Celiac's And H1n1
#1
Posted 06 November 2009 - 07:20 AM
Some of the articles I've read say that Cecliac's have an over active immune system and therefore are LESS likely to get sick following a strict gluten-free diet.
I know before my Cecliac's got bad 8 years ago that I was never sick....then I had the flu all the time, now that I've been gluten-free, nothing bothers me.
I've been around people falling down dying with the flu and I will feel crappy for what seems like a few hours then I'm fine again.
I am in the public every day all day. I'm in and our of businesses, meeting people all day, even those with the flu and never catch a cold.
I'd be very interested to see what the winter flu numbers look like for Celiac's on a gluten-free diet versus the general population.
#2
Posted 06 November 2009 - 09:05 AM
I'd definitely be interested in a study comparing the relative rate of flu among people with diagnosed celiac disease and those without. I'd guess that those of us who got sick all the time pre-diagnosis were getting sick because we were unhealthy, and now that we're healthier, our immune systems are better. I'm not sure it makes intuitive sense to me that a gluten-free diet inherently confers immunity, but it would be interesting. You'd first have to look at those with diagnosed celiac disease against the general population, I think, and then those who follow a gluten-free diet who aren't diagnosed with celiac disease against the general population, and see what you come up with.
(Also, just FYI: It's "celiac," not "Celiac's.")
#3
Posted 06 November 2009 - 09:20 AM
FMcGee, on Nov 6 2009, 12:05 PM, said:
I'd definitely be interested in a study comparing the relative rate of flu among people with diagnosed celiac disease and those without. I'd guess that those of us who got sick all the time pre-diagnosis were getting sick because we were unhealthy, and now that we're healthier, our immune systems are better. I'm not sure it makes intuitive sense to me that a gluten-free diet inherently confers immunity, but it would be interesting. You'd first have to look at those with diagnosed celiac disease against the general population, I think, and then those who follow a gluten-free diet who aren't diagnosed with celiac disease against the general population, and see what you come up with.
(Also, just FYI: It's "celiac," not "Celiac's.")
Well considering celiac's is an autoimmune disorder and the article I am referring to(have to get the link) stated that part of celiac's is from an overactive immune system.
I did find this:
Quote
from http://www.glutenfre....com/gfdiet.php but I had read the original medical documentation that statement came from.
The gist was, celiac's have a better overall immune system than a regular person, so long as they do not eat gluten they are more effective fighting off disease, hence not getting sick.
#4
Posted 06 November 2009 - 09:23 AM
Quote
Yup, that's what they're doing and I'm guessing it's got a lot to do with their attempts to get socialized medicine passed. Plus, if you keep people pre-occupied with fears of a pandemic, they aren't focused on what's really going on. It's happened in many an administration and will happen again. It's politics.
As for my theory on why people may be less prone to the flu after going gluten-free, well....they are definitely healthier and eating better (presumably). However, I wonder if the fact that we have overactive immune systems means that any marauding invader will be set upon and viciously subdued, due to this over-activity? I mean, look what happens when we eat gluten. It doesn't take much to get the immune system angry and go on the attack so what does that say about viruses which may enter the body?
Just my crackpot theory but I have never had a flu shot and certainly am not going to start now, in spite of all the fear mongering. I have also never had the flu and rarely, if ever, get a cold. I may have other immunity problems besides Celiac but they are well under control and I've been fine so far this year.
FYI.....my brother, who I strongly suspect is a Celiac but has chosen the denial path, is now currently sick with the swine flu and now his wife has it. He is sick all the time but also has Type 1 diabetes.
It just makes you wonder.....
#5
Posted 06 November 2009 - 09:30 AM
Gemini, on Nov 6 2009, 12:23 PM, said:
That's absurd!
Politics does not fare well here. Might be best to stay on topic.
Can't recall being seriously sick in the last five years. I have gotten the flu shot once. But, I'm very pleased and relieved that my seven month pregnant daughter was able to get the H1N1.
Gluten Free - August 15, 2004
"Not all who wander are lost" - JRR Tolkien
Celiac.com - Celiac Disease Board Moderator
#6
Posted 06 November 2009 - 09:33 AM
I talked to the nurse and apparently we celiacs are in the high risk group, so I should get a vaccine...but I'm not going to. I survived it once and to tell you the truth it was really all that bad, it just sucked for a few days.
#7
Posted 06 November 2009 - 10:06 AM
#8
Posted 06 November 2009 - 10:47 AM
RideAllWays, on Nov 6 2009, 12:33 PM, said:
I talked to the nurse and apparently we celiacs are in the high risk group, so I should get a vaccine...but I'm not going to. I survived it once and to tell you the truth it was really all that bad, it just sucked for a few days.
I do think celiac's are in a high risk group, IF they do not eat gluten-free.
As far as socialized medicine, the minute I took my health into my own hands, started making my own decisions, my health improved. When you put the responsability of care on the individual versus having it all handed to them, they tend to make smarter choices, and spend less money.
We just switched to catastrophic insurance. No covered doctors visits, no RX coverage, 10K deductible. Why?
We called our regular doctor and said we are going to pay cash, 40 percent discount.
I went for a cholesterol test, insurance company charged $480.
Wife went for the same test, $280
Called an independent lab, $69 for the same exact test.
Chiro was dropped from most major medical providers, what happened? Costs dropped dramatically. They started to offer their own plans, competition increased, prices went down, and the consumer now has more power to determine the quality of health care based on where they want to spend their money.
The politics of health care right now will matter more to your future health than eating a gluten-free diet. So few understand how things really work, or how they will work in rationed health care.
Considering the possability of all the things that can go wrong with people with Celiac's are willing to trust someone else to tell you what quality of care you get?
It comes down to numbers. 2 people get a curable form of cancer. One is 40 years old and makes 200,000 a year in income which means they are a good source of tax income. Person 2 is 62, retired, and drawing social security, a burden on the state financially.
If you think they have the same opportunity for the same care then your being naive. The person who is more productive and worth more to the system financially will get better treatment.
If the treat Person 2 over Person 1 then its a financial loss. If they treat person 1 and do not provide adequate treatment to person 2 its a financial GAIN.
Thats how life works in big business and if you believe any differently its pie in the sky thinking.
#9
Posted 06 November 2009 - 11:10 AM
But that is just my 2 cents.
dx celiac disease- November 1, 2008
dairy/casein free (much to my chagrin) for good- September 1, 2010
#10
Posted 06 November 2009 - 11:18 AM
Eric_C, on Nov 6 2009, 01:47 PM, said:
As far as socialized medicine, the minute I took my health into my own hands, started making my own decisions, my health improved. When you put the responsability of care on the individual versus having it all handed to them, they tend to make smarter choices, and spend less money.
We just switched to catastrophic insurance. No covered doctors visits, no RX coverage, 10K deductible. Why?
We called our regular doctor and said we are going to pay cash, 40 percent discount.
I went for a cholesterol test, insurance company charged $480.
Wife went for the same test, $280
Called an independent lab, $69 for the same exact test.
Chiro was dropped from most major medical providers, what happened? Costs dropped dramatically. They started to offer their own plans, competition increased, prices went down, and the consumer now has more power to determine the quality of health care based on where they want to spend their money.
The politics of health care right now will matter more to your future health than eating a gluten-free diet. So few understand how things really work, or how they will work in rationed health care.
Considering the possability of all the things that can go wrong with people with Celiac's are willing to trust someone else to tell you what quality of care you get?
It comes down to numbers. 2 people get a curable form of cancer. One is 40 years old and makes 200,000 a year in income which means they are a good source of tax income. Person 2 is 62, retired, and drawing social security, a burden on the state financially.
If you think they have the same opportunity for the same care then your being naive. The person who is more productive and worth more to the system financially will get better treatment.
If the treat Person 2 over Person 1 then its a financial loss. If they treat person 1 and do not provide adequate treatment to person 2 its a financial GAIN.
Thats how life works in big business and if you believe any differently its pie in the sky thinking.
Eric, your topic is H1N1 and Celiac Disease.
Gluten Free - August 15, 2004
"Not all who wander are lost" - JRR Tolkien
Celiac.com - Celiac Disease Board Moderator
#11
Posted 06 November 2009 - 12:57 PM
Eric_C, on Nov 6 2009, 01:47 PM, said:
As far as socialized medicine, the minute I took my health into my own hands, started making my own decisions, my health improved. When you put the responsability of care on the individual versus having it all handed to them, they tend to make smarter choices, and spend less money.
We just switched to catastrophic insurance. No covered doctors visits, no RX coverage, 10K deductible. Why?
We called our regular doctor and said we are going to pay cash, 40 percent discount.
I went for a cholesterol test, insurance company charged $480.
Wife went for the same test, $280
Called an independent lab, $69 for the same exact test.
Chiro was dropped from most major medical providers, what happened? Costs dropped dramatically. They started to offer their own plans, competition increased, prices went down, and the consumer now has more power to determine the quality of health care based on where they want to spend their money.
The politics of health care right now will matter more to your future health than eating a gluten-free diet. So few understand how things really work, or how they will work in rationed health care.
Considering the possability of all the things that can go wrong with people with Celiac's are willing to trust someone else to tell you what quality of care you get?
It comes down to numbers. 2 people get a curable form of cancer. One is 40 years old and makes 200,000 a year in income which means they are a good source of tax income. Person 2 is 62, retired, and drawing social security, a burden on the state financially.
If you think they have the same opportunity for the same care then your being naive. The person who is more productive and worth more to the system financially will get better treatment.
If the treat Person 2 over Person 1 then its a financial loss. If they treat person 1 and do not provide adequate treatment to person 2 its a financial GAIN.
Thats how life works in big business and if you believe any differently its pie in the sky thinking.
Eric.....you mean there is someone else who understands how the system really works?
I also agree with the logic of Celiacs NOT being high risk, unless they choose not to follow the diet. I think some medical people see the word disease and think you are automatically high risk. Pregnant women, most definitely are, so they can have my dose!
#12
Posted 06 November 2009 - 01:06 PM
Gemini, on Nov 6 2009, 03:57 PM, said:
I also agree with the logic of Celiacs NOT being high risk, unless they choose not to follow the diet. I think some medical people see the word disease and think you are automatically high risk. Pregnant women, most definitely are, so they can have my dose!
Anytime anything political comes up, we're told to stay on topic. It gets kind of chafing after awhile, as though we're kids who can't handle civil discourse. I disagree with you and Eric on this one, though. I think that the reaction to swine flu does, at times, seem a bit over the top, but it's actually how public health and prevention is supposed to work. A friend of mine who works in public health (though has nothing to do with swine flu, and is a little jealous that her issues aren't getting the same attention) put it this way in a recent blog post: "But if I stop resenting H1N1 for getting so much attention for a moment, I realize that what I’m complaining about is actually public health at is best. It is probably true that the coordination of government urgency, media attention, medical system mobilization, and common sense precautions will succeed in thwarting a pandemic. We will probably not look back at 2009 and say it was the beginning of a swine flu crisis that devastated a generation.
What feels like hysteria or over-emphasis is actually the way prevention is supposed to look. It is supposed to be widespread and coordinated. Messages about the importance and seriousness of the public health threat are supposed to be so pervasive that they are almost impossible to ignore. I’m so used to caring about public health crises that don’t get the attention and resources they deserve that I almost can’t recognize what the public health system looks like when it does work."
So, I don't think this is the administration trying to drum up support for "socialized medicine." (I'm going to leave that entire issue alone.) I think that, while I roll my eyes at swine flu coverage sometimes, it's more along the lines of a system that's working the way it should, in a way we're not used to.
As for your other point: I agree that people see "disease" and assume high risk, and that people with celiac disease probably aren't at higher risk than anyone else. I'm not going to get vaccinated until the CDC has enough vaccines available for everyone. The high-risk populations need it first. If they have enough to go around while the flu is still a threat, sure, why not? But for now, I'll pass. If I get the swine flu, I'll be okay.
#13
Posted 06 November 2009 - 01:13 PM
FMcGee, on Nov 6 2009, 04:06 PM, said:
This board is about celiac disease and the gluten-free diet that it requires.
There are plenty of other internet forums where politics, religion and other controversial topics can be discussed. This board is not one of them.
There is a Gab/Chat forum on this board, but on the rest of the board, the topics should relate to celiac disease, or the gluten-free diet.
Diagnosis by biopsy of practically non-existent villi; gluten-free since July 2000.
Type 1 (autoimmune) diabetes diagnosed in March 1986
Markham, Ontario (borders on Toronto)
Celiac.com - Celiac Disease Board Moderator

Help












