Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Son Going For Follow Up- Test Question


Sharon C.

Recommended Posts

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

My son is going back for a follow up after being diagnosed last October with Celiac. They are testing him with this same test. They are not doing a Gliadin/IgG-IgA. Just a tTG, and also thyroid function and also CBC/platlet. Is this a normal way to check to see if levels have gone down?

Also, when my son was diagnosed, I asked my doctor to screen me. He had NEVER screened anyone for gluten intolerance before. He sent me for the Gliadin IgG-IgA test but NOT the tTG. He said it "seemed" like I was negative. Is this the proper way to screen someone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nikki-uk Enthusiast

Hi Sharon,

In answer to your question about your son-doing just a tTg test is normal to see if his level of antibodies have gone down since going gluten-free.

To gain the full facts your doctor would have done better to include a tTg test in your coeliac screen.The tTg test is only for coeliac disease(meaning it is only gluten intolerance that can give you a positive).Whereas a high IgA or IgG could point towards coeliac,but other conditions also cause raised levels

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Lesliean Apprentice

tTga misses up to 70% of celiacs so the anti-gliadin tests are very important. I am a lot less concerned about the relatively low sensitivity (being positive when you don't have it) than I am with a low sensitivity (being told you don't have it when you do) of the individual tests. The problem, as I see it, is that untill you have an advanced case with moderate to severe intestinal damage you may not show up positive on any one test. By that time you will no doubt have all sorts of medical problems and some of them are likely to not be reversable.

Autoantibodies and histogenesis of celiac disease.

OBJECTIVE: Autoantibodies are used as markers for celiac disease (celiac disease) identifying patients with mucosal lesions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and role of the autoantibodies such as IgA antiendomysium (EMA), IgA antigliadin (AGA) and the IgA antitissue transglutaminase (tTGA) in histogenesis of celiac disease. METHODS: Seventy-nine cases including 30 untreated celiacs, 5 celiacs on gluten-free diet (GFD), 41 first degree relatives and 3 non-relatives suspected for celiac disease were investigated. Three untreated celiacs with IgA deficiency were excluded from this study group. IgA antibodies to tTGA were determined by ELISA, as described before. Twelve of 41 relatives and 2 cases of non relatives suspected with positive serology underwent a small intestinal biopsy. Results were correlated with the degrees of abnormality of the intestinal mucosa in patients with celiac disease. Intestinal biopsies obtained from study population were evaluated for histological quantification. RESULTS: Celiacs and suspected cases with positive EMA/AGA and or tTGA showed shorter villi (p < 0.007) and/or a higher number of intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) (p < 0.035). The sensitivity of serology (EMA, AGA, tTGA) in patients with Marsh IIIc was 100%. However, in patients with Marsh IIIa the sensitivity for EMA, AGA, and tTGA was 40%, 50% and 20% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of antibodies is related to the degree of mucosal infiltration by IELs. Although tTGA, like EMA provide a highly sensitive parameter for the detection of celiacs with severe mucosal damage, it appears to be less sensitive (even less than AGA) in celiac patients with milder histopathological abnormalities. However, it should be recognized that the substantial part of the celiac population present with these milder forms of mucosal abnormalities. Using tTGA as a single test in screening may result in missing up to 60-70% of celiacs with mild mucosal abnormalities. Combination with other screening tests (at least with AGA) is essential and strongly recommended.

Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nikki-uk Enthusiast

Interesting article,I didn't realise the tTg missed so many people.

I think my husband is a medical mystery!All his bloods were negative except for the tTg which was borderline.

When he had biopsy it showed extensive villous atrophy-so it doesn't necessarily correlate that high levels of antibodies means more intestinal damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast
tTga misses up to 70% of celiacs so the anti-gliadin tests are very important. I am a lot less concerned about the relatively low sensitivity (being positive when you don't have it) than I am with a low sensitivity (being told you don't have it when you do) of the individual tests. The problem, as I see it, is that untill you have an advanced case with moderate to severe intestinal damage you may not show up positive on any one test. By that time you will no doubt have all sorts of medical problems and some of them are likely to not be reversable.

   

   

tTG is the most specific test for celiac. The tTG and EMA are the most important, along with the total serum IgA.

The other 2 tests(IgA and IgG) are not really relied on because they can be so inaccurate

The tTG test may take the place of a biopsy in diagnosis in children in the near future. It is a very sensitive test and the probability of it being false is slim to none.

I wouldn't trust all articles that you find on the Internet. Some are accurate but I have heard up to 50% of the info on the Internet is incorrect in some way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
celiac3270 Collaborator
tTG is the most specific test for celiac. The tTG and EMA are the most important, along with the total serum IgA.

The other 2 tests(IgA and IgG) are not really relied on because they can be so inaccurate

The tTG test may take the place of a biopsy in diagnosis in children in the near future. It is a very sensitive test and the probability of it being false is slim to none.

Yes...that's what I had heard from multiple knowledgeable doctors.

The biopsy is still the gold standard, but the tTG is the best serologic test we have right now--much, much better than the Anti-Gliadin IgA and IgG, and even better and less expensive than the EMA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lesliean Apprentice

I hear what you are saying. But these aren't articles on the web. They are abstracts from medical peer reviewed studies. My vote is for several tests to be done at one time and to not rely on one or two tests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

which medical studies? some medical people dont exactly know what they are talking about..and obviously the research has been going well with the tTG testing that they are getting ready to use it to replace biopsy for diagnosis. I mean the research all points to that test being the best blood test and highly accurate. The rate of it being false is really low...but I guess possible. I think a full panel is beneficial but I think that the tTG is really the best test of the bunch

I would like to know who wrote that abstract you are referring to:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
key Contributor

Not all research articles are accurate, but I disagree with one blood test being 100% accurate for diagnoses. Especially in children under 2 years old. My son has it and his ttg was normal. He only had one blood level elevated and it was least sensitive for celiac. I think there is alot they don't know yet, so I thought the article was interesting.

Monica

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

In kids under the age of 2 all of the celiac tests can be inaccurate. In other cases, I think a full panel is beneficial to get done..I never recommend just one test be done...but from info I have gathered from many knowlegable doctors and many reliable articles it shows that the tTG is the best test for detecting the disease...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lesliean Apprentice

Kaiti,

When people ask for what tests to be done I always wait for your answer. You put a great panel of tests up with clear guidance. The study link for my first post was on the post and here is the header to it that I did leave off: Rom J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jun;12(2):101-6. I brought this abstract in to show my specialist and he was very impressed by it.

Autoantibodies and histogenesis of celiac disease.

Rostami K, Mulder CJ, Stapel S, von Blomberg BM, Kerckhaert J, Meijer JW, Pena SA, Heymans HS.

Department of Gastroenterology Withybush General Hospital, Pembrokeshire, Haverfordwest, UK. krostami@hotmail.com. (see weblink in above posting)

In America we miss diagnosing most celiacs (studies show 1/133). I agree that the tTga is the best test currently to specifically diagnose celiac disease, but this study (as well as a few more recent ones I have read recently) are finding a coorelation between tTga's being positive and the amount of villi damage. They conclude the moderate and mild early cases will be missed (till later) and they recommend keeping AGA and AGG to help pick up those cases.

I like to see blood work used without biopsy. I just recommend a complete panel including tTga and AGA and AGG. This seems in line with your recommendations to people who write in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Leslie-yep,I agree the full panel is definitely the way to go. I never recommend one test..its just to risky that way in my opinion

Thanks for posting the source of that info as well...I like to learn all views :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
anniej55 Apprentice

Kaiti,

I am so confused ... and if you don't me asking, how old are you? I can't figure it from the picture. You are so knowledgeable!

I never had the ttg test, but was diagnosed with the Iga and IGg. So now I'm wondering if I do have celiacs .... and to make it even tougher, I'm having a very difficult time staying away from the forbidden foods. Up until this week my life was wrapped up with school (I'm a middle school librarian) and medical tests (biopsy, colonoscopy, etc). Now that I have "down" time I find myself VERY angry that I cannot eat what I want to eat and very sad. Even though all the tests came back great ....

It's all I can do to stop myself from going to the local sub shop and getting a tuna sub on their great bread ... or spaghetti and meatballs ... or fried scallops. Yep, got it bad. And I do have the gluten-free food in the house - it is NOT what I want. :angry:

Thanks for listening

ann

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

I'm 17 at the moment...I will be 18 in about 2 weeks!!!

If the doctor gave you a diagnosis with high IgA I would say you have it. IgA can be wrong when low due to IgA deficiency. Most of the time when it's high it will be accurate. You have antibodies so therefore there is a gluten problem

However, now a full panel which includes the tTG is recommended because that will be very thorough then.

You really need to make sure you are gluten free though...if not it can cause alot more problems.

Good luck with everything and feel free to email me if you need any more help with foods, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,091
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Grammar B
    Newest Member
    Grammar B
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Oh, okay. The lower case "b" in boots in your first post didn't lead me in the direction of a proper name. I thought maybe it was a specialty apothecary for people with pedal diseases or something.
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! There are other things that may cause elevated tTg-IgA levels, but in general a reaction to gluten is the culprit:    
    • cristiana
      Hi @trents Just seen this - Boot's is a chain of pharmacies in the UK, originally founded in the 19th Century by a chap with the surname, Boot.  It's a household name here in the UK and if you say you are going to Boot's everyone knows you are off to the pharmacist! Cristiana
    • Denise I
      I am looking to find a Celiac Dietician who is affiliated with the Celiac Disease Foundation who I can set up an appointment with.  Can you possibly give some guidance on this?  Thank you!
    • Posterboy
      Nacina, Knitty Kitty has given you good advice. But I would say/add find a Fat Soluble B-1 like Benfotiamine for best results.  The kind found in most Multivitamins have a very low absorption rate. This article shows how taking a Fat Soluble B-1 can effectively help absorption by 6x to7x times. https://www.naturalmedicinejournal.com/journal/thiamine-deficiency-and-diabetic-polyneuropathy quoting from the article.... "The group ingesting benfotiamine had maximum plasma thiamine levels that were 6.7 times higher than the group ingesting thiamine mononitrate.32" Also, frequency is much more important than amount when it comes to B-Vitamin. These are best taken with meals because they provide the fat for better absorption. You will know your B-Vitamin is working properly when your urine becomes bright yellow all the time. This may take two or three months to achieve this.......maybe even longer depending on how low he/you are. The Yellow color is from excess Riboflavin bypassing the Kidneys....... Don't stop them until when 2x a day with meals they start producing a bright yellow urine with in 2 or 3 hours after the ingesting the B-Complex...... You will be able to see the color of your urine change as the hours go by and bounce back up after you take them in the evening. When this happens quickly......you are now bypassing all the Riboflavin that is in the supplement. The body won't absorb more than it needs! This can be taken as a "proxy" for your other B-Vitamin levels (if taken a B-Complex) ...... at least at a quick and dirty level......this will only be so for the B-1 Thiamine levels if you are taking the Fat Soluble forms with the Magnesium as Knitty Kitty mentioned. Magnesium is a Co-Factor is a Co-factor for both Thiamine and Vitamin D and your sons levels won't improve unless he also takes Magnesium with his Thiamine and B-Complex. You will notice his energy levels really pick up.  His sleeping will improve and his muscle cramps will get better from the Magnesium! Here is nice blog post that can help you Thiamine and it's many benefits. I hope this is helpful but it is not medical advice God speed on your son's continued journey I used to be him. There is hope! 2 Tim 2:7 “Consider what I say; and the Lord give thee understanding in all things” this included. Posterboy by the grace of God,  
×
×
  • Create New...