Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Do You Think?


rhondaslusher1

Recommended Posts

rhondaslusher1 Rookie

My general dr did blood work which shown a high possitive for igg low for iag but my gi did the full panel which came back normal but I was gluten-free when she took that test. My upper and lower scope test came back normal so she doesn't consider me celiac but my general dr does??? I do well on gluten-free and horrible when on gluten. So my gi says I will do the celiac challenge. I am supposed to eat gluten for 4-6 weeks which I am terrified of and then she wants to do another upper scope test. Does this sound right? Why not another blood panel instead? I will feel so bad for these next few weeks but it seems to me a blood test would pick up just as well. Really she didn't want to do anything more and said I am not celiac as of now but maybe in a few years things will have developed which I don't want to happen.

Does this sound right? I am so confused.

Rhonda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiac3270 Collaborator

The gluten challenge is a rudimentary system. The most orthodox, textbook way to get a diagnosis used to be something like:

  • Patient eating gluten has symptoms and I think it's celiac disease
  • Blood test
  • Analyze results. If negative, biopsy to completely rule it out, if positive, biopsy to completely rule it in.
  • Negative biopsy, neg. blood means that it probably isn't, positive biopsy -- celiac
  • Patient goes gluten-free and has improvement
  • Biopsy to see if healing has taken place
  • Let's make sure it's celiac and have a gluten challenge
  • Another biopsy
  • Gluten-free for good

In reality, this is the most ridiculous thing. What makes most sense is blood work, biopsy, diet, and maybe tests later on to make sure healing takes place. But if you feel better, you should just go gluten-free with or without test results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
key Contributor

Hi Rhonda,

I was gluten free for two weeks when I had the celiac panel done. My son has celiac and I was miserable when we found out he had it, so I decided to try eating gluten-free. I started feeling SO much better in just a week. No more bloating, no more gas, no more abdominal pain, nausea and fatigue got better, etc. Anyway, I haven't gotten my blood work back and don't know about a biopsy(if I will have one), because I have been on the diet for pretty much a month. I thought maybe it was all in my head, but everytime I eat it I end up sick. If my blood work comes back normal, then I am just going to stay on the diet. I feel SO much better and when I tried to eat it I was forced back into eating gluten-free by my bowels!! HA! Anyway, I want to feel good and if it means staying on the diet then I will. My baby needs help eating all the gluten free items anyway, and I figure it is nice he has someone that loves him on the diet with him.

So, I guess it is up to you whether you eat the gluten for six weeks and get rechecked. How long were you gluten free before you had the blood work done? Were you anemic at all? I do know I wasn't anemic at this point, but I don't know how fast that would reverse on the diet. I was bruising all the time and then after being on the diet for just two weeks I quit bruising.

Well, Let us know what you decide. I guess I figure if you feel better one way, then just eat that way.

MOnica

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rhondaslusher1 Rookie

Thanks for the reply! There are a few concerns for me. Can a normal biopsy change after 4-6 wks. on gluten? Blood test just sounds easier. And my other concern is I will be having my kids tested one is 10,7, and 1 1/2. Their dr wants them tested which I am glad but it worries me that I have all these bad symptoms when I eat gluten and not show possitive for celiac because if it is not on record how will my children and their children and so on know to beware? My 10 yr. old had shown all these signs when she was 3 and they ran all kind of tests on her and found nothing but I wasn't aware of celiac back then so I am worried for her too.

My hair keeps falling out and I called the pharmacy about some of the meds I am on and he said everything is safe, I called Krogers about my vitamins and they never returned my call? The gi says to take Biotin. I read some of you take gluten-free vitamins, can you get these at a regular grocery store? Can you refer me a name brand? As you see I am still learning.

Thanks again, Rhonda

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarnalberry Community Regular

The issue is getting the antibodies from the gut into the blood stream so that they show up on a panel.

If damage is being done at an appreciable rate, and it's true celiac, not a separate gluten intolerance, then a good biopsy may well detect the changes to the villi far before the antibodies are able to escape the gut wall and become detectable in the blood. (There's evidence that one can produce antibodies to gluten - hence, be gluten intolerant - without (at the time) it causing damage to the intestines (which is a definition of celiac disease). That doesn't mean you should continue eating gluten, of course! Just that celiac may not be the sole problem people experience with relation to gluten.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Bayb replied to Bayb's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Trying to read my lab results

    2. - Aussienae replied to Aussienae's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      65

      Constant low back, abdominal and pelvic pain!

    3. - trents replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?

    4. - trents replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?

    5. - mishyj replied to mishyj's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Why?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,222
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Smith-Ronald
    Newest Member
    Smith-Ronald
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Bayb
      Hi Scott, yes I have had symptoms for years and this is the second GI I have seen and he could not believe I have never been tested. He called later today and I am scheduled for an endoscopy. Is there a way to tell how severe my potential celiac is from the results above? What are the chances I will have the biopsy and come back negative and we have to keep searching for a cause? 
    • Aussienae
      I agree christina, there is definitely many contributing factors! I have the pain today, my pelvis, hips and thighs ache! No idea why. But i have been sitting at work for 3 days so im thinking its my back. This disease is very mysterious (and frustrating) but not always to blame for every pain. 
    • trents
      "her stool study showed she had extreme reactions to everything achievement on it long course of microbials to treat that." The wording of this part of the sentence does not make any sense at all. I don't mean to insult you, but is English your first language? This part of the sentence sounds like it was generated by translation software.
    • trents
      What kind of stool test was done? Can you be more specific? 
    • mishyj
      Perhaps I should also have said that in addition to showing a very high response to gluten, her stool study showed that she had extreme reactions to everything achievement on it long course of microbials to treat that.
×
×
  • Create New...