Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Child's Blood Test Results
0

12 posts in this topic

Hello, I haven't posted here before, but have learned a lot of very interesting information.

My 4 1/2-year-old son was recently tested for celiac. To preface, his symptoms have been: occasional loose stools (with undigested food), eczema since he was a baby (most recently disappearing, but coming back worse in January, enough to impact his eyes and face, and for him to complain of pain), an episode of canker sores in his mouth at 2 1/2 (his dentist found this very unusual), and his growth has gone down considerably from being a very pudgy baby to a small almost-Kindergartner (though growth is on a very slight upswing). His uncle (my husband's brother) was diagnosed with celiac as an adult, so the doctor said we might as well order the celiac panel as it's in the family.

Anyway, so he hasn't been very ill, and appeared big until around age 2.

The tests: he was tested for total IgA, IgA IgG, and the antibody IgA. (Perhaps TGG?) The two celiac screens came out negative. His total IgA was 45.6, with a reference range of 66-120. The doctor is not concerned, though did say a low IgA could skew the results. Her idea is to retest in a few years. She also said there is frequent transient variability in the "slightly" low IgA numbers--and that transient variability is most often the cause of low IgA.

Is this "slightly" low? After consulting with an out-of-state friend (also a doctor), we're planning on taking him to a Pediatric GI doctor anyway. But, we were curious whether this is indeed slightly low. We aren't inclined to do a biopsy, but have thought of doing the genetic test. Any downside to doing the genetic test? Is there other blood testing we can do that doesn't involve a biopsy?

Thank you. We appreciate any information you might have!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Your sons results show he is IGA deficient thus making the celiac screen basically worthless. He could very well be a false negative even with a normal total IGA. I think you are wise to consult with a ped GI.

As to the gene tests since most doctors only test for 2 of 9 celiac related genes in the US those tests IMHO are less than worthless. I am a bit jaded on them mainly because one of my celiac children had gene tests as an young adult and was told she was never, and never could be celiac because she 'doesn't have the genes'. Both her father and I are diagnosed celiacs and she had been biopsy and blood test positive when she was orginally diagnosed. She is now back on gluten, symptomatic and convinced she doesn't have celiac. There are some places that will test for all of the celiac associated genes but that really is only a small part of the diagnostic process.

Your son does sound like he could be one of us. Do make sure that you try him on the diet strictly after testing is over no matter what the test results. His response to the diet is really the best diagnostic tool there is at this point. Since celiac can impact the brain and thought processes and make it harder for us to learn and concentrate in school as well as impacting growth and overall health the younger it is found the better off he will be.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a very low total IgA.

Are you aware of that there is a much greater chance of celiac amongst those with IgA deficiency?

The celiac blood tests are invalid, the IgA type tests. (because of the low IgA)

About the gene test, it will robably be positive because of the relative who was diagnosed celiac.

The symptoms, especially the decrease in the growth chart, are very very suspicious for celiac.

Can you get ahold of the actual blood test results?

In cildren under 3, the antigliadin tests should be done, as they often do not make enough of the other antibody (ttg)

So that means the antigliadin IgG, and the Ttg IgG tests are the relevant ones.

The endomysium antibody test is a different kind of test, where they use monkey umbilical cord or the like, and incubate it with the blood test, and look at it through a microscope to see if they find flourescence. IT is very very specific for celiac.

Anybody know if it can be used when there is IgA deficiency?

Has the child been eating enough gluten for the blood tests to show up positive?

even if the blood tests are negative, a biopsy might be positive.

I can understand you would like to try the gene test before the biopsy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with ravenwoodglass on the genetic test front - if you're only going to test for a couple things, and then say it's conclusive... well, that's not good testing.

And yes, with a low IgA (which that is), the other tests could be wrong. Doesn't really matter WHY the IgA is low - even if it's transitory, it's going to cause the other tests to be low right now, because it's low right now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the responses!

That is interesting to hear that it is a low total IgA; the pediatrician wanted to emphasize how it wasn't really low, just slightly low, etc. (In fact, she's been unreachable since I first talked to her Thursday, and we got the reference range from the lab, ourselves, yesterday.)

Symptomatically, we do see that our son could need to go gluten-free. We would like some test or doctor to advise that, however. It will be difficult, though not impossible. (I have done gluten-free, myself, here and there, unfortunately in the six weeks before getting myself tested a few years ago.)

It will be much easier with family and his future school to say there is a diagnosis or a doctor's order. We didn't want to take him gluten-free on a whim, if that makes sense. (We've already been accused of "looking for issues" or being overly-concerned about his size. I say: if he's meant to be small, that's great. Genetically speaking, we're not giants. But, babies/kids aren't small in our families; they just might not grow very tall overall.) We've been back-and-forth wondering about this for a few years, and given the painful rash, this isn't great for our son either. I do appreciate hearing that school issues can be impacted in the future as well. We don't see any behavioral/learning things at this time, and I would hate for diet to cause something like that for him.

About the biopsy: I had thought that in kids under 5 there could be false negatives as well? That the villi could be undamaged, particularly in someone so young? The kid was also protected, we think, by breastfeeding for a long time (certainly, his weight was in a higher category for a while). Anyway, that's our strong hesitation with the biopsy--putting him through something that would likely come out negative, regardless of the truth.

I will get the copy of the lab report today to know what were the two celiac screens he did have. If there are any unaffected by low total IgA, I guess that's what we'd like to do first.

Thank you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Thank you for the responses!

That is interesting to hear that it is a low total IgA; the pediatrician wanted to emphasize how it wasn't really low, just slightly low, etc. (In fact, she's been unreachable since I first talked to her Thursday, and we got the reference range from the lab, ourselves, yesterday.)

Symptomatically, we do see that our son could need to go gluten-free. We would like some test or doctor to advise that, however. It will be difficult, though not impossible. (I have done gluten-free, myself, here and there, unfortunately in the six weeks before getting myself tested a few years ago.)

It will be much easier with family and his future school to say there is a diagnosis or a doctor's order. We didn't want to take him gluten-free on a whim, if that makes sense. (We've already been accused of "looking for issues" or being overly-concerned about his size. I say: if he's meant to be small, that's great. Genetically speaking, we're not giants. But, babies/kids aren't small in our families; they just might not grow very tall overall.) We've been back-and-forth wondering about this for a few years, and given the painful rash, this isn't great for our son either. I do appreciate hearing that school issues can be impacted in the future as well. We don't see any behavioral/learning things at this time, and I would hate for diet to cause something like that for him.

About the biopsy: I had thought that in kids under 5 there could be false negatives as well? That the villi could be undamaged, particularly in someone so young? The kid was also protected, we think, by breastfeeding for a long time (certainly, his weight was in a higher category for a while). Anyway, that's our strong hesitation with the biopsy--putting him through something that would likely come out negative, regardless of the truth.

I will get the copy of the lab report today to know what were the two celiac screens he did have. If there are any unaffected by low total IgA, I guess that's what we'd like to do first.

Thank you.

Have you taken him to a derm to see about getting the rash biopsied for DH? If the test for DH is positive that is a positive for sure diagnosis of celiac and no other testing is needed. The derm need to know how to do the test, the skin next to the lesion needs to biopsied and they need to be specifically looking for dermatitis herpeformis. It might be the easiest way for you to go if the rash is indeed DH. One of the signs of DH is that the scar from the rash will be a purply color and take a long time to fade. It also usually iches intensely and sometimes it will itch so much that the small blisters are not real obvious. Usually folks have the lesions in sort of clusters but some will have what almost look like flea bites that are more scattered. Another feature is that DH will usually show up on both sides of the body, in other words if he has a rash on one arm there will often be a rash in the same area on the other side.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. No, we hadn't thought about the skin biopsy. The rash really looks like eczema (we had read that rashes in children could appear to be like eczema). At times it has been worse (after antibiotics, for example), and perhaps those rashes more resemble a DH rash? All the photos I've seen online, though, look nothing like his rash.

I did find out what blood tests he had:

Total IgA (low)

Endomysial IgA AB (negative)

TTG IgA (<1.3, reference <4.0)

TTG IgG (2.2, reference <6.0)

So, he was negative on the IgA tests, but also on an IgG test.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a slight response on those tests, and there was a number on the ttg IgA test even though the total IgA was well below range.....

In children under the ageof 3, the ttg antibodies often do not respond, but the antigliadin tests are known to be a better indicatr of celiac.

I would recommend to ask for the antigliadin tests, especially the IgG version because of the low total IgA.

Yes, the result of any IgA type result is totally dependent on the amount of total IgA.

I have seen discussions by doctors where they commented that a slightly positive ttg IgA was a false positive because the total IgA was above range.

So the reverse applies too just by reasoning.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There was a slight response on those tests, and there was a number on the ttg IgA test even though the total IgA was well below range.....

In children under the ageof 3, the ttg antibodies often do not respond, but the antigliadin tests are known to be a better indicatr of celiac.

I would recommend to ask for the antigliadin tests, especially the IgG version because of the low total IgA.

Yes, the result of any IgA type result is totally dependent on the amount of total IgA.

I have seen discussions by doctors where they commented that a slightly positive ttg IgA was a false positive because the total IgA was above range.

So the reverse applies too just by reasoning.

Thank you! We're going to ask to do those tests as well. I was confused by all the tests, not realizing there was an AGA test. Is the AGA not as common to do for some reason? I think my kid would have passed out with any more blood drawn that day, so it's just as well they didn't do it then.

(Oh-my son is over 3 (almost 5, actually), but perhaps it's similar for all young children?)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

May I ask: why do they insist on stool tests first? Children's made such a good case for an endoscopy (could be celiac or intestinal allergy, his very slowed growth indicates that there will be damage, and we'll want to have proof of results for when he's a teenager and diet-resistant).

My son eats everything we eat, and has not travelled abroad to countries with known parasites. He's also not always cooperative (i.e., sometimes his only #2 of the day is outside the home, not into a "hat" over the toilet). And, the delay in growth has been since he was 2 1/2--he's almost 5 (so, presumably, a really bad bug would have reared it's head by now, right?)

Anyway, I'm just trying to figure out why we're doing this and not just moving forward to the endoscopy (which, it seems, they want to do anyway).

Thank you!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

May I ask: why do they insist on stool tests first? Children's made such a good case for an endoscopy (could be celiac or intestinal allergy, his very slowed growth indicates that there will be damage, and we'll want to have proof of results for when he's a teenager and diet-resistant).

My son eats everything we eat, and has not travelled abroad to countries with known parasites. He's also not always cooperative (i.e., sometimes his only #2 of the day is outside the home, not into a "hat" over the toilet). And, the delay in growth has been since he was 2 1/2--he's almost 5 (so, presumably, a really bad bug would have reared it's head by now, right?)

Anyway, I'm just trying to figure out why we're doing this and not just moving forward to the endoscopy (which, it seems, they want to do anyway).

Thank you!

I don't think they are looking for a parasite :)

A stool sample is tested to detect fat in the stool, since celiac disease prevents fat from being absorbed from food.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think they are looking for a parasite :)

A stool sample is tested to detect fat in the stool, since celiac disease prevents fat from being absorbed from food.

Thank you--that's a very good point. I guess the task has seemed a bit lacking in fun, especially today (as I'm sure everyone here knows), and I was trying to figure out why we're doing it (if they're going to recommend endoscopy anyway). Perhaps this would rule something out for them, though I'm not sure about that. I do remember something mentioned about absorption of protein and carbs as well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,096
    • Total Posts
      920,334
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Awok, Welcome to the forum.  Have you considered trace gluten?  Here is a study on the topic: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3598839/pdf/1471-230X-13-40.pdf It could explain why you felt good for a while.  I personally was glutened badly last summer.  I have no idea what got me.  I suspect either a prescription medication or one gluten free product (not certified).  I ended up on a whole foods diet and avoided even certified processed gluten-free foods including grains until I was healed (three to six months).  
    • I've had a range of symptoms in the last 2 months and in the past few weeks I have discovered that my TTG abs (igA) levels were 41 (my igA tests were fine). The doctor said that he is pretty much certain that it is celiac disease and I am awaiting an endoscopy to confirm it.  Before I found out that my TTG abs (igA) levels were high, I noticed that my body was reacting really badly to dairy products. I went on an elimination diet and stopped all gluten and dairy products and felt much better. I carried this on after my results and thought that I must have developed a dairy intolerance due to my celiac. 2 days ago I accidentally consumed a glass of wine which I thought was dairy free but it contained Milk. I have not had any gluten.  I am currently in the middle of a flare up. All of a sudden rashes have started to appear on my hands and my anxiety has returned (usually not a anxious person). No diarhhoea, vomiting or digestive issues. I am currently suffering from muscle twitching, rashes predominantly on hands and feet, brain fog, pins and needles/numbness on hands, feet and arms. However, I have been tested for milk allergy and this came back negative. Is it possible that it is dairy that is causing my symptoms/autoimmune reaction and could this be a reason for elevetated TTG abs (igA) levels. Or has the doctor only picked up my celiac and missing something else. If it was dairy intolerance then I would have digestive issues but I don't seem to have any. Could it be the casein protein?  Anyone been in a similar situation or can anyone provide some insight? 
    • Hello Everyone, This is my first post here and I am writing to seek help from experienced people here. I have been suffering for over 4 years now and still no where close to having a solution/ satisfactory diagnosis of my problem. My problems started in Mar 2012 with sudden diarrhea which would not go away for days. At first, I was given general antibiotics medication which would help bring down the frequency for some days and then it would come back. Since then it has been going on. I am giving a time line and the series of tests and procedures I have gone through. Would like opinion from experienced and experts here. I can send the scans and reports if required. Would really appreciate the help. Male, Indian origin Mar 2012 - onset of symptoms - multiple bouts diarrhea - spaced 3-4 weeks, bloating, weight loss (to start with I was 74 Kgs), GP managed with antibitocs and loperamide for months Dec 2012 - consulted a GI doc towards end of 2012, Colonoscopy done - conclusion was "IBS" - was advised to manage stress. use Rifaximin and immodium Jan 2013 - Aug 2013 kept moderately fine for 3-4 months ..again started getting frequent diarrhea + weight loss (was around 70 Kgs) Oct 2013 - Consulted another doc, MD - stool and blood test - Ecoli and high Eosinophil Count, medication done for 5-6 months, montinored eosinophil from nov - Mar: always kept high.. came down but then again shot up in a month Mar 2014 - Consulted another GI expert - Endoscopy and duodenal biopsy done - H Pylori and Unremarkable Villious pattern, (weight 68 Kgs) - On and Off diarrhea continued. Given: Ivermectin July 2014 - again same doc - Blood test done: High Eosinophil count,  Colonoscopy and Ileum biopsy - preserved villous architecture, features of eosinophilic enteritis; Endoscopy  + duodenal biospy again - numerous H pylori bacteria, Preserved villous crypt ratio, features of eosinophilic enteritis > conclusion: I have eosinophilic enteritis. Started on Prednisolone (steroids) Aug 2014 - 3-4 days of severe diarrhea> weight came down to 65 Kgs. Hospitalised for 3 days - continued on Prednisolonerios Sep 2014 - After 10 days only again a serious bout of diarrhea - hospitalized again - put on IV fluid for 8 days - weight 59 Kgs. Colonoscopy + biopsy done: features of superimposed c. difficile colitis, non-specific mild colitis > c. difficle test came out negative. CT Enterolysis +Scan done: mesenteric lymphadenopathy > nothing wrong acc to docs. IgA deficiency found - diagnosed Celiac - advised for Gluten free diet.   Sep 14 - May 16: continued gluten-free diet, gained weight upto 63 Kg in Jan 16, but then started losing again and came to 59 Kgs in May. No signficant diarrhea. Minor issues. June 16 onwards: Again diarrhea started, still on gluten-free diet, weight lost - 54 Kgs now. hospitalised again under same GI doc - blood test - eosinophil high, CT Enterolysis done: Showing mucosal thickening in Jejunum and Ileum; Enteroscopy (going in jejunum) + jejunal biopsy - jejunal erosions + villous blunting, marked atrophic with V:C ratio of 0.5: 1 to 0:1. HttG blood test done - Came out negative> Conclusion : No gluten exposure (how?) + Refractory Celiac disease. June - July - have been suffering from continuous diarrhea (goes off for 5-6 days and comes back, bloating, trappings in abdomen - waiting for I don't know what. On Rifaximin + Ivermectin + Codeine Sulphate (for diarrhea) I am very depressed and have no clarity on what's going on. If it is celiac, why am I not doing better on gluten-free diet. If the villous damage is still there in small intestine, then why did I kept fine for Sep - May period? HTTG - negative now but was NOT taken in Sep when I was first diagnosed with celiac. Can we trust negative HTTG now and conclude that it has come down? I am 20 kgs down from my ideal weight and still going down. Have no clue what NOT to eat to stop this. Why is eosinophil always high. Can any of you expert help me to put my case to docs in other countries? With lots of hope, Alok          
    • So, I know I'm obsessing but...... University of Chicago Celiac Disease Center website says any total IgA result over 20 won't affect the celiac test.   If this is so,  I'm still confused as to what a weak positive ttg iga means even though her result was barely in this category.  Why bother having a weak positive anyway?   I just don't get it and our doc is on vacation so I won't know what he'll recommend for another week.  I'll be finding out this week if we can see a GI without a referral. Our lyme doc (she's had lyme, may still have it, like I said it's a long story) is having her do an IgG wheat test but I don't think that has any bearing on celiac does it?    
    • Hi!  I've had good luck at the Minnesota state fair because most food booths are only doing one thing so there is no cross-contamination. For example: french fries or chocolate covered bacon or Indian kebabs.   But I live in California and I am heading to the state fair today! Does anybody have any great food suggestions that are definitely gluten-free there? Thanks, Celiac C.
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,131
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Feralgurl
    Joined