|
|
Celiac.com Sponsor: |
Romans, Chapter 14 (from The Bible)
#1
Posted 16 June 2005 - 05:46 AM
Romans, chapter 14
13 Therefore let us stop passing judgment on one another. Instead, make up your mind not to put any stumbling block or obstacle in your brother's way.
14 As one who is in the Lord Jesus, I am fully convinced that no food is unclean in itself. But if anyone regards something as unclean, then for him it is unclean.
15 If your brother is distressed because of what you eat, you are no longer acting in love. Do not by your eating destroy your brother for whom Christ died.
16 Do not allow what you consider good to be spoken of as evil.
17 For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit,
18 because anyone who serves Christ in this way is pleasing to God and approved by men.
This seems to say: no food is bad or unclean, but if someone thinks it is (i.e. through an allergy or intolerance) then for that person it isn't okay. Then at the end, it says that God and piety doesn't revolve around eating or drinking, but about who you are as a person. And that even if you aren't eating gluten or a gluten-containing Communion, if you're being a good person, that's all that matters.
#2
Guest_gfinnebraska_*
Posted 16 June 2005 - 05:52 AM
#3
Posted 16 June 2005 - 05:57 AM
Jen
Indianapolis, IN
gluten-free since Feb 2005
dairy-free
#4
Posted 16 June 2005 - 05:58 AM
Oh, shucks. I knew there must be a catch....This passage refers back to the eating of "clean" and "unclean" animals in the Old Testament, under the "old law"...
Me, tooI especially love verse 17...
Edited by Coulter, 16 June 2005 - 06:00 AM.
#5
Posted 16 June 2005 - 06:10 AM
I personally don't think that God would want us to damage ourselves by eating gluten bread at communion. I believe that it does say somewhere in the bible not to hurt your body. The whole purpose of communion is to take the bread and wine/grapejuice as a symbol of the body and blood to remember that Jesus died for our sins so that we could have eternal life. I personally don't think God cares if the bread we take as a symbol has gluten or not. I mean we don't actually drink the actual blood or eat the actual body right? We drink wine or grape juice and eat bread as a symbol.
Just my two cents
Diagnosed with Celiac Disease in March 2004
Postitive tTg Blood Test, December 2003
Positive Biopsy, March 3, 2004
#6
Posted 16 June 2005 - 06:54 AM
#7
Posted 16 June 2005 - 06:58 AM
I ditto that!Good work celiac3270! and great topic.
I personally don't think that God would want us to damage ourselves by eating gluten bread at communion. I believe that it does say somewhere in the bible not to hurt your body. The whole purpose of communion is to take the bread and wine/grapejuice as a symbol of the body and blood to remember that Jesus died for our sins so that we could have eternal life. I personally don't think God cares if the bread we take as a symbol has gluten or not. I mean we don't actually drink the actual blood or eat the actual body right? We drink wine or grape juice and eat bread as a symbol.
Just my two cents
Thanks for posting this celiac3270
Positive bloodwork
Gluten-free since January 2004
Arkansas
Jeremiah 29:11- "For I know the plans that I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for you to prosper and not harm you,plans to give you a hope and future"
"One Nation, Under God"
Feel free to email me anytime....jkbrodbent@yahoo.com
#8
Posted 16 June 2005 - 07:44 AM
#9
Posted 16 June 2005 - 09:23 AM
If Catholics believe that it is truly transformed to the body and blood of Christ then why can't a wafer made of rice be transformed to the body and blood of Christ too? Why does it have to be that particular ingredient? Christ did not command that it must have a certain ingredient. He did NOT say take this wheat bread in remembrance of me. I don't think He would even want you to take something that would make you sick.
Theres a verse in the Bible where it says people look on the outside but God looks at the heart...I think that applies with this because it doesn't matter what you can and can't have or anything like that. God knows the condition of the heart and I think that should be the meaning of communion. I don't think that the ingredient of what you take should overshadow that meaning.
I know people who get reactions because they take communion...and I know some people who take communion with rice wafers even if its rejected. God doesn't reject it....we live for an audience of one and that one person is God.
That's the thing that seems to confuse me..I understand it is tradition and know that tradition will not be changed...I am just trying to understand the logic of it so I hope none of you take offense because thats not my objective.
Positive bloodwork
Gluten-free since January 2004
Arkansas
Jeremiah 29:11- "For I know the plans that I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for you to prosper and not harm you,plans to give you a hope and future"
"One Nation, Under God"
Feel free to email me anytime....jkbrodbent@yahoo.com
#10
Guest_gfinnebraska_*
Posted 16 June 2005 - 09:59 AM
I know, for me, I just take the "grape juice" during communion. I know God understands why I don't take the bread 1/2 of the ceremony. That is the final line, for me. Did God give me celiac? No. Does He understand my limitations? YES!
#11
Posted 16 June 2005 - 10:00 AM
I know people who get reactions because they take communion
I've heard of someone who got put in the hospital because the gluten they ingested at each communion made them very sick.
I am not Catholoc, but I think that they believe that the bread must be unleavened, meaning that it has to contain wheat. That is why there is so many issues with celiacs that are catholic.
Diagnosed with Celiac Disease in March 2004
Postitive tTg Blood Test, December 2003
Positive Biopsy, March 3, 2004
#12
Posted 16 June 2005 - 10:39 AM
There are many mysteries tied up into this controversy, including...have the guys making these rules lost their minds?? To deny a Catholic the opportunity to partake in the most sacred part of their religion based on a supposed necessary RECIPE for the body of Christ, just blows me away. It's like persecuting your own kind due to an unseemly disability. If they weren't so nervous about admitting the gluten was still in the host when it's SUPPOSED to be transformed, then they might see that a little gluten doesn't shake the belief of the faithful who still believe it's actually transformed into Jesus's body.
I guess this is why it's so important to put your faith in God and not a bunch of humans who, no matter how hard they try, are still flawed just like the rest of us.
#13
Guest_gfinnebraska_*
Posted 16 June 2005 - 12:29 PM
Well said!!
#14
Posted 16 June 2005 - 01:14 PM
This is not the place for me to argue why I extremly disagree with the Catholic Church on this, just place to point out why the above passage is not sufficent to convice the Catholic Church of anything. Since the Catholic Chuch teaches that the bread must contian wheat, then for them thats the same as if it was stated that way in the Bible.
As far as my studies tell me, theres no reason at all the "bread" has to have wheat in it. The important fact here is your are NOT saved by comunine, its a response to being saved. Theres a big differnce there, and those here that take a non-wheat comunine need to understand that, and not worry about what the world says. Salvation is by faith alone, not works or cermony.
My son Timothy is Gluten Free, Egg Free, Diary Free, Soy Free, Almond Free, and Oat Free and yet still manages to get plenty of junk food some how!
#15
Guest_BERNESES_*
Posted 16 June 2005 - 02:37 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








