Get email alerts Get Celiac.com E-mail Alerts  




Celiac.com Sponsor:
Celiac.com Sponsor:




Ads by Google:






   Get email alerts  Subscribe to FREE Celiac.com email alerts

Antibodies?
0

10 posts in this topic

My daughter has tested positive for the antibodies for Celiac. Does she really need the biopsy to prove it or should we go gluten-free since she has the antibodies?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Ads by Google:

Thats up to you. If you feel the blood test was enough for the diagnosis, then stop there.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My daughter has tested positive for the antibodies for Celiac. Does she really need the biopsy to prove it or should we go gluten-free since she has the antibodies?

I'm not a medical person, but my G.I. doc said that, aside for it being confirmation of celiac disease, that they are also looking for certain markers and baselines, plus examining for esophageal damage that may have resulted from GERD (many celiacs also suffer from this), etc. You should ask the GI doc to elaborate.

It (the biopsy) may also be an important piece of medical evidence to have for your daughter's school, or for research studies/treatments, etc. I've seen a few trials that would only take celiacs who had been confirmed by small intestine biopsy.

Whether or not you decide on the endoscopy, your daughter's blood tests shows she has celiac disease (I don't believe there are false positives - you can search this forum and internet - blood test is quite definitive) so I think your medical provider will tell you that you should definitely begin the gluten free diet. The sooner you do, the sooner the damage stops and she begins to heal.

Plus, this is a genetic disease. She got the gene from one side of the family or the other. You may inquire about testing additional family members (including parents).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a link to the University of Chicago Celiac Center, it has tons of information (treatment, factsheets, video, etc):

http://www.celiacdisease.net/testing

They state on their site that endoscopy biopsy is necessary to confirm the diagnosis.

other sites with info on this:

http://www.celiaccenter.org/celiac/faq.asp

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/115/5/1341.full.pdf+html

http://thesavvyceliac.com/2011/04/21/research-diagnosing-children-with-celiac-disease/

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I didn't mention is that we had the endoscopy done in December and it showed minimal inflammation of the lining of the small intestine but no damage to the villi, so the doctor says it's "Latent Celiac" which means we caught it before it did any damage. She has been gluten-free for 4 months now but still has some stomach aches, which doctor says are from Irritable Bowel Syndrome. The doctor says we can try gluten for 4 months and then do another endoscopy to see if there is any damage. My question is why would we put her back on gluten if she has the antibodies, which tells me that her body is fighting the gluten and will eventually cause damage. What would be the point of putting her back on gluten and doing another endoscopy if we know that, eventually, she'll have damage -- we just don't know when the damage will occur?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites




Well, I personally think that is pretty dumb. Much more interesting would be to do another one now and see how it looks today after 4 months gluten free.

Her lingering stomach aches may be related to some other food that she does not tolerate well. For example, did you take her off lactose too? Because we often cannot handle lactose well until we fully heal. Or it could be something else that she reacts badly to. You could try a food and symptom diary and see if you can make any correlations. But I do think it would be cruel to subject her to further damage (not to mention pain) just to satisfy the doctor's curiosity.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I personally think that is pretty dumb. Much more interesting would be to do another one now and see how it looks today after 4 months gluten free.

Her lingering stomach aches may be related to some other food that she does not tolerate well. For example, did you take her off lactose too? Because we often cannot handle lactose well until we fully heal. Or it could be something else that she reacts badly to. You could try a food and symptom diary and see if you can make any correlations. But I do think it would be cruel to subject her to further damage (not to mention pain) just to satisfy the doctor's curiosity.

The doctor took another celiac panel 2 months after being gluten-free and he said her levels were "slightly high" but lower than the first time. They took another panel yesterday and we'll see what it shows. I wonder if there's any chance that the celiac panel was originally a false positive???

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, if repeated celiac panels when she is gluten free show that the antibodies are going down - well, that's what they are supposed to do. In the absence of gluten the antibodies are not needed and will gradually go away. Now if they had been going up, that would be a different story. It sounds to me that the diagnosis was correct and her progression is normal (improving) except for the tummy aches which may well be caused by some other food intolerance.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, if repeated celiac panels when she is gluten free show that the antibodies are going down - well, that's what they are supposed to do. In the absence of gluten the antibodies are not needed and will gradually go away. Now if they had been going up, that would be a different story. It sounds to me that the diagnosis was correct and her progression is normal (improving) except for the tummy aches which may well be caused by some other food intolerance.

Thank you for your input. I asked the doctor if my daughter is lactose intolerant and he said, based on the biopsy, that she is not deficient or intolerant of anything. I'm wondering if I should take her off lactose on my own and see what happens. That would be milk, cheese, yogurt....anything else?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were lactose, you may only need to remove milk, cream, ice cream, soft cheese. Enzymes and cultures 'digest' most ot the lactose in yogurt, cheese, etc., and the lactose is all squeezed out of butter pretty much. But it could be something other than lactose. Many of us whose guts are clean as a whistle have other food intolerances. I don't see how he could 'see' them :o Of course, I am no M.D., just a skeptic.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
0

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      104,385
    • Total Posts
      920,613
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Squirmingitch, I forgot to mention best of luck to you during the storm! I hope you are safe and that your home isn't impacted too badly! I'm on the coast in SC so we will see some storms from it but nothing near as bad as what you will have. Take care and good luck.
    • SquirmingItch, I really appreciate you gathering info for me! To answer your questions, yes, I'm on Dapsone now and have been on it for about 4.5 weeks. I have been gluten free for the same amount of time. I started on 50 mg of Dapsone which didn't seem to help much. I spoke to my doctor about it and after about a week she raised it to 100 mg. Since then I did notice a huge improvement in both my rash and itch. I no longer have any active rashes and my itching isn't completely gone but it's very minimal. I have been getting weekly blood tests done and will soon be moving to monthly.  My DH skin biopsy was done before the gluten free diet and Dapsone. My results for the skin biopsy came back as inconclusive, but even with those results, my doctor was convinced I had DH. I specifically asked her about the fact that she took the biopsy directly from the lesion rather than next to it and if that affects the result. Her explanation was that if it's a fresh enough lesion that isn't scratched, there should be IgA antibodies present. But she said that an inconclusive result isn't surprising because the IgA antibodies come and go from the skin so quickly that it can be very difficult to get a positive result, even in someone who is positive.  That's when she decided to run the celiac blood panel on me. And even though those results came back positive for the deamidated gliadin and negative for tTg, she still is very convinced that I have DH. I am happy that my doctor seems to be certain, but I would just feel better if the results were more definitive. The one other thing I am waiting on is I have been asked to attend grand rounds at the local academic hospital in 2 weeks. I guess grand rounds is where all of the academic dermatologists and dermatopathologists get together to review certain complicated cases. They will meet with me, review all of my pictures, biopsies and blood tests. My situation has been so complicated so they asked me to come. I am hoping maybe then I will get some more answers. 
    • It sure is, it really is. 
    • shellyb, I have info. for you & you may yet be able to get an official dx from your dermatologist as she sounds like she would be willing to learn. If you are dx'd with dh it is definitive & no other testing is needed. You don't need to see a GI. Im in FL & have had a long day watching Tropical Storm Hermine & making preparations for it's track which is over where I live. I'm tired! I will have links for you to reputable medical info. on the rash but it make take me till tomorrow or even longer if we lose power.  I'll be back as soon as I can. Question: You're on Dapsone now? How long have you been on it? How is it working for you? Are you getting the proper testing at regular intervals to make sure it isn't doing bad things to you? Were you gluten free before the skin biopsy?
    • Thank you so much for your quick response, GFinDC. While I wouldn't be completely opposed to another skin biopsy, I already had 4 done (3 were done prior to my dermatologist suspecting DH) so I don't love the idea of  yet another hole and scar on my body. Plus, fortunately I don't have any fresh lesions now, which I believe is needed for the biopsy. I wish I would have known to see a GI before going gluten free but I was so desperate to get any relief that I started that and Dapsone as soon as my doctor mentioned it to me.  My rash is definitely symmetrical and I have it in all of the "classic" DH spots although it basically spread over my entire body. As much as I'd like a more formal diagnosis, I really don't think I can go through all of that again. It was so bad that not only was I getting no sleep but I had to change my sheets every morning because there was blood all over them. Sorry, TMI. The worst part is that this all developed during my ninth month of pregnancy and got much worse after I delivered my baby. So not only was I dealing with this insanely itchy rash but I had a newborn and a toddler to take care of.  My daughters' pediatrician did mention doing DNA testing on me first and then my daughters to see if there's any concern that they may be susceptible. I may just go that route for now. I was just curious if others have had similar test results to mine and how did their doctors treat it? Thanks again!
  • Upcoming Events

  • Blog Entries

  • Recent Status Updates

  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      61,455
    • Most Online
      1,763

    Newest Member
    JLeigh
    Joined