Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Anyone Hear Of This Study?


T.H.

Recommended Posts

T.H. Community Regular

Has anyone read this study: Open Original Shared Link

It's an old one - 2005 - and a small one. I haven't heard of it before at all. As I've only been able to read the abstract, I'd love to hear what anyone else has figured out about this, what you might have heard about it, etc... Partly because I'm wondering if it's saying what I think it's saying, or if I'm just completely misinterpreting the information.

If I understand right what this study said, they introduced gluten from the hind end, as it were, to celiacs and a control group and measured the results of some of the indicators of a gluten reaction, like the production of Nitric Oxide. Then they measured the same reaction for corn. They were looking for information on what order certain symptoms happened, etc...

All the celiacs had a gluten reaction to gluten, no big surprise. All the control group didn't. But half the celiacs had a gluten reaction to corn too! A lesser reaction, but the control group didn't react to this either.

:blink: Really? Anybody hear of this before? I've heard nothing whatsoever, so I'm wondering if I'm just wrong in what I think it means, or if it was proven to be a poor study, etc...

If it's actually saying that corn sets off a gluten reaction in some folks, however, it would completely change my life, I think. I've been avoiding corn because it seems to do bad things to me, even teeny, tiny amounts. (and yet, sometimes I still cheat and eat it, because I'm an idiot :( )I'm not allergic to it, however, and now, looking at this...I'm wondering if I've found out something about this.

Although honestly, even if I'm wrong, I may decide to pretend this is the case anyway, at least with myself. For whatever reason, I have no trouble avoiding gluten and not cheating on THAT diet. But corn I have a harder time with. I wonder, if I can make myself think it's gluten, will I have an easier time avoiding it? :D

I wonder if there's a way to make my brain think procrastination is gluten so I can avoid that too, LOL.

In any case, thank you for reading and hope someone has heard of this and knows a little more about it. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pixespirit Rookie

Has anyone read this study: Open Original Shared Link

Although honestly, even if I'm wrong, I may decide to pretend this is the case anyway, at least with myself. For whatever reason, I have no trouble avoiding gluten and not cheating on THAT diet. But corn I have a harder time with. I wonder, if I can make myself think it's gluten, will I have an easier time avoiding it? :D

Good morning,

While I have not read your article, I too had read where some celiacs have a corn sensitivity. I thought "not me!!" I love corn way too much to have a sensitivity. Then a colleague at work suggested I go off corn as his wife has the same thing and said...most celiacs have a corn sensitivity. So, I reluctantly quit all corn products. All I can say is that since going off corn, I have found energy I once had as a child. The lethargy is slowly disappearing although I have gained 40lbs...that I need work off from this frustrating diet. While it makes me frustrated---I would much rather have the energy over the gluten symptoms.

Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lovegrov Collaborator

I don;'t think you can tell anything at all from an abstract of a 5-year-old study. It certainly hasn't produced any concern or shockwaves in the celiac community, including among celiac experts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cassP Contributor

i didnt read the study (im lazy). but i DO KNOW that there is so much controversy online over corn containing its own kind of gluten, corn intolerances for celiacs, and corn being completely safe.

i just want to share with u guys, that while corn products sometimes bother me (with different reactions-> gut & sinus).... i had the WORST reaction EVER the other day to HIGH MALTOSE CORN SYRUP!!!!!!!!!!!! it was HORRIFIC... worse than gluten..

now i know the OFFICIAL word from the scientific community and the moderators here- is that HMCS is SAFE with no gluten. but i would like to add- that MAYBE HMCS has a similar molecular structure to gluten- because i am 100000% convinced that once that warm High Maltose Corn Syrup hit my stomach- my body registered "gluten"!!!! my stomach began THROBBING, i got NAUSEAUS, my face and neck and elbows turned HOT and RED, and then i got hives over my right forearm (where i had DH last year), and over my stomach (where i have a small patch of DH now)... this lasted for an hour- i was PISSEEDDDD...

so i suspect that my body confused it, thinking it was gluten (cause the body does get confused sometimes with viruses and its own cells)-> and because it was a warm syrup- it probably absorbed right thru my stomach into my bloodstream. i will NEVER eat HMCS again!!!!! :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lisa25 Rookie

I don't know about the study, but my body doesn't like corn :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mushroom Proficient

I don't know about the study, but my body doesn't like corn :(

Same here - knew it was a problem before gluten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ahorsesoul Enthusiast

I tested this theory this summer with fresh corn. It produced the Big D within 10 minutes...twice since I wanted to make sure it wasn't something else I had eaten. So I am starting to read labels for corn and corn syrup now. Nothing like making it a little more restricting. But it's worth it to feel better.

The corn issue feeds into my theory that it's the genetically engineered foods that are some of the problem. I suppose next it will be salmon. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

The corn issue feeds into my theory that it's the genetically engineered foods that are some of the problem. I suppose next it will be salmon. lol

That salmon is no laughing matter :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ahorsesoul Enthusiast

mushroom,

So true. I wonder what is next. Soon they could just hand us a pill instead of us eating. Reminds me of the song by Zager And Evans - In The Year 2525. Great song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jerseyangel Proficient

mushroom,

So true. I wonder what is next. Soon they could just hand us a pill instead of us eating. Reminds me of the song by Zager And Evans - In The Year 2525. Great song.

I often think the very same thing--great song! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lucia Enthusiast

My neuropathy cleared up almost entirely when I stopped eating corn. It comes back immediately if I ingest corn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lynnelise Apprentice

mushroom,

So true. I wonder what is next. Soon they could just hand us a pill instead of us eating.

Soylent Green?!?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
T.H. Community Regular

That salmon is no laughing matter :angry:

I so agree. I heard of that and my jaw dropped. Not even looking at how it may interact with our bodies, I think of interfering with wild salmon populations. We can't even control the spread of genetically modified crops that are grown out in the open. I can't imagine why anyone thinks that genetically modified fish will somehow do better than stationary plants. :blink:

And that cheesy part of me wants to yell out: did you not see Jurassic Park, dudes! Because you don't even have the island to keep these suckers separated from everything else. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ahorsesoul Enthusiast

Cartoon about genetically modified fish from newspaper:

Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dilettantesteph Collaborator

This is old. I found a link to the full article.

Open Original Shared Link

It has this statement: ""The manufacturer claimed that their corn product was free from wheat or other cereals. We tested the product at the Swedish National Food Administration (Livsmedelsverket) and it was found to be contaminated with 82 μg/g (ppm), which is less than the usual allowed amount in a gluten free diet (<200 ppm) according to the Codex Alimentarius Standard for gluten free foods, and far less than what has been found to be a safe amount of gluten contamination when correlated with histology in oral challenge studies"

That was an old paper when 200 ppm was considered to be the limit for gluten free. Since the corn had 82 ppm gluten, any reaction could have come form the gluten and not the corn.

Corn contains gluten by definition:

Definition of gluten:

a protein substance that remains when starch is removed from cereal grains; gives cohesiveness to dough

wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

That doesn't mean that it contains the type of gluten that bothers celiacs. Some are intolerant to corn. Glad I'm not!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
i-geek Rookie

That was an old paper when 200 ppm was considered to be the limit for gluten free. Since the corn had 82 ppm gluten, any reaction could have come form the gluten and not the corn.

Yep. That doesn't mean that some people aren't corn-sensitive, but this study had so many confounding factors that I don't consider it particularly reliable. They looked at chemical by-products of inflammatory reactions that could have come from either wheat or corn- there was no distinction made. You'll notice that the corn reactions were less severe than the wheat reactions: there's no way to determine whether this was due to the corn itself or the confounding presence of wheat gluten. The researchers even make note of this in the discussion section.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
T.H. Community Regular

Thank you very much - I couldn't make any links to the full study work, so I couldn't see the details. Was wondering if possibly something was contaminated or done poorly, because I hadn't heard a thing on this anywhere else, really. Looks like it was.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Skylark Collaborator

There is a link to the free full article right on the page with the abstract, Shauna.

As Steph says, the corn was contaminated with 82 ppm gluten. You cannot make conclusions about corn from that study.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
T.H. Community Regular

Ha, yeah, I saw that after I posted. *hits head* But for some reason, I couldn't get it to work for me, sigh.

There is a link to the free full article right on the page with the abstract, Shauna.

As Steph says, the corn was contaminated with 82 ppm gluten. You cannot make conclusions about corn from that study.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,502
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nadaly100
    Newest Member
    Nadaly100
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...