Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Can H Pylori Give False Positive On Endoscopy Biopsy?


Prairigirl

Recommended Posts

Prairigirl Rookie

I went in to the doctor three weeks ago with severe stomach pains, diarhea, etc. I tested positive for H Pylori but was ordered to have a colonosoy and Upper Gi. I also was told I needed to have my gallbladder removed which I did. I went on Prevpak for two weeks (and had the colonoscopy/upper GI while on prevpac). I just got the biopsy report back which showed that I showed "early" signs of celiac. Would the h pylori make the biopsy look positive for celiac when I really don't have it? Blood work was negative for celiac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



T.H. Community Regular

Would the h pylori make the biopsy look positive for celiac when I really don't have it? Blood work was negative for celiac.

To the best of my knowledge, no. Quite a number of Celiacs have H. Pylori infections, so it's pretty common to have the biopsy while infected with this. I have two in my own family, actually. I have never heard of any damage by the H. pylori that mimics the damage done by our own bodies when we have Celiac Disease. Someone might have other information contradicting that, but honestly, I've never heard of anything.

And re: the negative blood work - There is a percentage of celiacs who have negative blood work and are only diagnosed through biopsy. And some who test negative to both tests but have symptom resolution on a gluten free diet, anyway (I guess their bodies didn't realize they had to pass a test first and didn't study. ;) ) However, most of those with negative blood work take YEARS to get diagnosed, because many doctors refuse to test further once the blood work is negative.

So, short answer - sorry, hon, you've got Celiac Disease.

Good answer - though the diet is a pain, it's likely you will feel so much better after you get on this diet. :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Looking for answers Contributor

No, hpylori is VERY common and does not cause that kind of damage. I have hpylori as well. I've kept it in control though dietary changes only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Prairigirl Rookie

Oh man--thank you both for your replies. I really was hoping that I didn't have celiac. The very idea of those kind of dietary changes is making me panic. Thanks you once again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

Oh man--thank you both for your replies. I really was hoping that I didn't have celiac. The very idea of those kind of dietary changes is making me panic. Thanks you once again.

Don't panic. It is going to be life changing but in a good way. Read as much as you can here and ask any questions you need to. Some of us do go through withdrawl so if your a bit moodier than usual that is normal. If you have any favorite foods that are gluten filled do ask and likely someone will know of a replacement. Your not alone there are a lot of us and more are being diagnosed everyday so it is getting easier. I hope your feeling better soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 years later...
Cboogy Newbie

I went in to the doctor three weeks ago with severe stomach pains, diarhea, etc. I tested positive for H Pylori but was ordered to have a colonosoy and Upper Gi. I also was told I needed to have my gallbladder removed which I did. I went on Prevpak for two weeks (and had the colonoscopy/upper GI while on prevpac). I just got the biopsy report back which showed that I showed "early" signs of celiac. Would the h pylori make the biopsy look positive for celiac when I really don't have it? Blood work was negative for celiac.

Yes, it can cause increased IELs, which is also a warning sign of Celiac Disease. Here are a few research articles explaining:

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1desperateladysaved Proficient

My functional medicine nurse told me that H-Pylori is a organism that lives mainly in the stomach and causes ulcers..

 

Dee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



beth01 Enthusiast

h-pylori might cause increased IELs but it will not cause the atrophy of the villi.

 

The study/research that is posted above is from 2006 and clearly states that only 17 people out of the original 639 were included in the final research. Only 2% of the initial 639 were celiacs, which it doesn't state how many of them actually made it into the final 17.  This study also only deals with the IELs and doesn't state anywhere the correlation of atrophied villi. 17 people doesn't make scientific research in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cboogy Newbie

h-pylori might cause increased IELs but it will not cause the atrophy of the villi.

 

The study/research that is posted above is from 2006 and clearly states that only 17 people out of the original 639 were included in the final research. Only 2% of the initial 639 were celiacs, which it doesn't state how many of them actually made it into the final 17.  This study also only deals with the IELs and doesn't state anywhere the correlation of atrophied villi. 17 people doesn't make scientific research in my opinion.

I am not referring to villous atrophy, as that is the Gold standard for Celiac diagnosis.  Maybe all of these sites are out of date, but I thought it could still be a possibility to rule out. My apologies. Open Original Shared Link

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beth01 Enthusiast

No need to apologize. For one, I just noticed this was from March and they probably already have their answer.  I just didn't want to give anyone false hope. I really don't think doctors diagnose Celiac based on increased IELs alone, and the OP didn't state just what the findings of the endoscopy was.  I didn't want them confused.  We're all here to help :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cboogy Newbie

No need to apologize. For one, I just noticed this was from March and they probably already have their answer.  I just didn't want to give anyone false hope. I really don't think doctors diagnose Celiac based on increased IELs alone, and the OP didn't state just what the findings of the endoscopy was.  I didn't want them confused.  We're all here to help :)

The reason I'm following this topic is because a few weeks ago I was diagnosed with Celiac based solely on elevated IELs, so I am really scrambling to understand because everything I've been reading does not match my test results or experiences. Talk about frustrating. I had negative blood work and I'm not IgA deficient, so I tried eating a high-gluten diet for two months for a retest and my antibody levels actually went DOWN, and my symptoms seemed to be getting better. I'm waiting for the Dr. to call me back about that one. Before the endoscopy I'm told villous atrophy is what they're looking for. Then they say "Weeeeeeeell, lymphocytes are sort of a positive result too." Then I'm told the bloodwork will "definitely show something" and then when the results come back negative they're like "Weeeeeeeell, that's still possible." I just wish they'd give me some more concrete evidence if I'm required to make a lifelong decision to be strictly 100% gluten free.  :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beth01 Enthusiast

Maybe you can start a topic about diagnosis based on increased IEL's to see if anyone else was diagnosed that way.  Have you gotten a second opinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 9 months later...
Cboogy Newbie

Maybe you can start a topic about diagnosis based on increased IEL's to see if anyone else was diagnosed that way.  Have you gotten a second opinion?

My new doctor says I do NOT have Celiac disease based on my history. According to his research only 12-20% of patients with elevated IELs actually have celiac, so you cannot diagnose Celiac based on this result alone. At least not without ruling out all other possible causes for the IELs (there are several). In fact, he performed some simple tests (breath and blood analysis) that previous doctors neglected or refused to offer me, which revealed lactose intolerance, H. Pylori antibodies and carnitine deficiency. Feeling much better now that I'm being treated for the correct diagnosis! And also less frustrated! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
murphy203 Rookie

So what is an IEL? And wwhat were you dxd with? Sounds like you are seronegative, as am I. what specifically led you to conclude it isnt celiac disease?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cboogy Newbie

My understanding of an IEL (intraepithelial lymphocyte) is that it is just a type of white blood cell that indicates inflammation of whatever tissue it is found in. I went from an old diagnosis of Celiac to a new diagnosis of lactose intolerance, carnitine deficiency and likely H. Pylori. I am having my blood celiac panel rechecked now that I've been on a gluten challenge for basically 9 months. It could come back positive for celiac disease, but if it's negative we will all be convinced that I never had celiac in the first place. 

 

There are many reasons for doubting the original diagnosis. Going gluten free made literally no difference in my symptoms. So eventually I saw a nutritionist and other docs for a 2nd and 3rd opinion and they've informed me that there is literally nothing in my medical record leading to a Celiac diagnosis. They said the original tests I have on record are meaningless and they do not even order those anymore. I never even had an endoscopy with the original diagnosis, and when I finally did have it done there was no villous atrophy. The original doctor ran the wrong blood tests (tests that are not highly specific to celiac disease), and also ran tests that are considered alternative and quacky, which makes us highly suspicious of the accuracy of his diagnosis. My new doctor said it's "embarassing" how little some of my previous doctors understood what they were doing. The doctor that did my upper endoscopy never even took a gastric biopsy, which should be standard procedure! Now I'm having to go through 3 more tests because of that. Smh...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
murphy203 Rookie

Interesting -- thanks for posting the additional information! I totally get why you want more evidence before you accept a diagnosis -- hopefully the next endoscopy and biopsies will provide you with some clinical evidence one way or the other. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,503
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PBunny39
    Newest Member
    PBunny39
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...