Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

  • Announcements

    • admin

      Frequently Asked Questions About Celiac Disease   09/30/2015

      This Celiac.com FAQ on celiac disease will guide you to all of the basic information you will need to know about the disease, its diagnosis, testing methods, a gluten-free diet, etc.   Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts What are the major symptoms of celiac disease? Celiac Disease Symptoms What testing is available for celiac disease? - list blood tests, endo with biopsy, genetic test and enterolab (not diagnostic) Celiac Disease Screening Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results Can I be tested even though I am eating gluten free? How long must gluten be taken for the serological tests to be meaningful? The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free Is celiac inherited? Should my children be tested? Ten Facts About Celiac Disease Genetic Testing Is there a link between celiac and other autoimmune diseases? Celiac Disease Research: Associated Diseases and Disorders Is there a list of gluten foods to avoid? Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients) Is there a list of gluten free foods? Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients) Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages Distilled Spirits (Grain Alcohols) and Vinegar: Are they Gluten-Free? Where does gluten hide? Additional Things to Beware of to Maintain a 100% Gluten-Free Diet Free recipes: Gluten-Free Recipes Where can I buy gluten-free stuff? Support this site by shopping at The Celiac.com Store.

Gliadin Iga
0

9 posts in this topic

I recently had the celiac blood testing done. My Deamidated Anti Gliadin IGA was 55 (30+ is strong positive) and my TTG IGG was 6 (with 6-9 being weak positive). Every other test (and they did the full panel) was negative. I can't get in with a GI doctor unti Dec. 1st.

I've been researching my results online, and have found several sites that say the Gliadin tests are outdated and even "normal" people can have elevated levels? Anyone heard this? Do you think they are referring to the Deamidated Gliadin? I was under the impression that this was a very good test for celiac and replaced a test for gliadin that wasn't deamidated? Could I have a positive Gliadin IGA test and not have celiac? I have had lots of celiac symptoms for years and have been diagnosed with IBS, Raynaud's, Hypoglycemia, among other things. I was almost hoping for a Celiac Diagnosis because finally I might have the answer to feeling good for once! Is the IGA test really outdated and meaninless in a diagnosis?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

I recently had the celiac blood testing done. My Deamidated Anti Gliadin IGA was 55 (30+ is strong positive) and my TTG IGG was 6 (with 6-9 being weak positive). Every other test (and they did the full panel) was negative. I can't get in with a GI doctor unti Dec. 1st.

I've been researching my results online, and have found several sites that say the Gliadin tests are outdated and even "normal" people can have elevated levels? Anyone heard this? Do you think they are referring to the Deamidated Gliadin? I was under the impression that this was a very good test for celiac and replaced a test for gliadin that wasn't deamidated? Could I have a positive Gliadin IGA test and not have celiac? I have had lots of celiac symptoms for years and have been diagnosed with IBS, Raynaud's, Hypoglycemia, among other things. I was almost hoping for a Celiac Diagnosis because finally I might have the answer to feeling good for once! Is the IGA test really outdated and meaninless in a diagnosis?

My understanding is that Anti Gliadin IGA is more specific to Celiac than Anti Gliadin IGG. IGG is more senstive however but can be present in other illness such as Chrohns. Here is some info from this site that I've copied for you. Bold is mine.

Anti-Gliadin Antibodies:

Both IgA and IgG anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) are detected in sera of patients with gluten sensitive enteropathy (celiac disease). IgG anti-gliadin antibodies are more sensitive but are less specific markers for disease compared with IgA class antibodies. IgA anti-gliadin antibodies are less sensitive but are more specific. In clinical trials, the IgA antibodies have a specificity of 97% but the sensitivity is only 71%. That means that, if a patient is IgA positive, there is a 97% probability that they have celiac disease. Conversely, if the patient is IgA negative, there is only a 71% probability that the patient is truly negative for celiac disease. Therefore, a positive result is a strong indication that the patient has the disease but a negative result does not necessarily mean that they don not have it. False positive results are rather uncommon but false negative results can occur. On the other hand, the IgG anti-gliadin antibodies are 91% specific and have an 87% sensitivity. This means that they will show positive results more readily but there is not as strong a correlation with celiac disease. It is less specific. Patients with other conditions but not afflicted with celiac disease will occasionally show positive results. IgG anti-gliadin antibodies are detectable in approximately 21% of patients with other gastrointestinal disorders. This test might yield false positive results but is less likely to yield false negative results.

I'm sure others more knowledgeable than myself will come along with some answers for you too!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently had the celiac blood testing done. My Deamidated Anti Gliadin IGA was 55 (30+ is strong positive) and my TTG IGG was 6 (with 6-9 being weak positive). Every other test (and they did the full panel) was negative. I can't get in with a GI doctor unti Dec. 1st.

I've been researching my results online, and have found several sites that say the Gliadin tests are outdated and even "normal" people can have elevated levels? Anyone heard this? Do you think they are referring to the Deamidated Gliadin? I was under the impression that this was a very good test for celiac and replaced a test for gliadin that wasn't deamidated? Could I have a positive Gliadin IGA test and not have celiac? I have had lots of celiac symptoms for years and have been diagnosed with IBS, Raynaud's, Hypoglycemia, among other things. I was almost hoping for a Celiac Diagnosis because finally I might have the answer to feeling good for once! Is the IGA test really outdated and meaninless in a diagnosis?

The deamidated gliadin test is the newer version of the older, AGA/IgA and AGA/IgG tests. The older tests are still very useful to test for dietary compliance and were not used exclusively for diagnostic purposes. It was part of a panel of 5 tests used for diagnosis of Celiac Disease. The newer version is supposedly more accurate but I do not know much more than that about it. I am already diagnosed by 5 years so am not as familiar with newer diagnostic tests.

Having a positive on either of these versions means you are making antibodies to gluten. You may either be gluten sensitive or have full blown Celiac. Either way, you need to be following a gluten free diet. There have been recent studies which have shown that many, many people show some level of antibody activity to gluten, which sort of proves what I believe.......that there are many more folks with gluten problems than most doctors can even begin to fathom. I would suggest that your doctor do a complete Celiac panel and not just one or two tests. Then, if you need an official diagnosis to follow the diet, you could proceed to a biopsy but those tests are not 100% accurate either, for many reasons. Have you tried a dietary trial? That is usually the definitive proof of a problem, if symptoms improve.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So much confusion in these posts. You are very likely celiac orangez, and even if your biopsy is normal you may want to stop eating gluten. I imagine your GI will tell you this.

Kathy, the distinction is not between IgG and IgA, but between anti-gliadin and anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP).

Gemini, anti-DGP is as accurate as anti-EMA and both more sensitive and specific than anti-TTG. There is no really reason to spend money and resources on more tests if that one is positive.

The celiac gut processes gliadin into deamidated gliadin with TTG. This only happens in conditions of intestinal injury where TTG is secreted to the lumen, not in a normal intestine. Deamidated gliadin is more immunoreactive than gliadin, and eventually leads to autoimmunity because the immune system gets confused and makes antibodies to TTG along with the deamidated gliadin. The TTG antibodies signal the immune system to attack the intestinal mucosa (or skin and nervous system in some people).

The old tests were for antibodies to plain gliadin, as the deamidation pricess has only been discovered in the past ten years. They were not very sensitive or specific and are considered outdated. They can be useful trying to diagnose gluten intolerance or gluten neuropathy. The newer test is deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP). The anti-DGP IgG has been demonstrated to be 98% specific for celiac, similar to anti-EMA and the anti-DGP IgA is almost as good. Since antibodies to deamidated gliadin are thought to trigger autoimmune antibodies, researchers think that people who have the anti-DGP and a negative biopsy are highly likely to develop celiac in the future. I don't think a proper prospective study has been done as with anti-EMA because the test is so new.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Skylark, thank you for the detailed information, I am one who likes to research these kind of things to learn everything I can. However it definitely doesn't look like English to me.

Do you think you could define what DGP, EMA and TTG are, and why they matter? Can levels of these all be tested for, and if so, which is necessary and which are overkill? And would all tests require the person to eat Gluten in order to show a positive result?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




It sounds like you need to read some introductory information on celiac testing. I was writing that for orangez, who has been doing more reading.

Try this University of Chicago information.

http://www.celiacdisease.net/testing

Another on testing from the NIH.

http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov/ddiseases/pubs/celiactesting/index.htm

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So much confusion in these posts.

Gemini, anti-DGP is as accurate as anti-EMA and both more sensitive and specific than anti-TTG. There is no really reason to spend money and resources on more tests if that one is positive.

The celiac gut processes gliadin into deamidated gliadin with TTG. This only happens in conditions of intestinal injury where TTG is secreted to the lumen, not in a normal intestine. Deamidated gliadin is more immunoreactive than gliadin, and eventually leads to autoimmunity because the immune system gets confused and makes antibodies to TTG along with the deamidated gliadin. The TTG antibodies signal the immune system to attack the intestinal mucosa (or skin and nervous system in some people).

The old tests were for antibodies to plain gliadin, as the deamidation pricess has only been discovered in the past ten years. They were not very sensitive or specific and are considered outdated. They can be useful trying to diagnose gluten intolerance or gluten neuropathy. The newer test is deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP). The anti-DGP IgG has been demonstrated to be 98% specific for celiac, similar to anti-EMA and the anti-DGP IgA is almost as good. Since antibodies to deamidated gliadin are thought to trigger autoimmune antibodies, researchers think that people who have the anti-DGP and a negative biopsy are highly likely to develop celiac in the future. I don't think a proper prospective study has been done as with anti-EMA because the test is so new.

I am not sure why you are so confused over the previous posts.....I thought both were explained fairly well. As I stated, I am not an expert on the newer tests as I was diagnosed almost 6 years ago but the AGA IgA/IgG were never used singly as a diagnostic tool and are still extremely useful in testing for dietary compliance. The newer tests may be more sensitive but I know of no doctor or lab who would base this type of diagnosis on one test alone, unless the patient had flaming symptoms of classic Celiac Disease. Most people have insurance and doing a full panel is still considered the best way to go. If insurance coverage is a problem, and a patient doesn't need a definitive diagnosis to stick to the diet, then a dietary trial would be the next best thing to try. However, as so many people seem to doubt without a diagnosis, most will seek a formal one and a full panel gives a much clearer picture of what's going on.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How does a "full panel" of less accurate and specific tests give a clearer picture? It's hard enough to get positive bloodwork, let alone a positive on something that's 98% specific. There are actually articles in the medical literature encouraging doctors to diagnose celiac with positive DGP or EMA and avoid the discomfort of a biopsy unless symptoms do not resolve on a gluten-free diet. I don't know that the average clinician is that comfortable with DGP but it's a really good test. At this point, I would not be at all surprised if the GI moves straight to a biopsy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your comments and feedback. Sounds like the tests I had were the correct most recent tests available. I was hoping that was the case. I've spent 27 years feeling sick and it would be absolutely wonderful to get a diagnosis and validate all of my symptoms. I feel like some kind of crazy hypochondriac always going to the doctor, requesting tests, complaining about my many symptoms and having them call it IBS. So frustrating! I just can't wait to meet with the GI doc and see what he has to say.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      103,344
    • Total Posts
      917,402
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Daughter with celiac- need test result help
      Thanks so much for your reply and the encouragement! She has not had the dgp test. I will ask her doctor at the next appointment in two weeks. Her doctor is out of the country now for a family emergency so I can't talk to her before her appointment. Her thyroid is good. The whole thing has been tough - logistically dealing with the dietary change and how extremely careful we have to be. Emotionally - worrying about her health and her feelings about all of this. I'm happy her number came down so much. There's hope. I'm just praying there's not more wrong and trying to prevent any possible risk of cross contamination. It seems she's very sensitive. It's also tough she's a kid at school with gluten on every surface. 
    • Newbie: mother to coeliac kids
      Wonderful news to hear that he has finally had his testing done, and can go gluten free. I understand that he is afraid of needles. Most children are. It is great that the hospital have acknowledged his and your family's suffering. Hopefully now they will give him the A1 treatment that he deserves. I am really looking forward to hearing of his improvement, as no doubt he will come along in leaps and bounds. Children are remarkably resilient, and with any luck he will enjoy a healthy and bright future with adherence to his required diet. Way to go Mum, you have been through a lot, watching your boy suffer. I hope that you are handsomely rewarded with being able to watch him flourish now. Good luck with your older boy too. Keep us posted.
    • Newbie: mother to coeliac kids
      Well thank goodness the gluten eating is over for him now & he can begin the journey back to good health! Poor fella. He was so sick! Just a heads up --- he isn't going to feel better instantly but at least he's a kid & they heal faster as a general rule. Bone broth!!!! Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy mom! That's really going to help him!   Do I recall correctly that you still have the 17 yr. old to go through testing yet?
    • Weird Reaction
      Hi Richard Glad you are feeling better!   Sorry - DX is an abbreviation for diagnosis.   Thanks so much  for the info about MSG, broccoli and IBS.  Like you say, there is v. little bad press about broccoli. My aunt, who is a farmer's wife, put forward another theory that it might not have been the broccoli itself but rather some insecticide a farmer sprayed on it.   I just can't bring myself to try organic broccoli however...  Thankfully cauliflower is fine.  I just can't figure it out as I thought they were the in the same vegetable family?  So maybe it is MSG. Regarding anemia, there can be a link with iron anemia and anxiety. http://www.livestrong.com/article/471225-iron-anxiety/ And I was definitely breathless before my diagnosis; I remember finding myself  walking up a hill behind a  huge crowd of friends on a church walk, and many of them were at least 20 years older than me, and wondering why I was in last place! My B12 levels were very low at DX and I found B12 supplements helped enormously with anxiety.   I remember drinking Berroca and feeling so much better within hours of drinking it, on more than one occasion, before even understanding the link. I have just been told however that I can't take any more iron because my hemoglobin is on the high side.  It is a good thing my doctor was monitoring my supplementation as I gather too much iron can be dangerous.  Have you been told to supplement by your doctor?  If you are supplementing make sure you get your levels monitored. All the very best - and welcome to the forum!    
    • Weird Reaction
      Thank  you Flowerqueen and Cristiana for your replies. I'm actually feeling much better today. I got my appetite back yesterday lunchtime (a few hours after I typed the original post) and managed to keep in/hold down some chicken and lettuce!!! I also had a "fat" coffee (as I call it) before work with MCT Oil and butter (your probably going "yuk" right now but it's really nice...really haha) and started feeling a bit better after that. The nausea went away almost immediately after that although just the thought of having all that fat nearly made me sick but I just wanted to get back to normal asap. I usually have a lot of fat in my diet anyway which is normal for me so the coffee choice isn't unusual. Plus it was also the third day which was when I started feeling better after the first time. I didn't eat til lunchtime and I was good and hungry by then so I knew I was coming out of it. That nausea and trembling feeling is something I don't want ever again. I think after the workout and tearing down muscle tissue (which is a form of stress) and then not being able to hold the nutrients in for repair affected my nervous system. My theory only but to me it makes sense. Although Vitargo also comes in flavors I always get the Natural / Unflavored one so the barley is the only ingredient. As for there being something wrong with that particular batch, well, you be on to something there. Also I'm not knocking the product because as I said, I have used it before and it did exactly what it was supposed to do. But, I will never have it again. Cristiana, my last blood test revealed I had slight anaemia which really surprised me with the amount of red meat I've eaten during my life and the anxiety thing is also new as I'm usually a happy, positive person. Life is good but after this recent reaction I think it is an indirect cause of the glutening. I'm also surprised at how sensitive I've become to it and how quickly. Also what is DX? I also follow a FODMAP eating plan (I can give you more info if you haven't heard of it) which also eliminates certain foods. It's a plan directed mostly at IBS but is well worth looking into if you are suffering any gut health, digestion issues or any ailment you may have which you can't get to the bottom of. Broccoli was one of the foods which I have cut back on and I've eaten HUGE amounts of broccoli so it is a superfood for some but apparently not for others. (I even think I read somewhere it has MSG naturally in it) It's hard to find any bad articles on broccoli so this also really surprised me. It also answered a few other questions I had. Many, many thanks again to you both for your replies. It actually settled me just reading them. I'm glad I found these forums so I don't think i'll be a stranger around here for long.   Richard
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

    • ChiaChick  »  Peaceflower

      Hi Peaceflower, Just wanted to say thank you for the chat.
      · 0 replies
    • ukuleleerika

      Hello! I am new to this Celiac website... Is there anyone out there with Celiac AND extensive food allergies? My allergies include shellfish, dairy, eggs, cantaloupe, kiwi, mango, nuts, oranges, red dye, and more I can't think of. I went to the allergist about a year ago to see why I wasn't feeling well, and once everything was eliminated, I still didn't feel well. We did more testing to find out I had celiac as well as allergies to cattle as well as rye grass (I live on a farm basically). This was back in January 2016. I recently had my endoscopy with the gastroenterologist a week ago. I have no idea what to do or what to eat... So fish and potatoes for me!
      · 2 replies
    • SLLRunner

      Week 4 of the gluten challenge- wheat cereal every morning, regular bread every day, and wheat tortillas for my lunch wraps. Right now, body aches that seem exercise related (weight lifting and running), even though I am doing the same intensity of weight lifting and running I've always done.  Just a few more weeks until my blood test. Counting down the days.
      · 0 replies
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      60,478
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Andrew Miller
    Joined