the total consumed is going to add up. To say it won't is like saying eating something with 10 grams of protein in the morning and eating something with 10 grams of protein at lunch then having dinner with 10 grams of protein is still only giving you only 10 grams of protein, it isn't it is giving you 30 grams of protein total for the day.

A better analogy might be with alcoholic beverages. Using your logic I would have the same BAC consuming 10 drinks as I would consuming one. Sure each drink had the same ratio of alcohol in it but it adds up in the body. My issue is not that the ratio of how much gluten is in a food would increase but that the total amount consumed would add up. Just as it does with alcohol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tim-n-VA Contributor
A better analogy might be with alcoholic beverages. Using your logic I would have the same BAC consuming 10 drinks as I would consuming one. Sure each drink had the same ratio of alcohol in it but it adds up in the body. My issue is not that the ratio of how much gluten is in a food would increase but that the total amount consumed would add up. Just as it does with alcohol.

That isn't the "logic" of anyone posting in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor
That isn't the "logic" of anyone posting in this thread.

Either your misunderstanding me or I am misunderstanding you. I gave my opinion to the original question and explained why I simply want clear labels. I just don't want gluten hidden in my food because it tests below the 'offically accepted safe level'. For me low level consumption repeatedly throughout my days would be a problem. If it isn't a concern for others that's okay too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike M Rookie
I do understand that the ratio is going to remain the same. My issue is that if you are consuming multiple servings at 20 ppm that the total amount is going to add up. If you are get 20ppm from one food and 20 ppm from another food, and 20 ppm from another food etc those 20 ppm are going to add up in your system. The food is going to stay at the same ratio but the amount of gluten is going to add up. It will not change in the ratio of the food at that level but the total consumed is going to add up. To say it won't is like saying eating something with 10 grams of protein in the morning and eating something with 10 grams of protein at lunch then having dinner with 10 grams of protein is still only giving you only 10 grams of protein, it isn't it is giving you 30 grams of protein total for the day.

A better analogy might be with alcoholic beverages. Using your logic I would have the same BAC consuming 10 drinks as I would consuming one. Sure each drink had the same ratio of alcohol in it but it adds up in the body. My issue is not that the ratio of how much gluten is in a food would increase but that the total amount consumed would add up. Just as it does with alcohol.

Bingo Ravenwoodglass! How much gluten I consume, determines the severity of my reaction. For me, just one average food or drink item at 20 parts per million (or there about) and I have a reaction. I don't understand why this is the case and others seem to have little to no reaction. Seems logical to me though that even those that are not seeing or feeling a reaction, still must be reacting or at a minimum the gluten exposure is building up. If this was not so, how did they ever come to the point of knowing they had Celiac in the first place? I am aware of the so called 30 mg per day and it is still OK.....Seems hard to believe. I am glad also to see they are putting limits on the allowable gluten content, it is better than nothing. All the best, Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites
irish daveyboy Community Regular
I do understand that the ratio is going to remain the same. My issue is that if you are consuming multiple servings at 20 ppm that the total amount is going to add up. If you are get 20ppm from one food and 20 ppm from another food, and 20 ppm from another food etc those 20 ppm are going to add up in your system. The food is going to stay at the same ratio but the amount of gluten is going to add up. It will not change in the ratio of the food at that level but the total consumed is going to add up. To say it won't is like saying eating something with 10 grams of protein in the morning and eating something with 10 grams of protein at lunch then having dinner with 10 grams of protein is still only giving you only 10 grams of protein, it isn't it is giving you 30 grams of protein total for the day.

A better analogy might be with alcoholic beverages. Using your logic I would have the same BAC consuming 10 drinks as I would consuming one. Sure each drink had the same ratio of alcohol in it but it adds up in the body. My issue is not that the ratio of how much gluten is in a food would increase but that the total amount consumed would add up. Just as it does with alcohol.

Hi,

so by your own analogy, if you had 3 doctor appointments in 1 week.

.

On Monday you visit your GP he tells you your 10% overweight

.

On Wednesday you visit your GI, he tells you your 10% overweight

.

On Thursday your Dietitian tells you your 10% overweight

.

So on Friday you must be 30% overweight (cumulative overweight readings)

.

SORRY Doesn't work like that. !!!

.

Best Regards,

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jestgar Rising Star
I do understand that the ratio is going to remain the same. My issue is that if you are consuming multiple servings at 20 ppm that the total amount is going to add up.

I'm backing the Raven on this one.

Sure, my chip has only 20 parts gluten to (almost) 1 million parts of whatever, but if I eat 100 chips, I've eaten 2,000 parts of gluten, regardless of how much whatever. All the number means is that you can eat more before having a reaction (assuming consumption within a short period of time, and 'short' will vary among individuals).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jerseyangel Proficient
I'm backing the Raven on this one.

Sure, my chip has only 20 parts gluten to (almost) 1 million parts of whatever, but if I eat 100 chips, I've eaten 2,000 parts of gluten, regardless of how much whatever. All the number means is that you can eat more before having a reaction (assuming consumption within a short period of time, and 'short' will vary among individuals).

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nikki-uk Enthusiast

Ok, I don't do Math(s) but this I know:

If my hubby has 2 slices of bread with codex for breakfast (currently 200ppm) he is fine

If he has another 2 slices lunchtime he seems fine

Another 2 slices with dinner???............long appointment in the loo! :o

Accumulative affect, no? :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jerseyangel Proficient
Accumulative affect, no? :unsure:

All I know is that a cumulative effect will take place for me when I "discover" a new product, think I'm ok with it, eat it every day, and then when I begin to feel sick, find out that it was not as safe as I thought.

The way I see this whole thing--the math(s) were all correct as far as that goes, but Ravenwood was reasoning in a different direction. :)

Hope that came out right......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor
Ok, I don't do Math(s) but this I know:

If my hubby has 2 slices of bread with codex for breakfast (currently 200ppm) he is fine

If he has another 2 slices lunchtime he seems fine

Another 2 slices with dinner???............long appointment in the loo! :o

Accumulative affect, no? :unsure:

That's what I was talking about. I sometimes don't put things as clearly as I would like. I was referring to the cumulative effect but I guess I didn't express it well.

Thanks to everyone who helped clarify what I was trying to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sbj Rookie

Perhaps Table III-1 at the below will help:

Open Original Shared Link

If you consume 50 grams (g) of 'gluten-free' food that contains 20 parts per million (ppm) gluten, then you will have consumed 1 microgram (mg) of gluten.

If you consume 300 g of 'gluten-free' food that contains 20 ppm gluten then you will have consumed 6 mg of gluten.

Personally I have no idea what my daily microgram limit of gluten should be to prevent mucosal damage, but I am hoping that if I eat less than 100 grams of gluten free flour products a day and those products are cerrtified to be less than 20 ppm gluten then I should be okay because I will be ingesting no more than 2 micrograms of gluten daily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tim-n-VA Contributor

Perhaps I'm getting hung up on semantics but it seems that there are mulitple concepts being used inconsistently.

First there is he idea that there is a threshold, a total amount of gluten than can be consumed without reaction. The study linked by SBJ indicates that is probably between 10 and 50 mg. If you don't accept that, than nothing other than zero gluten is acceptable.

Next there is the amount of gluten in a fixed amount of the food. This is given in parts per million to standardize for comparing. If it helps, it is like the unit price on the shelf at the supermarket that allows you to easily compare when both the price and amount are different.

Next is the total amount of the food consumed.

Then we have the total amount of gluten consumed. If you know the ratio and the amount you consume, you can calculate the amount of gluten.

Still, that is a lot of calculation even for someone who is comfortable with the math. The solution is to pick a threshold and to calculate an average amount of food consumed per day. Using that you can figure out what the reasonable CODEX ppm should be.

IF you accept that 50 mg of gluten is tolerated, you can either eat 5.5 pounds of 20 ppm food or you can eat half a pound of 200 ppm food.

IF you only want the 10 mg threshold, those numbers are 1.1 pounds of 20 ppm or .1 pound of 200 ppm food.

Of course, if the acceptable threshold is 50 mg and you are eating 200 ppm food but you eat more that half a pound you will exceed the threshold. But you will still only be consuming 200 ppm food.

Nikki-UK's example could fit this if the assumption was that daily servings was four slices of bread per day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
irish daveyboy Community Regular
Ok, I don't do Math(s) but this I know:

If my hubby has 2 slices of bread with codex for breakfast (currently 200ppm) he is fine

If he has another 2 slices lunchtime he seems fine

Another 2 slices with dinner???............long appointment in the loo! :o

Accumulative affect, no? :unsure:

.

Hi Nikki,

If eating 6 slices of gluten-free bread in a day that contains 200PPM causes a reaction!

then i stands to reason that,

Eating 60 slices of gluten-free bread that contains 20PPM will cause the same effect.

.

Numbers are being bandied around.

.

Eating multiple items increases the quantity but the percentage remains the same.

.

Eating 1 potato chip contains .002% gluten

.

Eating 1 Bag of potato chips contains .002% gluten

.

Eating 500 loaves of bread contains .002% gluten.

.

Assume a loaf weighs 1 Kg or 1,000g or 100,000mg

then 500 loaves = 50,000,000 mg @ 20PPm =1000mg or

20 days quota of safe level of Gluten intake.

.

somehow I don't think anybody is likely to eat 500 loaves in 20 days or 25 loaves in 1 day.

.

Best Regards,

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dilettantesteph Collaborator

My GI says that some celiacs have a reaction to as little as 0.5 mg. A 20 ppm product would give you that in 25 g. which is one slice of bread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tom Contributor
If you consume 50 grams (g) of 'gluten-free' food that contains 20 parts per million (ppm) gluten, then you will have consumed 1 microgram (mg) of gluten.

If you consume 300 g of 'gluten-free' food that contains 20 ppm gluten then you will have consumed 6 mg of gluten.

Personally I have no idea what my daily microgram limit of gluten should be to prevent mucosal damage, but I am hoping that if I eat less than 100 grams of gluten free flour products a day and those products are cerrtified to be less than 20 ppm gluten then I should be okay because I will be ingesting no more than 2 micrograms of gluten daily.

Micrograms?? :o I'm sure you mean milligrams, which, of course is abbrev mg.

Micrograms are abbrev as ug, in lieu of a greek alphabet typewriter w/ a lower-case Mu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
irish daveyboy Community Regular
Micrograms?? :o I'm sure you mean milligrams, which, of course is abbrev mg.

Micrograms are abbrev as ug, in lieu of a greek alphabet typewriter w/ a lower-case Mu.

Hi Tom,

The annotation for microgram is generally accepted as mcg.

.

kg = Kilogram or 1,000 grammes (g)

g = gram or 100 miligrams (mg)

mg = miligram or 100 micrograms (mcg)

.

Best Regards,

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sbj Rookie
Hi Tom, The annotation for microgram is generally accepted as mcg.

.

kg = Kilogram or 1,000 grammes (g)

g = gram or 100 miligrams (mg)

mg = miligram or 100 micrograms (mcg)

.

Best Regards,

David

Yes, didn't think I had misread that report (although no one's perfect). It seemed to me that the study I referenced was using 'mg' as the abbreviation for micrograms (and several sources indicate that mg is an acceptable acronym for microgram). mcg, however, seems much more clear to me.

In context, the article seems to indeed be referring to a tolerable level of micrograms and not to milligrams of gluten. That is, us celiacs may be able to tolerate 6 millionths of a gram daily and not 6 thousandths of a gram.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Help Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    2. - Julie Riordan replied to Julie Riordan's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      3

      Any ideas for travelling

    3. - Nedast replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to SuzanneL's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test

    5. - SuzanneL posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,496
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    JamesDavid
    Newest Member
    JamesDavid
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @SuzanneL! Which tTG was that? tTG-IGA? tTG-IGG? Were there other celiac antibody tests run from that blood draw? Was total IGA measured? By some chance were you already cutting back on gluten by the time the blood draw was taken or just not eating much? For the celiac antibody tests to be accurate a person needs to be eating about 10g of gluten daily which is about 4-6 pieces of bread.
    • SuzanneL
      I've recently received a weak positive tTG, 6. For about six years, I've been sick almost everyday. I was told it was just my IBS. I have constant nausea. Sometimes after I eat, I have sharp, upper pain in my abdomen. I sometimes feel or vomit (bile) after eating. The doctor wanted me to try a stronger anti acid before doing an endoscopy. I'm just curious if these symptoms are pointing towards Celiac Disease? 
×
×
  • Create New...