Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Importance Of Biopsys


Guest GITRDONE

Recommended Posts

Guest GITRDONE

I have read under various topics that alot of you have choosen not to get a biopsy. So I'am wondering how do you know if your intestines are healing and/or do not have any permenant damage? And when should you go back to the doc for another endoscopy??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

tTG and EMA blood tests are the specific ones for detecting damage. Doctors test usually after 6 months to see if the levels have gone down. Usually 3-6 months gluten free will heal damage.If you have not gotten a biopsy and had just positive blood tests then whatever tests were positive should be followed up on to see if levels of them went down. Blood tests are used to measure compliance of the diet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ianm Apprentice

I have never had any of the celiac tests so I don't know for sure what is happening in my gut. What I do know is that I was extremely sick, tired and overweight. I stopped eating gluten and my life underwent a drastic transformation for the better. I don't want any of the tests because I can't afford to get that sick again. I have turned my life around and can't afford to mess it up again. Plus I am a single parent and my son needs me to be as healthy as I possibly can. The gluten free diet is all I can do any way so for me it just isn't worth it to get tested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest nini

I only had blood tests. No biopsy. I too was very very ill prior to the blood tests definitively dx me with celiac. I don't need to know what's going on in my gut, my general health is so much better than it was. It's not worth it to me to go through a biopsy when I already know what is wrong with me and what fixes it. I personally don't feel that biopsies are necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carriefaith Enthusiast

Every doctor seems to diagnose and deal with celiac disease differently. To diagnose, some just do blood tests, some do blood tests and a biopsy, and few still do the dietary challenge but it has been done.

In my opinon, I don't think that a follow up biopsy is necessay if you are following the diet and feeling better. Very rarely celiacs can get refactory celiac disease where the intestine doesn't heal, that's why I think follow up biopsies are important if you aren't feeling better on the diet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frenchiemama Collaborator

I was diagnosed through bloodwork. My doctor offered to set up a biopsy if I wanted it, but I decided not to. For one thing, the course of treatment doesn't change based on the results of the biopsy. So it would really be telling me only what I already knew, that I have celiac disease. We decided that if I wasn't feeling better in 3 months that I would have one, but I am feeling better and still don't really see the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lovegrov Collaborator

Biopsy diagnosis is still the gold standard and it can also be used to check for any other possible problems. But most doctors don't think a followup biopsy is necessary unless you continue to have problems.

richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



julie5914 Contributor

I wanted a diagnosis, and I would have done it if my doctor wanted it for diagnosis. They diagnosed based on blood tests alone though since they were so high and since I had the EMA positive. I was happy because I felt like they were right, I didn't want to wait anymore to start the diet, and it saved me time and money to not have to do the procedure. They will be checking the blood levels in 3 months to check up on me, but I already feel a million times better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest nini

Richard, according to the latest info I had read, the biopsy is NO LONGER THE GOLD STANDARD. The treatment is the same whether you are dx with blood tests alone, blood tests and biopsy, or dietary challenge...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pegster Apprentice

My GI Doc also said that the intestinal biopsy was the best diagnostic tool for celiac disease. When she told me this, I had already been gluten-free for six months after a positive biopsy for DH. I asked her why she felt another biopsy would be necessary since I was already on a gluten-free diet. She basically said it was so I could know I have celiac disease "for sure". I decided then that maybe she didn't know as much as the people on this site so I turned down the biopsy. Now I see that maybe I should have one just to check for healing or damage--even though I've been gluten-free for 15 months now. Any thoughts? :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Biopsies have been considered the gold standard for diagnosis but that is changing. Blood tests are becoming more sophisticated. The tTG test will be taking place of biopsies in kids coming up in the near future.

Pegster-usually they will want to do a followup 6 months later to see if damage has healed if you had a biopsy to diagnose you.

Diagnosis from blood tests they will do the ones that showed up positive 6 months later to see if levels went down. This is how they test for compliance with the diet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
celiac3270 Collaborator

How is it not still the gold standard? The EMA isn't going to replace it anytime soon, and the tTG, though good, is not yet at a point where it can fully replace the biopsy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

It is still considered the gold standard but that will be changing in the near future.

My GI doctor said " biopsies are so last year" lol...he said that there are better ways for diagnosis without being invasive. I think this will be something that happens in the near future. In some cases biopsies are good when in question though. I am not downplaying biopsies because they can be very useful

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest nini

I can't find it right now, but I read several medical journals recently that stated that Biopsies were no longer the gold standard because the diagnostic protocols are changing for celiac. People are presenting with symptoms that are NOT classic celiac symptoms and the biopsies are overlooking gluten intolerance and the genetic predisposition to celiac which leads to full blown celiac damage. In a lot of cases patients have no noticeable damage to the intestines YET, but the more specific blood tests are confirming EARLY Celiac. Why wait till damage is done or is so severe before dx a patient with celiac, when the blood tests clearly show the propensity for this? In children especially, most are too young for a biopsy to show any damage, and even if blood tests are inconclusive, when put on a gluten-free diet the patients respond "miraculously". The risks of an invasive procedure like a biopsy, although small, are still present, such as perforation of the intestinal wall or other such complications.

The medical community is making great strides in celiac research, however, there are so many Dr.s out there still unwilling to dx celiac if someone presents with symptoms other than the classic celiac symptoms. In my case, I was Overweight (despite not being able to keep food in me) and I was initially told it couldn't be Celiac because you ONLY LOSE weight with it. So also, Dr.s are still clinging to the outdated notion that biopsies are the only way to positively dx celiac.

When is a biopsy useful? When Celiac is suspected because of blood or fecal screenings, the diet has been implemented for at least 3 months and there is NO positive dietary response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest GITRDONE

YOU ARE ALL AWESOME WHEN IT COMES TO INFORMATION & VALID OPINIONS. SORRY I HAVEN'T RESPONDED EARLIER. MY COMPUTER WAS BEING UNCOPORATIVE

OK, SO MAYBE NOT A BIOPSY, BUT WHAT ABOUT THE ENDYSCOPE??? I WAS MISDX FOR 15+ YEARS. WHEN THEY DID THE FIRST BIOPSY THEY SAID I HAD "COMPLETLY FLAT INTESTINES, WITH NO VISIBLE VILLIA". SO WITH THIS IN MIND, WILL A gluten-free DIET HEAL THE INTESTINES 100%???

:huh: SUSAN

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carriefaith Enthusiast
I HAD "COMPLETLY FLAT INTESTINES, WITH NO VISIBLE VILLIA". SO WITH THIS IN MIND, WILL A gluten-free DIET HEAL THE INTESTINES 100%???
A very strict gluten free diet will result in healing of the villi in the small intestine. Only in very rare cases the villi cannot heal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest nini

Susan, how are your symptoms when you are on the gluten-free diet? Are you feeling better? Is your health improving?

If it is, then that is a pretty good indicator that the villi are healing... If your health hasn't improved at all, and you are 100% gluten-free, then you may want to have another endoscope/biopsy to see what's going on. BUT... if you are feeling better I don't see a reason to do a follow up biopsy. And my Dr. said that a biopsy would only be necessary if I did not get better on the gluten-free diet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest GITRDONE

Yes I do feel much better when on a gluten free diet. I have also noticed that when I am exposed that I experince all the symptoms that have mentioned under other topics (fog brain, vomiting, dizzy, the big D, etc). It also seems that the longer you are gluten-free, the harder it hits you when glutened.

Thanks for your comments. Its great to have you guys out there and to know you are not alone.

:) Susan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,995
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    FatimaFarhan
    Newest Member
    FatimaFarhan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • GardeningForHealth
      As a side note, it seems that medical science has evolved in the past 5-6 years regarding Celiac Disease, and I am now catching up. It seems that anything that disrupts the microbiome sufficiently enough can--in genetically susceptible individuals--lead to Celiac Disease. I have been reading now that antibiotics, excessive simple carbohydrates such as refined sugars and starches, the manner of birth such as C-section vs vaginal delivery, the diversity of one's diet, the presence of certain bacteria or viruses, can all contribute to microbiome dysbiosis, which can lead to Celiac. This is fascinating research.
    • GardeningForHealth
      I mostly eat healthy. My diet has varied over the past 10 years but mostly consisted of meals I cooked at home made from scratch. Ingredients I used over the years include (not in order): non-wheat grains such as teff, sorghum, millet, and eggs, butter, cheese, some milk, meat (poultry, red meat, but very little processed meat), gluten-free baked bread (mostly Canyon Bakehouse brand), vegetables, fruits, nuts, legumes, peanuts, chocolate (not in the past 6 months). However, the mistakes I made in my diet are that I consumed too much sugar and carbohydrates from gluten-free baked goods that I baked myself at home such as gluten-free dessert items, and also I ate pretty much the same exact meals over and over, so a great lack of diversity in what I ate. I got lazy. I think this messed up my microbiome. The meals I ate were mostly healthy though. I always made sure to eat vegetables and fruits on a daily basis.  I have checked for nutrient deficiencies over the years and I am sometimes low in Vitamin D. I started supplementing it after that. What concerns me is the progressive nature of the food intolerances, which indicates the gut is not healing and has been leaking all along. 
    • TessaBaker
      It sounds like you're dealing with a complex situation, and I can understand how frustrating it must be not to have a clear answer. Gut health can indeed play a significant role in various aspects of our well-being, including hair health.
    • Celiac16
      I have found similar benefits from thiamine. I was diagnosed with celiac at 16 and never really recovered despite strict gluten and dairy free diet and no detectable antibodies on checkup bloodworks. I’ve tried stopping the b1 but start to feel bad again- I wanted my doctors to do more extensive testing for the different thiamine transporters and enzymes which would be a better indication if I was deficient or dependent on it but everyone dismisses it (there are know genetic mutations where you need to take it daily for life). I have looked into Thiamine Responsive Megablast Anemia and I have a lot of the more mild symptoms of the disease that manifest when thiamine isn’t given to the patient such as optic neuritis… I just find the parallels interesting. i think that celiacs could be a side issue of inflammation that resulted from vitamin deficiencies. I was eating a lot of sugar leading up to my diagnosis and since eating gluten free didn’t make me feel much better, I’m wondering if this was more the underlying issue (sugar heavily depletes b1). I usually take 1.5g thiamine a day.
    • Fluka66
      Thank you for your welcome and reply.  Yes I've been carefully reading labels looking for everything in bold and have been amazed by what I have seen. However Heinz tomato and basil soup is wheat free so I m thinking I already have ulcers?  The acid could be causing the pain . My pain always starts in one place then follows the same route through me . GP confirmed that is the route of our digestive system.  So much pain from stabbing to tearing. If I throw in milk with lactose it's horrific.  Many years of it now, won't go into details but been seeing a consultant for a supposedly different problem . Wondering what damage has been done over the years. Many thanks for your reply. Wishing you the very best.    
×
×
  • Create New...