Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Really Hacked Off At Kinnikinnick Foods.


Guest scully

Recommended Posts

Guest scully

To all who may have noticed, Kinnikinnick Foods has just reformulated their personal 7" pizza crusts into a square shape. That is hardly a big deal. I could even deal with the fact that they thinned out the crust big time, and charged the same amount of money for only 4 crusts. The big deal was when I wolfed it down and then realized upon looking at the packaging that they have QUADRUPLED the amount of calories in one crust. 496 calories, to be exact. I sorely wished I hadn't eaten it. After sauce and cheese, it weighed in at over 600 calories.

The old round crust was nice and thick, came in a package of five, and was a reasonable 123 calories per crust. WHY OH WHY DID THEY CHANGE IT?!?!?! I know they have a new dedicated facility and had to adapt the new crust to the new machines, but did they really have to change the recipe THAT MUCH?

This gluten-free thing is hard enough without trying to maintain a clothing size in the low single digits. So many of the gluten free breads, rolls, etc. are incredibly high in calories, and most of the time I try to avoid them. But if I am going to waste 600 calories on a gluten free pizza, it is going to be from the pizzeria in town that makes it sinfully good and not on some crappy frozen crust.

I am getting really tired of this. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

You should write them or even call! That is really ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest scully

Oh, I did call. Left two messages. Never heard anything. :rolleyes:

And--get this---a "serving size" is 248 calories. HALF of a personal-sized pizza. Who is just going to eat ONE HALF of a tiny pizza? "Gee, I'm FULL!" Sorry, don't think so.

Good grief. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites
emcmaster Collaborator

The last package I had of the round Kinnikinnick crusts had 280 calories per crust. I believe they came 4 or so crusts to a package and the serving size was for 8 servings in a package, which would be half of a crust.

ETA: Sorry, the serving size is for 70 calories per 1 slice, 16 slices in a package, which would make each crust 280 calories.

Nutrition Facts

Serving Size: 1 slice

Servings Per Container: 16

Amount Per Serving % Daily Value

Calories: 70

Calories from Fat: 27

Total Fat: 3g 4%

Saturated Fat: 0g 0%

Cholesterol: 15mg 5%

Sodium: 85mg 3%

Total Carb: 15g 5%

Dietary Fiber: 1g 4%

Sugars: 2

Protein: 1g

Vitamin A: 7%

Vitamin C: 0%

Calcium: 0%

Iron: 45%

Organic: %

Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gfresh404 Enthusiast

If you have that big of a problem with their product, simply don't buy it. And if you cannot control how many calories you are consuming that is your own fault. Other companies besdies kinnikinnick do sell gluten-free Pizza Crusts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jestgar Rising Star

Dude! It's a rant! Chill!

Sure you can buy pizza crusts elsewhere, the point is that these have gotten more caloric, which wasn't very nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rinne Apprentice

Hi. :)

Dealing with all of this can be incredibly frustrating, I sympathize.

Here's my remedy when all the frustrations get too much, I rent a movie that is real tear jerker and have a good cry.

By the way, many people have problems with Kinnikinnik, perhaps this is a hidden blessing. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



emcmaster Collaborator

Well my point was that they haven't quadrupled in calories - they haven't even doubled in calories. Not sure where the OP was getting the calorie information on the 7" round crusts because it isn't accurate.

123 calories per crust is way too good to believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
digmom1014 Enthusiast

I have learned the hard way to look at the calorie count in gluten-free foods. I was just so happy to be able to eat something, I never looked!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jerseyangel Proficient
I have learned the hard way to look at the calorie count in gluten-free foods. I was just so happy to be able to eat something, I never looked!

:lol: :lol: Ain't it the truth!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
scully Newbie
If you have that big of a problem with their product, simply don't buy it. And if you cannot control how many calories you are consuming that is your own fault. Other companies besdies kinnikinnick do sell gluten-free Pizza Crusts.

WOW....that was extremely rude! Actually, I do a very good job of controlling how many calories I consume; it is the reason I wear size 2 jeans, and why I will NEVER be buying these pizza crusts again. Good grief. Can't a person rant on these forums? You should think more carefully about what you post before you hit "send".

To the person who had the calorie information on the old crusts, I checked my package and I think the label is wrong. It still says "123 calories" for one serving, which equaled one crust. I kind of thought it would be too good to be true as well, but I figured the package was correct. I went back to the store this week and they still had the old crusts, but they had new labels with the information you quoted plastered on to the old label. It must have been a typo. AGH!

Still, 280 calories for one crust was still a pretty good deal. ;)

What other brands do people recommend that are tasty and not 500 calories a crust? I'd love to have my Saturday night splurge back! Thanks!! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor
WOW....that was extremely rude! Actually, I do a very good job of controlling how many calories I consume; it is the reason I wear size 2 jeans, and why I will NEVER be buying these pizza crusts again. Good grief. Can't a person rant on these forums? You should think more carefully about what you post before you hit "send".

To the person who had the calorie information on the old crusts, I checked my package and I think the label is wrong. It still says "123 calories" for one serving, which equaled one crust. I kind of thought it would be too good to be true as well, but I figured the package was correct. I went back to the store this week and they still had the old crusts, but they had new labels with the information you quoted plastered on to the old label. It must have been a typo. AGH!

Still, 280 calories for one crust was still a pretty good deal. ;)

What other brands do people recommend that are tasty and not 500 calories a crust? I'd love to have my Saturday night splurge back! Thanks!! :)

The Kinny pizzas are not really all that out of line with the calorie counts of regular pizza. Here is a link to the calorie counts of gluten pizzas. If you like their crusts there is no reason not to splurge occasionally if you did on gluten pizza before.

Open Original Shared Link

Also the old crusts were 123 calories per serving with each crust having four servings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Juliebove Rising Star

The way I look at it, pizza isn't really a diet friendly food. If I were on a calorie restricted diet, I wouldn't eat it, period.

I use the Ener-G rice crusts. The personal size. We don't eat them very often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kari Apprentice

I noticed the change too, and stopped buying them just because the price had gone up so much. But the 123 calories before was definitely not 'per crust', but 'per serving', which no doubt is smaller than one of those crusts. also, I haven't tried the new crusts (again, because they're just so damn expensive, and I usually just use one then the rest get all moldy and crumbly in my fridge), but they definitely appear to be bigger than the original round ones. maybe just eat half? 600 calories is absolutely a reflection of it being more than one serving of bread. Or make your own. I use namaste mix, divide it into portions and stretch it super thin so I can taste the toppings rather than the dry bready gluten free crust action going on.

To all who may have noticed, Kinnikinnick Foods has just reformulated their personal 7" pizza crusts into a square shape. That is hardly a big deal. I could even deal with the fact that they thinned out the crust big time, and charged the same amount of money for only 4 crusts. The big deal was when I wolfed it down and then realized upon looking at the packaging that they have QUADRUPLED the amount of calories in one crust. 496 calories, to be exact. I sorely wished I hadn't eaten it. After sauce and cheese, it weighed in at over 600 calories.

The old round crust was nice and thick, came in a package of five, and was a reasonable 123 calories per crust. WHY OH WHY DID THEY CHANGE IT?!?!?! I know they have a new dedicated facility and had to adapt the new crust to the new machines, but did they really have to change the recipe THAT MUCH?

This gluten-free thing is hard enough without trying to maintain a clothing size in the low single digits. So many of the gluten free breads, rolls, etc. are incredibly high in calories, and most of the time I try to avoid them. But if I am going to waste 600 calories on a gluten free pizza, it is going to be from the pizzeria in town that makes it sinfully good and not on some crappy frozen crust.

I am getting really tired of this. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor
I noticed the change too, and stopped buying them just because the price had gone up so much. But the 123 calories before was definitely not 'per crust', but 'per serving', which no doubt is smaller than one of those crusts. also, I haven't tried the new crusts (again, because they're just so damn expensive, and I usually just use one then the rest get all moldy and crumbly in my fridge), but they definitely appear to be bigger than the original round ones. maybe just eat half? 600 calories is absolutely a reflection of it being more than one serving of bread. Or make your own. I use namaste mix, divide it into portions and stretch it super thin so I can taste the toppings rather than the dry bready gluten free crust action going on.

Kari, You should store them in the freezer and keep them frozen until you are ready to use them. I like to have pizza maybe once a week and while they are pricey I figure 8 bucks comes out to $2 a crust so even with the toppings it's still cheaper than takeout pizza. I usually freeze the leftover pizza sauce in a plastic bag so that it is very thin and I can just break a bit off for my pizza and not have to buy a new thing of sauce for each pizza.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gfresh404 Enthusiast
WOW....that was extremely rude! Actually, I do a very good job of controlling how many calories I consume; it is the reason I wear size 2 jeans, and why I will NEVER be buying these pizza crusts again. Good grief. Can't a person rant on these forums? You should think more carefully about what you post before you hit "send".

To the person who had the calorie information on the old crusts, I checked my package and I think the label is wrong. It still says "123 calories" for one serving, which equaled one crust. I kind of thought it would be too good to be true as well, but I figured the package was correct. I went back to the store this week and they still had the old crusts, but they had new labels with the information you quoted plastered on to the old label. It must have been a typo. AGH!

Still, 280 calories for one crust was still a pretty good deal. ;)

What other brands do people recommend that are tasty and not 500 calories a crust? I'd love to have my Saturday night splurge back! Thanks!! :)

First of all, it's "Add Reply."

Second of all calm down, I was just stating the facts. And as already shown, two slices of regular pizza is roughly 500 - 600 calories. So it's not that much of a difference. Pizza is already known to be very high in calories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gemini Experienced
WOW....that was extremely rude! Actually, I do a very good job of controlling how many calories I consume; it is the reason I wear size 2 jeans, and why I will NEVER be buying these pizza crusts again. Good grief. Can't a person rant on these forums? You should think more carefully about what you post before you hit "send".

To the person who had the calorie information on the old crusts, I checked my package and I think the label is wrong. It still says "123 calories" for one serving, which equaled one crust. I kind of thought it would be too good to be true as well, but I figured the package was correct. I went back to the store this week and they still had the old crusts, but they had new labels with the information you quoted plastered on to the old label. It must have been a typo. AGH!

Still, 280 calories for one crust was still a pretty good deal. ;)

What other brands do people recommend that are tasty and not 500 calories a crust? I'd love to have my Saturday night splurge back! Thanks!! :)

WOW! You thought that was a rude statement?!?!? :huh: I realize you were in a rant but when you put your rant out in a public place, expect some feed back!

I used to be a size 2...when I was malnourished and wasting away from celiac disease. Now I am a "fat" size 4-6, which is much healthier for my 5'4" frame. I also do not worry about the weight gain, as it was needed, and maintain my present size by NOT BUYING fatty, high calorie food. I think you will find that most frozen pizza's are not exactly calorie wise foods anyway. It's perfectly OK to eat them once in a while and that calorie count shouldn't upset anyone eating them once in a while either. I tend to not buy them 90% of the time because they are nutrient empty foods or just not good enough, taste-wise, to waste my money on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Salax Contributor

Gemini, please tell me your being sarcastic about the "fat" size 4-6. That is not fat. I am sure your aware. :D

These comments even in jest bother me because I see our young children in our society going to extremes and delevoping eating disorders because of statements like that. People have a tendancy to believe that size is everything and nothing else matters. As long as your healthy and take care of your body the number on your clothing does not define who you are nor what you do.

End rant...off soap box. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
njbeachbum Explorer

Schar makes a delicious gluten free pizza crust that is sold on the grocers shelf and not frozen (in boxes of two crusts sealed in airtight plastic wrapping). It is the best I've tried, similiar to the frozen Kini crust but a bit thicker and not crumbly at all.

Open Original Shared Link

It shows 130 calories and 3 servings per crust, so that makes 390 calories in one pizza before toppings. Honestly, not that bad considering how filling it is and if you're only indulging once a week or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
emcmaster Collaborator

I use Open Original Shared Link recipe (although I split the 2/3 c. sorghum flour into 1/3 c. brown rice and 1/3 c. sorghum) and spread it super thin.

It's still not super low-calorie, but it IS good and you could halve the recipe to make a smaller pie and lower the calories further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
    • Tanner L
      Constantly! I don't want everything to cost as much as a KIND bar, as great as they are.  Happy most of the info is available to us to make smart decisions for our health, just need to do a little more research. 
×
×
  • Create New...