Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Is A Biopsy Always Needed?


sandy-sas

Recommended Posts

sandy-sas Rookie

Hi Everyone,

I am new here and my husband was just diagnosed with Celiac about a month ago. He has most of the symptoms including anemia. His doctor said from the blood work there is no doubt he has celiac. The results were as follows

Anti-transglutaminase IgA 28.0 U/mL " normal is below 7"

Anti-endomysial 3+ Can anyone tell me what this test indicates and is this number high or low?

I'm in Canada so I don't know if the lab testing is the same everywhere. My husband feels like crap and has pretty bad diarrhea most of the time. What is upsetting to me is that it's been over a month and he's still waiting to see a specialist to go for a biopsy. His doctor said they always do it to confirm and also rule out anything else I guess. I think they just do it automatically. The problem is it's going to be between 3-6 months before he can get in and the doctor said to stay ON gluten for now. That seems ridiculous to me. If he goes on the diet, gets better and the next set of blood work comes back normal, isn't that good enough? Do you HAVE to get the biopsy. What are the chances that's it's something else?

Thanks

Sandy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

Hi Sandy, and welcome.

The biopsy is done because it has traditionally been done :o Before the blood tests were developed it was the ONLY way to diagnose celiac, and it is still considered to be the "gold standard". Most doctors, however, will diagnose celiac on positive blood work and a positive response to the diet. I agree that it seems senseless to continue poisoning yourself for six months, doing untold additional damage, to wait for biopsy confirmation of the diagnosis, when you can confirm it by diet. The way I look at it, if there is something else other than diet, it is still going to be there when the biopsy is done whenever they can fit it into their overbooked, undersupplied schedule. That is, I would if it were me go ahead with the endoscopy, but I would also go gluten free right away before anything more insidious pops up (spoken as one with psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis). There are others here who would probably disagree with me, but I'm not saying "forget the biopsy". It can be useful for diagnosing any additional conditions, but if he is certain your husband has celiac, there is no point getting biopsy confirmation of that in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gfbatali Newbie

Hi dear

Blood tests are not always accurate because some times it becomese negative .But taking a biobsy is always the gold standerd to detect celiac disease.For example, iam A2YEARS CELIAC PATIENT and my gastro reapeats the endoscopy every year . B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gaingus Rookie

I suggest getting the scope and biopsy done. Unfotunately, it is the gold standard for diagnosis (and at least for American HMOs) the only true verification. Personnally, I believe that blood testing has gotten much better than what it was and should suffice for a diagnosis.

One thing I can agree to is at least getting the endoscopy done. It might show other underlying issues that you may not know are there. When I first was scoped, my GI (at that time), found a hyatal hernia (sp) and that I also had a H. pylori ulcer. He thinks the ulcer was possibly related to or caused by celiac.

Also, depending on how long he has had the symptoms, and how much damage was actually done, going gluten free should not alter the biopsy results right away. It can take many months to repair the damage. Unfortunately, all of my biopsies were inconclusive and negative, but the doctor could see the tell tale "scallop shaped" damage. Unfortunately, my insurance has to have the gold standard for a positive diagnosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

How badly do you want an 'official' diagnosis? If your husbands recovering is more important than getting the 'OD' then go ahead and start the diet. I would keep the appointment for the biopsy if he is still having issues after that but if the diet takes care of the issues IMHO you have your 'official' diagnosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sandy-sas Rookie

How badly do you want an 'official' diagnosis? If your husbands recovering is more important than getting the 'OD' then go ahead and start the diet. I would keep the appointment for the biopsy if he is still having issues after that but if the diet takes care of the issues IMHO you have your 'official' diagnosis.

We don't care about the official diagnoses at all. My husband started the diet this morning. I'm with you on the fact that his health will be the one way to tell or not. If he feels better and his blood work improves why would you need to have the biopsy? That's what we thought too, but I just wanted to get others opinions as to whether there was some other reason that a biopsy "had" to be done. To me it makes more sense to rely on how you feel and monitoring the blood work to see if there is an improvement.

Thanks

Sandy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GFinDC Veteran

There may be a reason to do the biopsy if the Canadian Health system requires it for cost reimbursements. I don't know if they do but it might be worth checking into. I think in England they reimburse celiac patients for some food costs.

Does it do any good to call the health care system administrators and ask for an earlier appointment? There are lots of gastroenterologists around, so it seems like they might be able to get him into another one? 6 months is a long time to have to suffer just for one person's schedule to open up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sandsurfgirl Collaborator

It takes you SIX MONTHS to see a specialist??? That's just horrible. Here in the U.S. it takes a couple of weeks, maybe a month if it's a doc who is in high demand, but even then they will get you in if you are sick.

My blood tests were abnormal and the doc wanted me to stay on gluten to get to a gastroenterologist and confirm with a biopsy. I said NO WAY. I was sick as a dog and I'm not willing to do more damage to my intestines so they can do that test and feel better.

I found a doc who thinks it's barbaric to do that and diagnosed me based on blood tests, symptoms and dietary response.

It's a gamble with the biopsy because the intestines are long and if they don't get damaged tissue it can be false negative. If the pathologist doesn't know how to read it you can get a false negative.

There is a withdrawal period once you start the diet and it also takes time to find out where the hidden gluten is. I've been on the gluten free diet for 3 weeks, but technically only one week because there were a few things I ate that I didn't know had gluten like fast food chicken breast and all my beauty products had gluten in them so I had a few setbacks.

That Gold Standard stuff is a bunch of baloney. It's a "Gold standard" alright. Gold in the doctor's pockets for doing surgeries instead of blood tests. The "gold" isn't golden for your health, it's golden for them. There are NO FALSE positives on the blood tests.Sorry, after 40 years of being misdiagnosed and sick, I'm a cynic about the docs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
muchmalignedminx Newbie

Hi..This is my first post on here .. so 'ello all :-) In response. I had the blood work done but that came back negative so thought that was that but luckily I had a persistant doctor who said well somethings not quite right. I had all the usual unpleasent symptoms and was losing weight etc. I went on to have a gastroscopy and colonoscopy (not nice!) The gastroscopy biopsy showed I had damage ie partial villious atrophy etc. I had my final diagnosis friday 5th February just gone but the whole thing took from the beginning of december 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,506
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    NanaA
    Newest Member
    NanaA
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...