Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

New Dgp Iga Igg Lab Results
0

9 posts in this topic

I am not so patiently awaiting results of my teen's biopsy today. My question is regarding the labs prior to the biopsy. She tested positive with the dgp igg and iga but negative with the ttg iga and ema. Anybody else had results like this? Doctor told me only way to diagnose was biopsy. These tests are just a screening and nothing more. However I read that this new dgp test was highly accurate in diagnosis. Hence I am now confused. Why positive on dgp and negative on other tests.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Can you post the results with the lab ranges. That will help.

I was not familiar with the DGP testing, but I found this easily.

http://www.celiac.com/articles/22043/1/Is-DGP-Serological-Test-the-Wave-of-the-Future-for-Celiac-Disease-Testing/Page1.html

"The results of these tests clearly demonstrate that IgA DGP does not offer any advantages to the IgA tTG antibodies, and is actually less accurate and more expensive. However, IgG DGP antibodies present an invaluable tool in screening for celiac disease in cases where IgA tTG tests fail. Eventually, a new antibody screening will hopefully be designed which combines IgA tTG and IgG DGP, and reduces the number of tests currently used in celiac screening. However, intestinal biopsy is always required to confirm the presence of celiac disease no matter what serological tests are involved."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post the results with the lab ranges. That will help.

I was not familiar with the DGP testing, but I found this easily.

http://www.celiac.com/articles/22043/1/Is-DGP-Serological-Test-the-Wave-of-the-Future-for-Celiac-Disease-Testing/Page1.html

"The results of these tests clearly demonstrate that IgA DGP does not offer any advantages to the IgA tTG antibodies, and is actually less accurate and more expensive. However, IgG DGP antibodies present an invaluable tool in screening for celiac disease in cases where IgA tTG tests fail. Eventually, a new antibody screening will hopefully be designed which combines IgA tTG and IgG DGP, and reduces the number of tests currently used in celiac screening. However, intestinal biopsy is always required to confirm the presence of celiac disease no matter what serological tests are involved."

I don't have the labs but looked at them at hospital today. I believe a positive level was like 1.6 and her score was like a 4.9. Unfortunately I can't remember if that was the igg or iga score for the dgp and I can't recall the other dgp score except it was definitely positive. I was told it was a high positive.

I know there is less written about this newer test but in multiple places it is rated an extremely good test.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That Celiac.com article was based on one study and sadly the self-designated experts writing there often overinterpret single articles. I've read all the studies on DGP and the IgG version is considered more sensitive than TTG, and comparably specific to EMA, at 95%-98%.

Was she tested for IgA deficiency? That could explain low results on the IgA tests. Also, the autoimmunity has to be pretty severe for TTG and EMA antibodies (which is also thought to be TTG) to be in the bloodstream. IgG is more typically found in the blood, and the deamidated form of gliadin is only made by people somewhere in the process of developing celiac, which is what makes the DGP IgG a better test.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of these new tests can be so confusing. I also had the DGP tests done along with complete celiac panel. My DGP IGA was a high positive, and my TTG IGG was a weak positive. All other tests were negative. I did the endoscopy and they took 6 biopsies which were all negative. I was still put on the gluten free diet and it has made a world of difference. My understanding is that some doctors will diagnose celiac based on DGP tests alone, where others still believe a positive biopsy

is the gold standard. Its all very frustrating.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




I just put a link to new research you might find interesting in this other thread.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had elevated anti alpha gliadin antibodies (positive) but the anti ttg was not elevated (negative). From what I read there were 2 reasons for this result, one was that I had been eating very little gluten for several years and the other was that I had significant sprue indicating that most of my villi were damaged and in that case the anti ttg is sometimes not elevated.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That Celiac.com article was based on one study and sadly the self-designated experts writing there often overinterpret single articles. I've read all the studies on DGP and the IgG version is considered more sensitive than TTG, and comparably specific to EMA, at 95%-98%.

Was she tested for IgA deficiency? That could explain low results on the IgA tests. Also, the autoimmunity has to be pretty severe for TTG and EMA antibodies (which is also thought to be TTG) to be in the bloodstream. IgG is more typically found in the blood, and the deamidated form of gliadin is only made by people somewhere in the process of developing celiac, which is what makes the DGP IgG a better test.

Thanks for the info. My daughter was in fact determined to test positive in the biopsy. Her total IgA was 67 which is in normal range but on the low side. It was the DGP IgG that was the high number. Maybe she is somewhat IgA deficient? Just trying to understand as many people get tested using only the EMA and TTG and if we were not lucky enough to have a GI doctor in the hospital run this test we'd continue running around for years trying to figure out what was wrong. I'm very grateful for this new test and feel lucky that they found out what is wrong with her. However, I have found little written on this test and in my humble opinion it has without a doubt proved to be a very important test. The doctor's office said she has early stages of Celiac disease which goes along with what you said. Does anyone know how long early stages of Celiac go on for? She's been sick for years with multiple ailments first beginning with sinus issues, then severe chronic headaches, multiple fractures amongst other things. Could this all be traced to this disease? Also, does this disease cause weird things with blood work like low lymphocytes, high SEG rates, and stuff like that off and on? Also, what about pulse rates that seem abnormal?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm glad to hear you got a firm diagnosis and are over the wondering. You were lucky to get a good doctor and your daughter was very lucky to have her celiac diagnosed in her teens rather than her thirties like me.

Her low-normal IgA would make it a little harder to get positive results on EMA and TTG. The lower the total IgA is, the higher the chance of a false negative because of how the test works. "Early stages" is a little bit of an assumption on your doctor's part. The biopsy only looks at a tiny bit of the intestine and celiac damage is patchy so you don't really know the state of her whole intestine. Also, not all celiacs even secrete TTG and EMA into the bloodstream even if they have severe villous damage. Remember, IgA is primarily a mucosal antibody and the bulk of the TTG and EMA is in the intestine. That's part of why the DGP IgG test is so good. IgG is mostly a bloodstream antibody.

Celiac disease can cause all sorts of weird things. Malnutrition from malabsorption can affect almost any system in the body depending on the deficiencies, and the autoimmunity is not limited to the intestinal lining either. The immune activity can make people feel generally ill, with fatigue, depression, headaches and so forth. The multiple fractures would be from calcium malabsorption causing weak bones. The blood work abnormalities may be from celiac as well -- we've seen just about anything around here.

I hope she starts feeling better over the next few months as she heals.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,120
    • Total Posts
      919,472
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought I would update you all.  I started to eat gluten shortly after this post.  I was miserable by the time I had my EGD.  The doctor gave a diagnosis after the EGD was completed, duodenitis, gastritis and hiatal hernia.  I had abnormal mucosa of the whole stomach and severe inflammation.  The biopsy results came back today, they stated early stages celiac disease.  I wonder what it would've shown if I wasn't on a gluten free diet for two years?  My doctor said he still wants me to come in for a talk, he doesn't really know if he should call it celiac disease since it's early stages....  WTH!  I've really got to find a doctor that specializes in Celiac Disease...    
    • thank you for the info, its very helpful to hear from someone else who has it and knows a lot about it. When you say I may be eliminating one problem vs 3, what would you think the other problems could be? It's frustrating because I even buy Uldis gluten-free bagels and what not and I still find myself reacting sometimes to that, I don't use butter but just gluten-free peanut butter, but like I said I don't know for sure if its from that or maybe something else. I have read on this site about a couple others that have had issues with uldis breads so could be that. but like you said I guess it can also just take awhile to get better. I read the other day that a lot of throwing up can put stress on your small intestine which can maybe cause your body to react to dairy, do you know anything about that or if that's true?
    • Thanks for the reply!  Yeah, I really should have gotten testing done before the elimination diet.  I had asked my previous doctor, but she didn't want to do it.  I was transitioning to a new insurance and couldn't get a doctor's appointment for awhile, so I thought I would just do the elimination diet.  After all, it might not have been gluten.  (<--that was my thought process...) Hindsight is 20/20.  I felt pretty good during those 3 weeks gluten free, and was not expecting how bad it would be when I added it back in.  Anyway, I found a new doctor and I think she would totally be willing to test me again 9 weeks out. I think she would also be willing to order the endoscopy if I brought her research and really pushed for it. Now that I know how good feeling good feels... I just can't see staying on gluten for another 9 weeks.  I honestly don't know how I would survive.  Even if it's not Celiac, and it's ONLY the wheat allergy... it's making my life absolutely miserable. Thanks again for the reply!  I think I'll go in Friday for the blood test and take it from there.
    • Hi Alok, I suggest not eating any soy.  Soy is one of the top 8 food allergens in the USA.  Soy has other things about it that are not helpful to us.  Plus it is often sprayed with pesticides that are not so great for people.  Maybe you can try some other food for a while?  Also it might help to wash all your vegetables before using them. Just some ideas, I hope they help.
    • What she said!     The antibody panel is an important part of follow-up!
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,159
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    Anns
    Joined