Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Pregnancy To Term And Undiagnosed Celiacs


T.H.

Recommended Posts

T.H. Community Regular

I've been trying to determine when my celiac disease triggered, and the one factor that I can't figure out is my pregnancies. I have read many places that miscarriages are often caused by undiagnosed celiacs disease, but I wondered if anyone knew if a woman can carry a baby to term with undiagnosed celiacs disease, or how common/rare that might be?

I'd love it if anyone has any information on this!

For info...

When I was diagnosed, I had no gut symptoms, was overweight, and had very few major vitamin deficiencies (assumed that I was managing that by overeating like crazy). I got sick all the time, got injured easily and recovered slowly, had depression, nerve and soft tissue issues, and off and on vertigo and headaches.

All this went away once going gluten free. I'd always assumed that I likely triggered after having my second child, 8 years ago, but a friend mentioned something that made me really sit down and think.

I was a very, very healthy kid, and then when I hit 16, I had depression, got sick constantly, suddenly was getting injury after injury in all the sports I'd previously done injury-free. The nerve issues popped up the year before my first pregnancy. The vertigo popped up 4 years after my last pregnancy.

So now I"m wondering...could I have had this THAT long? Since I was 16? That's 22 years! :blink: And the only way it would be possible is if I could have carried two BIG babies to term during this time, and I didn't think that was possible. Does anyone know?

During both pregnancies, one thing that I've been remembering, now that I'm looking back, is that I couldn't STAND major wheat products like crackers, breads, pasta, etc... I ate mostly corn and rice products that second pregnancy, or pretty plain fruits, veggies, dairy, or meats. I'm sure I still got gluten, only a lot less of it.

Hoping someone here has more knowledge on this subject than I do and can help me figure this out! :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

My docs & I think maybe I had it while pregnant and before. I have always had iron deficiencies but no one thought to test for other ones. It wasn't as common to do that then. I still ate wheat but my stomach issues were better during pregnancy (except morning sickness). I didn't have diarhea. That may have been due to the large amounts of iron they had me taking. It stops you up. I ate Corn Chex & Rice Krispies for morning sickness. They may have had malt in them back then but probably a lot less gluten then Saltines. My boys are 14 & 17. I had no problem getting pregnant when I wanted to. I did have at least 2 early miscarriages (4-6 weeks).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GFRPH Newbie

I found out I had celiac disease when I was about 8 weeks pregnant. I suspect I had celiac disease for at least 10 years before I was diagnosed. I got pregnant the first month I tried and had no complications with my pregnancy. I ate gluten free after I found out I had celiac disease but I already had quite a bit of gut damage. My doctor said it would take a couple years to heal. I only showed a Vitamin A deficiency when I was diagnosed. I also have autoimmune hepatitis (probably caused by undiagnosed celiac disease) which settled down during my pregnancy, as autoimmune diseases often do during pregnancy. The hepatitis flared after delivery, so I guess I'm healthiest when I'm pregnant :0). My thoughts are that celiac disease affects everyone differently. In my case, I developed autoimmune hepatitis and ulcerative colitis from it. But, it didn't seen to affect my ability to get pregnant or maintain a pregnancy. Others have difficulty getting pregnant but might not have other autoimmune diseases etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
txplowgirl Enthusiast

I have been sick since i was 7 to 8 yrs old. You name it I had it. Major depression at the age of 8 is not normal. But then finding your mother in the bathtub with her throat and wrists slit will do that to you. She made it by the way.

Anyway, my first pregnancy was bad. Had been anemic most of my life. Was sick 24/7, iron pills made me sicker, crackers made it worse. The only things I could seem to keep down was rice and liver. Yeeacckkk! I hate liver to this day.

Son was born 2 months preemie due to preeclampsia and toxemia. Had 7 miscarriages in 5 years after that. Dr's could never tell me why. Just that it wasn't meant to be. I genuinely believe it was due to the gluten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
T.H. Community Regular

Thank you all so much for your replies, especially sharing some things that I'm sure were very painful. Hearing from you, it really does make me think that I may have had Celiac disease for a lot more years than I was thinking, but...sigh, what a frustrating thought, eh? <_<

At least things are on their way up, now though. So glad I was diagnosed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lovegrov Collaborator

Of course you can carry to term with undiagnosed celiac, but it certainly would make it tougher in most women.

richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dilettantesteph Collaborator

I think I have had celiac disease as long as I can remember. I missed a lot of school growing up. I was diagnosed with IBS in my late teens due to bad stomach pain. I was having uncontrolled diarrhea by my late 20's. (i.e. going elsewhere than the toilet) Nevertheless, I had two normal pregnancies with healthy babies. My son was almost 9 pounds. I also didn't have any fertility problems. First try for the first and third try for the second. I was diagnosed in my late 40's. I'd say that it is definitely possible, but obviously difficult for some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gflooser Contributor

I had successful pregnancies before dx and now 1.5 after :) i'm pregnant now, 14 weeks. all my pregnancies were pretty much the same. i'm one of those people who didn't show symptoms before dx. my kids' weight ranged from 8-9 lbs. the only thing (hopefully) i've ever dealt with durning preg. is pregnancy induced hypertension. it never went into preclampsia thankfully. but, i have always been an overweight and at times morbidly obese person. thankfully, i have lost 110 lbs before consieving this baby, so i'm hoping it will go a bit better this time! i'm not one of those super skinny celiac people, i went the other way.

so yes, i believe LOTS of people have babies before dx! good luck to you!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
LittleFrench Newbie

I'm 27 and had my first son at 20, my second son at 25. I juuuuuuust got diagnosed with celiac 2 months ago, but I've been having symptoms since I was 16. Eleven years of unexplained abdominal pain, insomnia, bone crushing fatigue, migranes, depression and of course the big D.

With my first pregnancy I was so weak I couldn't walk through the store to get simple items like toilet paper. A whole shopping trip was out of the question. I weighed 120 when I got pregnant and only gained about 15 pounds, but the docs said that was ok. Baby 1 was born about 2 weeks early. Also not too bad.

Following that I had 4 miscarriages all at about 10-13 weeks. It was horrible.

When I got pregnant with Auz our youngest I was so scared I'd lose the pregnancy. I had spotting the entire time, fainting spells, weakness, horrible anemia even with iron supps. I could eat 3 times what my husband ate, but I only gained about 20 pounds and I'd started this one at a measly 103 pounds so I really needed the weight. He was born 3.5 weeks early and weighed 5 lbs. It was definately rougher than the first time around, but then I had untreated celiac for almost 9 years at that point.

Now that I know that it didn't have to be that hard it makes me sad. Both pregnancies were difficult and I found myself hating being pregnant. My best friend was pregnant at the same time as me both times and she just raved about how wonderful it felt and how much she loved it. Of course I could never understand why in the world she'd love it, but then again she probably didn't feel like she was going to die at any second the way I did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tina B Apprentice

I've been trying to determine when my celiac disease triggered, and the one factor that I can't figure out is my pregnancies. I have read many places that miscarriages are often caused by undiagnosed celiacs disease, but I wondered if anyone knew if a woman can carry a baby to term with undiagnosed celiacs disease, or how common/rare that might be?

I'd love it if anyone has any information on this!

Carried 2 babies to term and was diagnosed after the second when I presented with a severe iron deficiency anemia that did not respond to iron replacement. Looking back I always had vague GI symptoms as a kid and was probably undiagnosed since childhood. The demands of pregnancy and nursing the babies made the anemia severe enough to take a second look. I have now been gluten free for 20 + years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
Swimmr Contributor

I was under the impression that if you have been diagnosed POSITIVE for Celiac, that means you carry a gene for it. In that case, it could be presumed that you've had it since birth, that it was passed on to you from one of your parents. I'm told it's genetic. Thus why there is a gene for it. Then the chances of passing it on to baby is very likely depending on if the husband has Celiac or not. Right?

If this is NOT correct, can someone please tell me how one could just "develop" Celiac if there is a specific gene for it? And if what I've learned, been told, and read is correct, wouldn't a person who "developed" it later in life be considered as gluten intolerant instead??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kareng Grand Master

I was under the impression that if you have been diagnosed POSITIVE for Celiac, that means you carry a gene for it. In that case, it could be presumed that you've had it since birth, that it was passed on to you from one of your parents. I'm told it's genetic. Thus why there is a gene for it. Then the chances of passing it on to baby is very likely depending on if the husband has Celiac or not. Right?

If this is NOT correct, can someone please tell me how one could just "develop" Celiac if there is a specific gene for it? And if what I've learned, been told, and read is correct, wouldn't a person who "developed" it later in life be considered as gluten intolerant instead??

There are different sorts of ways that a gene can make something happen. You're born with blue eyes because both parents gave you a gene for blue eyes. Some genes never turn on. You only have to have one gene, from one parent, to develop Celiac. Having the gene doesn't mean you will get Celiac. It has to be triggered (turned on).

Genes are a lot more complex than we learned in high school biology. They know a lot more since I took Genetics in College.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mushroom Proficient

Folks have reported all kinds of triggers for their celiac gene turning on, including serious illness or infection, trauma, stress, childbirth - even quitting smoking :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
sweetpea Rookie

Reading your symptoms makes me feel like I was reading my own!

Not sure about the pregnancies though b/c I was diagnosed several months before I became pregnant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cyberprof Enthusiast

I believe that I developed celiac at age 16. They were testing me for RA then (it was negative but I think there was a connetion) and I don't remember stomach problems before that. That is also the first time I remember having canker sores.

I wasn't diagnosed until I was 47, so that's a good 30 years of stomach problems, joint problems, mental health/depression. However, I had two extremely easy pregnancies when I was 32 and 34 - got pregnant first time each time, had virtually no morning sickness, never threw up, no sick days while working full time, and 9-10 APGAR scores. (Horrible deliveries, both, but that's another story.) Never had a miscarriage.

But I have three distinct memories from pregnancy: The first I ate a glazed donut and in an hour had such bad stomach pain and gas that I had to curl up in a ball for hours. For the second, I ate a wheat-pasta instant meal and threw up for the first time in 20 years. Again, I was amazed at how much my stomach hurt. And the third is the massive post-partum depression each time, which may or may not be related to celiac.

I feel so blessed that I had such healthy babies and that I was able to have kids, period. I'm a very lucky person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
×
×
  • Create New...