Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Diagnostic Methods And Second Opinions


GFG

Recommended Posts

GFG Newbie

Hi,

I was recently diagnosed with Celiac via an Enterolab gene and stool test. It showed I have both a gene and the physical manifestations through the stool results. At this point my only symptom has been fatigue but the demands of my life (won't bore you here) could provide reason for that alone.

I'm working with a nutritionist and MD who encouraged the testing based on other bloodwork and their suspicions. After getting the results I have begun a gluten free diet and cow dairy free as a casein intolerance was also indicated (again, I've never had any symptoms of that).

Subsequently we've had our children tested through the same means and their results came back today that they both have a gene and the manifestation (though no symptoms that are obvious).

Since discovering I have it I've been a total research fiend reading books, GlutenFree living magazine, Living Without magazine, this website, etc. The Enterolab methods are never mentioned; usually a biopsy is used. I also tested negative on the blood test for Celiac (which I've heard can be a false negative).

I'm feeling overwhelmed about starting my 2 yr old and 6 yr old on this path without feeling more confident about the diagnosis. I'd greatly welcome feedback on the integrity of Enterlabs method of diagnosis, as well as what I might do as a validating or second opinion for myself and my children. If it's the right thing I'll go down the path willingly but would feel better with a second opinion and feedback about Enterolab. Is there another lab to have the same tests done?

Thanks for any help! Toni

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Carriefaith Enthusiast

I personally have not had tests done with enterolab since I was diagnosed through positive bloodwork and biopsy. I think that enterlab is reliable. If you have the gene for celiac and positive gluten sensitivity result from enterolab than you should definiately be on the gluten-free diet; however, you could also get the celiac blood panel and see if these results are consistant with the enterolab results. Just make sure you are eating gluten until the tests because you could get fasle negative results.

Some people with celiac disease have no symptoms at all and still have intestinal damage. I actually know someone whose only symptoms of celiac were anemia, fatigue, and low energy. If you indeed have celiac, than you are at a higher risk for conditions such as cancer, osteoporosis, infertility, seizures, ect.

I know the diet seems overwhelming at first, and it is... but it gets better with time and we all can help give you suggestions to make meal time better for your kids. I am both gluten free and dairy free and don't mind it. Once you know what you can/can't have grocery shopping and cooking becomes a lot faster and less stressful.

BTW - always feel welcome to ask any questions about the diet or anything else and we will do our best to help :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

The Enterolab is the up and coming thing in my opinion. Some doctors now accept it but others do not.

Blood tests are very accurate, depending on which one you get done.

The tTG test is getting ready to take the place of biopsies for diagnosis in kids.

Biopsies can have false negatives to...in my opinion the blood tests are better.

My doctor did not bother doing a biopsy because I not only had a main gene but my tests were so high that he had no doubt that it was celiac.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GFG Newbie
The Enterolab is the up and coming thing in my opinion. Some doctors now accept it but others do not.

Blood tests are very accurate, depending on which one you get done.

The tTG test is getting ready to take the place of biopsies for diagnosis in kids.

Biopsies can have false negatives to...in my opinion the blood tests are better.

My doctor did not bother doing a biopsy because I not only had a main gene but my tests were so high that he had no doubt that it was celiac.

Thanks Kati; could you tell me what the tTG test is exactly? Is that what they do at Enterolab or a different test? If a different test do you know how it's administered (I looked it up online but it didn't indicate if it's a blood test, stool test, etc). Thanks so much !

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

This is the complete panel that is very efficient in testing.

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG

Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA

Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA

Total Serum IgA

The tTG test they do also do in Enterolab but it is by stool sample. The panel above is bloodwork

If you are gluten free it can make test results inaccurate so keep that in mind.

I think the Enterolab is a really good test too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
drewsant Rookie

I have a question about these tests. It's been stated that if you have been gluten-free, then the blood tests will come back negative. I've been on the gluten-free diet for about 3 weeks, and had blood work done last Monday. I know I've screwed up along the way, but I would say about 95% gluten-free. I guess my question is, with the maybe 5% I've eaten with gluten in this time period, would that be enough to show a positive on the blood tests if I have it?

I am feeling much better as far as the stomach goes. Since I haven't gotten a definitive diagnosis, yesterday I decided to test myself to see what would happen. I ate a Chicken Whopper from Burger King last night. This afternoon, I've made like 5 trips to the bathroom in 2 hours. I have a feeling it is Celiac. Although about 3 nights ago, I drank something with alcohol, that at the time, I didn't know had wheat in it--was clear, and looked distilled. So I thought that might make me sick, but it didn't seem to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast
I have a question about these tests. It's been stated that if you have been gluten-free, then the blood tests will come back negative. I've been on the gluten-free diet for about 3 weeks, and had blood work done last Monday. I know I've screwed up along the way, but I would say about 95% gluten-free. I guess my question is, with the maybe 5% I've eaten with gluten in this time period, would that be enough to show a positive on the blood tests if I have it?

It could mess tests up. You should be on gluten for 3 months prior to testing with eating about equal to 3 pieces of bread every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,506
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    NanaA
    Newest Member
    NanaA
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...