Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Feeling Lousy After A Bone Scan
0

7 posts in this topic

I had a nuclear medicine bone scan yesterday afternoon, to hopefully explain (or rule out) causes of ongoing rib discomfort. I was injected with a radioactive dye, had to wait 3 hours then had the scan done; the scan itself took 30 min. About 4 hours later (so just after the scan was completed) I started feeling a little dizzy/woozy, but I blamed it on perhaps being a bit anxious (I didn't think I was anxious in a huge way, but who knows). Once I got home this progressed to mild/moderate headache, mild nausea, and fatigue, and I went to bed early. Slept fine through the night, but got up feeling weak (didn't resolve with eating - I was thinking low blood sugar), mildly dizzy, and with a moderate headache, and this has persisted now for 4 hours. I've been drinking lots to get rid of the stuff they injected. I can can pretty much put up with the symptoms, but they sound so much like a gluten reaction to me. Nothing I've read in my online research tells me exactly what is in the stuff they injected besides radioactive isotopes (there must be some sort of fluid base the isotopes are put into in order to make them injectable). Has anyone else had this test done? Does anyone know if there is any gluten in what they inject?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

I had a nuclear medicine bone scan yesterday afternoon, to hopefully explain (or rule out) causes of ongoing rib discomfort. I was injected with a radioactive dye, had to wait 3 hours then had the scan done; the scan itself took 30 min. About 4 hours later (so just after the scan was completed) I started feeling a little dizzy/woozy, but I blamed it on perhaps being a bit anxious (I didn't think I was anxious in a huge way, but who knows). Once I got home this progressed to mild/moderate headache, mild nausea, and fatigue, and I went to bed early. Slept fine through the night, but got up feeling weak (didn't resolve with eating - I was thinking low blood sugar), mildly dizzy, and with a moderate headache, and this has persisted now for 4 hours. I've been drinking lots to get rid of the stuff they injected. I can can pretty much put up with the symptoms, but they sound so much like a gluten reaction to me. Nothing I've read in my online research tells me exactly what is in the stuff they injected besides radioactive isotopes (there must be some sort of fluid base the isotopes are put into in order to make them injectable). Has anyone else had this test done? Does anyone know if there is any gluten in what they inject?

I've had it done with no ill side-effects. I'm sorry you feel so bad. To be clear, you cannot get glutened by injection. You can only get glutened by ingesting gluten. If you didn't eat it, you didn't get glutened from it. However, if you feel that you got sick from the procedure, you should call your doctor to make sure that you aren't having a different side effect. Better to be safe than sorry. Good luck.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone in my local celiac support group had to have a CT scan for which she had to drink something. She called the hospital and had them check the gluten status first. One of the flavors did contain gluten, so she didn't have that one and everything went fine. You could try to phone the hospital and have them check for you. A little too late now, though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

. .. . To be clear, you cannot get glutened by injection. You can only get glutened by ingesting gluten. If you didn't eat it, you didn't get glutened from it.

....

Hoping this doesn't come off as too harsh but that is simply not true.

I do understand how a celiac w/ primarily or only GI symptoms would think this.

But celiac can affect EVERY system in the body due to gluten/gliadin fragments entering the bloodstream via the leaky gut, which I believe has become acknowledged to exist in every symptomatic celiac. (See Aug '09 Scientific American)

In fact, the most promising "celiac pill" is actually a leaky gut pill, blocking the path to the bloodstream for these gluten/gliadin fragments.

P.S. After all that I have to say I can't imagine why gluten would be in any solution/substance meant for injection. :wacko:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I didn't see the injection part. I thought it was something ingested anyway.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




P.S. After all that I have to say I can't imagine why gluten would be in any solution/substance meant for injection. :wacko:

Have you looked much at biopharmaceutical processes and manufacturing of biopharmaceutical therapies? Many of these therapies target autoimmune diseases. These therapies (usually injectable) are manufactured using nutrient solutions (also called "media") that may be derived from wheat.

http://www.invitrogen.com/etc/medialib/en/filelibrary/bioproduction/pdfs.Par.34443.File.dat/Biopharm-article-Improving-Protein-Production-in-CHO.pdf

http://biopharminternational.findpharma.com/biopharm/Upstream+Processing/Improving-Protein-Production-in-CHO-Cells/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/522164?contextCategoryId=41918

With the drive to remove serum and products of animal origin from cell-culture media during manufacture of protein-based biologics, plant hydrolysates have become popular as feeds in fed-batch cell culture to boost productivity.

To determine the effect that plant hydrolysates or a chemically defined medium had on protein production, on days 3, 6, and 9, a 10% v/v solution of one of the plant hydrolysates derived from pea, wheat, soy, or rice (Kerry Bio-Science, Rochester, MN) was added at a stock concentration of 100 g/L to the cultures or the media were supplemented with a 10% v/v chemically defined feed, CHO celiac disease EfficientFeed A (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY).

I don't know how plant hydrolysates are manufactured. There is a Purification process for harvesting the resultant protein therapies of these biopharmaceutical processes, but how would one determine if they evaluate gluten content?

Here is another bit about these media solutions.

http://www.masshightech.com/stories/2008/03/03/daily32-Miilipore-to-supply-plant-chemicals-from-Solabia-for-biologics.html

Millipore (NYSE: MIL) will have exclusive rights to market and sell all seven of Solabia's plant-derived hydrolysates -- also called plant-derived peptones -- for use in the media that grows cell cultures throughout the Americas, the European Economic Community and the Asia-Pacific region, company officials said.

Millipore, which is based in Billerica, provides technologies tools and services for bioscience research and biopharmaceutical manufacturing. The plant-based hydrolysates most commonly come from soy, wheat, peas, or potatoes, officials said.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hoping this doesn't come off as too harsh but that is simply not true.

I do understand how a celiac w/ primarily or only GI symptoms would think this.

But celiac can affect EVERY system in the body due to gluten/gliadin fragments entering the bloodstream via the leaky gut, which I believe has become acknowledged to exist in every symptomatic celiac. (See Aug '09 Scientific American)

In fact, the most promising "celiac pill" is actually a leaky gut pill, blocking the path to the bloodstream for these gluten/gliadin fragments.

P.S. After all that I have to say I can't imagine why gluten would be in any solution/substance meant for injection. :wacko:

Not harsh at all! If I post misinformation, I expect that someone should tell me.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,681
    • Total Posts
      921,724
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok, I can't seem to find my first lot of blood tests that were done for Celiac screening, they did include TTG I remember that much, and I am getting another copy of it but another test did come in today.  I don't know how different tests are done around the world and I don't get all the medical jargon but this is what it states, ******************************************************************************* HLA DR/DQ Genotyping for Coeliac Disease, Specimen type : EDTA blood Method : Detection of sequence-specific oligonucleotides (Gen-Probe). HLA-DR - 1, 13          DRB1 - 01, 13 HLA-DQ - 5,6        HLA-DQA1 - 5,6      HLA-DB1 - 05, 06 Interpretation : No genotype susceptibility for coeliac disease.  The DQ2 and DQ8 antigens associated with increased risk of coeliac disease were not identified in this patient.  In the absence of these antigens, coeliac disease is extremely unlikely.   *******************************************************************************   I have read the horror stories of blood tests and scope biopsies not be done right or flawed but here is what I do know as of now, At the moment the most non invasive test I can have done say negative.  I have double scopes (endoscopy and colonoscopy) booked for the 12th of October with results from biopsies expected a week or two after. Chances are they will show, a) signs of coeliac disease (even if the odds are low it can still happen), b) show signs of something else entirely and we will be busy dealing with the ramifications of that or c) it will show no signs of coeliac but I will still be suffering from gluten sensitivity (which is harder/impossible to measure clinically). My GP has told me that stress and anxiety can be a cause of all the symptoms I have been experiencing and suggests if the scopes show nothing that I may benefit from something to treat anxiety, i.e. antidepressants.  Not in a, "Oh we don't know what it is so have these," kind of way, he agrees with the thought that the scopes could indeed show coeliac, something else or even be negative. I did tell him that I could have a sensitivity and that even without benefit of clinical results, some people have gone on a gluten elimination diet for a period of time to see if they get any relief.  My question is this, if the scopes come up negative and I try eliminating gluten, how long would it be before I saw any results or improvements?  I have read enough here and elsewhere to know that everybody is different, some see results within days, some see results longer but are there any guidelines for how long a test like this should be undertaken for?  I have heard everything thing from two weeks to two months.  All of this is entirely moot at this point but I know that even if the results said clear, there would always be a little part of me that wonders if it could be a sensitivity that is the problem.  Any thoughts or advice greatly appreciated, and a thank you to all those who have taken the time to respond and offer advice and encouragement so far.        
    • We don't delete accounts but can delete any personal information and change your screen name if you would like. Just send me a personal message with three possible screen names. For the record you can edit most things in your account area with the exception of your screen name.
    • Thanks I never heard of that dye before, I guess I have to find more natural meat thanks for the suggestion. 
    • Yes, I only eat one meal a day. Sometimes salad or fries or whatever I can find. And thanks for the replies again.
    • A colonoscopy is not used to diagnose celiac disease.  An endoscopy is used to obtain biopsies in the small intestine.  
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,680
    • Most Online
      3,093

    Newest Member
    Misalina
    Joined