Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Threshold Of Acceptability


October3

Recommended Posts

October3 Explorer

I called Crest and Colgate to inquire about whether their toothpastes are gluten-free, because I have seen gluten-free toothpaste advertised and hadn't previously considered that there could be gluten in toothpaste. Crest said their toothpaste has no gluten. Colgate said they don't add gluten to their products but can't guarentee they ingredients weren't exposed to gluten prior to their arrival at the factory. They said if something travels past a wheat field during transit it could be "exposed" and so they make no promises about things like that.

It seemed to be a very strict standard and one that on the surface seems to me to be unnecessary. I guess my thought is I'm willing to take that risk for the ease and savings of using something more mainstream. But maybe this is an issue for people??? Is it worth it to buy the labeled Gluten Free thing, or is it simply labeling tricks? I just don't see how anyone could guarantee that something has never passed by a wheat field.

On the other hand, I know Mela leuca products are tested for gluten and they have a list on their website of things that have tested gluten-free. (Toothpaste, btw, didn't make the list) So maybe that is important?

Can someone advise me as to how strict one should be starting out on things like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

I called Crest and Colgate to inquire about whether their toothpastes are gluten-free, because I have seen gluten-free toothpaste advertised and hadn't previously considered that there could be gluten in toothpaste. Crest said their toothpaste has no gluten. Colgate said they don't add gluten to their products but can't guarentee they ingredients weren't exposed to gluten prior to their arrival at the factory. They said if something travels past a wheat field during transit it could be "exposed" and so they make no promises about things like that.

It seemed to be a very strict standard and one that on the surface seems to me to be unnecessary. I guess my thought is I'm willing to take that risk for the ease and savings of using something more mainstream. But maybe this is an issue for people??? Is it worth it to buy the labeled Gluten Free thing, or is it simply labeling tricks? I just don't see how anyone could guarantee that something has never passed by a wheat field.

On the other hand, I know Mela leuca products are tested for gluten and they have a list on their website of things that have tested gluten-free. (Toothpaste, btw, didn't make the list) So maybe that is important?

Can someone advise me as to how strict one should be starting out on things like this?

Those companies are just giving CYA statements. NO company can guarentee that anything is 100% gluten free. Although some things you can be more sure about than others, it is physically impossible to test for no gluten. The most sensitive test detects 5 PPM.

From an experience standpoint--I am very sensitive to cc and I have not had to worry wbout my toothpaste. I use Crest, Colgate and Aquafresh (whatever I can get free with a coupon).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sa1937 Community Regular

I totally agree with GlutenFreeManna. Not everything we use will have a gluten-free label slapped on it and the companies are being honest about not being able to guarantee gluten-free status of ingredients. So yes, CYA statements abound.

That said, I use Colgate toothpaste and have no problem with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,201
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sohaib Askar
    Newest Member
    Sohaib Askar
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, I contacted Scott Adams, the author of that article and also the creator/admin of this website, and pointed out to him the need to clarify the information in the paragraph in question. He has now updated the paragraph and it is clear that the DGP-IGA does serve the purpose of circumventing the false negatives that IGA deficiencies can generate in the tTG-IGA antibody test.
    • knitty kitty
      Here's a link... Thiamine Deficiency Causes Intracellular Potassium Wasting https://www.hormonesmatter.com/thiamine-deficiency-causes-intracellular-potassium-wasting/
    • Soleihey
      Has anyone experimenced enlarged lymph nodes with celiac? Both in the neck and groin area. Imaging of both areas have said that lymph nodes are reactive in nature. However, they have been present for months and just wondering how long this may take to go down. Been gluten-free for about two months. Blood counts are normal.
    • Kmd2024
      Hmm interesting I just assumed that any “IGA” tests including the DPG iga would be negative in a person who is IGA deficient but maybe that is not the case for the DPG test.
    • Scott Adams
      If you were just diagnosed I can say that if you go 100% gluten-free should should see dramatic improvement of your symptoms over the next few months, but the hard part is to stay gluten-free. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
×
×
  • Create New...